Tip: use − and + on any card to filter by it

Lotus Field

Played in 100,820 decks

Lotus Field
$2.61 €2.59

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Obeka, Brute Chronologist relevance 5.06 · 29.7% (1,435 of 4,830 decks)
  2. Quintorius, History Chaser relevance 4.44 · 57.9% (7,547 of 13,032 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.32 · 21.0% (2,479 of 11,785 decks)
  4. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 4.20 · 71.6% (4,394 of 6,138 decks)
  5. Impossible Man relevance 4.06 · 72.3% (146 of 202 decks)
  6. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.82 · 23.0% (1,241 of 5,402 decks)
  7. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 3.81 · 44.8% (391 of 872 decks)
  8. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.77 · 30.0% (631 of 2,100 decks)
  9. The Necrobloom relevance 3.35 · 22.7% (2,592 of 11,430 decks)
  10. Derevi, Empyrial Tactician relevance 3.33 · 11.1% (693 of 6,239 decks)
  11. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 3.33 · 22.0% (952 of 4,324 decks)
  12. Zask, Skittering Swarmlord relevance 3.31 · 21.7% (540 of 2,485 decks)
  13. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.20 · 62.8% (811 of 1,292 decks)
  14. Super Shredder relevance 3.17 · 8.6% (368 of 4,277 decks)
  15. Ertai Resurrected relevance 3.16 · 17.9% (83 of 463 decks)
  16. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 3.15 · 20.1% (5,347 of 26,575 decks)
  17. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 3.01 · 32.0% (1,093 of 3,414 decks)
  18. Juri, Master of the Revue relevance 2.95 · 5.2% (183 of 3,523 decks)
  19. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.91 · 33.9% (8,617 of 25,449 decks)
  20. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.81 · 15.1% (800 of 5,305 decks)
  21. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.76 · 16.1% (131 of 812 decks)
  22. Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 2.74 · 36.3% (53 of 146 decks)
  23. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.69 · 24.1% (882 of 3,658 decks)
  24. The Lady of Otaria relevance 2.65 · 32.7% (118 of 361 decks)
  25. Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.62 · 50.3% (390 of 776 decks)
  26. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.58 · 21.5% (919 of 4,270 decks)
  27. Beza, the Bounding Spring relevance 2.56 · 48.5% (292 of 602 decks)
  28. Rakdos the Defiler relevance 2.55 · 17.0% (25 of 147 decks)
  29. Tymna the Weaver // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.48 · 42.4% (14 of 33 decks)
  30. Absorbing Man relevance 2.40 · 28.6% (73 of 255 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.32 31.8%
    $3.69 €1.81
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.22 30.4%
    $7.21 €6.81
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.19 34.6%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.19 33.1%
    $22.74 €23.91
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.07 28.1%
    $0.99 €1.20
  • Crop Rotation
    1.07 34.3%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Scapeshift
    0.99 21.9%
    $41.65 €33.09
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.96 27.2%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.95 23.0%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Exploration
    0.93 26.7%
    $29.98 €27.12
All most relevant (30)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.32 · 31.8% (32,065 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.22 · 30.4% (30,662 of 100,820 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.19 · 34.6% (34,915 of 100,820 decks)
  4. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.19 · 33.1% (33,348 of 100,820 decks)
  5. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (28,291 of 100,820 decks)
  6. Crop Rotation relevance 1.07 · 34.3% (34,563 of 100,820 decks)
  7. Scapeshift relevance 0.99 · 21.9% (22,098 of 100,820 decks)
  8. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 27.2% (27,377 of 100,820 decks)
  9. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (23,179 of 100,820 decks)
  10. Exploration relevance 0.93 · 26.7% (26,874 of 100,820 decks)
  11. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 28.7% (28,953 of 100,820 decks)
  12. Scute Swarm relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (27,098 of 100,820 decks)
  13. Six relevance 0.87 · 22.3% (22,441 of 100,820 decks)
  14. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.87 · 22.5% (22,708 of 100,820 decks)
  15. Spelunking relevance 0.86 · 20.9% (21,099 of 100,820 decks)
  16. Harrow relevance 0.86 · 26.1% (26,348 of 100,820 decks)
  17. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (20,780 of 100,820 decks)
  18. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (21,752 of 100,820 decks)
  19. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.83 · 18.5% (18,688 of 100,820 decks)
  20. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (18,591 of 100,820 decks)
  21. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.80 · 17.9% (18,002 of 100,820 decks)
  22. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.80 · 19.5% (19,625 of 100,820 decks)
  23. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (21,184 of 100,820 decks)
  24. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.76 · 21.8% (21,995 of 100,820 decks)
  25. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (17,451 of 100,820 decks)
  26. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (17,059 of 100,820 decks)
  27. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.74 · 19.1% (19,284 of 100,820 decks)
  28. Life from the Loam relevance 0.73 · 18.2% (18,379 of 100,820 decks)
  29. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 14.6% (14,693 of 100,820 decks)
  30. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.71 · 17.8% (17,987 of 100,820 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.22 30.4%
    $7.21 €6.81
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.19 34.6%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.19 33.1%
    $22.74 €23.91
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.07 28.1%
    $0.99 €1.20
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.96 27.2%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.90 28.7%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Scute Swarm
    0.88 26.9%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Six
    0.87 22.3%
    $5.58 €5.11
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.87 22.5%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • The Gitrog Monster
    0.86 20.6%
    $0.49 €1.05
All creatures (22)
  1. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.22 · 30.4% (30,662 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.19 · 34.6% (34,915 of 100,820 decks)
  3. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.19 · 33.1% (33,348 of 100,820 decks)
  4. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (28,291 of 100,820 decks)
  5. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 27.2% (27,377 of 100,820 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 28.7% (28,953 of 100,820 decks)
  7. Scute Swarm relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (27,098 of 100,820 decks)
  8. Six relevance 0.87 · 22.3% (22,441 of 100,820 decks)
  9. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.87 · 22.5% (22,708 of 100,820 decks)
  10. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (20,780 of 100,820 decks)
  11. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (18,591 of 100,820 decks)
  12. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.80 · 17.9% (18,002 of 100,820 decks)
  13. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.80 · 19.5% (19,625 of 100,820 decks)
  14. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (21,184 of 100,820 decks)
  15. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.76 · 21.8% (21,995 of 100,820 decks)
  16. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (17,059 of 100,820 decks)
  17. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 14.6% (14,693 of 100,820 decks)
  18. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.71 · 17.8% (17,987 of 100,820 decks)
  19. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (14,719 of 100,820 decks)
  20. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.63 · 15.2% (15,345 of 100,820 decks)
  21. Famished Worldsire relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (11,672 of 100,820 decks)
  22. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.58 · 16.0% (16,097 of 100,820 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.32 31.8%
    $3.69 €1.81
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.85 21.6%
    $33.00 €19.98
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.83 18.5%
    $50.54 €33.19
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.76 17.3%
    $3.05 €3.24
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.74 19.1%
    $1.12 €1.38
All artifacts (5)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.32 · 31.8% (32,065 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (21,752 of 100,820 decks)
  3. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.83 · 18.5% (18,688 of 100,820 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (17,451 of 100,820 decks)
  5. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.74 · 19.1% (19,284 of 100,820 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.93 26.7%
    $29.98 €27.12
  • Spelunking
    0.86 20.9%
    $3.43 €3.18
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.93 · 26.7% (26,874 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.86 · 20.9% (21,099 of 100,820 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.07 34.3%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Harrow
    0.86 26.1%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Entish Restoration
    0.59 15.7%
    $2.62 €1.95
  • Constant Mists
    0.58 11.4%
    $19.96 €13.83
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.07 · 34.3% (34,563 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 0.86 · 26.1% (26,348 of 100,820 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 0.59 · 15.7% (15,798 of 100,820 decks)
  4. Constant Mists relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (11,488 of 100,820 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    0.99 21.9%
    $41.65 €33.09
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.95 23.0%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Life from the Loam
    0.73 18.2%
    $5.21 €5.11
All sorceries (3)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 0.99 · 21.9% (22,098 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (23,179 of 100,820 decks)
  3. Life from the Loam relevance 0.73 · 18.2% (18,379 of 100,820 decks)

Utility Lands

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.92 24.3%
    $28.83 €27.39
  • Strip Mine
    0.82 21.8%
    $10.71 €5.69
  • Shifting Woodland
    0.76 21.9%
    $7.08 €5.35
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.74 28.9%
    $16.76 €13.00
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.63 25.0%
    $49.49 €39.74
  • Thespian's Stage
    0.62 16.0%
    $0.45 €0.65
  • Urza's Cave
    0.61 16.8%
    $2.58 €1.32
  • Arid Archway
    0.59 12.5%
    $1.55 €0.55
All utility lands (8)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.92 · 24.3% (24,486 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Strip Mine relevance 0.82 · 21.8% (22,029 of 100,820 decks)
  3. Shifting Woodland relevance 0.76 · 21.9% (22,107 of 100,820 decks)
  4. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.74 · 28.9% (29,183 of 100,820 decks)
  5. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.63 · 25.0% (25,211 of 100,820 decks)
  6. Thespian's Stage relevance 0.62 · 16.0% (16,121 of 100,820 decks)
  7. Urza's Cave relevance 0.61 · 16.8% (16,936 of 100,820 decks)
  8. Arid Archway relevance 0.59 · 12.5% (12,571 of 100,820 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    0.96 45.5%
    $0.64 €0.95
  • Vesuva
    0.74 17.6%
    $3.83 €3.40
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.60 26.0%
    $29.04 €24.74
  • Lotus Vale
    0.59 9.5%
    $45.46 €28.08
  • Echoing Deeps
    0.58 11.4%
    $0.77 €0.62
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.58 25.2%
    $19.18 €16.84
All lands (6)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 0.96 · 45.5% (45,858 of 100,820 decks)
  2. Vesuva relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (17,702 of 100,820 decks)
  3. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.60 · 26.0% (26,239 of 100,820 decks)
  4. Lotus Vale relevance 0.59 · 9.5% (9,590 of 100,820 decks)
  5. Echoing Deeps relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (11,489 of 100,820 decks)
  6. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.58 · 25.2% (25,409 of 100,820 decks)

EDH data for Lotus Field: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 100,820 real decks.