Ramunap Excavator

Played in 128,165 decks

Ramunap Excavator
$4.84 €3.71

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 5.01 · 77.9% (2,842 of 3,649 decks)
  2. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.45 · 59.6% (3,212 of 5,388 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.16 · 15.6% (1,829 of 11,725 decks)
  4. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.99 · 41.5% (4,859 of 11,696 decks)
  5. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.74 · 38.9% (1,652 of 4,251 decks)
  6. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.65 · 49.1% (2,591 of 5,275 decks)
  7. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.60 · 51.2% (2,073 of 4,045 decks)
  8. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.48 · 42.4% (1,190 of 2,807 decks)
  9. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.45 · 54.9% (5,012 of 9,125 decks)
  10. The Necrobloom relevance 3.33 · 48.9% (5,570 of 11,380 decks)
  11. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.33 · 56.6% (3,358 of 5,938 decks)
  12. Child of Alara relevance 3.26 · 11.6% (677 of 5,852 decks)
  13. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 3.21 · 16.7% (100 of 599 decks)
  14. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 3.11 · 34.5% (616 of 1,786 decks)
  15. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 3.10 · 57.2% (14,490 of 25,354 decks)
  16. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.06 · 36.0% (754 of 2,094 decks)
  17. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.00 · 45.1% (3,132 of 6,946 decks)
  18. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.95 · 45.7% (4,498 of 9,847 decks)
  19. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.95 · 73.9% (950 of 1,285 decks)
  20. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.94 · 56.9% (2,019 of 3,551 decks)
  21. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 2.79 · 51.1% (377 of 738 decks)
  22. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.79 · 50.8% (4,519 of 8,897 decks)
  23. Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord relevance 2.71 · 25.6% (806 of 3,151 decks)
  24. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.70 · 62.6% (2,945 of 4,704 decks)
  25. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.66 · 39.4% (319 of 809 decks)
  26. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.56 · 37.3% (1,745 of 4,673 decks)
  27. Borborygmos Enraged relevance 2.54 · 35.7% (494 of 1,383 decks)
  28. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.53 · 33.5% (2,346 of 6,995 decks)
  29. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.46 · 5.0% (171 of 3,414 decks)
  30. Six relevance 2.43 · 47.9% (883 of 1,842 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Mole Man, Moloid Master 27.3% of swaps out (24 swaps)

Parallel Cards

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
All parallel cards (3)
  1. Ancient Greenwarden
  2. Icetill Explorer
  3. Crucible of Worlds

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.98 55.8%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.85 53.6%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.80 47.8%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Scute Swarm
    1.78 54.5%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.75 42.7%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.62 39.1%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.61 41.6%
    $1.14 €1.39
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.58 44.0%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.52 43.5%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Harrow
    1.50 45.6%
    $0.31 €0.38
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.98 · 55.8% (71,540 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.85 · 53.6% (68,754 of 128,165 decks)
  3. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.80 · 47.8% (61,326 of 128,165 decks)
  4. Scute Swarm relevance 1.78 · 54.5% (69,872 of 128,165 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.75 · 42.7% (54,761 of 128,165 decks)
  6. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.62 · 39.1% (50,173 of 128,165 decks)
  7. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.61 · 41.6% (53,263 of 128,165 decks)
  8. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.58 · 44.0% (56,437 of 128,165 decks)
  9. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.52 · 43.5% (55,733 of 128,165 decks)
  10. Harrow relevance 1.50 · 45.6% (58,445 of 128,165 decks)
  11. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.48 · 37.6% (48,232 of 128,165 decks)
  12. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.47 · 47.3% (60,560 of 128,165 decks)
  13. Exploration relevance 1.46 · 42.1% (53,936 of 128,165 decks)
  14. Crop Rotation relevance 1.43 · 45.8% (58,659 of 128,165 decks)
  15. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.41 · 38.9% (49,905 of 128,165 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.37 · 35.8% (45,828 of 128,165 decks)
  17. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.36 · 39.9% (51,140 of 128,165 decks)
  18. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.34 · 30.4% (39,016 of 128,165 decks)
  19. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.30 · 31.2% (39,934 of 128,165 decks)
  20. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.29 · 32.1% (41,200 of 128,165 decks)
  21. Zuran Orb relevance 1.28 · 30.9% (39,611 of 128,165 decks)
  22. Life from the Loam relevance 1.27 · 31.6% (40,448 of 128,165 decks)
  23. Scapeshift relevance 1.15 · 25.4% (32,559 of 128,165 decks)
  24. Six relevance 1.11 · 28.5% (36,565 of 128,165 decks)
  25. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.99 · 22.9% (29,392 of 128,165 decks)
  26. Spelunking relevance 0.98 · 23.7% (30,398 of 128,165 decks)
  27. Beast Within relevance 0.98 · 48.4% (62,063 of 128,165 decks)
  28. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.6% (31,545 of 128,165 decks)
  29. World Shaper relevance 0.94 · 19.7% (25,285 of 128,165 decks)
  30. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.94 · 21.7% (27,756 of 128,165 decks)

Creatures

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.98 55.8%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.85 53.6%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.80 47.8%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Scute Swarm
    1.78 54.5%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.75 42.7%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.58 44.0%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.52 43.5%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.47 47.3%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.41 38.9%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.37 35.8%
    $0.97 €1.23
All creatures (28)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.98 · 55.8% (71,540 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.85 · 53.6% (68,754 of 128,165 decks)
  3. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.80 · 47.8% (61,326 of 128,165 decks)
  4. Scute Swarm relevance 1.78 · 54.5% (69,872 of 128,165 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.75 · 42.7% (54,761 of 128,165 decks)
  6. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.58 · 44.0% (56,437 of 128,165 decks)
  7. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.52 · 43.5% (55,733 of 128,165 decks)
  8. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.47 · 47.3% (60,560 of 128,165 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.41 · 38.9% (49,905 of 128,165 decks)
  10. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.37 · 35.8% (45,828 of 128,165 decks)
  11. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.36 · 39.9% (51,140 of 128,165 decks)
  12. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.34 · 30.4% (39,016 of 128,165 decks)
  13. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.30 · 31.2% (39,934 of 128,165 decks)
  14. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.29 · 32.1% (41,200 of 128,165 decks)
  15. Six relevance 1.11 · 28.5% (36,565 of 128,165 decks)
  16. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.6% (31,545 of 128,165 decks)
  17. World Shaper relevance 0.94 · 19.7% (25,285 of 128,165 decks)
  18. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.94 · 21.7% (27,756 of 128,165 decks)
  19. Eternal Witness relevance 0.94 · 33.8% (43,277 of 128,165 decks)
  20. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (29,386 of 128,165 decks)
  21. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.87 · 31.6% (40,459 of 128,165 decks)
  22. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (25,197 of 128,165 decks)
  23. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.86 · 21.0% (26,910 of 128,165 decks)
  24. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.85 · 20.7% (26,509 of 128,165 decks)
  25. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.84 · 20.9% (26,840 of 128,165 decks)
  26. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.78 · 19.7% (25,273 of 128,165 decks)
  27. Horizon Explorer relevance 0.78 · 17.4% (22,347 of 128,165 decks)
  28. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 18.5% (23,750 of 128,165 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.61 41.6%
    $1.14 €1.39
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.48 37.6%
    $33.00 €19.76
  • Zuran Orb
    1.28 30.9%
    $3.56 €1.81
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.89 20.4%
    $3.03 €3.23
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.61 · 41.6% (53,263 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.48 · 37.6% (48,232 of 128,165 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.28 · 30.9% (39,611 of 128,165 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.89 · 20.4% (26,143 of 128,165 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.46 42.1%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Spelunking
    0.98 23.7%
    $3.67 €3.18
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.46 · 42.1% (53,936 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.98 · 23.7% (30,398 of 128,165 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.50 45.6%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Crop Rotation
    1.43 45.8%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.99 22.9%
    $0.34 €0.30
  • Beast Within
    0.98 48.4%
    $0.68 €0.85
  • Entish Restoration
    0.91 24.2%
    $2.79 €1.87
All instants (5)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.50 · 45.6% (58,445 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Crop Rotation relevance 1.43 · 45.8% (58,659 of 128,165 decks)
  3. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.99 · 22.9% (29,392 of 128,165 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.98 · 48.4% (62,063 of 128,165 decks)
  5. Entish Restoration relevance 0.91 · 24.2% (31,017 of 128,165 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.62 39.1%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Life from the Loam
    1.27 31.6%
    $5.30 €5.08
  • Scapeshift
    1.15 25.4%
    $41.33 €33.40
  • Nature's Lore
    0.88 44.5%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Explore
    0.78 23.8%
    $0.19 €0.24
All sorceries (5)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.62 · 39.1% (50,173 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 1.27 · 31.6% (40,448 of 128,165 decks)
  3. Scapeshift relevance 1.15 · 25.4% (32,559 of 128,165 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.88 · 44.5% (57,049 of 128,165 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.78 · 23.8% (30,466 of 128,165 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.04 27.4%
    $28.94 €27.39
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.84 33.0%
    $17.14 €12.95
All utility lands (2)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.04 · 27.4% (35,178 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.84 · 33.0% (42,352 of 128,165 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    1.01 48.0%
    $0.62 €0.95
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.84 41.4%
    $0.27 €0.11
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.77 33.7%
    $29.23 €24.96
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.77 44.8%
    $0.29 €0.13
All lands (4)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 1.01 · 48.0% (61,515 of 128,165 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.84 · 41.4% (53,064 of 128,165 decks)
  3. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.77 · 33.7% (43,144 of 128,165 decks)
  4. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.77 · 44.8% (57,422 of 128,165 decks)

EDH data for Ramunap Excavator: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 128,165 real decks.