Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
Played in 184,626 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
184.6K decks
All commanders (30)
- Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 4.33 · 53.5% (1,540 of 2,877 decks)
- Rendmaw, Creaking Nest relevance 4.19 · 40.2% (2,416 of 6,013 decks)
- Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 3.91 · 85.7% (1,424 of 1,661 decks)
- Sythis, Harvest's Hand relevance 3.74 · 43.4% (3,080 of 7,097 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.57 · 64.4% (4,545 of 7,057 decks)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.49 · 46.8% (5,584 of 11,934 decks)
- Tuvasa the Sunlit relevance 3.47 · 33.2% (1,290 of 3,888 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 3.27 · 36.6% (9,873 of 26,957 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.25 · 24.5% (1,343 of 5,491 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.19 · 52.2% (2,265 of 4,337 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.14 · 40.5% (2,193 of 5,413 decks)
- Anikthea, Hand of Erebos relevance 3.03 · 57.1% (3,997 of 7,003 decks)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 3.02 · 54.7% (2,626 of 4,801 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.94 · 38.1% (1,583 of 4,150 decks)
- Go-Shintai of Life's Origin relevance 2.91 · 50.0% (4,648 of 9,289 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.87 · 40.7% (3,801 of 9,346 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 2.87 · 46.8% (5,427 of 11,595 decks)
- Yuna, Hope of Spira relevance 2.84 · 31.4% (1,017 of 3,240 decks)
- Loot, the Key to Everything relevance 2.78 · 48.2% (880 of 1,824 decks)
- Wildsear, Scouring Maw relevance 2.72 · 42.9% (674 of 1,571 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.72 · 32.5% (8,390 of 25,807 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.72 · 31.6% (4,386 of 13,874 decks)
- Kestia, the Cultivator relevance 2.69 · 38.3% (196 of 512 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.67 · 26.4% (2,657 of 10,066 decks)
- Maular, the Next Evolution relevance 2.60 · 38.6% (662 of 1,717 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 2.58 · 48.2% (365 of 757 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 2.45 · 52.6% (220 of 418 decks)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.42 · 35.1% (4,203 of 11,974 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 2.38 · 47.4% (234 of 494 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.36 · 33.9% (1,618 of 4,774 decks)
All replaced by (4)
- Chromatic Lantern 3.7% of swaps out (4 swaps)
- Hexhaven Invigorator 3.7% of swaps out (4 swaps)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer 2.8% of swaps out (3 swaps)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking 2.8% of swaps out (3 swaps)
All parallel cards (5)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.53 · 43.0% (79,457 of 184,626 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.32 · 38.0% (70,220 of 184,626 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.31 · 37.9% (70,027 of 184,626 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.18 · 30.8% (56,777 of 184,626 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.16 · 30.9% (57,047 of 184,626 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.16 · 35.5% (65,492 of 184,626 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 26.8% (49,479 of 184,626 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.03 · 33.0% (60,989 of 184,626 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.98 · 31.4% (58,014 of 184,626 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.98 · 27.2% (50,254 of 184,626 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (40,729 of 184,626 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.84 · 24.5% (45,203 of 184,626 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 20.2% (37,259 of 184,626 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 21.4% (39,559 of 184,626 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (33,310 of 184,626 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.81 · 19.6% (36,229 of 184,626 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.81 · 40.9% (75,558 of 184,626 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.80 · 19.9% (36,668 of 184,626 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 22.0% (40,633 of 184,626 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.78 · 42.0% (77,557 of 184,626 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.76 · 38.2% (70,592 of 184,626 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (42,230 of 184,626 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.75 · 19.6% (36,107 of 184,626 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 18.0% (33,164 of 184,626 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.74 · 33.0% (60,838 of 184,626 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.72 · 17.5% (32,313 of 184,626 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (30,431 of 184,626 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.69 · 34.4% (63,513 of 184,626 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (30,408 of 184,626 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.66 · 32.2% (59,379 of 184,626 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.53 · 43.0% (79,457 of 184,626 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.31 · 37.9% (70,027 of 184,626 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.18 · 30.8% (56,777 of 184,626 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.16 · 30.9% (57,047 of 184,626 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.16 · 35.5% (65,492 of 184,626 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 26.8% (49,479 of 184,626 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.03 · 33.0% (60,989 of 184,626 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.98 · 27.2% (50,254 of 184,626 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.84 · 24.5% (45,203 of 184,626 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.80 · 19.9% (36,668 of 184,626 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.80 · 22.0% (40,633 of 184,626 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.75 · 19.6% (36,107 of 184,626 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.72 · 17.5% (32,313 of 184,626 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (30,431 of 184,626 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.66 · 32.2% (59,379 of 184,626 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (29,096 of 184,626 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.65 · 14.8% (27,387 of 184,626 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.65 · 15.5% (28,561 of 184,626 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.64 · 13.9% (25,742 of 184,626 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (29,368 of 184,626 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (28,355 of 184,626 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (29,960 of 184,626 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (40,729 of 184,626 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 21.4% (39,559 of 184,626 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.81 · 19.6% (36,229 of 184,626 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.32 · 38.0% (70,220 of 184,626 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 18.0% (33,164 of 184,626 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (30,408 of 184,626 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.98 · 31.4% (58,014 of 184,626 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.76 · 38.2% (70,592 of 184,626 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (42,230 of 184,626 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.69 · 34.4% (63,513 of 184,626 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 20.2% (37,259 of 184,626 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (33,310 of 184,626 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.81 · 40.9% (75,558 of 184,626 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.78 · 42.0% (77,557 of 184,626 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.74 · 33.0% (60,838 of 184,626 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.64 · 36.7% (67,682 of 184,626 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.92 · 36.2% (66,915 of 184,626 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.79 · 20.9% (38,627 of 184,626 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.64 · 25.3% (46,716 of 184,626 decks)
All lands (9)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.76 · 30.9% (56,993 of 184,626 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.74 · 32.4% (59,866 of 184,626 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.72 · 31.3% (57,855 of 184,626 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.72 · 29.9% (55,126 of 184,626 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.69 · 27.7% (51,083 of 184,626 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.69 · 32.8% (60,466 of 184,626 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.68 · 28.7% (52,897 of 184,626 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.68 · 29.8% (54,995 of 184,626 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.67 · 29.3% (54,042 of 184,626 decks)
EDH data for Dryad of the Ilysian Grove: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 184,626 real decks.