Ancient Greenwarden

Played in 100,528 decks

Ancient Greenwarden
$13.07 €10.04

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.70 · 27.3% (1,473 of 5,388 decks)
  2. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.39 · 71.2% (2,597 of 3,649 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.28 · 17.1% (2,008 of 11,725 decks)
  4. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 4.12 · 20.5% (699 of 3,414 decks)
  5. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 4.07 · 57.1% (1,116 of 1,956 decks)
  6. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 4.00 · 63.7% (2,575 of 4,045 decks)
  7. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.99 · 55.2% (2,348 of 4,251 decks)
  8. The Necrobloom relevance 3.73 · 48.5% (5,524 of 11,380 decks)
  9. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.72 · 51.2% (2,703 of 5,275 decks)
  10. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.46 · 48.9% (4,462 of 9,125 decks)
  11. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 3.42 · 50.8% (3,555 of 6,995 decks)
  12. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 3.39 · 25.9% (155 of 599 decks)
  13. Homer, the Hermit relevance 3.30 · 37.7% (1,747 of 4,636 decks)
  14. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 3.22 · 32.3% (2,282 of 7,065 decks)
  15. Horde of Notions relevance 3.21 · 17.7% (282 of 1,595 decks)
  16. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 3.10 · 42.4% (758 of 1,786 decks)
  17. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.03 · 49.8% (2,343 of 4,704 decks)
  18. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.00 · 37.4% (2,222 of 5,938 decks)
  19. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.98 · 33.9% (8,600 of 25,354 decks)
  20. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.87 · 62.2% (5,534 of 8,897 decks)
  21. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.83 · 47.2% (4,650 of 9,847 decks)
  22. Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 2.80 · 34.4% (304 of 884 decks)
  23. Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 2.80 · 51.2% (378 of 738 decks)
  24. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.78 · 5.4% (585 of 10,844 decks)
  25. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.77 · 43.6% (182 of 417 decks)
  26. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.71 · 15.9% (1,858 of 11,696 decks)
  27. Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 2.64 · 42.2% (416 of 986 decks)
  28. Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Scion of Halaster relevance 2.61 · 20.7% (80 of 386 decks)
  29. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.58 · 33.2% (431 of 1,298 decks)
  30. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.55 · 32.9% (1,537 of 4,673 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Avenger of Zendikar 7.1% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
All parallel cards (3)
  1. Icetill Explorer
  2. Ramunap Excavator
  3. Mole Man, Moloid Master

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.35 66.3%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.24 65.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Scute Swarm
    2.18 67.0%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Ramunap Excavator
    2.09 54.5%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    2.00 53.2%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.76 56.3%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.3%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.70 49.8%
    $0.46 €0.58
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.69 48.2%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Harrow
    1.68 51.1%
    $0.31 €0.38
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.35 · 66.3% (66,626 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.24 · 65.0% (65,331 of 100,528 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 2.18 · 67.0% (67,324 of 100,528 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.09 · 54.5% (54,761 of 100,528 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.00 · 53.2% (53,447 of 100,528 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.76 · 56.3% (56,591 of 100,528 decks)
  7. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.3% (50,602 of 100,528 decks)
  8. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.70 · 49.8% (50,039 of 100,528 decks)
  9. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.69 · 48.2% (48,495 of 100,528 decks)
  10. Harrow relevance 1.68 · 51.1% (51,372 of 100,528 decks)
  11. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.67 · 46.2% (46,409 of 100,528 decks)
  12. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.62 · 45.2% (45,402 of 100,528 decks)
  13. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.56 · 37.7% (37,871 of 100,528 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.55 · 40.1% (40,265 of 100,528 decks)
  15. Crop Rotation relevance 1.51 · 48.5% (48,744 of 100,528 decks)
  16. Scapeshift relevance 1.47 · 32.6% (32,742 of 100,528 decks)
  17. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.46 · 37.2% (37,443 of 100,528 decks)
  18. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.40 · 34.4% (34,597 of 100,528 decks)
  19. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (32,099 of 100,528 decks)
  20. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.34 · 33.5% (33,689 of 100,528 decks)
  21. Zuran Orb relevance 1.31 · 31.5% (31,661 of 100,528 decks)
  22. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.30 · 31.1% (31,268 of 100,528 decks)
  23. Entish Restoration relevance 1.23 · 32.8% (32,996 of 100,528 decks)
  24. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.20 · 27.7% (27,892 of 100,528 decks)
  25. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.17 · 24.7% (24,800 of 100,528 decks)
  26. Spelunking relevance 1.11 · 26.9% (27,069 of 100,528 decks)
  27. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.10 · 26.9% (27,059 of 100,528 decks)
  28. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.09 · 25.3% (25,430 of 100,528 decks)
  29. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (28,229 of 100,528 decks)
  30. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.06 · 24.2% (24,302 of 100,528 decks)

Creatures

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.35 66.3%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.24 65.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Scute Swarm
    2.18 67.0%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Ramunap Excavator
    2.09 54.5%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    2.00 53.2%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.76 56.3%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.70 49.8%
    $0.46 €0.58
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.69 48.2%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.67 46.2%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.62 45.2%
    $23.22 €23.79
All creatures (28)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.35 · 66.3% (66,626 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.24 · 65.0% (65,331 of 100,528 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 2.18 · 67.0% (67,324 of 100,528 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.09 · 54.5% (54,761 of 100,528 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.00 · 53.2% (53,447 of 100,528 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.76 · 56.3% (56,591 of 100,528 decks)
  7. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.70 · 49.8% (50,039 of 100,528 decks)
  8. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.69 · 48.2% (48,495 of 100,528 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.67 · 46.2% (46,409 of 100,528 decks)
  10. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.62 · 45.2% (45,402 of 100,528 decks)
  11. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.40 · 34.4% (34,597 of 100,528 decks)
  12. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (32,099 of 100,528 decks)
  13. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.34 · 33.5% (33,689 of 100,528 decks)
  14. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.30 · 31.1% (31,268 of 100,528 decks)
  15. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.20 · 27.7% (27,892 of 100,528 decks)
  16. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.17 · 24.7% (24,800 of 100,528 decks)
  17. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.10 · 26.9% (27,059 of 100,528 decks)
  18. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.07 · 28.1% (28,229 of 100,528 decks)
  19. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.06 · 24.2% (24,302 of 100,528 decks)
  20. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.05 · 27.5% (27,646 of 100,528 decks)
  21. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.00 · 25.2% (25,383 of 100,528 decks)
  22. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.00 · 24.1% (24,191 of 100,528 decks)
  23. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.96 · 22.1% (22,226 of 100,528 decks)
  24. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.94 · 19.5% (19,590 of 100,528 decks)
  25. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.92 · 23.0% (23,122 of 100,528 decks)
  26. Six relevance 0.90 · 23.1% (23,262 of 100,528 decks)
  27. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.89 · 22.2% (22,313 of 100,528 decks)
  28. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.89 · 19.2% (19,320 of 100,528 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.55 40.1%
    $1.14 €1.39
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.46 37.2%
    $33.00 €19.76
  • Zuran Orb
    1.31 31.5%
    $3.56 €1.81
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.90 20.6%
    $3.03 €3.23
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.55 · 40.1% (40,265 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.46 · 37.2% (37,443 of 100,528 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.31 · 31.5% (31,661 of 100,528 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (20,725 of 100,528 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.3%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Spelunking
    1.11 26.9%
    $3.67 €3.18
  • Burgeoning
    0.91 21.9%
    $34.04 €24.59
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.3% (50,602 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.11 · 26.9% (27,069 of 100,528 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 0.91 · 21.9% (21,987 of 100,528 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.68 51.1%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Crop Rotation
    1.51 48.5%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Entish Restoration
    1.23 32.8%
    $2.79 €1.87
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.09 25.3%
    $0.34 €0.30
  • Beast Within
    0.97 48.1%
    $0.68 €0.85
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.85 42.7%
    $17.55 €14.17
All instants (6)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.68 · 51.1% (51,372 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Crop Rotation relevance 1.51 · 48.5% (48,744 of 100,528 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 1.23 · 32.8% (32,996 of 100,528 decks)
  4. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.09 · 25.3% (25,430 of 100,528 decks)
  5. Beast Within relevance 0.97 · 48.1% (48,340 of 100,528 decks)
  6. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.85 · 42.7% (42,938 of 100,528 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.56 37.7%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Scapeshift
    1.47 32.6%
    $41.33 €33.40
  • Nature's Lore
    0.97 49.4%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Life from the Loam
    0.93 23.2%
    $5.30 €5.08
  • Explore
    0.87 26.6%
    $0.19 €0.24
All sorceries (5)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.56 · 37.7% (37,871 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.47 · 32.6% (32,742 of 100,528 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.97 · 49.4% (49,696 of 100,528 decks)
  4. Life from the Loam relevance 0.93 · 23.2% (23,289 of 100,528 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.87 · 26.6% (26,730 of 100,528 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.17 30.9%
    $28.94 €27.39
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.88 34.7%
    $17.14 €12.95
All utility lands (2)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.17 · 30.9% (31,028 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.88 · 34.7% (34,875 of 100,528 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    1.13 53.8%
    $0.62 €0.95
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.90 44.5%
    $0.27 €0.11
All lands (2)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 1.13 · 53.8% (54,063 of 100,528 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.90 · 44.5% (44,781 of 100,528 decks)

EDH data for Ancient Greenwarden: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 100,528 real decks.