Ancient Greenwarden
Played in 6,060 Ink-Treader decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (3)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.89 · 61.9% (5,666 of 9,151 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (363 of 10,207 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.03 · 1.2% (5 of 418 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.55 · 80.5% (4,878 of 6,060 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.54 · 80.6% (4,882 of 6,060 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.52 · 78.4% (4,749 of 6,060 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.50 · 78.9% (4,781 of 6,060 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.49 · 74.8% (4,532 of 6,060 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.44 · 63.6% (3,857 of 6,060 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.38 · 68.0% (4,121 of 6,060 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.35 · 58.4% (3,537 of 6,060 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.35 · 65.6% (3,973 of 6,060 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.35 · 58.2% (3,529 of 6,060 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.33 · 84.4% (5,113 of 6,060 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.31 · 51.8% (3,138 of 6,060 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.29 · 63.3% (3,839 of 6,060 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.29 · 76.3% (4,626 of 6,060 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.26 · 50.1% (3,039 of 6,060 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.25 · 56.8% (3,443 of 6,060 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.20 · 60.1% (3,640 of 6,060 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.19 · 49.5% (2,997 of 6,060 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.17 · 45.3% (2,745 of 6,060 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.15 · 50.8% (3,079 of 6,060 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.10 · 44.5% (2,694 of 6,060 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.09 · 41.0% (2,485 of 6,060 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.06 · 39.2% (2,376 of 6,060 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.06 · 40.5% (2,453 of 6,060 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.06 · 36.9% (2,234 of 6,060 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.02 · 37.1% (2,247 of 6,060 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.02 · 36.0% (2,182 of 6,060 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.02 · 37.5% (2,275 of 6,060 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.00 · 35.9% (2,178 of 6,060 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.99 · 33.3% (2,017 of 6,060 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.55 · 80.5% (4,878 of 6,060 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.54 · 80.6% (4,882 of 6,060 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.52 · 78.4% (4,749 of 6,060 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.50 · 78.9% (4,781 of 6,060 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.49 · 74.8% (4,532 of 6,060 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.44 · 63.6% (3,857 of 6,060 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.38 · 68.0% (4,121 of 6,060 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.35 · 58.4% (3,537 of 6,060 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.35 · 58.2% (3,529 of 6,060 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.33 · 84.4% (5,113 of 6,060 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.31 · 51.8% (3,138 of 6,060 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.29 · 76.3% (4,626 of 6,060 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.25 · 56.8% (3,443 of 6,060 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.20 · 60.1% (3,640 of 6,060 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.19 · 49.5% (2,997 of 6,060 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.17 · 45.3% (2,745 of 6,060 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.10 · 44.5% (2,694 of 6,060 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.09 · 41.0% (2,485 of 6,060 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.06 · 40.5% (2,453 of 6,060 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.02 · 37.5% (2,275 of 6,060 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.00 · 35.9% (2,178 of 6,060 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.99 · 33.3% (2,017 of 6,060 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.96 · 32.0% (1,939 of 6,060 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.94 · 33.9% (2,055 of 6,060 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.90 · 29.5% (1,789 of 6,060 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.88 · 29.3% (1,777 of 6,060 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.84 · 28.3% (1,717 of 6,060 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.77 · 31.3% (1,897 of 6,060 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.76 · 25.6% (1,551 of 6,060 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.75 · 24.6% (1,493 of 6,060 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.26 · 50.1% (3,039 of 6,060 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.06 · 39.2% (2,376 of 6,060 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.35 · 65.6% (3,973 of 6,060 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.29 · 63.3% (3,839 of 6,060 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.02 · 37.1% (2,247 of 6,060 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.94 · 34.3% (2,076 of 6,060 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.88 · 30.7% (1,862 of 6,060 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.75 · 26.6% (1,610 of 6,060 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 1.15 · 50.8% (3,079 of 6,060 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.93 · 52.3% (3,172 of 6,060 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.84 · 35.7% (2,166 of 6,060 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.83 · 28.9% (1,751 of 6,060 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.06 · 36.9% (2,234 of 6,060 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.02 · 36.0% (2,182 of 6,060 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.73 · 43.7% (2,647 of 6,060 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.06 · 41.1% (2,489 of 6,060 decks)
All lands (4)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.02 · 51.0% (3,088 of 6,060 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.95 · 44.2% (2,678 of 6,060 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.89 · 40.5% (2,456 of 6,060 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.79 · 55.5% (3,365 of 6,060 decks)
EDH data for Ancient Greenwarden: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,060 real decks.