Nissa, Resurgent Animist

Played in 42,292 decks

Nissa, Resurgent Animist
$21.81 €22.78

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.15 · 13.4% (1,564 of 11,691 decks)
  2. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 4.08 · 15.0% (512 of 3,410 decks)
  3. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 3.92 · 55.1% (3,367 of 6,110 decks)
  4. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 3.73 · 23.5% (459 of 1,955 decks)
  5. Thranduil the Strategist relevance 3.55 · 43.4% (517 of 1,190 decks)
  6. Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 3.54 · 10.4% (508 of 4,901 decks)
  7. The Necrobloom relevance 3.47 · 18.8% (2,133 of 11,361 decks)
  8. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.98 · 17.7% (759 of 4,300 decks)
  9. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.94 · 8.2% (439 of 5,380 decks)
  10. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.93 · 17.4% (701 of 4,035 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.87 · 15.6% (819 of 5,263 decks)
  12. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.83 · 12.6% (887 of 7,049 decks)
  13. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 2.62 · 38.4% (121 of 315 decks)
  14. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.57 · 24.8% (2,200 of 8,878 decks)
  15. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.54 · 4.8% (1,268 of 26,452 decks)
  16. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.53 · 12.9% (3,277 of 25,309 decks)
  17. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.46 · 12.2% (1,112 of 9,114 decks)
  18. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.43 · 17.7% (832 of 4,697 decks)
  19. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.40 · 13.8% (643 of 4,656 decks)
  20. Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 2.39 · 19.6% (166 of 849 decks)
  21. Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 2.31 · 45.0% (171 of 380 decks)
  22. Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 2.30 · 15.3% (378 of 2,466 decks)
  23. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 2.23 · 19.8% (175 of 882 decks)
  24. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.09 · 20.3% (719 of 3,544 decks)
  25. The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 2.04 · 5.0% (166 of 3,352 decks)
  26. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.96 · 23.7% (304 of 1,281 decks)
  27. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.95 · 5.3% (192 of 3,648 decks)
  28. Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.94 · 14.3% (169 of 1,178 decks)
  29. Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.89 · 13.8% (162 of 1,171 decks)
  30. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.88 · 20.9% (339 of 1,620 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.65 77.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Tireless Provisioner
    2.06 66.0%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Exploration
    1.97 56.6%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.87 52.0%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.86 46.5%
    $7.18 €6.81
  • Scapeshift
    1.81 40.0%
    $41.33 €33.40
  • Crop Rotation
    1.75 56.0%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Springheart Nantuko
    1.73 43.7%
    $6.95 €4.41
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.68 47.2%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.56 38.3%
    $13.07 €10.04
All most relevant (30)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.65 · 77.0% (32,578 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Tireless Provisioner relevance 2.06 · 66.0% (27,917 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 1.97 · 56.6% (23,917 of 42,292 decks)
  4. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.87 · 52.0% (22,011 of 42,292 decks)
  5. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.86 · 46.5% (19,646 of 42,292 decks)
  6. Scapeshift relevance 1.81 · 40.0% (16,905 of 42,292 decks)
  7. Crop Rotation relevance 1.75 · 56.0% (23,688 of 42,292 decks)
  8. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.73 · 43.7% (18,474 of 42,292 decks)
  9. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.68 · 47.2% (19,973 of 42,292 decks)
  10. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.56 · 38.3% (16,188 of 42,292 decks)
  11. Scute Swarm relevance 1.53 · 47.0% (19,892 of 42,292 decks)
  12. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.53 · 34.9% (14,778 of 42,292 decks)
  13. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.53 · 40.0% (16,897 of 42,292 decks)
  14. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.53 · 36.7% (15,513 of 42,292 decks)
  15. Zuran Orb relevance 1.51 · 36.5% (15,451 of 42,292 decks)
  16. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.45 · 32.4% (13,707 of 42,292 decks)
  17. Spelunking relevance 1.42 · 34.4% (14,538 of 42,292 decks)
  18. Six relevance 1.39 · 35.6% (15,073 of 42,292 decks)
  19. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.35 · 36.0% (15,234 of 42,292 decks)
  20. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.33 · 27.0% (11,414 of 42,292 decks)
  21. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.31 · 37.4% (15,805 of 42,292 decks)
  22. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.29 · 33.4% (14,140 of 42,292 decks)
  23. Green Sun's Zenith relevance 1.25 · 34.3% (14,490 of 42,292 decks)
  24. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.15 · 29.3% (12,397 of 42,292 decks)
  25. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.13 · 24.0% (10,135 of 42,292 decks)
  26. Finale of Devastation relevance 1.12 · 34.1% (14,407 of 42,292 decks)
  27. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.11 · 26.9% (11,358 of 42,292 decks)
  28. Burgeoning relevance 1.06 · 25.5% (10,775 of 42,292 decks)
  29. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.06 · 31.0% (13,102 of 42,292 decks)
  30. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.04 · 23.2% (9,809 of 42,292 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.65 77.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Tireless Provisioner
    2.06 66.0%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.87 52.0%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.86 46.5%
    $7.18 €6.81
  • Springheart Nantuko
    1.73 43.7%
    $6.95 €4.41
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.68 47.2%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.56 38.3%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Scute Swarm
    1.53 47.0%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
    1.53 34.9%
    $28.70 €25.50
  • Aftermath Analyst
    1.53 40.0%
    $0.97 €1.23
All creatures (22)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.65 · 77.0% (32,578 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Tireless Provisioner relevance 2.06 · 66.0% (27,917 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.87 · 52.0% (22,011 of 42,292 decks)
  4. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.86 · 46.5% (19,646 of 42,292 decks)
  5. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.73 · 43.7% (18,474 of 42,292 decks)
  6. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.68 · 47.2% (19,973 of 42,292 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.56 · 38.3% (16,188 of 42,292 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 1.53 · 47.0% (19,892 of 42,292 decks)
  9. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.53 · 34.9% (14,778 of 42,292 decks)
  10. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.53 · 40.0% (16,897 of 42,292 decks)
  11. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.53 · 36.7% (15,513 of 42,292 decks)
  12. Six relevance 1.39 · 35.6% (15,073 of 42,292 decks)
  13. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.35 · 36.0% (15,234 of 42,292 decks)
  14. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.33 · 27.0% (11,414 of 42,292 decks)
  15. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.31 · 37.4% (15,805 of 42,292 decks)
  16. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.29 · 33.4% (14,140 of 42,292 decks)
  17. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.13 · 24.0% (10,135 of 42,292 decks)
  18. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.06 · 31.0% (13,102 of 42,292 decks)
  19. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.04 · 23.2% (9,809 of 42,292 decks)
  20. Tiller Engine relevance 0.98 · 18.1% (7,675 of 42,292 decks)
  21. Dryad Arbor relevance 0.98 · 24.2% (10,233 of 42,292 decks)
  22. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.95 · 21.6% (9,115 of 42,292 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.51 36.5%
    $3.56 €1.81
  • Amulet of Vigor
    1.45 32.4%
    $50.54 €33.19
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.15 29.3%
    $33.00 €19.76
All artifacts (3)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.51 · 36.5% (15,451 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.45 · 32.4% (13,707 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.15 · 29.3% (12,397 of 42,292 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.97 56.6%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Spelunking
    1.42 34.4%
    $3.67 €3.18
  • Burgeoning
    1.06 25.5%
    $34.04 €24.59
  • Sylvan Library
    0.94 29.6%
    $28.62 €24.53
All enchantments (4)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.97 · 56.6% (23,917 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.42 · 34.4% (14,538 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 1.06 · 25.5% (10,775 of 42,292 decks)
  4. Sylvan Library relevance 0.94 · 29.6% (12,498 of 42,292 decks)

Instants

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.75 56.0%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Archdruid's Charm
    0.95 24.6%
    $8.43 €6.14
  • Harrow
    0.92 28.0%
    $0.31 €0.38
All instants (3)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.75 · 56.0% (23,688 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.95 · 24.6% (10,386 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Harrow relevance 0.92 · 28.0% (11,850 of 42,292 decks)

Sorceries

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    1.81 40.0%
    $41.33 €33.40
  • Green Sun's Zenith
    1.25 34.3%
    $31.42 €18.88
  • Finale of Devastation
    1.12 34.1%
    $32.45 €28.06
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.11 26.9%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Life from the Loam
    0.93 23.2%
    $5.30 €5.08
All sorceries (5)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 1.81 · 40.0% (16,905 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Green Sun's Zenith relevance 1.25 · 34.3% (14,490 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Finale of Devastation relevance 1.12 · 34.1% (14,407 of 42,292 decks)
  4. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.11 · 26.9% (11,358 of 42,292 decks)
  5. Life from the Loam relevance 0.93 · 23.2% (9,794 of 42,292 decks)

Utility Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.53 40.5%
    $28.94 €27.39
  • Shifting Woodland
    1.46 41.8%
    $6.93 €5.38
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    1.40 55.0%
    $17.14 €12.95
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    1.38 54.8%
    $48.89 €39.85
  • Strip Mine
    1.09 29.0%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Talon Gates of Madara
    0.96 25.3%
    $41.56 €97.97
All utility lands (6)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.53 · 40.5% (17,149 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Shifting Woodland relevance 1.46 · 41.8% (17,665 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.40 · 55.0% (23,261 of 42,292 decks)
  4. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 1.38 · 54.8% (23,166 of 42,292 decks)
  5. Strip Mine relevance 1.09 · 29.0% (12,248 of 42,292 decks)
  6. Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.96 · 25.3% (10,701 of 42,292 decks)

Lands

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Wooded Foothills
    1.26 54.8%
    $19.09 €16.84
  • Verdant Catacombs
    1.23 53.5%
    $29.23 €24.96
  • Misty Rainforest
    1.22 53.7%
    $35.63 €26.45
  • Windswept Heath
    1.21 53.4%
    $12.20 €10.50
  • Lotus Field
    1.12 27.5%
    $2.56 €2.57
  • Snow-Covered Forest
    1.00 24.2%
    $0.88 €0.65
  • Prismatic Vista
    0.96 30.9%
    $30.91 €32.73
All lands (7)
  1. Wooded Foothills relevance 1.26 · 54.8% (23,157 of 42,292 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.23 · 53.5% (22,611 of 42,292 decks)
  3. Misty Rainforest relevance 1.22 · 53.7% (22,704 of 42,292 decks)
  4. Windswept Heath relevance 1.21 · 53.4% (22,577 of 42,292 decks)
  5. Lotus Field relevance 1.12 · 27.5% (11,618 of 42,292 decks)
  6. Snow-Covered Forest relevance 1.00 · 24.2% (10,224 of 42,292 decks)
  7. Prismatic Vista relevance 0.96 · 30.9% (13,079 of 42,292 decks)

EDH data for Nissa, Resurgent Animist: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 42,292 real decks.