Cards like Quirion Ranger
6.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other green decks
Cards
- Quirion Ranger 44%
- Arbor Elf 40%
- Scryb Ranger 32%
Cards like Argothian Elder
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Argothian Elder 31%
- Ley Weaver 25%
- Hope Tender 9%
- Krosan Restorer 6%
- Voyaging Satyr 4%
Other options: Blossom Dryad, Portent Tracker, Ley Druid, Juniper Order Druid
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
3.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other green decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 41%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 22%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 14%
- Scythecat Cub 10%
- Sazh's Chocobo 10%
- Undergrowth Champion 9%
- Territorial Scythecat 6%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 3%
- Seedship Agrarian 3%
- Floral Evoker 2%
Other options: Murasa Ranger, Foe-liage
Cards like Scute Swarm
5.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 58%
- Springheart Nantuko 27%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.43 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Dungrove Elder
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Dungrove Elder 20%
- Kalonian Twingrove 12%
- Dauntless Dourbark 4%
- Traproot Kami 2%
- People of the Woods 1%
- Treefolk Seedlings 1%
Other options: Gaea's Liege, Coiling Woodworm
Cards like Harrow
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 29%
- Entish Restoration 22%
- Roiling Regrowth 11%
- Planar Engineering 7%
- Cycle of Renewal 6%
- Scapeshift 6%
Cards like Badgermole Cub
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Green Sun's Zenith
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
5.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, Nissa's Expedition, New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey, Turtle Tracks
Cards like Mightform Harmonizer
7.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
15× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Titania, Gaea Incarnate
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards like Sol Ring
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other green decks
Cards like The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi
8.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards like Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps
9.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards like Worldly Tutor
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 27%
- Sylvan Tutor 4%
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ley Weaver relevance 0.84 · 24.9% (411 of 1,650 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.74 · 23.4% (386 of 1,650 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.67 · 31.3% (516 of 1,650 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.88 · 8.2% (135 of 1,650 decks)
- Boompile relevance 0.78 · 10.1% (166 of 1,650 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 0.76 · 10.9% (180 of 1,650 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.56 · 34.1% (563 of 1,650 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.54 · 32.3% (533 of 1,650 decks)
- Hope Tender relevance 0.74 · 9.1% (150 of 1,650 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.54 · 30.4% (502 of 1,650 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.61 · 18.1% (298 of 1,650 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.53 · 29.0% (478 of 1,650 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.68 · 10.6% (175 of 1,650 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (233 of 1,650 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.56 · 20.2% (333 of 1,650 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.44 · 44.4% (732 of 1,650 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (206 of 1,650 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.47 · 34.3% (566 of 1,650 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.36 · 58.1% (958 of 1,650 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.57 · 13.9% (229 of 1,650 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.69 · 5.8% (96 of 1,650 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.58 · 11.9% (197 of 1,650 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.35 · 58.4% (963 of 1,650 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.54 · 15.5% (256 of 1,650 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.50 · 22.2% (366 of 1,650 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.43 · 35.6% (588 of 1,650 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.62 · 8.0% (132 of 1,650 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 0.63 · 6.9% (114 of 1,650 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.46 · 27.5% (454 of 1,650 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.60 · 8.7% (144 of 1,650 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.36 · 48.2% (795 of 1,650 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (252 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.48 · 20.8% (344 of 1,650 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.47 · 22.6% (373 of 1,650 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.40 · 37.5% (619 of 1,650 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.50 · 15.8% (260 of 1,650 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (165 of 1,650 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (160 of 1,650 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.61 · 6.4% (105 of 1,650 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.61 · 6.2% (103 of 1,650 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.47 · 19.9% (328 of 1,650 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.61 · 5.9% (98 of 1,650 decks)
- Darksteel Garrison relevance 0.80 · 3.4% (56 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.36 · 45.5% (750 of 1,650 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.58 · 7.2% (119 of 1,650 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.57 · 7.8% (129 of 1,650 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.41 · 30.4% (501 of 1,650 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (248 of 1,650 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.34 · 49.3% (814 of 1,650 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (187 of 1,650 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ley Weaver relevance 0.84 · 24.9% (411 of 1,650 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.74 · 23.4% (386 of 1,650 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.67 · 31.3% (516 of 1,650 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.54 · 32.3% (533 of 1,650 decks)
- Hope Tender relevance 0.74 · 9.1% (150 of 1,650 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.54 · 30.4% (502 of 1,650 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.61 · 18.1% (298 of 1,650 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.53 · 29.0% (478 of 1,650 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.68 · 10.6% (175 of 1,650 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (233 of 1,650 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.56 · 20.2% (333 of 1,650 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.44 · 44.4% (732 of 1,650 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (206 of 1,650 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.36 · 58.1% (958 of 1,650 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.57 · 13.9% (229 of 1,650 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.69 · 5.8% (96 of 1,650 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.58 · 11.9% (197 of 1,650 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.35 · 58.4% (963 of 1,650 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.54 · 15.5% (256 of 1,650 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.43 · 35.6% (588 of 1,650 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 0.63 · 6.9% (114 of 1,650 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.60 · 8.7% (144 of 1,650 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.36 · 48.2% (795 of 1,650 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (252 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.48 · 20.8% (344 of 1,650 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.47 · 22.6% (373 of 1,650 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.40 · 37.5% (619 of 1,650 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.50 · 15.8% (260 of 1,650 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (165 of 1,650 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (160 of 1,650 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.61 · 6.4% (105 of 1,650 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.61 · 6.2% (103 of 1,650 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.47 · 19.9% (328 of 1,650 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.61 · 5.9% (98 of 1,650 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.58 · 7.2% (119 of 1,650 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.57 · 7.8% (129 of 1,650 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.41 · 30.4% (501 of 1,650 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (248 of 1,650 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.34 · 49.3% (814 of 1,650 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (257 of 1,650 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (228 of 1,650 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.36 · 41.4% (683 of 1,650 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.39 · 31.5% (520 of 1,650 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.41 · 27.2% (449 of 1,650 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.53 · 9.2% (151 of 1,650 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.33 · 45.4% (749 of 1,650 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.56 · 6.1% (100 of 1,650 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.41 · 23.9% (394 of 1,650 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (293 of 1,650 decks)
- Kazandu Nectarpot relevance 0.57 · 4.8% (79 of 1,650 decks)
All artifacts (43)
- Boompile relevance 0.78 · 10.1% (166 of 1,650 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 0.76 · 10.9% (180 of 1,650 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.62 · 8.0% (132 of 1,650 decks)
- Darksteel Garrison relevance 0.80 · 3.4% (56 of 1,650 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.43 · 19.1% (315 of 1,650 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.40 · 17.2% (284 of 1,650 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (137 of 1,650 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.49 · 5.6% (92 of 1,650 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.38 · 13.5% (222 of 1,650 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (88 of 1,650 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.41 · 7.2% (118 of 1,650 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (168 of 1,650 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (150 of 1,650 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (102 of 1,650 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.46 · 4.0% (66 of 1,650 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (113 of 1,650 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.50 · 3.2% (53 of 1,650 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (104 of 1,650 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (76 of 1,650 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.25 · 28.5% (470 of 1,650 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (80 of 1,650 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (81 of 1,650 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (71 of 1,650 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (84 of 1,650 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (102 of 1,650 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 24.0% (396 of 1,650 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.33 · 4.6% (76 of 1,650 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.27 · 9.9% (163 of 1,650 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (47 of 1,650 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.24 · 9.3% (153 of 1,650 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (53 of 1,650 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (71 of 1,650 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 21.5% (354 of 1,650 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (50 of 1,650 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (65 of 1,650 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (52 of 1,650 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.15 · 36.5% (602 of 1,650 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.19 · 14.4% (237 of 1,650 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (54 of 1,650 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (45 of 1,650 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (42 of 1,650 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (44 of 1,650 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 60.4% (996 of 1,650 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.56 · 34.1% (563 of 1,650 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.47 · 34.3% (566 of 1,650 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.50 · 22.2% (366 of 1,650 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.46 · 27.5% (454 of 1,650 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (187 of 1,650 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (217 of 1,650 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (231 of 1,650 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (182 of 1,650 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (177 of 1,650 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (132 of 1,650 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (171 of 1,650 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (88 of 1,650 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.46 · 6.7% (110 of 1,650 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (70 of 1,650 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.45 · 6.1% (101 of 1,650 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.41 · 9.0% (149 of 1,650 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.37 · 13.1% (216 of 1,650 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (271 of 1,650 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.33 · 20.2% (333 of 1,650 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.30 · 25.8% (426 of 1,650 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (145 of 1,650 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.34 · 13.3% (220 of 1,650 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (73 of 1,650 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.29 · 22.7% (374 of 1,650 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (75 of 1,650 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.33 · 11.7% (193 of 1,650 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (75 of 1,650 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (66 of 1,650 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (105 of 1,650 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 5.9% (97 of 1,650 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (56 of 1,650 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (184 of 1,650 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 21.7% (358 of 1,650 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (83 of 1,650 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (110 of 1,650 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (101 of 1,650 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.27 · 18.1% (299 of 1,650 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (192 of 1,650 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (252 of 1,650 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (80 of 1,650 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.41 · 3.5% (57 of 1,650 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (53 of 1,650 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (86 of 1,650 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (46 of 1,650 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.17 · 48.7% (804 of 1,650 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (149 of 1,650 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (58 of 1,650 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (149 of 1,650 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (66 of 1,650 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (105 of 1,650 decks)
All instants (50)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.88 · 8.2% (135 of 1,650 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (161 of 1,650 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (95 of 1,650 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.40 · 11.1% (183 of 1,650 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (126 of 1,650 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.33 · 21.3% (352 of 1,650 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.51 · 4.1% (68 of 1,650 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.38 · 11.4% (188 of 1,650 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.29 · 29.3% (483 of 1,650 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.41 · 7.4% (122 of 1,650 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (183 of 1,650 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.32 · 17.6% (290 of 1,650 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (99 of 1,650 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.32 · 15.3% (253 of 1,650 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (464 of 1,650 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.29 · 22.2% (367 of 1,650 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (83 of 1,650 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.27 · 27.4% (452 of 1,650 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (101 of 1,650 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (93 of 1,650 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (168 of 1,650 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (89 of 1,650 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (95 of 1,650 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.28 · 12.7% (209 of 1,650 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (299 of 1,650 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.23 · 27.5% (454 of 1,650 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.25 · 13.1% (216 of 1,650 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (50 of 1,650 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (83 of 1,650 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.23 · 15.1% (249 of 1,650 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (67 of 1,650 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (65 of 1,650 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (76 of 1,650 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (145 of 1,650 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.29 · 4.7% (77 of 1,650 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.40 · 2.6% (43 of 1,650 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.18 · 31.0% (511 of 1,650 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (76 of 1,650 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (45 of 1,650 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (98 of 1,650 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 47.9% (790 of 1,650 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (168 of 1,650 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (160 of 1,650 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (47 of 1,650 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (44 of 1,650 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (56 of 1,650 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 48.6% (802 of 1,650 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (67 of 1,650 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (46 of 1,650 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (60 of 1,650 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.45 · 19.5% (321 of 1,650 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (149 of 1,650 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (148 of 1,650 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (78 of 1,650 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.35 · 23.2% (383 of 1,650 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.36 · 18.2% (301 of 1,650 decks)
- Earth Rumble relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (79 of 1,650 decks)
- Seismic Sense relevance 0.47 · 4.8% (79 of 1,650 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (263 of 1,650 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (85 of 1,650 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (79 of 1,650 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.40 · 7.6% (125 of 1,650 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (156 of 1,650 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.29 · 27.5% (454 of 1,650 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.29 · 28.4% (469 of 1,650 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.56 · 3.1% (51 of 1,650 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.32 · 17.3% (286 of 1,650 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (194 of 1,650 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.49 · 3.9% (64 of 1,650 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.48 · 3.9% (64 of 1,650 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (118 of 1,650 decks)
- Uncage the Menagerie relevance 0.56 · 2.8% (47 of 1,650 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (123 of 1,650 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.42 · 4.4% (73 of 1,650 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (92 of 1,650 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (94 of 1,650 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (96 of 1,650 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (79 of 1,650 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (95 of 1,650 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.34 · 8.6% (142 of 1,650 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.32 · 9.9% (163 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (107 of 1,650 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (53 of 1,650 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.27 · 20.1% (332 of 1,650 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (46 of 1,650 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (58 of 1,650 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (92 of 1,650 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.33 · 5.9% (97 of 1,650 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (63 of 1,650 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (92 of 1,650 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.26 · 15.9% (262 of 1,650 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (57 of 1,650 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.25 · 18.9% (312 of 1,650 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (517 of 1,650 decks)
- Cracked Earth Technique relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (46 of 1,650 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (91 of 1,650 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (550 of 1,650 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.20 · 25.9% (428 of 1,650 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.41 · 2.8% (47 of 1,650 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (42 of 1,650 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.36 · 45.5% (750 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (260 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.53 · 6.4% (106 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (129 of 1,650 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (154 of 1,650 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.49 · 5.6% (93 of 1,650 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (49 of 1,650 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.33 · 7.6% (125 of 1,650 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (65 of 1,650 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.40 · 2.5% (42 of 1,650 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (155 of 1,650 decks)
All utility lands (49)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (254 of 1,650 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.40 · 19.0% (313 of 1,650 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (188 of 1,650 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.44 · 9.5% (156 of 1,650 decks)
- Sapseep Forest relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (69 of 1,650 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (83 of 1,650 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (99 of 1,650 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.34 · 14.2% (234 of 1,650 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (133 of 1,650 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.46 · 4.1% (68 of 1,650 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (106 of 1,650 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.37 · 7.8% (129 of 1,650 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (102 of 1,650 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.49 · 3.3% (55 of 1,650 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.35 · 7.8% (129 of 1,650 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.29 · 15.8% (260 of 1,650 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.26 · 25.6% (423 of 1,650 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 31.1% (513 of 1,650 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (108 of 1,650 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (88 of 1,650 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (136 of 1,650 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.28 · 13.2% (218 of 1,650 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (151 of 1,650 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (296 of 1,650 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (78 of 1,650 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.22 · 29.3% (484 of 1,650 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (77 of 1,650 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.46 · 2.5% (41 of 1,650 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.21 · 29.0% (479 of 1,650 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.25 · 14.1% (232 of 1,650 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (64 of 1,650 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.22 · 25.2% (416 of 1,650 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (90 of 1,650 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (53 of 1,650 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.21 · 26.4% (435 of 1,650 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (72 of 1,650 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 8.7% (143 of 1,650 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (179 of 1,650 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.40 · 2.6% (43 of 1,650 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (78 of 1,650 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (44 of 1,650 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (54 of 1,650 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 29.1% (480 of 1,650 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (75 of 1,650 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (55 of 1,650 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (50 of 1,650 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (57 of 1,650 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (46 of 1,650 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (61 of 1,650 decks)
All lands (27)
- Vesuva relevance 0.46 · 13.9% (230 of 1,650 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.44 · 6.4% (105 of 1,650 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.31 · 28.9% (477 of 1,650 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (89 of 1,650 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (361 of 1,650 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.33 · 16.4% (271 of 1,650 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.30 · 23.0% (379 of 1,650 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (166 of 1,650 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.33 · 12.2% (201 of 1,650 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (194 of 1,650 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.30 · 16.1% (265 of 1,650 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (194 of 1,650 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.32 · 12.4% (204 of 1,650 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (130 of 1,650 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (88 of 1,650 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (109 of 1,650 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.34 · 9.0% (148 of 1,650 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (84 of 1,650 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.30 · 12.8% (212 of 1,650 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.32 · 9.1% (150 of 1,650 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.24 · 29.9% (494 of 1,650 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.34 · 7.0% (116 of 1,650 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.34 · 5.9% (98 of 1,650 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (84 of 1,650 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (51 of 1,650 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (71 of 1,650 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.3% (1,540 of 1,650 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ashaya, Soul of the Wild, from 1,650 real Commander decks.