Broken Bond

Played in 34,360 decks

Broken Bond
$0.35 €0.24

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 4.37 · 31.8% (879 of 2,760 decks)
  2. Sergeant John Benton relevance 4.12 · 27.8% (650 of 2,337 decks)
  3. Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 3.15 · 13.6% (527 of 3,864 decks)
  4. Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful relevance 3.15 · 12.9% (183 of 1,419 decks)
  5. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.14 · 5.6% (652 of 11,725 decks)
  6. Child of Alara relevance 2.62 · 4.9% (287 of 5,852 decks)
  7. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.54 · 17.2% (1,566 of 9,125 decks)
  8. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.54 · 13.5% (712 of 5,275 decks)
  9. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.53 · 20.1% (937 of 4,673 decks)
  10. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.53 · 6.8% (291 of 4,251 decks)
  11. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.51 · 11.1% (217 of 1,956 decks)
  12. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.40 · 8.9% (302 of 3,402 decks)
  13. Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 2.32 · 27.1% (248 of 916 decks)
  14. Ygra, Eater of All relevance 2.31 · 5.0% (659 of 13,264 decks)
  15. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.29 · 12.9% (1,145 of 8,897 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.26 · 11.9% (482 of 4,045 decks)
  17. Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 2.25 · 18.1% (579 of 3,201 decks)
  18. Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 2.25 · 29.4% (177 of 603 decks)
  19. Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 2.11 · 8.3% (175 of 2,102 decks)
  20. Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 2.05 · 15.4% (152 of 986 decks)
  21. Sarulf, Realm Eater relevance 1.96 · 6.7% (127 of 1,887 decks)
  22. Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.91 · 20.5% (217 of 1,059 decks)
  23. Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 1.82 · 26.3% (100 of 380 decks)
  24. Tifa Lockhart relevance 1.80 · 10.8% (1,068 of 9,847 decks)
  25. Gishath, Sun's Avatar relevance 1.74 · 2.9% (305 of 10,659 decks)
  26. Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.71 · 19.3% (110 of 571 decks)
  27. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.70 · 4.7% (84 of 1,786 decks)
  28. Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 1.65 · 2.3% (129 of 5,531 decks)
  29. The Necrobloom relevance 1.65 · 2.1% (244 of 11,380 decks)
  30. Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 1.64 · 16.5% (49 of 297 decks)

Parallel Cards

12

Showing 1-10 of 12

Page size
All parallel cards (12)
  1. Reclaiming Vines
  2. Creeping Mold
  3. Price of Freedom
  4. Ice Storm
  5. Sunder from Within
  6. Cleansing Wildfire
  7. Winter's Grasp
  8. Seedship Impact
  9. Sinkhole
  10. Desecration Plague
  11. Geomancer's Gambit
  12. Rain of Thorns

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Explore
    1.35 41.1%
    $0.19 €0.24
  • Harrow
    0.97 29.5%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Rampant Growth
    0.96 46.0%
    $1.25 €0.52
  • Growth Spiral
    0.94 28.2%
    $0.32 €0.47
  • Cultivate
    0.90 51.6%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.89 24.6%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.85 24.0%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.82 21.6%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.80 34.2%
    $1.83 €1.50
  • Beast Within
    0.78 38.7%
    $0.68 €0.85
All most relevant (30)
  1. Explore relevance 1.35 · 41.1% (14,120 of 34,360 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 0.97 · 29.5% (10,133 of 34,360 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.96 · 46.0% (15,816 of 34,360 decks)
  4. Growth Spiral relevance 0.94 · 28.2% (9,690 of 34,360 decks)
  5. Cultivate relevance 0.90 · 51.6% (17,725 of 34,360 decks)
  6. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.89 · 24.6% (8,445 of 34,360 decks)
  7. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.85 · 24.0% (8,256 of 34,360 decks)
  8. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.82 · 21.6% (7,412 of 34,360 decks)
  9. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.80 · 34.2% (11,761 of 34,360 decks)
  10. Beast Within relevance 0.78 · 38.7% (13,285 of 34,360 decks)
  11. Scute Swarm relevance 0.77 · 23.7% (8,134 of 34,360 decks)
  12. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.75 · 21.8% (7,479 of 34,360 decks)
  13. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (7,321 of 34,360 decks)
  14. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 23.1% (7,931 of 34,360 decks)
  15. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.71 · 25.6% (8,782 of 34,360 decks)
  16. Entish Restoration relevance 0.71 · 18.8% (6,446 of 34,360 decks)
  17. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.70 · 18.7% (6,429 of 34,360 decks)
  18. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (5,849 of 34,360 decks)
  19. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.68 · 17.8% (6,101 of 34,360 decks)
  20. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (5,400 of 34,360 decks)
  21. Exploration relevance 0.63 · 18.2% (6,256 of 34,360 decks)
  22. Nature's Lore relevance 0.63 · 31.9% (10,964 of 34,360 decks)
  23. Crop Rotation relevance 0.59 · 19.0% (6,523 of 34,360 decks)
  24. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.59 · 22.9% (7,862 of 34,360 decks)
  25. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (4,989 of 34,360 decks)
  26. Summer Bloom relevance 0.57 · 10.6% (3,659 of 34,360 decks)
  27. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.57 · 16.5% (5,666 of 34,360 decks)
  28. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (5,470 of 34,360 decks)
  29. Farseek relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (10,275 of 34,360 decks)
  30. Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.55 · 10.1% (3,487 of 34,360 decks)

Creatures

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.89 24.6%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.85 24.0%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.82 21.6%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Scute Swarm
    0.77 23.7%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.75 21.8%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    0.73 21.3%
    $0.46 €0.58
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.72 23.1%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.71 25.6%
    $0.42 €0.58
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.70 18.7%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.70 17.0%
    $13.07 €10.04
All creatures (18)
  1. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.89 · 24.6% (8,445 of 34,360 decks)
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.85 · 24.0% (8,256 of 34,360 decks)
  3. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.82 · 21.6% (7,412 of 34,360 decks)
  4. Scute Swarm relevance 0.77 · 23.7% (8,134 of 34,360 decks)
  5. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.75 · 21.8% (7,479 of 34,360 decks)
  6. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (7,321 of 34,360 decks)
  7. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 23.1% (7,931 of 34,360 decks)
  8. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.71 · 25.6% (8,782 of 34,360 decks)
  9. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.70 · 18.7% (6,429 of 34,360 decks)
  10. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (5,849 of 34,360 decks)
  11. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.68 · 17.8% (6,101 of 34,360 decks)
  12. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (4,989 of 34,360 decks)
  13. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (5,470 of 34,360 decks)
  14. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.55 · 12.6% (4,341 of 34,360 decks)
  15. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.54 · 23.6% (8,093 of 34,360 decks)
  16. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.53 · 13.0% (4,452 of 34,360 decks)
  17. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.52 · 12.1% (4,145 of 34,360 decks)
  18. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (3,602 of 34,360 decks)

Enchantments

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.63 18.2%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.59 22.9%
    $0.57 €0.63
  • Khalni Heart Expedition
    0.55 10.1%
    $0.34 €0.24
  • Spelunking
    0.54 13.2%
    $3.67 €3.18
  • Druid Class
    0.54 10.9%
    $1.23 €1.84
  • Zendikar's Roil
    0.53 10.2%
    $0.92 €1.05
All enchantments (6)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.63 · 18.2% (6,256 of 34,360 decks)
  2. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.59 · 22.9% (7,862 of 34,360 decks)
  3. Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.55 · 10.1% (3,487 of 34,360 decks)
  4. Spelunking relevance 0.54 · 13.2% (4,544 of 34,360 decks)
  5. Druid Class relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (3,754 of 34,360 decks)
  6. Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.53 · 10.2% (3,491 of 34,360 decks)

Instants

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
  • Harrow
    0.97 29.5%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Growth Spiral
    0.94 28.2%
    $0.32 €0.47
  • Beast Within
    0.78 38.7%
    $0.68 €0.85
  • Entish Restoration
    0.71 18.8%
    $2.79 €1.87
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.68 15.7%
    $0.34 €0.30
  • Crop Rotation
    0.59 19.0%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Nature's Claim
    0.52 14.5%
    $1.34 €0.68
  • Return to Nature
    0.51 12.0%
    $0.32 €0.21
  • Eureka Moment
    0.51 10.3%
    $0.24 €0.16
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.50 25.3%
    $17.55 €14.17
All instants (10)
  1. Harrow relevance 0.97 · 29.5% (10,133 of 34,360 decks)
  2. Growth Spiral relevance 0.94 · 28.2% (9,690 of 34,360 decks)
  3. Beast Within relevance 0.78 · 38.7% (13,285 of 34,360 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 0.71 · 18.8% (6,446 of 34,360 decks)
  5. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (5,400 of 34,360 decks)
  6. Crop Rotation relevance 0.59 · 19.0% (6,523 of 34,360 decks)
  7. Nature's Claim relevance 0.52 · 14.5% (4,974 of 34,360 decks)
  8. Return to Nature relevance 0.51 · 12.0% (4,107 of 34,360 decks)
  9. Eureka Moment relevance 0.51 · 10.3% (3,527 of 34,360 decks)
  10. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.50 · 25.3% (8,690 of 34,360 decks)

Sorceries

11

Showing 1-10 of 11

Page size
  • Explore
    1.35 41.1%
    $0.19 €0.24
  • Rampant Growth
    0.96 46.0%
    $1.25 €0.52
  • Cultivate
    0.90 51.6%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.80 34.2%
    $1.83 €1.50
  • Nature's Lore
    0.63 31.9%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Summer Bloom
    0.57 10.6%
    $1.82 €0.59
  • Skyshroud Claim
    0.57 16.5%
    $1.08 €1.14
  • Farseek
    0.56 29.9%
    $0.46 €0.81
  • Urban Evolution
    0.55 10.5%
    $0.34 €0.13
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.55 13.3%
    $0.33 €0.75
All sorceries (11)
  1. Explore relevance 1.35 · 41.1% (14,120 of 34,360 decks)
  2. Rampant Growth relevance 0.96 · 46.0% (15,816 of 34,360 decks)
  3. Cultivate relevance 0.90 · 51.6% (17,725 of 34,360 decks)
  4. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.80 · 34.2% (11,761 of 34,360 decks)
  5. Nature's Lore relevance 0.63 · 31.9% (10,964 of 34,360 decks)
  6. Summer Bloom relevance 0.57 · 10.6% (3,659 of 34,360 decks)
  7. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.57 · 16.5% (5,666 of 34,360 decks)
  8. Farseek relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (10,275 of 34,360 decks)
  9. Urban Evolution relevance 0.55 · 10.5% (3,601 of 34,360 decks)
  10. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (4,557 of 34,360 decks)
  11. Three Visits relevance 0.51 · 22.9% (7,875 of 34,360 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Blighted Woodland
    0.57 12.8%
    $0.40 €0.25
  • Myriad Landscape
    0.54 24.4%
    $0.31 €0.24
All utility lands (2)
  1. Blighted Woodland relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (4,412 of 34,360 decks)
  2. Myriad Landscape relevance 0.54 · 24.4% (8,396 of 34,360 decks)

Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Simic Growth Chamber
    0.74 20.8%
    $0.37 €0.30
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.64 31.4%
    $0.27 €0.11
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.63 36.9%
    $0.29 €0.13
All lands (3)
  1. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (7,142 of 34,360 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.64 · 31.4% (10,785 of 34,360 decks)
  3. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.63 · 36.9% (12,686 of 34,360 decks)

EDH data for Broken Bond: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 34,360 real decks.