Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.94 · 22.2% (467 of 2,102 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.76 · 42.2% (887 of 2,102 decks)
- Ambling Stormshell relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (420 of 2,102 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.97 · 18.4% (386 of 2,102 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 0.97 · 15.3% (322 of 2,102 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.85 · 27.0% (567 of 2,102 decks)
- Mistford River Turtle relevance 0.96 · 14.5% (304 of 2,102 decks)
- Quandrix Cultivator relevance 0.91 · 18.1% (380 of 2,102 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.85 · 24.7% (519 of 2,102 decks)
- Gorex, the Tombshell relevance 0.92 · 16.6% (349 of 2,102 decks)
- Angler Turtle relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (306 of 2,102 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.94 · 13.8% (291 of 2,102 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.89 · 16.8% (353 of 2,102 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.97 · 12.3% (259 of 2,102 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.86 · 16.4% (345 of 2,102 decks)
- Hexbane Tortoise relevance 0.96 · 10.6% (222 of 2,102 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.90 · 12.8% (269 of 2,102 decks)
- Calcite Snapper relevance 0.95 · 9.5% (199 of 2,102 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.75 · 25.7% (540 of 2,102 decks)
- Cold-Water Snapper relevance 0.95 · 9.2% (194 of 2,102 decks)
- King Macar, the Gold-Cursed relevance 0.92 · 10.3% (217 of 2,102 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.60 · 46.1% (968 of 2,102 decks)
- Kappa Tech-Wrecker relevance 0.84 · 14.4% (303 of 2,102 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.94 · 9.3% (196 of 2,102 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.91 · 10.9% (229 of 2,102 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.94 · 9.4% (197 of 2,102 decks)
- Patron of the Moon relevance 0.91 · 10.6% (222 of 2,102 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.86 · 12.7% (267 of 2,102 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.85 · 13.1% (275 of 2,102 decks)
- Tidepool Turtle relevance 0.95 · 8.2% (172 of 2,102 decks)
- Wandering Tombshell relevance 0.95 · 8.1% (170 of 2,102 decks)
- Sailors' Bane relevance 0.94 · 8.5% (178 of 2,102 decks)
- Giant Tortoise relevance 0.95 · 7.8% (163 of 2,102 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 0.94 · 8.0% (168 of 2,102 decks)
- Shell Shield relevance 0.93 · 8.1% (170 of 2,102 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.88 · 10.4% (218 of 2,102 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.72 · 23.3% (489 of 2,102 decks)
- Tortoise Formation relevance 0.94 · 7.3% (153 of 2,102 decks)
- Shell of the Last Kappa relevance 0.94 · 7.0% (147 of 2,102 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.86 · 10.4% (218 of 2,102 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.81 · 12.5% (262 of 2,102 decks)
- Turtle Power! relevance 0.94 · 6.1% (128 of 2,102 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.86 · 9.5% (200 of 2,102 decks)
- Daring Thunder-Thief relevance 0.93 · 6.1% (128 of 2,102 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.91 · 6.5% (136 of 2,102 decks)
- Horned Turtle relevance 0.92 · 5.3% (111 of 2,102 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.88 · 7.0% (148 of 2,102 decks)
- Armored Whirl Turtle relevance 0.92 · 5.1% (108 of 2,102 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.72 · 15.6% (327 of 2,102 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.64 · 26.4% (554 of 2,102 decks)
Card Stacks
19
Card Stacks
19Showing 1-2 of 19
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
5.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Scout
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Springleaf Drum
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Springleaf Drum 42%
- Loam Dryad 9%
- Saruli Caretaker 9%
- Jaspera Sentinel 5%
- Gene Pollinator 5%
- Citanul Stalwart 3%
Other options: Supportive Parents
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
5.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Circuitous Route
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Sultai decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Sultai decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Cultivate 40%
- Rampant Growth 37%
- Kodama's Reach 29%
- Migration Path 10%
- Explosive Vegetation 8%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Far Wanderings 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
Other options: Grow from the Ashes, Beneath the Sands, Roamer's Routine, Verdant Mastery, Peregrination, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Path to the Festival, They Went This Way, Untamed Wilds, Primal Growth, Map the Wastes, Deep Reconnaissance
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
2.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Spiral
7.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 42%
- Eureka Moment 10%
- Joint Exploration 4%
Cards like Counterspell
1.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 41%
- Negate 26%
- Essence Scatter 1%
Other options: Wash Away, Spell Snare, Wild Unraveling, Envelop, Remove Soul, Mystic Denial, Intervene, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Minor Misstep, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, False Summoning, Extinguish
Cards like Scapeshift
3.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Relic of Legends
19× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Patriar's Seal, Bender's Waterskin, Spectral Searchlight, Victory Chimes
Cards like Reshape the Earth
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Reshape the Earth 23%
- Boundless Realms 8%
- Harvest Season 2%
- Traverse the Outlands 2%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey, Turtle Tracks
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
3.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
9.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Scute Swarm
2.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Freed from the Real
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Exploration
2.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Assassin's Trophy
4.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Assassin's Trophy 34%
- Deathsprout 8%
Cards like Sylvan Scrying
11× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sylvan Scrying 17%
- Dig Up 3%
Other options: Thirsting Roots, Fork in the Road, Attune with Aether, Seek the Horizon, Scouting Trek, Lay of the Land, Reclaim the Wastes, Rites of Spring
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.94 · 22.2% (467 of 2,102 decks)
- Ambling Stormshell relevance 0.95 · 20.0% (420 of 2,102 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.97 · 18.4% (386 of 2,102 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 0.97 · 15.3% (322 of 2,102 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.85 · 27.0% (567 of 2,102 decks)
- Mistford River Turtle relevance 0.96 · 14.5% (304 of 2,102 decks)
- Quandrix Cultivator relevance 0.91 · 18.1% (380 of 2,102 decks)
- Gorex, the Tombshell relevance 0.92 · 16.6% (349 of 2,102 decks)
- Angler Turtle relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (306 of 2,102 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.94 · 13.8% (291 of 2,102 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.89 · 16.8% (353 of 2,102 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.97 · 12.3% (259 of 2,102 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.86 · 16.4% (345 of 2,102 decks)
- Hexbane Tortoise relevance 0.96 · 10.6% (222 of 2,102 decks)
- Calcite Snapper relevance 0.95 · 9.5% (199 of 2,102 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.75 · 25.7% (540 of 2,102 decks)
- Cold-Water Snapper relevance 0.95 · 9.2% (194 of 2,102 decks)
- King Macar, the Gold-Cursed relevance 0.92 · 10.3% (217 of 2,102 decks)
- Kappa Tech-Wrecker relevance 0.84 · 14.4% (303 of 2,102 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.94 · 9.3% (196 of 2,102 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.94 · 9.4% (197 of 2,102 decks)
- Patron of the Moon relevance 0.91 · 10.6% (222 of 2,102 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.86 · 12.7% (267 of 2,102 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.85 · 13.1% (275 of 2,102 decks)
- Tidepool Turtle relevance 0.95 · 8.2% (172 of 2,102 decks)
- Wandering Tombshell relevance 0.95 · 8.1% (170 of 2,102 decks)
- Sailors' Bane relevance 0.94 · 8.5% (178 of 2,102 decks)
- Giant Tortoise relevance 0.95 · 7.8% (163 of 2,102 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 0.94 · 8.0% (168 of 2,102 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.88 · 10.4% (218 of 2,102 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.86 · 10.4% (218 of 2,102 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.81 · 12.5% (262 of 2,102 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.86 · 9.5% (200 of 2,102 decks)
- Daring Thunder-Thief relevance 0.93 · 6.1% (128 of 2,102 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 0.91 · 6.5% (136 of 2,102 decks)
- Horned Turtle relevance 0.92 · 5.3% (111 of 2,102 decks)
- Armored Whirl Turtle relevance 0.92 · 5.1% (108 of 2,102 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.72 · 15.6% (327 of 2,102 decks)
- Taeko, the Patient Avalanche relevance 0.87 · 7.0% (148 of 2,102 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (305 of 2,102 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.66 · 21.0% (442 of 2,102 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.76 · 10.4% (218 of 2,102 decks)
- Ticket Tortoise relevance 0.90 · 4.7% (99 of 2,102 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.79 · 8.7% (182 of 2,102 decks)
- Disciple of Deceit relevance 0.84 · 5.0% (106 of 2,102 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.79 · 7.1% (150 of 2,102 decks)
- Tideforce Elemental relevance 0.80 · 5.7% (119 of 2,102 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.61 · 19.4% (408 of 2,102 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.65 · 13.6% (286 of 2,102 decks)
- Royal Assassin relevance 0.77 · 6.1% (129 of 2,102 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.76 · 42.2% (887 of 2,102 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.85 · 24.7% (519 of 2,102 decks)
- Shell of the Last Kappa relevance 0.94 · 7.0% (147 of 2,102 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.82 · 8.8% (186 of 2,102 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.87 · 6.0% (127 of 2,102 decks)
- Honor-Worn Shaku relevance 0.86 · 5.5% (116 of 2,102 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.80 · 6.9% (145 of 2,102 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.86 · 4.6% (97 of 2,102 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.57 · 21.2% (446 of 2,102 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (206 of 2,102 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (272 of 2,102 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.63 · 8.0% (168 of 2,102 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (253 of 2,102 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.81 · 3.2% (67 of 2,102 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.69 · 4.1% (87 of 2,102 decks)
- Silent Submersible relevance 0.85 · 2.8% (59 of 2,102 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.63 · 4.4% (92 of 2,102 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.56 · 5.6% (117 of 2,102 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (171 of 2,102 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.64 · 3.9% (83 of 2,102 decks)
- Subterranean Schooner relevance 0.76 · 2.7% (57 of 2,102 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.72 · 3.0% (63 of 2,102 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.42 · 13.5% (284 of 2,102 decks)
- Unlicensed Hearse relevance 0.71 · 2.7% (57 of 2,102 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (123 of 2,102 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.65 · 3.1% (65 of 2,102 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (65 of 2,102 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.66 · 2.8% (58 of 2,102 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.64 · 2.8% (59 of 2,102 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.61 · 2.7% (56 of 2,102 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.61 · 2.5% (53 of 2,102 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.39 · 5.4% (114 of 2,102 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (107 of 2,102 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.30 · 16.3% (342 of 2,102 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (57 of 2,102 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (147 of 2,102 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.57 · 2.5% (52 of 2,102 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (111 of 2,102 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (78 of 2,102 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (99 of 2,102 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.24 · 16.2% (340 of 2,102 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (188 of 2,102 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (89 of 2,102 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (58 of 2,102 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (218 of 2,102 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (57 of 2,102 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (63 of 2,102 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (53 of 2,102 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (62 of 2,102 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (74 of 2,102 decks)
Enchantments
46
Enchantments
46 Showing 1-10 of 46
Page size
All enchantments (46)
- Opposition relevance 0.90 · 12.8% (269 of 2,102 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.60 · 46.1% (968 of 2,102 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.91 · 10.9% (229 of 2,102 decks)
- Turtle Power! relevance 0.94 · 6.1% (128 of 2,102 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.59 · 27.1% (569 of 2,102 decks)
- Sight of the Scalelords relevance 0.86 · 4.3% (90 of 2,102 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.83 · 4.2% (89 of 2,102 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.63 · 10.6% (223 of 2,102 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 0.84 · 3.9% (83 of 2,102 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.52 · 20.6% (434 of 2,102 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (132 of 2,102 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.62 · 7.8% (163 of 2,102 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.61 · 8.1% (170 of 2,102 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.63 · 6.4% (134 of 2,102 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (195 of 2,102 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.53 · 12.4% (261 of 2,102 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.47 · 19.1% (402 of 2,102 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.60 · 5.3% (111 of 2,102 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (248 of 2,102 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.55 · 6.0% (126 of 2,102 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.68 · 3.7% (78 of 2,102 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.72 · 3.3% (69 of 2,102 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.38 · 22.7% (477 of 2,102 decks)
- Excavation relevance 0.71 · 3.1% (65 of 2,102 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.51 · 5.5% (115 of 2,102 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 0.73 · 2.9% (60 of 2,102 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (260 of 2,102 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.69 · 2.9% (60 of 2,102 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.62 · 3.2% (68 of 2,102 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (178 of 2,102 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.43 · 7.0% (148 of 2,102 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.54 · 3.7% (77 of 2,102 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (76 of 2,102 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (133 of 2,102 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.56 · 2.9% (60 of 2,102 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (53 of 2,102 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (79 of 2,102 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (145 of 2,102 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 12.6% (265 of 2,102 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (110 of 2,102 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (52 of 2,102 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 14.7% (310 of 2,102 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (82 of 2,102 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (59 of 2,102 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (53 of 2,102 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (54 of 2,102 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Shell Shield relevance 0.93 · 8.1% (170 of 2,102 decks)
- Tortoise Formation relevance 0.94 · 7.3% (153 of 2,102 decks)
- Grim Contest relevance 0.87 · 4.9% (103 of 2,102 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 0.87 · 4.9% (103 of 2,102 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.84 · 5.4% (114 of 2,102 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.53 · 14.9% (314 of 2,102 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.58 · 10.5% (220 of 2,102 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.81 · 3.5% (73 of 2,102 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.56 · 8.3% (174 of 2,102 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.35 · 42.5% (893 of 2,102 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.56 · 7.0% (147 of 2,102 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.48 · 12.5% (262 of 2,102 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (179 of 2,102 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.58 · 4.4% (92 of 2,102 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 6.5% (137 of 2,102 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.36 · 28.4% (598 of 2,102 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (142 of 2,102 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.57 · 4.2% (88 of 2,102 decks)
- Weather the Storm relevance 0.65 · 2.9% (62 of 2,102 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.52 · 4.3% (90 of 2,102 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.32 · 26.5% (556 of 2,102 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.43 · 6.0% (127 of 2,102 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.36 · 12.7% (266 of 2,102 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (134 of 2,102 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (143 of 2,102 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.30 · 19.2% (404 of 2,102 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (108 of 2,102 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (297 of 2,102 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.37 · 7.0% (147 of 2,102 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.46 · 3.9% (83 of 2,102 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.25 · 32.8% (689 of 2,102 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (84 of 2,102 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (142 of 2,102 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (58 of 2,102 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.49 · 3.1% (66 of 2,102 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (167 of 2,102 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 6.6% (138 of 2,102 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (87 of 2,102 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (174 of 2,102 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.27 · 13.7% (287 of 2,102 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (82 of 2,102 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (64 of 2,102 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (166 of 2,102 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (57 of 2,102 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.24 · 16.6% (349 of 2,102 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (60 of 2,102 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (65 of 2,102 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (263 of 2,102 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.18 · 41.1% (864 of 2,102 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (396 of 2,102 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.72 · 23.3% (489 of 2,102 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.88 · 7.0% (148 of 2,102 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.64 · 26.4% (554 of 2,102 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.78 · 7.8% (163 of 2,102 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.59 · 16.5% (347 of 2,102 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.55 · 20.1% (423 of 2,102 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.62 · 11.8% (249 of 2,102 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (206 of 2,102 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.57 · 13.4% (282 of 2,102 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.65 · 7.5% (158 of 2,102 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.60 · 10.5% (221 of 2,102 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.48 · 26.3% (552 of 2,102 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.59 · 10.3% (217 of 2,102 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.49 · 22.8% (479 of 2,102 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.63 · 7.0% (148 of 2,102 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (175 of 2,102 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.59 · 7.8% (164 of 2,102 decks)
- Tendrils of Agony relevance 0.71 · 4.1% (86 of 2,102 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.77 · 3.3% (69 of 2,102 decks)
- Crippling Fear relevance 0.60 · 4.5% (95 of 2,102 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (192 of 2,102 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.53 · 5.7% (119 of 2,102 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (157 of 2,102 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.58 · 4.4% (92 of 2,102 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.75 · 2.6% (55 of 2,102 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.35 · 26.1% (548 of 2,102 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (123 of 2,102 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (132 of 2,102 decks)
- Mythos of Brokkos relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (97 of 2,102 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (111 of 2,102 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (88 of 2,102 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.45 · 4.9% (103 of 2,102 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.30 · 28.9% (608 of 2,102 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.43 · 5.4% (113 of 2,102 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (163 of 2,102 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.56 · 3.0% (64 of 2,102 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (72 of 2,102 decks)
- Dig Up relevance 0.52 · 3.5% (73 of 2,102 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (62 of 2,102 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (104 of 2,102 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (103 of 2,102 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.36 · 9.2% (194 of 2,102 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (104 of 2,102 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (98 of 2,102 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (96 of 2,102 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.51 · 2.8% (58 of 2,102 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.52 · 2.7% (56 of 2,102 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (321 of 2,102 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.45 · 3.2% (67 of 2,102 decks)
- Death Begets Life relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (85 of 2,102 decks)
Planeswalkers
3
Planeswalkers
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All planeswalkers (3)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.71 · 4.3% (90 of 2,102 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (110 of 2,102 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.52 · 5.5% (116 of 2,102 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Maze's End relevance 0.66 · 23.1% (485 of 2,102 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.66 · 22.4% (471 of 2,102 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.85 · 6.3% (133 of 2,102 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.65 · 20.6% (433 of 2,102 decks)
- Turtle Lair relevance 0.84 · 4.9% (102 of 2,102 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.57 · 21.2% (446 of 2,102 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.70 · 6.1% (128 of 2,102 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.57 · 13.1% (275 of 2,102 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.63 · 7.8% (164 of 2,102 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.62 · 6.3% (133 of 2,102 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.54 · 11.7% (245 of 2,102 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (321 of 2,102 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.63 · 4.5% (95 of 2,102 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.64 · 4.1% (86 of 2,102 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (248 of 2,102 decks)
- Shelldock Isle relevance 0.76 · 2.9% (60 of 2,102 decks)
- Susur Secundi, Void Altar relevance 0.53 · 4.8% (100 of 2,102 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.59 · 4.1% (86 of 2,102 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (101 of 2,102 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (131 of 2,102 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.48 · 5.6% (117 of 2,102 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.59 · 3.7% (78 of 2,102 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.34 · 26.0% (546 of 2,102 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.46 · 6.0% (126 of 2,102 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (444 of 2,102 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.66 · 2.7% (57 of 2,102 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.36 · 15.9% (334 of 2,102 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (392 of 2,102 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.47 · 4.4% (92 of 2,102 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (254 of 2,102 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (78 of 2,102 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (114 of 2,102 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.29 · 22.4% (470 of 2,102 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (118 of 2,102 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (75 of 2,102 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.24 · 36.5% (768 of 2,102 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.49 · 3.3% (70 of 2,102 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (61 of 2,102 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (64 of 2,102 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (154 of 2,102 decks)
- Port of Karfell relevance 0.46 · 3.0% (63 of 2,102 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.27 · 14.8% (312 of 2,102 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (59 of 2,102 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.25 · 21.0% (442 of 2,102 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (116 of 2,102 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.27 · 13.1% (276 of 2,102 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (109 of 2,102 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (242 of 2,102 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 15.3% (321 of 2,102 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.41 · 3.5% (74 of 2,102 decks)
Lands
50
Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All lands (50)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.93 · 25.1% (528 of 2,102 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.93 · 24.4% (512 of 2,102 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.78 · 13.7% (288 of 2,102 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.65 · 26.5% (558 of 2,102 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.65 · 26.6% (559 of 2,102 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.65 · 26.5% (556 of 2,102 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.66 · 24.1% (507 of 2,102 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.66 · 23.9% (502 of 2,102 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.59 · 31.3% (658 of 2,102 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.58 · 32.5% (683 of 2,102 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.57 · 31.4% (661 of 2,102 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.64 · 18.4% (386 of 2,102 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.64 · 16.3% (343 of 2,102 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.38 · 60.8% (1,277 of 2,102 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.40 · 53.7% (1,129 of 2,102 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.51 · 18.1% (380 of 2,102 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (263 of 2,102 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.32 · 58.5% (1,230 of 2,102 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.60 · 6.7% (140 of 2,102 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (223 of 2,102 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.55 · 6.9% (146 of 2,102 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 0.57 · 4.9% (103 of 2,102 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.72 · 3.3% (69 of 2,102 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.70 · 3.3% (70 of 2,102 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.71 · 3.1% (65 of 2,102 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.71 · 3.0% (64 of 2,102 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.48 · 6.3% (133 of 2,102 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (162 of 2,102 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.55 · 4.1% (86 of 2,102 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.46 · 5.9% (125 of 2,102 decks)
- Woodland Chasm relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (110 of 2,102 decks)
- Bad River relevance 0.58 · 3.4% (71 of 2,102 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.41 · 8.6% (180 of 2,102 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.39 · 9.6% (202 of 2,102 decks)
- Darkmoss Bridge relevance 0.55 · 3.3% (69 of 2,102 decks)
- Haunted Mire relevance 0.38 · 9.0% (190 of 2,102 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (174 of 2,102 decks)
- Soured Springs relevance 0.55 · 3.2% (67 of 2,102 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.39 · 7.0% (147 of 2,102 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.56 · 2.9% (62 of 2,102 decks)
- Festering Gulch relevance 0.51 · 3.4% (72 of 2,102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.38 · 6.6% (138 of 2,102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (129 of 2,102 decks)
- Ice Tunnel relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (84 of 2,102 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (82 of 2,102 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (112 of 2,102 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (61 of 2,102 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.24 · 28.9% (608 of 2,102 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.24 · 23.5% (493 of 2,102 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (80 of 2,102 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Archelos, Lagoon Mystic, from 2,102 real Commander decks.