Tip: use − and + on any card to filter by it

Through the Forest Gate

Played in 18,715 decks

Through the Forest Gate
$1.26 €0.61

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 4.44 · 37.5% (600 of 1,601 decks)
  2. Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 4.28 · 40.2% (635 of 1,581 decks)
  3. Thranduil the Strategist relevance 3.96 · 37.2% (447 of 1,202 decks)
  4. Homer, the Hermit relevance 3.25 · 15.6% (734 of 4,696 decks)
  5. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.03 · 3.8% (449 of 11,785 decks)
  6. Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.85 · 9.4% (1,148 of 12,220 decks)
  7. Ashaya's Enduring Bond relevance 2.47 · 11.1% (182 of 1,642 decks)
  8. The Chief Warg relevance 2.46 · 13.5% (46 of 341 decks)
  9. Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 2.46 · 3.1% (648 of 21,225 decks)
  10. Beorn the Fierce relevance 2.46 · 13.0% (862 of 6,639 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.15 · 6.0% (320 of 5,305 decks)
  12. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.11 · 8.4% (234 of 2,772 decks)
  13. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.11 · 1.9% (210 of 10,888 decks)
  14. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.11 · 2.3% (587 of 25,449 decks)
  15. Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 2.05 · 4.4% (103 of 2,335 decks)
  16. The Necrobloom relevance 1.99 · 2.5% (286 of 11,430 decks)
  17. Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 1.86 · 2.1% (114 of 5,552 decks)
  18. Flubs, the Fool relevance 1.75 · 1.5% (178 of 11,755 decks)
  19. Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 1.75 · 1.5% (150 of 10,338 decks)
  20. Jodah, Archmage Eternal relevance 1.74 · 1.9% (96 of 4,959 decks)
  21. Tifa Lockhart relevance 1.71 · 6.7% (665 of 9,902 decks)
  22. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.69 · 1.9% (82 of 4,270 decks)
  23. Kwia Vigorbloom relevance 1.69 · 1.6% (78 of 4,739 decks)
  24. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 1.65 · 1.1% (286 of 26,575 decks)
  25. Child of Alara relevance 1.64 · 1.7% (98 of 5,872 decks)
  26. The Notary Hobbits relevance 1.57 · 8.6% (194 of 2,266 decks)
  27. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.49 · 2.2% (39 of 1,793 decks)
  28. Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 1.45 · 6.2% (307 of 4,933 decks)
  29. Ureni, the Song Unending relevance 1.43 · 2.4% (30 of 1,228 decks)
  30. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.42 · 2.3% (30 of 1,305 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Verdant Kraken 5.2% of swaps out (4 swaps)

Parallel Cards

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All parallel cards (1)
  1. Nissa's Renewal

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.05 29.5%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Dancing from Dark to Dawn
    0.97 17.2%
    $6.09 €6.01
  • Beorn's Hospitality
    0.96 15.7%
    $0.29 €0.13
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.95 25.2%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Planar Engineering
    0.91 19.1%
    $1.26 €1.05
  • Cultivate
    0.89 51.0%
    $0.41 €0.48
  • Scute Swarm
    0.89 27.3%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Harrow
    0.86 26.2%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.86 27.6%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.84 23.1%
    $0.27 €0.31
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.05 · 29.5% (5,525 of 18,715 decks)
  2. Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (3,225 of 18,715 decks)
  3. Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.96 · 15.7% (2,945 of 18,715 decks)
  4. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.95 · 25.2% (4,711 of 18,715 decks)
  5. Planar Engineering relevance 0.91 · 19.1% (3,574 of 18,715 decks)
  6. Cultivate relevance 0.89 · 51.0% (9,538 of 18,715 decks)
  7. Scute Swarm relevance 0.89 · 27.3% (5,113 of 18,715 decks)
  8. Harrow relevance 0.86 · 26.2% (4,902 of 18,715 decks)
  9. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (5,157 of 18,715 decks)
  10. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.84 · 23.1% (4,330 of 18,715 decks)
  11. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.83 · 24.2% (4,524 of 18,715 decks)
  12. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.83 · 20.3% (3,802 of 18,715 decks)
  13. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.80 · 22.2% (4,150 of 18,715 decks)
  14. Entish Restoration relevance 0.79 · 21.1% (3,944 of 18,715 decks)
  15. Explore relevance 0.78 · 23.8% (4,445 of 18,715 decks)
  16. Exploration relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (4,177 of 18,715 decks)
  17. Thranduil's Company relevance 0.76 · 12.0% (2,254 of 18,715 decks)
  18. Beast Within relevance 0.75 · 37.0% (6,929 of 18,715 decks)
  19. Elven Raft-Steerer relevance 0.72 · 11.4% (2,127 of 18,715 decks)
  20. Crop Rotation relevance 0.72 · 23.1% (4,317 of 18,715 decks)
  21. Rampant Growth relevance 0.71 · 34.3% (6,416 of 18,715 decks)
  22. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 18.5% (3,467 of 18,715 decks)
  23. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (3,191 of 18,715 decks)
  24. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.70 · 20.0% (3,752 of 18,715 decks)
  25. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.70 · 20.5% (3,843 of 18,715 decks)
  26. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (3,193 of 18,715 decks)
  27. Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.69 · 12.7% (2,380 of 18,715 decks)
  28. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.68 · 34.3% (6,410 of 18,715 decks)
  29. Mirkwood Pathmaker relevance 0.68 · 9.6% (1,805 of 18,715 decks)
  30. Nature's Lore relevance 0.67 · 34.2% (6,402 of 18,715 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.05 29.5%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.95 25.2%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Scute Swarm
    0.89 27.3%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.86 27.6%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.84 23.1%
    $0.27 €0.31
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.83 24.2%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.83 20.3%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.80 22.2%
    $22.74 €23.91
  • Thranduil's Company
    0.76 12.0%
    $0.41 €0.45
  • Elven Raft-Steerer
    0.72 11.4%
    $0.24 €0.15
All creatures (22)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.05 · 29.5% (5,525 of 18,715 decks)
  2. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.95 · 25.2% (4,711 of 18,715 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 0.89 · 27.3% (5,113 of 18,715 decks)
  4. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.86 · 27.6% (5,157 of 18,715 decks)
  5. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.84 · 23.1% (4,330 of 18,715 decks)
  6. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.83 · 24.2% (4,524 of 18,715 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.83 · 20.3% (3,802 of 18,715 decks)
  8. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.80 · 22.2% (4,150 of 18,715 decks)
  9. Thranduil's Company relevance 0.76 · 12.0% (2,254 of 18,715 decks)
  10. Elven Raft-Steerer relevance 0.72 · 11.4% (2,127 of 18,715 decks)
  11. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 18.5% (3,467 of 18,715 decks)
  12. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.70 · 20.0% (3,752 of 18,715 decks)
  13. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.70 · 20.5% (3,843 of 18,715 decks)
  14. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (3,193 of 18,715 decks)
  15. Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.69 · 12.7% (2,380 of 18,715 decks)
  16. Mirkwood Pathmaker relevance 0.68 · 9.6% (1,805 of 18,715 decks)
  17. Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.66 · 10.9% (2,042 of 18,715 decks)
  18. Wood Elves relevance 0.66 · 16.6% (3,108 of 18,715 decks)
  19. Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 0.66 · 12.6% (2,356 of 18,715 decks)
  20. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.66 · 28.5% (5,333 of 18,715 decks)
  21. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.65 · 16.8% (3,152 of 18,715 decks)
  22. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.64 · 14.8% (2,771 of 18,715 decks)

Artifacts

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.63 16.4%
    $1.12 €1.38
  • Necklace of Girion
    0.60 10.0%
    $13.23 €12.62
All artifacts (2)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.63 · 16.4% (3,065 of 18,715 decks)
  2. Necklace of Girion relevance 0.60 · 10.0% (1,870 of 18,715 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Dancing from Dark to Dawn
    0.97 17.2%
    $6.09 €6.01
  • Beorn's Hospitality
    0.96 15.7%
    $0.29 €0.13
  • Exploration
    0.78 22.3%
    $29.98 €27.12
  • Spelunking
    0.62 15.0%
    $3.43 €3.18
All enchantments (4)
  1. Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (3,225 of 18,715 decks)
  2. Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.96 · 15.7% (2,945 of 18,715 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (4,177 of 18,715 decks)
  4. Spelunking relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (2,804 of 18,715 decks)

Instants

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Harrow
    0.86 26.2%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Entish Restoration
    0.79 21.1%
    $2.62 €1.95
  • Beast Within
    0.75 37.0%
    $0.65 €0.84
  • Crop Rotation
    0.72 23.1%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.68 34.3%
    $17.60 €14.04
  • Growth Spiral
    0.61 18.4%
    $0.33 €0.47
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.58 13.5%
    $0.34 €0.30
All instants (7)
  1. Harrow relevance 0.86 · 26.2% (4,902 of 18,715 decks)
  2. Entish Restoration relevance 0.79 · 21.1% (3,944 of 18,715 decks)
  3. Beast Within relevance 0.75 · 37.0% (6,929 of 18,715 decks)
  4. Crop Rotation relevance 0.72 · 23.1% (4,317 of 18,715 decks)
  5. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.68 · 34.3% (6,410 of 18,715 decks)
  6. Growth Spiral relevance 0.61 · 18.4% (3,445 of 18,715 decks)
  7. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.58 · 13.5% (2,532 of 18,715 decks)

Sorceries

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Planar Engineering
    0.91 19.1%
    $1.26 €1.05
  • Cultivate
    0.89 51.0%
    $0.41 €0.48
  • Explore
    0.78 23.8%
    $0.19 €0.27
  • Rampant Growth
    0.71 34.3%
    $1.28 €0.51
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.70 17.1%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Nature's Lore
    0.67 34.2%
    $2.23 €2.81
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.64 27.5%
    $1.77 €1.50
  • Farseek
    0.59 31.8%
    $0.46 €0.82
  • Skyshroud Claim
    0.59 17.1%
    $1.08 €1.14
All sorceries (9)
  1. Planar Engineering relevance 0.91 · 19.1% (3,574 of 18,715 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.89 · 51.0% (9,538 of 18,715 decks)
  3. Explore relevance 0.78 · 23.8% (4,445 of 18,715 decks)
  4. Rampant Growth relevance 0.71 · 34.3% (6,416 of 18,715 decks)
  5. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (3,191 of 18,715 decks)
  6. Nature's Lore relevance 0.67 · 34.2% (6,402 of 18,715 decks)
  7. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.64 · 27.5% (5,139 of 18,715 decks)
  8. Farseek relevance 0.59 · 31.8% (5,949 of 18,715 decks)
  9. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.59 · 17.1% (3,203 of 18,715 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.57 22.5%
    $16.76 €13.00
All utility lands (1)
  1. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.57 · 22.5% (4,202 of 18,715 decks)

Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Elven Passage
    0.67 11.5%
    $0.84 €0.87
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.61 35.4%
    $0.29 €0.14
  • Fabled Passage
    0.61 28.8%
    $0.64 €0.95
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.60 29.8%
    $0.26 €0.11
  • Hobbit Hole
    0.59 10.4%
    $0.26 €0.10
All lands (5)
  1. Elven Passage relevance 0.67 · 11.5% (2,147 of 18,715 decks)
  2. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.61 · 35.4% (6,626 of 18,715 decks)
  3. Fabled Passage relevance 0.61 · 28.8% (5,394 of 18,715 decks)
  4. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.60 · 29.8% (5,568 of 18,715 decks)
  5. Hobbit Hole relevance 0.59 · 10.4% (1,951 of 18,715 decks)

EDH data for Through the Forest Gate: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 18,715 real decks.