Cards like Avenger of Zendikar
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Naya decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
8.9× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Naya decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Naya decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Harrow 50%
- Entish Restoration 42%
- Roiling Regrowth 32%
- Planar Engineering 11%
- Scapeshift 11%
- Cycle of Renewal 9%
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
13× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Naya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 53%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 42%
- Mossborn Hydra 13%
- Foe-liage 5%
- Scythecat Cub 2%
- Sazh's Chocobo 1%
Other options: Floral Evoker, Undergrowth Champion, Oran-Rief Hydra, Territorial Scythecat, Seedship Agrarian, Prowling Felidar, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
7.7× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Naya decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
4.5× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Naya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Naya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Naya decks
Cards like Sylvan Caryatid
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Sylvan Caryatid 36%
- Wall of Roots 6%
- Vine Trellis 5%
Cards like Exploration
18× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Naya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
8.5× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Naya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Sabotender
2.8× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Naya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Akoum Hellkite, Koth, the Geomancer, Cosi's Ravager
Cards like Great Forest Druid
20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Naya decks
Cards like Magmatic Insight
6.8× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Romantic Rendezvous, Tormenting Voice, Wild Guess
All top picks (50)
- Willow Geist relevance 0.97 · 46.8% (613 of 1,309 decks)
- Phytohydra relevance 0.89 · 55.5% (727 of 1,309 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.80 · 63.2% (827 of 1,309 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.74 · 70.1% (918 of 1,309 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.83 · 55.4% (725 of 1,309 decks)
- Vinelasher Kudzu relevance 0.96 · 41.7% (546 of 1,309 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.89 · 47.9% (627 of 1,309 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.98 · 34.7% (454 of 1,309 decks)
- Hardbristle Bandit relevance 0.88 · 41.6% (544 of 1,309 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.92 · 36.2% (474 of 1,309 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.88 · 40.0% (523 of 1,309 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.73 · 56.5% (739 of 1,309 decks)
- Bristlebud Farmer relevance 0.90 · 34.4% (450 of 1,309 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.88 · 36.4% (477 of 1,309 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.76 · 49.4% (647 of 1,309 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.70 · 55.8% (730 of 1,309 decks)
- Six relevance 0.71 · 54.0% (707 of 1,309 decks)
- Briar Hydra relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (332 of 1,309 decks)
- Phytotitan relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (306 of 1,309 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.88 · 30.9% (405 of 1,309 decks)
- Aloe Alchemist relevance 0.94 · 23.5% (308 of 1,309 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.69 · 52.7% (690 of 1,309 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 0.82 · 35.5% (465 of 1,309 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.77 · 41.5% (543 of 1,309 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.97 · 18.9% (248 of 1,309 decks)
- Omnivorous Flytrap relevance 0.95 · 20.2% (265 of 1,309 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.96 · 16.8% (220 of 1,309 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.74 · 41.2% (539 of 1,309 decks)
- Cactarantula relevance 0.87 · 25.3% (331 of 1,309 decks)
- Cactuar relevance 0.92 · 19.0% (249 of 1,309 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.71 · 43.6% (571 of 1,309 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.95 · 14.4% (189 of 1,309 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.58 · 61.9% (810 of 1,309 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.50 · 75.1% (983 of 1,309 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.85 · 22.3% (292 of 1,309 decks)
- Prickly Pair relevance 0.91 · 15.9% (208 of 1,309 decks)
- Utopia Tree relevance 0.91 · 15.4% (202 of 1,309 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.86 · 20.5% (268 of 1,309 decks)
- Raucous Entertainer relevance 0.90 · 16.0% (209 of 1,309 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (193 of 1,309 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.56 · 60.0% (786 of 1,309 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.80 · 23.6% (309 of 1,309 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 0.90 · 13.1% (171 of 1,309 decks)
- Slumbering Trudge relevance 0.91 · 11.4% (149 of 1,309 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 0.70 · 32.4% (424 of 1,309 decks)
- Creeperhulk relevance 0.93 · 10.0% (131 of 1,309 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.78 · 19.4% (254 of 1,309 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.84 · 13.7% (179 of 1,309 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.92 · 9.7% (127 of 1,309 decks)
- Rootgrapple relevance 0.94 · 8.8% (115 of 1,309 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Willow Geist relevance 0.97 · 46.8% (613 of 1,309 decks)
- Phytohydra relevance 0.89 · 55.5% (727 of 1,309 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.80 · 63.2% (827 of 1,309 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.74 · 70.1% (918 of 1,309 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.83 · 55.4% (725 of 1,309 decks)
- Vinelasher Kudzu relevance 0.96 · 41.7% (546 of 1,309 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.89 · 47.9% (627 of 1,309 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 0.98 · 34.7% (454 of 1,309 decks)
- Hardbristle Bandit relevance 0.88 · 41.6% (544 of 1,309 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.92 · 36.2% (474 of 1,309 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.73 · 56.5% (739 of 1,309 decks)
- Bristlebud Farmer relevance 0.90 · 34.4% (450 of 1,309 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.88 · 36.4% (477 of 1,309 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.76 · 49.4% (647 of 1,309 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.70 · 55.8% (730 of 1,309 decks)
- Six relevance 0.71 · 54.0% (707 of 1,309 decks)
- Briar Hydra relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (332 of 1,309 decks)
- Phytotitan relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (306 of 1,309 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.88 · 30.9% (405 of 1,309 decks)
- Aloe Alchemist relevance 0.94 · 23.5% (308 of 1,309 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.69 · 52.7% (690 of 1,309 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 0.82 · 35.5% (465 of 1,309 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.97 · 18.9% (248 of 1,309 decks)
- Omnivorous Flytrap relevance 0.95 · 20.2% (265 of 1,309 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 0.96 · 16.8% (220 of 1,309 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.74 · 41.2% (539 of 1,309 decks)
- Cactarantula relevance 0.87 · 25.3% (331 of 1,309 decks)
- Cactuar relevance 0.92 · 19.0% (249 of 1,309 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.95 · 14.4% (189 of 1,309 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.58 · 61.9% (810 of 1,309 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.50 · 75.1% (983 of 1,309 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.85 · 22.3% (292 of 1,309 decks)
- Prickly Pair relevance 0.91 · 15.9% (208 of 1,309 decks)
- Utopia Tree relevance 0.91 · 15.4% (202 of 1,309 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.86 · 20.5% (268 of 1,309 decks)
- Raucous Entertainer relevance 0.90 · 16.0% (209 of 1,309 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (193 of 1,309 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.56 · 60.0% (786 of 1,309 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 0.90 · 13.1% (171 of 1,309 decks)
- Slumbering Trudge relevance 0.91 · 11.4% (149 of 1,309 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 0.70 · 32.4% (424 of 1,309 decks)
- Creeperhulk relevance 0.93 · 10.0% (131 of 1,309 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.78 · 19.4% (254 of 1,309 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.84 · 13.7% (179 of 1,309 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 0.92 · 9.7% (127 of 1,309 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.58 · 44.6% (584 of 1,309 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 0.92 · 8.0% (105 of 1,309 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.78 · 15.7% (205 of 1,309 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 0.89 · 9.2% (121 of 1,309 decks)
- Blooming Stinger relevance 0.87 · 10.5% (138 of 1,309 decks)
All artifacts (22)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.57 · 29.3% (384 of 1,309 decks)
- Ark of Hunger relevance 0.64 · 6.0% (78 of 1,309 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.62 · 7.6% (99 of 1,309 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (168 of 1,309 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.58 · 7.0% (91 of 1,309 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.39 · 25.6% (335 of 1,309 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (105 of 1,309 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (71 of 1,309 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.32 · 15.4% (202 of 1,309 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (110 of 1,309 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.33 · 11.5% (151 of 1,309 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (68 of 1,309 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.29 · 15.2% (199 of 1,309 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (48 of 1,309 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (148 of 1,309 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (46 of 1,309 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 17.6% (230 of 1,309 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (58 of 1,309 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (113 of 1,309 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (34 of 1,309 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 54.3% (711 of 1,309 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 65.0% (851 of 1,309 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.77 · 41.5% (543 of 1,309 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.80 · 23.6% (309 of 1,309 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.59 · 21.9% (287 of 1,309 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (164 of 1,309 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.62 · 7.6% (100 of 1,309 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.47 · 24.3% (318 of 1,309 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.56 · 10.3% (135 of 1,309 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.57 · 6.1% (80 of 1,309 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.56 · 6.2% (81 of 1,309 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.55 · 6.8% (89 of 1,309 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (119 of 1,309 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (134 of 1,309 decks)
- Dredger's Insight relevance 0.70 · 3.1% (41 of 1,309 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 0.51 · 5.7% (74 of 1,309 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.46 · 8.1% (106 of 1,309 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (149 of 1,309 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (40 of 1,309 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.42 · 9.9% (130 of 1,309 decks)
- Buried in the Garden relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (55 of 1,309 decks)
- Primary Research relevance 0.68 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.30 · 31.7% (415 of 1,309 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 0.43 · 5.6% (73 of 1,309 decks)
- Reach for the Sky relevance 0.64 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
- Tectonic Reformation relevance 0.54 · 3.0% (39 of 1,309 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (65 of 1,309 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.52 · 3.1% (40 of 1,309 decks)
- Annie Joins Up relevance 0.25 · 29.4% (385 of 1,309 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.23 · 33.5% (438 of 1,309 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (103 of 1,309 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (34 of 1,309 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (71 of 1,309 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (40 of 1,309 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (45 of 1,309 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.20 · 24.6% (322 of 1,309 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (100 of 1,309 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (56 of 1,309 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (58 of 1,309 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (54 of 1,309 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (40 of 1,309 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (35 of 1,309 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
All instants (46)
- Rootgrapple relevance 0.94 · 8.8% (115 of 1,309 decks)
- Reach of Branches relevance 0.92 · 7.6% (100 of 1,309 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.59 · 31.9% (418 of 1,309 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.49 · 42.0% (550 of 1,309 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.44 · 50.1% (656 of 1,309 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.62 · 11.3% (148 of 1,309 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.59 · 10.5% (138 of 1,309 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (150 of 1,309 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.38 · 30.1% (394 of 1,309 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.51 · 8.2% (107 of 1,309 decks)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (98 of 1,309 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.51 · 6.3% (82 of 1,309 decks)
- Crib Swap relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (118 of 1,309 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (106 of 1,309 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (188 of 1,309 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.61 · 3.1% (41 of 1,309 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (87 of 1,309 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (75 of 1,309 decks)
- Electric Revelation relevance 0.52 · 3.5% (46 of 1,309 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (113 of 1,309 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.28 · 24.2% (317 of 1,309 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (51 of 1,309 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (74 of 1,309 decks)
- Valorous Stance relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (56 of 1,309 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (42 of 1,309 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (50 of 1,309 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (51 of 1,309 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.21 · 28.1% (368 of 1,309 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (48 of 1,309 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 0.21 · 18.3% (239 of 1,309 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (108 of 1,309 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.22 · 12.7% (166 of 1,309 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.21 · 13.8% (181 of 1,309 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (34 of 1,309 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (39 of 1,309 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (96 of 1,309 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (68 of 1,309 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.15 · 29.1% (381 of 1,309 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (55 of 1,309 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (71 of 1,309 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (66 of 1,309 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (47 of 1,309 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.11 · 50.3% (658 of 1,309 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.10 · 48.9% (640 of 1,309 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (39 of 1,309 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.71 · 43.6% (571 of 1,309 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 0.67 · 25.7% (337 of 1,309 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.78 · 11.4% (149 of 1,309 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 0.61 · 21.5% (281 of 1,309 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.58 · 22.6% (296 of 1,309 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.62 · 15.5% (203 of 1,309 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 0.62 · 12.9% (169 of 1,309 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.53 · 25.0% (327 of 1,309 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (153 of 1,309 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.58 · 11.5% (150 of 1,309 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.68 · 4.9% (64 of 1,309 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.43 · 32.5% (426 of 1,309 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (191 of 1,309 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.59 · 7.6% (100 of 1,309 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.52 · 11.4% (149 of 1,309 decks)
- Highway Robbery relevance 0.59 · 6.3% (82 of 1,309 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (174 of 1,309 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (139 of 1,309 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.38 · 23.7% (310 of 1,309 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 0.50 · 6.7% (88 of 1,309 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.46 · 7.3% (96 of 1,309 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (61 of 1,309 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (98 of 1,309 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (99 of 1,309 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (91 of 1,309 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (68 of 1,309 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.50 · 3.0% (39 of 1,309 decks)
- Embrace the Unknown relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (43 of 1,309 decks)
- Audience with Trostani relevance 0.48 · 2.8% (36 of 1,309 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (49 of 1,309 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (84 of 1,309 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (35 of 1,309 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (98 of 1,309 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (38 of 1,309 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (84 of 1,309 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.23 · 21.8% (285 of 1,309 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.21 · 22.7% (297 of 1,309 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (72 of 1,309 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (42 of 1,309 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (35 of 1,309 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (35 of 1,309 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (111 of 1,309 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (57 of 1,309 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (50 of 1,309 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (46 of 1,309 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 30.0% (393 of 1,309 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.18 · 14.8% (194 of 1,309 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (60 of 1,309 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 42.2% (553 of 1,309 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 24.4% (319 of 1,309 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.88 · 40.0% (523 of 1,309 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (244 of 1,309 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.67 · 7.7% (101 of 1,309 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (62 of 1,309 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.74 · 36.4% (477 of 1,309 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.57 · 42.9% (562 of 1,309 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.69 · 12.1% (158 of 1,309 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.52 · 30.3% (397 of 1,309 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.69 · 9.4% (123 of 1,309 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.52 · 27.8% (364 of 1,309 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 0.52 · 27.7% (362 of 1,309 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.66 · 8.3% (108 of 1,309 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.50 · 23.1% (303 of 1,309 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.51 · 16.0% (209 of 1,309 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.49 · 18.9% (248 of 1,309 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.49 · 17.6% (231 of 1,309 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 0.49 · 18.5% (242 of 1,309 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.41 · 24.4% (319 of 1,309 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.40 · 24.3% (318 of 1,309 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.46 · 12.8% (167 of 1,309 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (110 of 1,309 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (93 of 1,309 decks)
- Desert relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (91 of 1,309 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (93 of 1,309 decks)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 0.34 · 25.2% (330 of 1,309 decks)
- Glittering Massif relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (63 of 1,309 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.33 · 21.9% (287 of 1,309 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (110 of 1,309 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.35 · 13.2% (173 of 1,309 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.34 · 13.6% (178 of 1,309 decks)
- Elegant Parlor relevance 0.36 · 10.0% (131 of 1,309 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.34 · 11.5% (151 of 1,309 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (39 of 1,309 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (177 of 1,309 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.26 · 22.8% (298 of 1,309 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (44 of 1,309 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (36 of 1,309 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (79 of 1,309 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (57 of 1,309 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (49 of 1,309 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 16.4% (215 of 1,309 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (46 of 1,309 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.46 · 2.7% (35 of 1,309 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (40 of 1,309 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (43 of 1,309 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.25 · 13.7% (179 of 1,309 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (56 of 1,309 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (51 of 1,309 decks)
- Kazuul's Fury // Kazuul's Cliffs relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (39 of 1,309 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (35 of 1,309 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.39 · 2.8% (36 of 1,309 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.17 · 38.3% (502 of 1,309 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (40 of 1,309 decks)
All lands (50)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.50 · 33.4% (437 of 1,309 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.50 · 32.7% (428 of 1,309 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 0.48 · 26.8% (351 of 1,309 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.51 · 20.2% (264 of 1,309 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.49 · 20.9% (273 of 1,309 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.41 · 22.7% (297 of 1,309 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (98 of 1,309 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.27 · 37.3% (488 of 1,309 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.53 · 3.5% (46 of 1,309 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.42 · 5.2% (68 of 1,309 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.29 · 26.3% (344 of 1,309 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.35 · 9.9% (129 of 1,309 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.50 · 3.2% (42 of 1,309 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 45.8% (600 of 1,309 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.35 · 5.4% (71 of 1,309 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (59 of 1,309 decks)
- Radiant Summit relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (68 of 1,309 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (105 of 1,309 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (102 of 1,309 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.39 · 3.5% (46 of 1,309 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (64 of 1,309 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (75 of 1,309 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (79 of 1,309 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (68 of 1,309 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (96 of 1,309 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (96 of 1,309 decks)
- Plateau relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (86 of 1,309 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.20 · 20.1% (263 of 1,309 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.19 · 24.3% (318 of 1,309 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.18 · 25.7% (337 of 1,309 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (50 of 1,309 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
- Inspiring Vantage relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (37 of 1,309 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (37 of 1,309 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (40 of 1,309 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (143 of 1,309 decks)
- Jungle Shrine relevance 0.12 · 43.9% (575 of 1,309 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.13 · 31.9% (417 of 1,309 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.13 · 29.9% (392 of 1,309 decks)
- Sunscorched Divide relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (50 of 1,309 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (36 of 1,309 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (84 of 1,309 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (45 of 1,309 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (116 of 1,309 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.12 · 33.5% (438 of 1,309 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (71 of 1,309 decks)
- Sundown Pass relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (56 of 1,309 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (32 of 1,309 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (62 of 1,309 decks)
- Sacred Foundry relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (262 of 1,309 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kirri, Talented Sprout, from 1,309 real Commander decks.