Hour of Promise
Played in 23,062 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
23.1K decks
3022+13+1+3+2+3+15+13+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 5.20 · 65.5% (4,587 of 7,006 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 5.08 · 65.8% (2,830 of 4,299 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.73 · 58.2% (2,139 of 3,673 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 4.06 · 21.0% (586 of 2,790 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 3.75 · 23.8% (177 of 744 decks)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.14 · 9.5% (1,124 of 11,862 decks)
- Child of Alara relevance 3.04 · 10.8% (638 of 5,910 decks)
- Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 3.03 · 10.9% (611 of 5,580 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 2.75 · 22.4% (44 of 196 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 2.63 · 3.8% (439 of 11,499 decks)
- Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.61 · 8.3% (134 of 1,622 decks)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 2.58 · 4.4% (207 of 4,754 decks)
- Iname as One relevance 2.51 · 14.8% (27 of 183 decks)
- Beledros Witherbloom relevance 2.33 · 3.9% (95 of 2,445 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 2.31 · 7.5% (160 of 2,134 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.21 · 7.9% (62 of 780 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 2.05 · 16.9% (30 of 178 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.94 · 6.8% (48 of 703 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 1.91 · 8.2% (34 of 414 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.91 · 3.5% (127 of 3,605 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 1.83 · 4.3% (45 of 1,058 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.74 · 4.4% (57 of 1,299 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.69 · 1.7% (93 of 5,432 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor relevance 1.68 · 5.6% (9 of 160 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.65 · 1.9% (78 of 4,146 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.59 · 2.6% (108 of 4,106 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.56 · 2.3% (45 of 1,979 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.48 · 2.2% (301 of 13,733 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Flaming Fist relevance 1.46 · 14.8% (4 of 27 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 1.42 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
All most relevant (22)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.93 · 42.4% (9,770 of 23,062 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.71 · 26.2% (6,037 of 23,062 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.56 · 40.4% (9,325 of 23,062 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.50 · 42.9% (9,902 of 23,062 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.41 · 22.6% (5,222 of 23,062 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.41 · 23.1% (5,332 of 23,062 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.41 · 37.4% (8,628 of 23,062 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.38 · 44.3% (10,224 of 23,062 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.37 · 40.1% (9,244 of 23,062 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.34 · 41.0% (9,456 of 23,062 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.32 · 23.4% (5,391 of 23,062 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.29 · 35.0% (8,077 of 23,062 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.26 · 23.4% (5,400 of 23,062 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.26 · 30.6% (7,052 of 23,062 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.19 · 33.5% (7,722 of 23,062 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.18 · 30.8% (7,113 of 23,062 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.09 · 26.7% (6,162 of 23,062 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.08 · 18.3% (4,217 of 23,062 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.06 · 17.1% (3,941 of 23,062 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.04 · 24.2% (5,583 of 23,062 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 1.04 · 31.2% (7,204 of 23,062 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.99 · 22.6% (5,217 of 23,062 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.56 · 40.4% (9,325 of 23,062 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.50 · 42.9% (9,902 of 23,062 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.41 · 22.6% (5,222 of 23,062 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.41 · 23.1% (5,332 of 23,062 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.41 · 37.4% (8,628 of 23,062 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.37 · 40.1% (9,244 of 23,062 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.34 · 41.0% (9,456 of 23,062 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.26 · 23.4% (5,400 of 23,062 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.19 · 33.5% (7,722 of 23,062 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.18 · 30.8% (7,113 of 23,062 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.09 · 26.7% (6,162 of 23,062 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.08 · 18.3% (4,217 of 23,062 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.99 · 22.6% (5,217 of 23,062 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.29 · 35.0% (8,077 of 23,062 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.71 · 26.2% (6,037 of 23,062 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.26 · 30.6% (7,052 of 23,062 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.06 · 17.1% (3,941 of 23,062 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.38 · 44.3% (10,224 of 23,062 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 1.04 · 31.2% (7,204 of 23,062 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.93 · 42.4% (9,770 of 23,062 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.32 · 23.4% (5,391 of 23,062 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.04 · 24.2% (5,583 of 23,062 decks)
All utility lands (15)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.94 · 33.5% (7,722 of 23,062 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.83 · 32.3% (7,459 of 23,062 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.60 · 29.6% (6,834 of 23,062 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.51 · 38.7% (8,919 of 23,062 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.39 · 22.6% (5,204 of 23,062 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 1.39 · 25.5% (5,888 of 23,062 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.33 · 22.1% (5,093 of 23,062 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.26 · 22.1% (5,108 of 23,062 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.25 · 26.4% (6,094 of 23,062 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.23 · 22.3% (5,151 of 23,062 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.23 · 22.2% (5,129 of 23,062 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.20 · 20.9% (4,809 of 23,062 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.11 · 29.3% (6,759 of 23,062 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.06 · 21.7% (5,001 of 23,062 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.05 · 27.7% (6,379 of 23,062 decks)
All lands (13)
- Vesuva relevance 1.53 · 36.4% (8,385 of 23,062 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.50 · 29.0% (6,678 of 23,062 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 1.38 · 28.5% (6,580 of 23,062 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 1.35 · 25.2% (5,820 of 23,062 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.28 · 22.0% (5,083 of 23,062 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.27 · 22.2% (5,126 of 23,062 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.25 · 26.6% (6,140 of 23,062 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 1.25 · 20.6% (4,745 of 23,062 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.17 · 21.3% (4,910 of 23,062 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.16 · 18.1% (4,166 of 23,062 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.15 · 19.6% (4,531 of 23,062 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 1.07 · 19.9% (4,592 of 23,062 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 1.07 · 17.2% (3,972 of 23,062 decks)
EDH data for Hour of Promise: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 23,062 real decks.


















































































