Cards like Sabotender
6.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Sabotender 34%
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign 34%
- Spitfire Lagac 13%
- Tunneling Geopede 8%
- Akoum Hellkite 2%
- Koth, the Geomancer 1%
Other options: Cosi's Ravager
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
6.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Sazh's Chocobo
8.7× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Sazh's Chocobo 45%
- Mossborn Hydra 20%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 10%
- Territorial Scythecat 4%
- Scythecat Cub 3%
- Seedship Agrarian 3%
- Undergrowth Champion 2%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 1%
Other options: Floral Evoker, Vinelasher Kudzu, Foe-liage, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
4.7× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Gruul decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Zell Dincht
19× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
2.9× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Gruul decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Harrow 28%
- Entish Restoration 21%
- Roiling Regrowth 14%
- Scapeshift 14%
- Cycle of Renewal 11%
- Planar Engineering 6%
Cards like Arcane Signet
4.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 60% of other Gruul decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.64 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 45%
- Commander's Sphere 19%
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other Gruul decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 44% of other Gruul decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 47%
- Cultivate 37%
- Kodama's Reach 25%
- They Went This Way 18%
- Reach the Horizon 15%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Migration Path 5%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
- Path to the Festival 1%
Other options: Primal Growth, Peregrination, Far Wanderings, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, New Generation's Technique, Beneath the Sands, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds
Cards like Tifa Lockhart
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
6.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Springheart Nantuko
4.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Springheart Nantuko 25%
- Scute Swarm 22%
Cards like Exploration
3.5× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Gruul decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Avenger of Zendikar
3.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Demand Answers
3.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Dangerous Wager
Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
4.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Ulvenwald Hydra
17× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
2.8× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Gruul decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Gruul decks
All top picks (50)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 45.5% (225 of 495 decks)
- Smashing Spree relevance 0.81 · 16.4% (81 of 495 decks)
- Call the Mountain Chocobo relevance 0.72 · 17.8% (88 of 495 decks)
- Gysahl Greens relevance 0.75 · 13.7% (68 of 495 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.76 · 12.9% (64 of 495 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.69 · 18.0% (89 of 495 decks)
- Fanged Flames relevance 0.75 · 11.9% (59 of 495 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.72 · 12.9% (64 of 495 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.58 · 29.9% (148 of 495 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.53 · 38.6% (191 of 495 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.59 · 28.5% (141 of 495 decks)
- Overwhelming Instinct relevance 0.68 · 13.9% (69 of 495 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (71 of 495 decks)
- Seifer Almasy relevance 0.67 · 14.1% (70 of 495 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.57 · 28.7% (142 of 495 decks)
- Sidequest: Raise a Chocobo // Black Chocobo relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (55 of 495 decks)
- Summon: Fat Chocobo relevance 0.64 · 15.6% (77 of 495 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.60 · 19.4% (96 of 495 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.60 · 18.8% (93 of 495 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (59 of 495 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.63 · 14.3% (71 of 495 decks)
- Choco-Comet relevance 0.67 · 11.5% (57 of 495 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (79 of 495 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.59 · 15.4% (76 of 495 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (72 of 495 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (80 of 495 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (76 of 495 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.55 · 19.0% (94 of 495 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (60 of 495 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (48 of 495 decks)
- Ghostfire Slice relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (63 of 495 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.58 · 13.1% (65 of 495 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.49 · 27.7% (137 of 495 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (73 of 495 decks)
- Bartz and Boko relevance 0.69 · 5.3% (26 of 495 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.54 · 17.4% (86 of 495 decks)
- Gigantoad relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (31 of 495 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (86 of 495 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (98 of 495 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.54 · 15.6% (77 of 495 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.50 · 22.8% (113 of 495 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.48 · 25.9% (128 of 495 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.60 · 10.3% (51 of 495 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.51 · 19.2% (95 of 495 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.42 · 36.0% (178 of 495 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.49 · 19.0% (94 of 495 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.49 · 17.8% (88 of 495 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.55 · 11.7% (58 of 495 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.57 · 9.9% (49 of 495 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.41 · 34.1% (169 of 495 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 45.5% (225 of 495 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.53 · 38.6% (191 of 495 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (71 of 495 decks)
- Seifer Almasy relevance 0.67 · 14.1% (70 of 495 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.57 · 28.7% (142 of 495 decks)
- Sidequest: Raise a Chocobo // Black Chocobo relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (55 of 495 decks)
- Summon: Fat Chocobo relevance 0.64 · 15.6% (77 of 495 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.63 · 14.3% (71 of 495 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (79 of 495 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (72 of 495 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.55 · 19.0% (94 of 495 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (60 of 495 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (48 of 495 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.58 · 13.1% (65 of 495 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.49 · 27.7% (137 of 495 decks)
- Bartz and Boko relevance 0.69 · 5.3% (26 of 495 decks)
- Gigantoad relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (31 of 495 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (98 of 495 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.48 · 25.9% (128 of 495 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.60 · 10.3% (51 of 495 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.51 · 19.2% (95 of 495 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.42 · 36.0% (178 of 495 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.49 · 19.0% (94 of 495 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.41 · 34.1% (169 of 495 decks)
- Six relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (94 of 495 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.55 · 10.1% (50 of 495 decks)
- Bloomvine Regent // Claim Territory relevance 0.48 · 16.4% (81 of 495 decks)
- Summon: Fenrir relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (85 of 495 decks)
- Heroes' Bane relevance 0.55 · 9.1% (45 of 495 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.47 · 17.4% (86 of 495 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.40 · 33.5% (166 of 495 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.39 · 35.4% (175 of 495 decks)
- Skoa, Embermage relevance 0.66 · 4.2% (21 of 495 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.42 · 23.4% (116 of 495 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.51 · 10.3% (51 of 495 decks)
- Spider-Man, Web-Spinner relevance 0.63 · 4.2% (21 of 495 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.41 · 25.3% (125 of 495 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.39 · 26.3% (130 of 495 decks)
- Dragonhawk, Fate's Tempest relevance 0.43 · 17.0% (84 of 495 decks)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 0.53 · 6.7% (33 of 495 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.42 · 20.2% (100 of 495 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.39 · 24.8% (123 of 495 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.58 · 4.2% (21 of 495 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (53 of 495 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.37 · 25.1% (124 of 495 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (30 of 495 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.39 · 20.4% (101 of 495 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.39 · 21.2% (105 of 495 decks)
- Writhing Chrysalis relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (30 of 495 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.35 · 29.9% (148 of 495 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.76 · 12.9% (64 of 495 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.72 · 12.9% (64 of 495 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.59 · 28.5% (141 of 495 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (59 of 495 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.59 · 15.4% (76 of 495 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.54 · 15.6% (77 of 495 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.49 · 17.8% (88 of 495 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.57 · 9.9% (49 of 495 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.48 · 12.7% (63 of 495 decks)
- Phyrexian Ironworks relevance 0.63 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Skyclave Pick-Axe relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (27 of 495 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.38 · 18.4% (91 of 495 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.40 · 14.7% (73 of 495 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.36 · 19.2% (95 of 495 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.42 · 8.7% (43 of 495 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.40 · 10.1% (50 of 495 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.34 · 18.0% (89 of 495 decks)
- Sidequest: Play Blitzball // World Champion, Celestial Weapon relevance 0.47 · 4.4% (22 of 495 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.53 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (22 of 495 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.46 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.40 · 5.7% (28 of 495 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.30 · 14.7% (73 of 495 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (36 of 495 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (40 of 495 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.30 · 14.5% (72 of 495 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (39 of 495 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (32 of 495 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.29 · 11.5% (57 of 495 decks)
- The Fire Crystal relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (47 of 495 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.48 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.25 · 19.6% (97 of 495 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Summoner's Grimoire relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (26 of 495 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (16 of 495 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 21.6% (107 of 495 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (42 of 495 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (32 of 495 decks)
- Cursed Mirror relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 44.8% (222 of 495 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.58 · 29.9% (148 of 495 decks)
- Overwhelming Instinct relevance 0.68 · 13.9% (69 of 495 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.43 · 12.5% (62 of 495 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.38 · 19.8% (98 of 495 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.39 · 16.4% (81 of 495 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.35 · 17.2% (85 of 495 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (36 of 495 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (32 of 495 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (32 of 495 decks)
- Retreat to Valakut relevance 0.48 · 3.8% (19 of 495 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (35 of 495 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.30 · 16.6% (82 of 495 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.32 · 12.7% (63 of 495 decks)
- Arachnus Web relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (40 of 495 decks)
- Fervor relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (37 of 495 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Furor of the Bitten relevance 0.48 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Nissa's Zendikon relevance 0.48 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.33 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (28 of 495 decks)
- Bitter Work relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (33 of 495 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- A Realm Reborn relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Bonds of Mortality relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (19 of 495 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (16 of 495 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (35 of 495 decks)
- The Sound of Drums relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Bard Class relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (35 of 495 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (25 of 495 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Rising of the Day relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (17 of 495 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Fiery Emancipation relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (16 of 495 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 19.0% (94 of 495 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.11 · 11.3% (56 of 495 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
All instants (50)
- Smashing Spree relevance 0.81 · 16.4% (81 of 495 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (80 of 495 decks)
- Ghostfire Slice relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (63 of 495 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.54 · 17.4% (86 of 495 decks)
- Siege Smash relevance 0.53 · 17.4% (86 of 495 decks)
- Lightning Strike relevance 0.50 · 11.9% (59 of 495 decks)
- Blitzball Shot relevance 0.56 · 7.1% (35 of 495 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.54 · 8.5% (42 of 495 decks)
- Thunder Magic relevance 0.55 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
- Galuf's Final Act relevance 0.54 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (37 of 495 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (52 of 495 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.38 · 17.6% (87 of 495 decks)
- Self-Destruct relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (34 of 495 decks)
- Haste Magic relevance 0.47 · 5.1% (25 of 495 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (71 of 495 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.30 · 27.9% (138 of 495 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.29 · 27.9% (138 of 495 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (45 of 495 decks)
- Light of Judgment relevance 0.55 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.30 · 21.0% (104 of 495 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.31 · 13.7% (68 of 495 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (55 of 495 decks)
- Fertilid's Favor relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (16 of 495 decks)
- Searing Blood relevance 0.53 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Pause for Reflection relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (17 of 495 decks)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Cast into the Fire relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Cut Propulsion relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.43 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (28 of 495 decks)
- Fire Magic relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
- Natural State relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (46 of 495 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (31 of 495 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (51 of 495 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (33 of 495 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (26 of 495 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Call the Mountain Chocobo relevance 0.72 · 17.8% (88 of 495 decks)
- Gysahl Greens relevance 0.75 · 13.7% (68 of 495 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.69 · 18.0% (89 of 495 decks)
- Fanged Flames relevance 0.75 · 11.9% (59 of 495 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.60 · 19.4% (96 of 495 decks)
- Choco-Comet relevance 0.67 · 11.5% (57 of 495 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (76 of 495 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (73 of 495 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.50 · 22.8% (113 of 495 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.55 · 11.7% (58 of 495 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.48 · 14.7% (73 of 495 decks)
- Suplex relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (38 of 495 decks)
- Rydia's Return relevance 0.53 · 5.5% (27 of 495 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.40 · 13.9% (69 of 495 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (34 of 495 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (36 of 495 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.44 · 5.9% (29 of 495 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.44 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
- Sparkmage's Gambit relevance 0.58 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.35 · 11.3% (56 of 495 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 0.46 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (71 of 495 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.35 · 9.7% (48 of 495 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.36 · 8.3% (41 of 495 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (30 of 495 decks)
- Undercity Upheaval relevance 0.53 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (28 of 495 decks)
- Nibelheim Aflame relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (22 of 495 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (31 of 495 decks)
- Sorceress's Schemes relevance 0.49 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Electro's Bolt relevance 0.48 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.32 · 5.7% (28 of 495 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Ruinous Rampage relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.41 · 3.2% (16 of 495 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 22.4% (111 of 495 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.22 · 25.1% (124 of 495 decks)
- Survivors' Bond relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (22 of 495 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.24 · 13.1% (65 of 495 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (38 of 495 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (27 of 495 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (25 of 495 decks)
- Random Encounter relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (31 of 495 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (17 of 495 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.60 · 18.8% (93 of 495 decks)
- Koth, Fire of Resistance relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (16 of 495 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.51 · 23.8% (118 of 495 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.57 · 10.3% (51 of 495 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.53 · 7.3% (36 of 495 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (40 of 495 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.53 · 5.5% (27 of 495 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.42 · 13.7% (68 of 495 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.42 · 13.7% (68 of 495 decks)
- Chocobo Camp relevance 0.57 · 3.8% (19 of 495 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (95 of 495 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (57 of 495 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.50 · 4.2% (21 of 495 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.35 · 14.9% (74 of 495 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.37 · 10.7% (53 of 495 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.41 · 5.1% (25 of 495 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.36 · 9.5% (47 of 495 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (31 of 495 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (42 of 495 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (25 of 495 decks)
- Adventurers' Guildhouse relevance 0.51 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.29 · 13.1% (65 of 495 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.26 · 20.6% (102 of 495 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (33 of 495 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (31 of 495 decks)
- Akoum Warrior // Akoum Teeth relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.21 · 22.4% (111 of 495 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.39 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (25 of 495 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.20 · 23.2% (115 of 495 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (49 of 495 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Dwarven Mine relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (96 of 495 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.23 · 10.5% (52 of 495 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 24.0% (119 of 495 decks)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (38 of 495 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (13 of 495 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (71 of 495 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (17 of 495 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (22 of 495 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
All lands (50)
- Rupture Spire relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (56 of 495 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (60 of 495 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.48 · 21.0% (104 of 495 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.52 · 12.3% (61 of 495 decks)
- Gongaga, Reactor Town relevance 0.45 · 12.1% (60 of 495 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (42 of 495 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.39 · 17.8% (88 of 495 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.39 · 18.6% (92 of 495 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.33 · 23.6% (117 of 495 decks)
- Training Compound relevance 0.36 · 12.9% (64 of 495 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (45 of 495 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.40 · 4.8% (24 of 495 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (62 of 495 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (16 of 495 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.38 · 4.6% (23 of 495 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.24 · 33.5% (166 of 495 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.33 · 10.1% (50 of 495 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.32 · 9.9% (49 of 495 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (28 of 495 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 26.9% (133 of 495 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (26 of 495 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 38.8% (192 of 495 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.26 · 16.6% (82 of 495 decks)
- Cliffgate relevance 0.41 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (77 of 495 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (56 of 495 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (27 of 495 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (14 of 495 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (37 of 495 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (22 of 495 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (18 of 495 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (17 of 495 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.25 · 10.1% (50 of 495 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (50 of 495 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (20 of 495 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.24 · 9.3% (46 of 495 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.23 · 10.5% (52 of 495 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (40 of 495 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.29 · 4.2% (21 of 495 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (12 of 495 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (42 of 495 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (15 of 495 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Gladiolus Amicitia, from 495 real Commander decks.