Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar
Played in 40,824 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Marina Vendrell relevance 6.08 · 52.7% (3,237 of 6,139 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.81 · 17.8% (977 of 5,491 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.67 · 10.7% (395 of 3,702 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 3.46 · 17.2% (1,227 of 7,142 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.34 · 16.5% (894 of 5,413 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 3.23 · 21.1% (2,445 of 11,595 decks)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.19 · 9.7% (1,161 of 11,934 decks)
- Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.12 · 14.4% (415 of 2,877 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 3.10 · 25.4% (6,553 of 25,807 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 3.07 · 21.6% (787 of 3,637 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.80 · 19.0% (1,151 of 6,056 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.69 · 23.0% (301 of 1,306 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 2.68 · 19.5% (170 of 871 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.60 · 5.1% (221 of 4,337 decks)
- Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 2.44 · 10.1% (214 of 2,113 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.26 · 8.7% (361 of 4,150 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 2.22 · 9.5% (2,619 of 27,474 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.19 · 9.0% (822 of 9,098 decks)
- Six relevance 2.14 · 13.9% (261 of 1,883 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.08 · 7.5% (328 of 4,377 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.07 · 6.4% (602 of 9,346 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 1.98 · 7.9% (797 of 10,066 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.96 · 4.2% (77 of 1,821 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.95 · 6.9% (331 of 4,774 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.90 · 11.2% (99 of 885 decks)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 1.89 · 10.9% (527 of 4,846 decks)
- Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 1.84 · 8.5% (71 of 832 decks)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 1.83 · 3.9% (461 of 11,974 decks)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 1.78 · 14.8% (710 of 4,801 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.77 · 10.4% (44 of 423 decks)
All parallel cards (2)
All most relevant (30)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 2.02 · 56.3% (22,967 of 40,824 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.86 · 48.4% (19,760 of 40,824 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.71 · 48.2% (19,690 of 40,824 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.70 · 49.2% (20,094 of 40,824 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.7% (17,829 of 40,824 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.63 · 40.8% (16,649 of 40,824 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.62 · 41.9% (17,094 of 40,824 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.53 · 36.6% (14,932 of 40,824 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.51 · 43.5% (17,739 of 40,824 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.50 · 39.8% (16,246 of 40,824 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.50 · 36.6% (14,937 of 40,824 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.47 · 35.6% (14,549 of 40,824 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.46 · 41.7% (17,016 of 40,824 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.43 · 43.8% (17,889 of 40,824 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.42 · 34.3% (14,003 of 40,824 decks)
- Six relevance 1.42 · 36.2% (14,772 of 40,824 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.41 · 45.0% (18,372 of 40,824 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.38 · 34.5% (14,066 of 40,824 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.35 · 34.3% (13,995 of 40,824 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.34 · 42.9% (17,526 of 40,824 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.28 · 29.1% (11,877 of 40,824 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.28 · 28.2% (11,524 of 40,824 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.27 · 28.8% (11,777 of 40,824 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.25 · 28.4% (11,604 of 40,824 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.24 · 37.5% (15,322 of 40,824 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.19 · 28.7% (11,731 of 40,824 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.04 · 26.3% (10,737 of 40,824 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.01 · 22.6% (9,227 of 40,824 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.99 · 20.2% (8,232 of 40,824 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (9,194 of 40,824 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 2.02 · 56.3% (22,967 of 40,824 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.86 · 48.4% (19,760 of 40,824 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.71 · 48.2% (19,690 of 40,824 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.70 · 49.2% (20,094 of 40,824 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.7% (17,829 of 40,824 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.63 · 40.8% (16,649 of 40,824 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.53 · 36.6% (14,932 of 40,824 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.50 · 39.8% (16,246 of 40,824 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.50 · 36.6% (14,937 of 40,824 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.46 · 41.7% (17,016 of 40,824 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.43 · 43.8% (17,889 of 40,824 decks)
- Six relevance 1.42 · 36.2% (14,772 of 40,824 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.34 · 42.9% (17,526 of 40,824 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.27 · 28.8% (11,777 of 40,824 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.25 · 28.4% (11,604 of 40,824 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.04 · 26.3% (10,737 of 40,824 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.01 · 22.6% (9,227 of 40,824 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.99 · 20.2% (8,232 of 40,824 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (9,194 of 40,824 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.93 · 25.8% (10,544 of 40,824 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.91 · 19.3% (7,878 of 40,824 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.89 · 19.3% (7,891 of 40,824 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (7,077 of 40,824 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.62 · 41.9% (17,094 of 40,824 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.42 · 34.3% (14,003 of 40,824 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.35 · 34.3% (13,995 of 40,824 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.28 · 29.1% (11,877 of 40,824 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.51 · 43.5% (17,739 of 40,824 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.19 · 28.7% (11,731 of 40,824 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (7,476 of 40,824 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.41 · 45.0% (18,372 of 40,824 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.24 · 37.5% (15,322 of 40,824 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.86 · 22.8% (9,293 of 40,824 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.83 · 16.4% (6,705 of 40,824 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.47 · 35.6% (14,549 of 40,824 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.38 · 34.5% (14,066 of 40,824 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.28 · 28.2% (11,524 of 40,824 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.91 · 46.3% (18,920 of 40,824 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 1.26 · 36.0% (14,694 of 40,824 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.25 · 33.0% (13,488 of 40,824 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.95 · 37.4% (15,255 of 40,824 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (9,961 of 40,824 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.90 · 35.7% (14,584 of 40,824 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.88 · 17.7% (7,207 of 40,824 decks)
All lands (6)
- Fabled Passage relevance 1.04 · 49.6% (20,244 of 40,824 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.04 · 45.1% (18,421 of 40,824 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.94 · 39.4% (16,078 of 40,824 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.93 · 40.2% (16,420 of 40,824 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.90 · 22.0% (8,967 of 40,824 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.84 · 36.8% (15,020 of 40,824 decks)
EDH data for Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 40,824 real decks.