Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other five-color decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other five-color decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Icetill Explorer
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Sabotender
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Sabotender 23%
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign 20%
- Iridescent Vinelasher 4%
- Spitfire Lagac 4%
- Tunneling Geopede 3%
Other options: Cosi's Ravager, Akoum Hellkite, Koth, the Geomancer
Cards like Growth Spiral
13× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other five-color decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 34%
- Eureka Moment 14%
- Joint Exploration 3%
Cards like Expedition Map
15× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other five-color decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Expedition Map 22%
- World Map 18%
- Wayfarer's Bauble 2%
Other options: Moonsilver Key, Traveler's Amulet, Armillary Sphere, Keys to the House, Wanderer's Twig, Ominous Parcel, Renegade Map, Braidwood Sextant
Cards like Scute Swarm
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 28%
- Springheart Nantuko 16%
Cards like Sazh's Chocobo
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other five-color decks
Cards
Other options: Undergrowth Champion, Floral Evoker, Territorial Scythecat, Seedship Agrarian, Vinelasher Kudzu, Prowling Felidar, Oran-Rief Hydra, Murasa Ranger, Foe-liage
Cards like Exploration
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other five-color decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other five-color decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other five-color decks
Cards like Zell Dincht
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
1.7× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other five-color decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other five-color decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.7× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other five-color decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other five-color decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 19%
- Mystic Remora 18%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
2.0× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other five-color decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other five-color decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other five-color decks
Cards like Scapeshift
6.3× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other five-color decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.3× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 78% of other five-color decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other five-color decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.88 in other five-color decks
Cards like Heroic Intervention
3.3× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other five-color decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other five-color decks
Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
2.9× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other five-color decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other five-color decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other five-color decks
Cards
Cards like Risen Reef
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other five-color decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other five-color decks
Cards
- Risen Reef 15%
- Coiling Oracle 5%
Cards like Tifa Lockhart
Over 20× as likely as other five-color decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other five-color decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other five-color decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.92 · 37.3% (4,405 of 11,818 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.86 · 42.9% (5,067 of 11,818 decks)
- Travel the Overworld relevance 0.95 · 33.2% (3,927 of 11,818 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.90 · 36.8% (4,350 of 11,818 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.92 · 30.3% (3,575 of 11,818 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.79 · 44.5% (5,259 of 11,818 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.98 · 23.0% (2,723 of 11,818 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.98 · 21.8% (2,573 of 11,818 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.98 · 22.0% (2,605 of 11,818 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.83 · 37.3% (4,407 of 11,818 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.92 · 25.1% (2,968 of 11,818 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.98 · 18.5% (2,181 of 11,818 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.86 · 31.4% (3,706 of 11,818 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 20.4% (2,409 of 11,818 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.99 · 16.7% (1,977 of 11,818 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.96 · 19.5% (2,303 of 11,818 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.95 · 20.5% (2,421 of 11,818 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.95 · 20.5% (2,426 of 11,818 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.89 · 25.8% (3,052 of 11,818 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 28.7% (3,388 of 11,818 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.89 · 25.6% (3,020 of 11,818 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.87 · 28.1% (3,320 of 11,818 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.93 · 20.3% (2,404 of 11,818 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.90 · 23.4% (2,771 of 11,818 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 0.92 · 20.2% (2,385 of 11,818 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.99 · 13.7% (1,617 of 11,818 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.75 · 38.8% (4,582 of 11,818 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.94 · 16.0% (1,894 of 11,818 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.87 · 22.5% (2,657 of 11,818 decks)
- Qiqirn Merchant relevance 1.02 · 11.5% (1,362 of 11,818 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.84 · 25.6% (3,022 of 11,818 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (1,932 of 11,818 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.80 · 30.1% (3,552 of 11,818 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.99 · 12.2% (1,445 of 11,818 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.90 · 16.9% (2,002 of 11,818 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.93 · 14.5% (1,713 of 11,818 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.93 · 14.2% (1,682 of 11,818 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.91 · 15.3% (1,808 of 11,818 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.89 · 17.2% (2,029 of 11,818 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.96 · 12.4% (1,469 of 11,818 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.88 · 17.7% (2,096 of 11,818 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.99 · 11.0% (1,303 of 11,818 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.93 · 13.9% (1,645 of 11,818 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.89 · 15.6% (1,844 of 11,818 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.82 · 21.9% (2,586 of 11,818 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.88 · 14.8% (1,749 of 11,818 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.91 · 13.4% (1,584 of 11,818 decks)
- Six relevance 0.93 · 12.5% (1,474 of 11,818 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.96 · 10.7% (1,260 of 11,818 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.71 · 34.4% (4,062 of 11,818 decks)
All creatures (50)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.92 · 37.3% (4,405 of 11,818 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.92 · 30.3% (3,575 of 11,818 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.79 · 44.5% (5,259 of 11,818 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.98 · 23.0% (2,723 of 11,818 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.98 · 22.0% (2,605 of 11,818 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.83 · 37.3% (4,407 of 11,818 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.92 · 25.1% (2,968 of 11,818 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.98 · 18.5% (2,181 of 11,818 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.86 · 31.4% (3,706 of 11,818 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 20.4% (2,409 of 11,818 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.99 · 16.7% (1,977 of 11,818 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.96 · 19.5% (2,303 of 11,818 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.95 · 20.5% (2,426 of 11,818 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 28.7% (3,388 of 11,818 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.87 · 28.1% (3,320 of 11,818 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.93 · 20.3% (2,404 of 11,818 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.90 · 23.4% (2,771 of 11,818 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 0.92 · 20.2% (2,385 of 11,818 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.75 · 38.8% (4,582 of 11,818 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.94 · 16.0% (1,894 of 11,818 decks)
- Qiqirn Merchant relevance 1.02 · 11.5% (1,362 of 11,818 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.84 · 25.6% (3,022 of 11,818 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.92 · 16.3% (1,932 of 11,818 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.80 · 30.1% (3,552 of 11,818 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.99 · 12.2% (1,445 of 11,818 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.90 · 16.9% (2,002 of 11,818 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.93 · 14.2% (1,682 of 11,818 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.89 · 17.2% (2,029 of 11,818 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.89 · 15.6% (1,844 of 11,818 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.82 · 21.9% (2,586 of 11,818 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.88 · 14.8% (1,749 of 11,818 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.91 · 13.4% (1,584 of 11,818 decks)
- Six relevance 0.93 · 12.5% (1,474 of 11,818 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 1.00 · 8.8% (1,039 of 11,818 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.93 · 11.2% (1,325 of 11,818 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 1.01 · 7.5% (892 of 11,818 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (1,714 of 11,818 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.94 · 10.3% (1,214 of 11,818 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.93 · 10.4% (1,227 of 11,818 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.91 · 11.3% (1,340 of 11,818 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.88 · 12.0% (1,415 of 11,818 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.94 · 8.9% (1,053 of 11,818 decks)
- Sidequest: Raise a Chocobo // Black Chocobo relevance 0.98 · 6.3% (746 of 11,818 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.97 · 6.8% (798 of 11,818 decks)
- Ambrosia Whiteheart relevance 0.97 · 6.4% (752 of 11,818 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.90 · 8.3% (976 of 11,818 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 0.73 · 19.7% (2,329 of 11,818 decks)
- Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 0.92 · 7.2% (850 of 11,818 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.91 · 7.6% (894 of 11,818 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.90 · 5.0% (594 of 11,818 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.98 · 21.8% (2,573 of 11,818 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.95 · 20.5% (2,421 of 11,818 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.91 · 15.3% (1,808 of 11,818 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.88 · 17.7% (2,096 of 11,818 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 14.2% (1,675 of 11,818 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.71 · 21.9% (2,594 of 11,818 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 11.4% (1,345 of 11,818 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.75 · 13.8% (1,631 of 11,818 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.88 · 6.4% (758 of 11,818 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.81 · 8.4% (996 of 11,818 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 0.84 · 6.1% (719 of 11,818 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.87 · 4.9% (584 of 11,818 decks)
- Bard's Bow relevance 0.96 · 4.1% (485 of 11,818 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.75 · 6.6% (775 of 11,818 decks)
- Samurai's Katana relevance 0.94 · 3.6% (430 of 11,818 decks)
- Paladin's Arms relevance 0.95 · 3.4% (405 of 11,818 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.65 · 9.9% (1,172 of 11,818 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.71 · 5.6% (661 of 11,818 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.90 · 3.6% (420 of 11,818 decks)
- Dragoon's Lance relevance 0.94 · 3.3% (389 of 11,818 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.78 · 4.5% (527 of 11,818 decks)
- Sage's Nouliths relevance 0.95 · 3.2% (379 of 11,818 decks)
- Thief's Knife relevance 0.93 · 3.3% (388 of 11,818 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.94 · 3.2% (382 of 11,818 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (1,187 of 11,818 decks)
- Dark Knight's Greatsword relevance 0.95 · 3.1% (370 of 11,818 decks)
- White Mage's Staff relevance 0.93 · 3.1% (369 of 11,818 decks)
- Ninja's Blades relevance 0.93 · 3.1% (361 of 11,818 decks)
- Machinist's Arsenal relevance 0.91 · 3.1% (370 of 11,818 decks)
- Summoner's Grimoire relevance 0.72 · 4.6% (538 of 11,818 decks)
- Red Mage's Rapier relevance 0.94 · 2.9% (341 of 11,818 decks)
- Warrior's Sword relevance 0.93 · 2.9% (347 of 11,818 decks)
- Reaper's Scythe relevance 0.94 · 2.9% (338 of 11,818 decks)
- Dancer's Chakrams relevance 0.92 · 3.0% (352 of 11,818 decks)
- Blue Mage's Cane relevance 0.94 · 2.8% (334 of 11,818 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.49 · 14.8% (1,754 of 11,818 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.52 · 10.9% (1,291 of 11,818 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.50 · 12.0% (1,419 of 11,818 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.55 · 7.0% (831 of 11,818 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.49 · 11.8% (1,397 of 11,818 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (1,206 of 11,818 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.74 · 2.6% (303 of 11,818 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.68 · 3.1% (364 of 11,818 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (866 of 11,818 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (511 of 11,818 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (929 of 11,818 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (537 of 11,818 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (326 of 11,818 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (393 of 11,818 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (1,107 of 11,818 decks)
All enchantments (40)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.99 · 13.7% (1,617 of 11,818 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.87 · 22.5% (2,657 of 11,818 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.96 · 12.4% (1,469 of 11,818 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.99 · 11.0% (1,303 of 11,818 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.93 · 13.9% (1,645 of 11,818 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.96 · 10.7% (1,260 of 11,818 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.71 · 34.4% (4,062 of 11,818 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (1,555 of 11,818 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 1.00 · 6.5% (772 of 11,818 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.95 · 5.7% (676 of 11,818 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.73 · 17.3% (2,042 of 11,818 decks)
- Manabond relevance 0.99 · 4.4% (518 of 11,818 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.79 · 9.0% (1,060 of 11,818 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.79 · 7.9% (929 of 11,818 decks)
- Champions from Beyond relevance 0.92 · 4.5% (526 of 11,818 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (1,660 of 11,818 decks)
- A Realm Reborn relevance 0.79 · 6.2% (727 of 11,818 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.90 · 4.3% (511 of 11,818 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.89 · 4.3% (512 of 11,818 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.82 · 4.5% (533 of 11,818 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.84 · 4.2% (495 of 11,818 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.71 · 5.4% (638 of 11,818 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (1,364 of 11,818 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.86 · 3.6% (428 of 11,818 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.67 · 4.3% (506 of 11,818 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.70 · 3.9% (457 of 11,818 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.44 · 18.2% (2,155 of 11,818 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (654 of 11,818 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.61 · 3.7% (434 of 11,818 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.60 · 3.6% (424 of 11,818 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (655 of 11,818 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (2,197 of 11,818 decks)
- Leyline of the Guildpact relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (1,194 of 11,818 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.53 · 3.9% (459 of 11,818 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.58 · 3.1% (363 of 11,818 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (341 of 11,818 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.40 · 4.4% (517 of 11,818 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (323 of 11,818 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (421 of 11,818 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (376 of 11,818 decks)
All instants (50)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.90 · 36.8% (4,350 of 11,818 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.90 · 9.7% (1,141 of 11,818 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.61 · 34.5% (4,074 of 11,818 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.77 · 13.8% (1,631 of 11,818 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (2,165 of 11,818 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.80 · 11.6% (1,372 of 11,818 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.93 · 5.0% (595 of 11,818 decks)
- Overkill relevance 0.86 · 6.1% (717 of 11,818 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.56 · 33.5% (3,962 of 11,818 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.80 · 7.9% (935 of 11,818 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.75 · 10.0% (1,185 of 11,818 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.80 · 6.4% (759 of 11,818 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.71 · 9.5% (1,126 of 11,818 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.73 · 7.4% (870 of 11,818 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (1,220 of 11,818 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (1,227 of 11,818 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.68 · 6.4% (751 of 11,818 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.68 · 6.2% (728 of 11,818 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.68 · 5.8% (686 of 11,818 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.66 · 6.9% (817 of 11,818 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.65 · 5.4% (635 of 11,818 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.64 · 6.1% (718 of 11,818 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.55 · 11.7% (1,385 of 11,818 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.81 · 3.5% (418 of 11,818 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.57 · 9.1% (1,080 of 11,818 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.56 · 9.7% (1,145 of 11,818 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (1,417 of 11,818 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (1,286 of 11,818 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.61 · 5.3% (625 of 11,818 decks)
- Moogles' Valor relevance 0.89 · 2.7% (321 of 11,818 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (1,429 of 11,818 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.64 · 4.6% (541 of 11,818 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.63 · 4.7% (553 of 11,818 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.50 · 12.8% (1,507 of 11,818 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.87 · 2.7% (314 of 11,818 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (1,402 of 11,818 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.59 · 4.8% (570 of 11,818 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.44 · 16.1% (1,908 of 11,818 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.77 · 2.9% (339 of 11,818 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.51 · 7.3% (860 of 11,818 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.41 · 18.9% (2,231 of 11,818 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (1,875 of 11,818 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.40 · 16.9% (2,001 of 11,818 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (1,875 of 11,818 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (981 of 11,818 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.70 · 3.0% (356 of 11,818 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.48 · 6.2% (729 of 11,818 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (635 of 11,818 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.59 · 3.7% (436 of 11,818 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.43 · 8.1% (958 of 11,818 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.86 · 42.9% (5,067 of 11,818 decks)
- Travel the Overworld relevance 0.95 · 33.2% (3,927 of 11,818 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.89 · 25.8% (3,052 of 11,818 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.89 · 25.6% (3,020 of 11,818 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.93 · 14.5% (1,713 of 11,818 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 1.01 · 7.4% (870 of 11,818 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.96 · 8.8% (1,045 of 11,818 decks)
- Choco-Comet relevance 1.01 · 4.8% (567 of 11,818 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.78 · 14.4% (1,707 of 11,818 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (2,687 of 11,818 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.86 · 7.9% (928 of 11,818 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.90 · 5.7% (670 of 11,818 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.62 · 28.3% (3,341 of 11,818 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.81 · 9.5% (1,120 of 11,818 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.77 · 11.1% (1,309 of 11,818 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.87 · 5.6% (660 of 11,818 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.97 · 4.4% (521 of 11,818 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.75 · 10.9% (1,284 of 11,818 decks)
- Gysahl Greens relevance 1.02 · 3.9% (460 of 11,818 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (2,399 of 11,818 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.70 · 10.7% (1,265 of 11,818 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.64 · 13.9% (1,642 of 11,818 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.73 · 7.2% (853 of 11,818 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.70 · 8.9% (1,056 of 11,818 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (1,396 of 11,818 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.89 · 3.9% (462 of 11,818 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.71 · 6.7% (789 of 11,818 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.85 · 4.0% (478 of 11,818 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.85 · 4.0% (473 of 11,818 decks)
- Call the Mountain Chocobo relevance 0.99 · 3.1% (362 of 11,818 decks)
- Gates Ablaze relevance 0.80 · 4.1% (484 of 11,818 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.67 · 5.9% (694 of 11,818 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.63 · 7.9% (932 of 11,818 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.74 · 4.1% (487 of 11,818 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.59 · 8.2% (965 of 11,818 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.81 · 3.4% (405 of 11,818 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.62 · 5.4% (644 of 11,818 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.89 · 2.7% (315 of 11,818 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.57 · 6.6% (780 of 11,818 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.81 · 3.0% (358 of 11,818 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.84 · 2.8% (336 of 11,818 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.55 · 7.1% (838 of 11,818 decks)
- Ultima relevance 0.82 · 2.8% (333 of 11,818 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.57 · 5.0% (587 of 11,818 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.75 · 3.3% (390 of 11,818 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.71 · 3.3% (388 of 11,818 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.52 · 6.2% (735 of 11,818 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.74 · 2.8% (330 of 11,818 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.60 · 4.1% (479 of 11,818 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.76 · 2.5% (299 of 11,818 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.85 · 5.1% (599 of 11,818 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.55 · 2.9% (342 of 11,818 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Balamb Garden, SeeD Academy // Balamb Garden, Airborne relevance 0.87 · 51.8% (6,123 of 11,818 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.88 · 46.8% (5,535 of 11,818 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.90 · 43.7% (5,169 of 11,818 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.90 · 42.8% (5,055 of 11,818 decks)
- Midgar, City of Mako // Reactor Raid relevance 0.88 · 43.4% (5,131 of 11,818 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.91 · 38.9% (4,595 of 11,818 decks)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.89 · 40.6% (4,796 of 11,818 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.86 · 43.7% (5,166 of 11,818 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.84 · 45.8% (5,411 of 11,818 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.81 · 43.1% (5,097 of 11,818 decks)
- Clive's Hideaway relevance 0.86 · 36.3% (4,293 of 11,818 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (1,737 of 11,818 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.98 · 10.3% (1,219 of 11,818 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.93 · 12.2% (1,445 of 11,818 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.79 · 21.4% (2,527 of 11,818 decks)
- Port of Karfell relevance 1.00 · 7.7% (912 of 11,818 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.91 · 10.4% (1,230 of 11,818 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (1,960 of 11,818 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.73 · 18.9% (2,235 of 11,818 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (2,235 of 11,818 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (1,350 of 11,818 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.88 · 5.3% (622 of 11,818 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.67 · 17.2% (2,031 of 11,818 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.70 · 12.1% (1,430 of 11,818 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.73 · 9.8% (1,153 of 11,818 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.69 · 11.8% (1,395 of 11,818 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.68 · 10.9% (1,286 of 11,818 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.73 · 7.7% (908 of 11,818 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.70 · 9.0% (1,064 of 11,818 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.67 · 10.8% (1,272 of 11,818 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.72 · 6.3% (739 of 11,818 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.67 · 6.7% (789 of 11,818 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.65 · 6.2% (736 of 11,818 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.72 · 4.4% (517 of 11,818 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.52 · 14.7% (1,734 of 11,818 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.61 · 6.6% (783 of 11,818 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.68 · 4.6% (540 of 11,818 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.71 · 4.2% (496 of 11,818 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.57 · 7.8% (919 of 11,818 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.68 · 4.2% (501 of 11,818 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.79 · 3.1% (370 of 11,818 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.74 · 3.4% (403 of 11,818 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.43 · 17.9% (2,110 of 11,818 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.80 · 2.8% (335 of 11,818 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.78 · 3.0% (351 of 11,818 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.72 · 3.5% (408 of 11,818 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.72 · 3.4% (406 of 11,818 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (1,502 of 11,818 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.62 · 4.3% (507 of 11,818 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.78 · 2.8% (334 of 11,818 decks)
All lands (50)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.85 · 58.0% (6,857 of 11,818 decks)
- Gohn, Town of Ruin relevance 0.85 · 57.3% (6,777 of 11,818 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.84 · 57.5% (6,791 of 11,818 decks)
- Gongaga, Reactor Town relevance 0.84 · 57.3% (6,770 of 11,818 decks)
- Sharlayan, Nation of Scholars relevance 0.85 · 56.5% (6,672 of 11,818 decks)
- Baron, Airship Kingdom relevance 0.85 · 56.2% (6,645 of 11,818 decks)
- Treno, Dark City relevance 0.84 · 55.6% (6,569 of 11,818 decks)
- Rabanastre, Royal City relevance 0.84 · 53.8% (6,363 of 11,818 decks)
- Insomnia, Crown City relevance 0.85 · 52.9% (6,253 of 11,818 decks)
- Vector, Imperial Capital relevance 0.86 · 51.8% (6,122 of 11,818 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.80 · 50.8% (5,998 of 11,818 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.79 · 42.3% (4,995 of 11,818 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.81 · 31.8% (3,763 of 11,818 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.93 · 16.1% (1,901 of 11,818 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.86 · 21.0% (2,487 of 11,818 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.80 · 25.9% (3,064 of 11,818 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.80 · 24.8% (2,925 of 11,818 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.82 · 21.4% (2,534 of 11,818 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.57 · 54.4% (6,426 of 11,818 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.94 · 10.0% (1,176 of 11,818 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.99 · 6.8% (806 of 11,818 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.80 · 16.9% (2,002 of 11,818 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.79 · 18.3% (2,160 of 11,818 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.78 · 17.9% (2,118 of 11,818 decks)
- Rakdos Carnarium relevance 0.80 · 10.6% (1,248 of 11,818 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.79 · 10.8% (1,276 of 11,818 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.78 · 10.9% (1,287 of 11,818 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.76 · 9.7% (1,151 of 11,818 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.64 · 19.3% (2,279 of 11,818 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (1,801 of 11,818 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.64 · 17.3% (2,040 of 11,818 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (1,976 of 11,818 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 16.8% (1,984 of 11,818 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (1,857 of 11,818 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.65 · 14.7% (1,733 of 11,818 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (1,823 of 11,818 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 1.01 · 3.6% (428 of 11,818 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (1,876 of 11,818 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.74 · 8.1% (962 of 11,818 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.64 · 13.4% (1,581 of 11,818 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.65 · 12.9% (1,523 of 11,818 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (1,671 of 11,818 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 13.8% (1,626 of 11,818 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (1,605 of 11,818 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.64 · 12.1% (1,433 of 11,818 decks)
- Citadel Gate relevance 0.64 · 11.7% (1,381 of 11,818 decks)
- Cliffgate relevance 0.64 · 11.6% (1,370 of 11,818 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.89 · 3.9% (459 of 11,818 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.62 · 10.1% (1,191 of 11,818 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 0.70 · 4.2% (501 of 11,818 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Wandering Minstrel, from 11,818 real Commander decks.