Sakura-Tribe Scout

Played in 23,656 decks

Sakura-Tribe Scout
$2.76 €1.10

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Aphelia, Viper Whisperer relevance 4.62 · 25.0% (603 of 2,409 decks)
  2. Sergeant John Benton relevance 4.44 · 26.8% (626 of 2,337 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.98 · 6.8% (795 of 11,725 decks)
  4. Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 3.87 · 25.7% (540 of 2,102 decks)
  5. Seshiro the Anointed relevance 3.75 · 77.2% (234 of 303 decks)
  6. Sachi, Daughter of Seshiro relevance 3.41 · 75.3% (146 of 194 decks)
  7. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.33 · 27.5% (2,510 of 9,125 decks)
  8. Patron of the Orochi relevance 3.30 · 57.5% (183 of 318 decks)
  9. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 3.27 · 31.5% (1,473 of 4,673 decks)
  10. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.01 · 13.9% (385 of 2,760 decks)
  11. Shisato, Whispering Hunter relevance 2.89 · 79.0% (64 of 81 decks)
  12. Kaseto, Orochi Archmage relevance 2.74 · 47.0% (196 of 417 decks)
  13. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.67 · 6.2% (327 of 5,275 decks)
  14. Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 2.53 · 21.9% (238 of 1,088 decks)
  15. Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 2.44 · 29.1% (118 of 406 decks)
  16. Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 2.42 · 11.1% (180 of 1,628 decks)
  17. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.40 · 15.7% (1,399 of 8,897 decks)
  18. Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 2.38 · 12.6% (74 of 588 decks)
  19. Shroofus Sproutsire relevance 2.32 · 11.3% (727 of 6,444 decks)
  20. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 2.10 · 17.5% (142 of 810 decks)
  21. Zimone and Dina relevance 1.98 · 6.3% (212 of 3,383 decks)
  22. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 1.95 · 11.8% (828 of 6,995 decks)
  23. Xyris, the Writhing Storm relevance 1.91 · 3.3% (339 of 10,209 decks)
  24. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.90 · 5.4% (106 of 1,956 decks)
  25. Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 1.88 · 50.0% (21 of 42 decks)
  26. Amareth, the Lustrous relevance 1.74 · 4.6% (37 of 808 decks)
  27. The Necrobloom relevance 1.73 · 1.2% (132 of 11,380 decks)
  28. Torsten, Founder of Benalia relevance 1.66 · 9.7% (26 of 269 decks)
  29. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.63 · 3.0% (121 of 4,045 decks)
  30. Flubs, the Fool relevance 1.62 · 2.5% (294 of 11,696 decks)

Parallel Cards

12

Showing 1-10 of 12

Page size
All parallel cards (12)
  1. Llanowar Scout
  2. Scaled Herbalist
  3. Skyshroud Ranger
  4. Firebrand Ranger
  5. Walking Atlas
  6. Gretchen Titchwillow
  7. Murasa Rootgrazer
  8. Krosan Wayfarer
  9. Elvish Pioneer
  10. Arboreal Grazer
  11. Terrain Generator
  12. Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.65 48.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Skyshroud Ranger
    1.57 25.6%
    $2.22 €0.63
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.51 42.7%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Retreat to Coralhelm
    1.44 29.7%
    $0.41 €0.58
  • Exploration
    1.32 38.1%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    1.22 31.9%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Scute Swarm
    1.20 36.7%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.16 30.2%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Burgeoning
    1.10 26.3%
    $34.04 €24.59
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.08 34.7%
    $4.18 €3.05
All most relevant (30)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.65 · 48.0% (11,356 of 23,656 decks)
  2. Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.57 · 25.6% (6,067 of 23,656 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.51 · 42.7% (10,096 of 23,656 decks)
  4. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.44 · 29.7% (7,033 of 23,656 decks)
  5. Exploration relevance 1.32 · 38.1% (9,005 of 23,656 decks)
  6. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.22 · 31.9% (7,554 of 23,656 decks)
  7. Scute Swarm relevance 1.20 · 36.7% (8,688 of 23,656 decks)
  8. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.16 · 30.2% (7,142 of 23,656 decks)
  9. Burgeoning relevance 1.10 · 26.3% (6,230 of 23,656 decks)
  10. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.7% (8,219 of 23,656 decks)
  11. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.07 · 26.2% (6,201 of 23,656 decks)
  12. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.06 · 28.3% (6,688 of 23,656 decks)
  13. Crop Rotation relevance 1.06 · 33.8% (8,001 of 23,656 decks)
  14. Llanowar Scout relevance 1.02 · 16.7% (3,960 of 23,656 decks)
  15. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 29.2% (6,897 of 23,656 decks)
  16. Growth Spiral relevance 0.99 · 29.8% (7,048 of 23,656 decks)
  17. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.97 · 35.2% (8,324 of 23,656 decks)
  18. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.95 · 26.3% (6,222 of 23,656 decks)
  19. Harrow relevance 0.94 · 28.4% (6,728 of 23,656 decks)
  20. Explore relevance 0.94 · 28.6% (6,757 of 23,656 decks)
  21. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.92 · 21.2% (5,006 of 23,656 decks)
  22. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.87 · 25.6% (6,046 of 23,656 decks)
  23. Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.83 · 17.1% (4,049 of 23,656 decks)
  24. Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.81 · 18.8% (4,437 of 23,656 decks)
  25. Beast Within relevance 0.80 · 39.5% (9,346 of 23,656 decks)
  26. Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.79 · 12.9% (3,041 of 23,656 decks)
  27. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.79 · 18.1% (4,291 of 23,656 decks)
  28. Summer Bloom relevance 0.78 · 14.5% (3,424 of 23,656 decks)
  29. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 18.5% (4,375 of 23,656 decks)
  30. Scapeshift relevance 0.77 · 17.0% (4,010 of 23,656 decks)

Creatures

29

Showing 1-10 of 29

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.65 48.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Skyshroud Ranger
    1.57 25.6%
    $2.22 €0.63
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.51 42.7%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    1.22 31.9%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Scute Swarm
    1.20 36.7%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.16 30.2%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.08 34.7%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.07 26.2%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.06 28.3%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Llanowar Scout
    1.02 16.7%
    $0.29 €0.22
All creatures (29)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.65 · 48.0% (11,356 of 23,656 decks)
  2. Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.57 · 25.6% (6,067 of 23,656 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.51 · 42.7% (10,096 of 23,656 decks)
  4. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.22 · 31.9% (7,554 of 23,656 decks)
  5. Scute Swarm relevance 1.20 · 36.7% (8,688 of 23,656 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.16 · 30.2% (7,142 of 23,656 decks)
  7. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.7% (8,219 of 23,656 decks)
  8. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.07 · 26.2% (6,201 of 23,656 decks)
  9. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.06 · 28.3% (6,688 of 23,656 decks)
  10. Llanowar Scout relevance 1.02 · 16.7% (3,960 of 23,656 decks)
  11. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 29.2% (6,897 of 23,656 decks)
  12. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.97 · 35.2% (8,324 of 23,656 decks)
  13. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.95 · 26.3% (6,222 of 23,656 decks)
  14. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.92 · 21.2% (5,006 of 23,656 decks)
  15. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.87 · 25.6% (6,046 of 23,656 decks)
  16. Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.83 · 17.1% (4,049 of 23,656 decks)
  17. Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.81 · 18.8% (4,437 of 23,656 decks)
  18. Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.79 · 12.9% (3,041 of 23,656 decks)
  19. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.79 · 18.1% (4,291 of 23,656 decks)
  20. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 18.5% (4,375 of 23,656 decks)
  21. Walking Atlas relevance 0.75 · 14.3% (3,374 of 23,656 decks)
  22. Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.69 · 10.4% (2,460 of 23,656 decks)
  23. Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.68 · 15.5% (3,673 of 23,656 decks)
  24. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.68 · 19.1% (4,509 of 23,656 decks)
  25. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.67 · 16.9% (3,988 of 23,656 decks)
  26. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.65 · 28.4% (6,711 of 23,656 decks)
  27. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.64 · 13.3% (3,144 of 23,656 decks)
  28. Eternal Witness relevance 0.64 · 23.1% (5,465 of 23,656 decks)
  29. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.64 · 16.0% (3,787 of 23,656 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.67 17.1%
    $33.00 €19.76
All artifacts (1)
  1. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.67 · 17.1% (4,046 of 23,656 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Retreat to Coralhelm
    1.44 29.7%
    $0.41 €0.58
  • Exploration
    1.32 38.1%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Burgeoning
    1.10 26.3%
    $34.04 €24.59
  • Spelunking
    0.73 17.7%
    $3.67 €3.18
All enchantments (4)
  1. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.44 · 29.7% (7,033 of 23,656 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 1.32 · 38.1% (9,005 of 23,656 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 1.10 · 26.3% (6,230 of 23,656 decks)
  4. Spelunking relevance 0.73 · 17.7% (4,176 of 23,656 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.06 33.8%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Growth Spiral
    0.99 29.8%
    $0.32 €0.47
  • Harrow
    0.94 28.4%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Beast Within
    0.80 39.5%
    $0.68 €0.85
All instants (4)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.06 · 33.8% (8,001 of 23,656 decks)
  2. Growth Spiral relevance 0.99 · 29.8% (7,048 of 23,656 decks)
  3. Harrow relevance 0.94 · 28.4% (6,728 of 23,656 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.80 · 39.5% (9,346 of 23,656 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Explore
    0.94 28.6%
    $0.19 €0.24
  • Summer Bloom
    0.78 14.5%
    $1.82 €0.59
  • Scapeshift
    0.77 17.0%
    $41.33 €33.40
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.72 17.3%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.70 30.0%
    $1.83 €1.50
  • Nature's Lore
    0.70 35.4%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Cultivate
    0.67 38.3%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Rampant Growth
    0.64 30.7%
    $1.25 €0.52
All sorceries (8)
  1. Explore relevance 0.94 · 28.6% (6,757 of 23,656 decks)
  2. Summer Bloom relevance 0.78 · 14.5% (3,424 of 23,656 decks)
  3. Scapeshift relevance 0.77 · 17.0% (4,010 of 23,656 decks)
  4. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (4,097 of 23,656 decks)
  5. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.70 · 30.0% (7,085 of 23,656 decks)
  6. Nature's Lore relevance 0.70 · 35.4% (8,385 of 23,656 decks)
  7. Cultivate relevance 0.67 · 38.3% (9,069 of 23,656 decks)
  8. Rampant Growth relevance 0.64 · 30.7% (7,262 of 23,656 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.64 16.9%
    $28.94 €27.39
All utility lands (1)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.64 · 16.9% (4,004 of 23,656 decks)

Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Simic Growth Chamber
    1.38 38.9%
    $0.37 €0.30
  • Breeding Pool
    0.70 29.3%
    $9.52 €9.22
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.65 28.5%
    $35.63 €26.45
All lands (3)
  1. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.38 · 38.9% (9,198 of 23,656 decks)
  2. Breeding Pool relevance 0.70 · 29.3% (6,935 of 23,656 decks)
  3. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.65 · 28.5% (6,751 of 23,656 decks)

EDH data for Sakura-Tribe Scout: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 23,656 real decks.