Oracle of Mul Daya

Played in 139,491 decks

Oracle of Mul Daya
$2.01 €2.65

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.47 · 72.3% (2,637 of 3,648 decks)
  2. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.40 · 25.6% (2,988 of 11,691 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.94 · 52.5% (2,229 of 4,246 decks)
  4. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.86 · 30.8% (1,658 of 5,380 decks)
  5. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.58 · 42.3% (4,935 of 11,669 decks)
  6. The Necrobloom relevance 3.44 · 34.8% (3,948 of 11,361 decks)
  7. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.37 · 50.3% (2,649 of 5,263 decks)
  8. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 3.37 · 83.2% (21,048 of 25,309 decks)
  9. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.33 · 52.4% (2,115 of 4,035 decks)
  10. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 3.01 · 55.4% (878 of 1,585 decks)
  11. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.01 · 41.6% (3,790 of 9,114 decks)
  12. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.92 · 36.3% (1,001 of 2,755 decks)
  13. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.89 · 29.4% (1,743 of 5,930 decks)
  14. Child of Alara relevance 2.86 · 13.0% (758 of 5,841 decks)
  15. Thranduil the Strategist relevance 2.71 · 56.5% (672 of 1,190 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.69 · 45.3% (4,019 of 8,878 decks)
  17. Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 2.67 · 73.7% (4,231 of 5,742 decks)
  18. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.60 · 10.8% (367 of 3,410 decks)
  19. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.51 · 35.3% (1,642 of 4,656 decks)
  20. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.47 · 60.8% (2,153 of 3,544 decks)
  21. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.44 · 48.7% (4,791 of 9,833 decks)
  22. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.44 · 26.7% (477 of 1,784 decks)
  23. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.43 · 17.4% (104 of 599 decks)
  24. Torsten, Founder of Benalia relevance 2.33 · 22.4% (60 of 268 decks)
  25. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.27 · 27.6% (1,908 of 6,924 decks)
  26. Hazezon Tamar relevance 2.21 · 37.4% (133 of 356 decks)
  27. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.16 · 15.1% (2,054 of 13,589 decks)
  28. Borborygmos Enraged relevance 2.12 · 31.2% (431 of 1,382 decks)
  29. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.09 · 58.4% (748 of 1,281 decks)
  30. Hugs, Grisly Guardian relevance 2.09 · 38.0% (237 of 623 decks)

Replaced By

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All replaced by (2)
  1. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 3.9% of swaps out (3 swaps)
  2. Hexhaven Invigorator 3.9% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

11

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.90 53.6%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.69 43.9%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.68 48.8%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.56 38.3%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.55 37.5%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.5%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Harrow
    1.51 45.7%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.49 41.3%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Exploration
    1.42 40.8%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    1.40 32.0%
    $0.30 €0.42
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.90 · 53.6% (74,803 of 139,491 decks)
  2. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.69 · 43.9% (61,223 of 139,491 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.68 · 48.8% (68,106 of 139,491 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.56 · 38.3% (53,363 of 139,491 decks)
  5. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.55 · 37.5% (52,301 of 139,491 decks)
  6. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.5% (66,265 of 139,491 decks)
  7. Harrow relevance 1.51 · 45.7% (63,804 of 139,491 decks)
  8. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.49 · 41.3% (57,596 of 139,491 decks)
  9. Exploration relevance 1.42 · 40.8% (56,917 of 139,491 decks)
  10. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 32.0% (44,622 of 139,491 decks)
  11. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.40 · 40.0% (55,840 of 139,491 decks)
  12. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (60,436 of 139,491 decks)
  13. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.35 · 37.6% (52,407 of 139,491 decks)
  14. Crop Rotation relevance 1.21 · 38.7% (53,940 of 139,491 decks)
  15. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.20 · 31.3% (43,704 of 139,491 decks)
  16. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.6% (42,709 of 139,491 decks)
  17. Exploration Broodship relevance 1.19 · 27.0% (37,711 of 139,491 decks)
  18. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.18 · 34.6% (48,249 of 139,491 decks)
  19. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.17 · 27.2% (38,001 of 139,491 decks)
  20. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,616 of 139,491 decks)
  21. Zuran Orb relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,575 of 139,491 decks)
  22. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 27.7% (38,583 of 139,491 decks)
  23. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.09 · 26.5% (37,008 of 139,491 decks)
  24. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.08 · 27.0% (37,705 of 139,491 decks)
  25. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.07 · 24.0% (33,462 of 139,491 decks)
  26. Springbloom Druid relevance 1.06 · 26.4% (36,851 of 139,491 decks)
  27. Beast Within relevance 1.04 · 51.4% (71,700 of 139,491 decks)
  28. Scapeshift relevance 1.04 · 22.9% (31,930 of 139,491 decks)
  29. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.02 · 23.6% (32,872 of 139,491 decks)
  30. Augur of Autumn relevance 1.02 · 23.1% (32,203 of 139,491 decks)

Creatures

26

Showing 1-10 of 26

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.90 53.6%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.69 43.9%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.68 48.8%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.56 38.3%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.5%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.49 41.3%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Titania, Protector of Argoth
    1.40 32.0%
    $0.30 €0.42
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.40 40.0%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.35 43.3%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.35 37.6%
    $23.22 €23.79
All creatures (26)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.90 · 53.6% (74,803 of 139,491 decks)
  2. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.69 · 43.9% (61,223 of 139,491 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.68 · 48.8% (68,106 of 139,491 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.56 · 38.3% (53,363 of 139,491 decks)
  5. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.5% (66,265 of 139,491 decks)
  6. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.49 · 41.3% (57,596 of 139,491 decks)
  7. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 32.0% (44,622 of 139,491 decks)
  8. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.40 · 40.0% (55,840 of 139,491 decks)
  9. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (60,436 of 139,491 decks)
  10. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.35 · 37.6% (52,407 of 139,491 decks)
  11. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.20 · 31.3% (43,704 of 139,491 decks)
  12. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.18 · 34.6% (48,249 of 139,491 decks)
  13. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,616 of 139,491 decks)
  14. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.09 · 26.5% (37,008 of 139,491 decks)
  15. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.08 · 27.0% (37,705 of 139,491 decks)
  16. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.07 · 24.0% (33,462 of 139,491 decks)
  17. Springbloom Druid relevance 1.06 · 26.4% (36,851 of 139,491 decks)
  18. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.02 · 23.6% (32,872 of 139,491 decks)
  19. Augur of Autumn relevance 1.02 · 23.1% (32,203 of 139,491 decks)
  20. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (34,365 of 139,491 decks)
  21. Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.89 · 21.4% (29,832 of 139,491 decks)
  22. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.87 · 21.3% (29,689 of 139,491 decks)
  23. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (25,706 of 139,491 decks)
  24. Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 0.82 · 16.8% (23,487 of 139,491 decks)
  25. Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.79 · 16.7% (23,233 of 139,491 decks)
  26. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.76 · 18.3% (25,568 of 139,491 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.19 30.6%
    $1.14 €1.39
  • Exploration Broodship
    1.19 27.0%
    $3.03 €3.23
  • Zuran Orb
    1.15 27.7%
    $3.56 €1.81
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.09 27.7%
    $33.00 €19.76
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.6% (42,709 of 139,491 decks)
  2. Exploration Broodship relevance 1.19 · 27.0% (37,711 of 139,491 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,575 of 139,491 decks)
  4. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 27.7% (38,583 of 139,491 decks)

Enchantments

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.42 40.8%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Spelunking
    0.89 21.5%
    $3.67 €3.18
All enchantments (2)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.42 · 40.8% (56,917 of 139,491 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.89 · 21.5% (29,967 of 139,491 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.51 45.7%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Crop Rotation
    1.21 38.7%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.17 27.2%
    $0.34 €0.30
  • Beast Within
    1.04 51.4%
    $0.68 €0.85
  • Entish Restoration
    0.86 22.8%
    $2.79 €1.87
All instants (5)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.51 · 45.7% (63,804 of 139,491 decks)
  2. Crop Rotation relevance 1.21 · 38.7% (53,940 of 139,491 decks)
  3. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.17 · 27.2% (38,001 of 139,491 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 1.04 · 51.4% (71,700 of 139,491 decks)
  5. Entish Restoration relevance 0.86 · 22.8% (31,857 of 139,491 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.55 37.5%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Scapeshift
    1.04 22.9%
    $41.33 €33.40
  • Nature's Lore
    1.00 50.6%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Worldsoul's Rage
    0.91 17.9%
    $0.25 €0.27
  • Skyshroud Claim
    0.90 26.2%
    $1.08 €1.14
  • Cultivate
    0.86 49.0%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Explore
    0.84 25.5%
    $0.19 €0.24
  • Farseek
    0.76 40.6%
    $0.46 €0.81
All sorceries (8)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.55 · 37.5% (52,301 of 139,491 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.04 · 22.9% (31,930 of 139,491 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 1.00 · 50.6% (70,632 of 139,491 decks)
  4. Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.91 · 17.9% (25,032 of 139,491 decks)
  5. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.90 · 26.2% (36,571 of 139,491 decks)
  6. Cultivate relevance 0.86 · 49.0% (68,294 of 139,491 decks)
  7. Explore relevance 0.84 · 25.5% (35,596 of 139,491 decks)
  8. Farseek relevance 0.76 · 40.6% (56,692 of 139,491 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.82 21.8%
    $28.94 €27.39
All utility lands (1)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.82 · 21.8% (30,413 of 139,491 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    1.02 48.4%
    $0.62 €0.95
  • Cabaretti Courtyard
    0.94 22.2%
    $0.36 €0.35
  • Riveteers Overlook
    0.93 23.8%
    $0.28 €0.16
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.81 39.8%
    $0.27 €0.11
All lands (4)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 1.02 · 48.4% (67,535 of 139,491 decks)
  2. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.94 · 22.2% (30,997 of 139,491 decks)
  3. Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.93 · 23.8% (33,188 of 139,491 decks)
  4. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.81 · 39.8% (55,474 of 139,491 decks)

EDH data for Oracle of Mul Daya: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 139,491 real decks.