Oracle of Mul Daya
Played in 139,491 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
30
Commanders
30All commanders (30)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.47 · 72.3% (2,637 of 3,648 decks)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.40 · 25.6% (2,988 of 11,691 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.94 · 52.5% (2,229 of 4,246 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.86 · 30.8% (1,658 of 5,380 decks)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.58 · 42.3% (4,935 of 11,669 decks)
- The Necrobloom relevance 3.44 · 34.8% (3,948 of 11,361 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.37 · 50.3% (2,649 of 5,263 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 3.37 · 83.2% (21,048 of 25,309 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.33 · 52.4% (2,115 of 4,035 decks)
- Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 3.01 · 55.4% (878 of 1,585 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.01 · 41.6% (3,790 of 9,114 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.92 · 36.3% (1,001 of 2,755 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.89 · 29.4% (1,743 of 5,930 decks)
- Child of Alara relevance 2.86 · 13.0% (758 of 5,841 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 2.71 · 56.5% (672 of 1,190 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.69 · 45.3% (4,019 of 8,878 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 2.67 · 73.7% (4,231 of 5,742 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.60 · 10.8% (367 of 3,410 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.51 · 35.3% (1,642 of 4,656 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.47 · 60.8% (2,153 of 3,544 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.44 · 48.7% (4,791 of 9,833 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.44 · 26.7% (477 of 1,784 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.43 · 17.4% (104 of 599 decks)
- Torsten, Founder of Benalia relevance 2.33 · 22.4% (60 of 268 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.27 · 27.6% (1,908 of 6,924 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 2.21 · 37.4% (133 of 356 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.16 · 15.1% (2,054 of 13,589 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 2.12 · 31.2% (431 of 1,382 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.09 · 58.4% (748 of 1,281 decks)
- Hugs, Grisly Guardian relevance 2.09 · 38.0% (237 of 623 decks)
Replaced By
2
Replaced By
2All replaced by (2)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 3.9% of swaps out (3 swaps)
- Hexhaven Invigorator 3.9% of swaps out (3 swaps)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.90 · 53.6% (74,803 of 139,491 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.69 · 43.9% (61,223 of 139,491 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.68 · 48.8% (68,106 of 139,491 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.56 · 38.3% (53,363 of 139,491 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.55 · 37.5% (52,301 of 139,491 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.5% (66,265 of 139,491 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.51 · 45.7% (63,804 of 139,491 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.49 · 41.3% (57,596 of 139,491 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.42 · 40.8% (56,917 of 139,491 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 32.0% (44,622 of 139,491 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.40 · 40.0% (55,840 of 139,491 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (60,436 of 139,491 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.35 · 37.6% (52,407 of 139,491 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.21 · 38.7% (53,940 of 139,491 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.20 · 31.3% (43,704 of 139,491 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.6% (42,709 of 139,491 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.19 · 27.0% (37,711 of 139,491 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.18 · 34.6% (48,249 of 139,491 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.17 · 27.2% (38,001 of 139,491 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,616 of 139,491 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,575 of 139,491 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 27.7% (38,583 of 139,491 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.09 · 26.5% (37,008 of 139,491 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.08 · 27.0% (37,705 of 139,491 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.07 · 24.0% (33,462 of 139,491 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.06 · 26.4% (36,851 of 139,491 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 1.04 · 51.4% (71,700 of 139,491 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.04 · 22.9% (31,930 of 139,491 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.02 · 23.6% (32,872 of 139,491 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 1.02 · 23.1% (32,203 of 139,491 decks)
Creatures
26
Creatures
26 All creatures (26)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.90 · 53.6% (74,803 of 139,491 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.69 · 43.9% (61,223 of 139,491 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.68 · 48.8% (68,106 of 139,491 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.56 · 38.3% (53,363 of 139,491 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.5% (66,265 of 139,491 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.49 · 41.3% (57,596 of 139,491 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 32.0% (44,622 of 139,491 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.40 · 40.0% (55,840 of 139,491 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (60,436 of 139,491 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.35 · 37.6% (52,407 of 139,491 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.20 · 31.3% (43,704 of 139,491 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.18 · 34.6% (48,249 of 139,491 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,616 of 139,491 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.09 · 26.5% (37,008 of 139,491 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.08 · 27.0% (37,705 of 139,491 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.07 · 24.0% (33,462 of 139,491 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.06 · 26.4% (36,851 of 139,491 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.02 · 23.6% (32,872 of 139,491 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 1.02 · 23.1% (32,203 of 139,491 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (34,365 of 139,491 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.89 · 21.4% (29,832 of 139,491 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.87 · 21.3% (29,689 of 139,491 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.85 · 18.4% (25,706 of 139,491 decks)
- Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 0.82 · 16.8% (23,487 of 139,491 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.79 · 16.7% (23,233 of 139,491 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.76 · 18.3% (25,568 of 139,491 decks)
Artifacts
4
Artifacts
4 All artifacts (4)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.6% (42,709 of 139,491 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.19 · 27.0% (37,711 of 139,491 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.15 · 27.7% (38,575 of 139,491 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 27.7% (38,583 of 139,491 decks)
Enchantments
2
Enchantments
2 All enchantments (2)
- Exploration relevance 1.42 · 40.8% (56,917 of 139,491 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.89 · 21.5% (29,967 of 139,491 decks)
Instants
5
Instants
5 All instants (5)
- Harrow relevance 1.51 · 45.7% (63,804 of 139,491 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.21 · 38.7% (53,940 of 139,491 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.17 · 27.2% (38,001 of 139,491 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 1.04 · 51.4% (71,700 of 139,491 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.86 · 22.8% (31,857 of 139,491 decks)
Sorceries
8
Sorceries
8 All sorceries (8)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.55 · 37.5% (52,301 of 139,491 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.04 · 22.9% (31,930 of 139,491 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 1.00 · 50.6% (70,632 of 139,491 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.91 · 17.9% (25,032 of 139,491 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.90 · 26.2% (36,571 of 139,491 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.86 · 49.0% (68,294 of 139,491 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.84 · 25.5% (35,596 of 139,491 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.76 · 40.6% (56,692 of 139,491 decks)
Utility Lands
1
Utility Lands
1 All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.82 · 21.8% (30,413 of 139,491 decks)
Lands
4
Lands
4 All lands (4)
- Fabled Passage relevance 1.02 · 48.4% (67,535 of 139,491 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.94 · 22.2% (30,997 of 139,491 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.93 · 23.8% (33,188 of 139,491 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.81 · 39.8% (55,474 of 139,491 decks)
EDH data for Oracle of Mul Daya: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 139,491 real decks.















































































