Mul Daya Channelers
Played in 938 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
3030+347+1+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Sachi, Daughter of Seshiro relevance 2.04 · 6.7% (13 of 195 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 1.97 · 3.4% (20 of 595 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.85 · 1.3% (24 of 1,839 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 1.43 · 1.1% (8 of 754 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.42 · 1.3% (18 of 1,341 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.24 · 1.1% (15 of 1,383 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 1.06 · 2.9% (2 of 70 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.96 · 2.5% (3 of 122 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.95 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.91 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.86 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Popular Entertainer relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Tavern Brawler // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.65 · 1.0% (2 of 192 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.64 · 1.2% (3 of 252 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.64 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Livonya Silone relevance 0.61 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.61 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Tuknir Deathlock relevance 0.61 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.59 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 0.58 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Guild Artisan relevance 0.57 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.55 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.49 · 1.1% (2 of 184 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.48 · 1.0% (2 of 193 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 0.42 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.42 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All parallel cards (3)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.59 · 39.7% (372 of 938 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.44 · 36.7% (344 of 938 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.34 · 30.6% (287 of 938 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.13 · 48.9% (459 of 938 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.13 · 25.9% (243 of 938 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.12 · 19.9% (187 of 938 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.10 · 21.6% (203 of 938 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 28.8% (270 of 938 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.04 · 22.3% (209 of 938 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.03 · 19.4% (182 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.02 · 20.1% (189 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.02 · 39.6% (371 of 938 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.00 · 20.6% (193 of 938 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (161 of 938 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.96 · 30.1% (282 of 938 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.96 · 27.3% (256 of 938 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.88 · 28.1% (264 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.88 · 17.5% (164 of 938 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.87 · 17.4% (163 of 938 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (212 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.86 · 16.5% (155 of 938 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (136 of 938 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.86 · 15.9% (149 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.85 · 19.0% (178 of 938 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (149 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.85 · 16.2% (152 of 938 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.82 · 11.2% (105 of 938 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.81 · 19.0% (178 of 938 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.81 · 16.4% (154 of 938 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.77 · 13.6% (128 of 938 decks)
All creatures (47)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.59 · 39.7% (372 of 938 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.44 · 36.7% (344 of 938 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.34 · 30.6% (287 of 938 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.13 · 48.9% (459 of 938 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.13 · 25.9% (243 of 938 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.12 · 19.9% (187 of 938 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.10 · 21.6% (203 of 938 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 28.8% (270 of 938 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.04 · 22.3% (209 of 938 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.03 · 19.4% (182 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.02 · 20.1% (189 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.02 · 39.6% (371 of 938 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.00 · 20.6% (193 of 938 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (161 of 938 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.96 · 30.1% (282 of 938 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.96 · 27.3% (256 of 938 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.88 · 28.1% (264 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.88 · 17.5% (164 of 938 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.87 · 17.4% (163 of 938 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.87 · 22.6% (212 of 938 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (136 of 938 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.86 · 15.9% (149 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.85 · 19.0% (178 of 938 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (149 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.85 · 16.2% (152 of 938 decks)
- Greenweaver Druid relevance 0.82 · 11.2% (105 of 938 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.81 · 19.0% (178 of 938 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.81 · 16.4% (154 of 938 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.77 · 13.6% (128 of 938 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.75 · 13.9% (130 of 938 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.73 · 13.0% (122 of 938 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.70 · 15.6% (146 of 938 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (119 of 938 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.67 · 13.5% (127 of 938 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (96 of 938 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.66 · 16.5% (155 of 938 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.66 · 11.1% (104 of 938 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.65 · 13.2% (124 of 938 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.64 · 10.8% (101 of 938 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.64 · 13.0% (122 of 938 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (101 of 938 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.61 · 13.0% (122 of 938 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 0.59 · 10.7% (100 of 938 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.59 · 14.1% (132 of 938 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.58 · 7.5% (70 of 938 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.58 · 11.9% (112 of 938 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (111 of 938 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.86 · 16.5% (155 of 938 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.67 · 12.9% (121 of 938 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.60 · 12.2% (114 of 938 decks)
EDH data for Mul Daya Channelers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 938 real decks.




























































