Cards like Elvish Archdruid
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
98% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
93% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
3.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Priest of Titania
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
97% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
94% of decks run two or more
vs. 44% of other green decks
3.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 93%
- Elvish Mystic 90%
- Fyndhorn Elves 76%
- Boreal Druid 30%
- Leaf Gilder 9%
- Druid of the Cowl 6%
- Fyndhorn Elder 5%
- Greenweaver Druid 5%
- Wirewood Elf 3%
Other options: Woodland Mystic, Skyshroud Troopers, Nantuko Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Lys Alana Huntmaster
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
8.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other green decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 71%
- Quirion Ranger 55%
- Scryb Ranger 10%
Cards like Immaculate Magistrate
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
8.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards like Beast Whisperer
7.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Green Sun's Zenith
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Heritage Druid
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
- Heritage Druid 51%
- Birchlore Rangers 23%
Cards like Elvish Champion
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Visionary
6.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Visionary 63%
- Llanowar Visionary 22%
- Multani's Acolyte 2%
- Shaman of Spring 2%
- Joraga Visionary 1%
Other options: Wall of Blossoms, Owlbear, Generous Stray, Pyknite, Kavu Climber, Striped Bears, Carven Caryatid, Arctic Wolves, Rhox Oracle
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Warmaster 63%
- Wolverine Riders 21%
Cards like Marwyn, the Nurturer
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Harbinger
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
4.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Indrik Stomphowler, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists
Cards like Eladamri, Korvecdal
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Eladamri, Korvecdal 40%
- Elven Chorus 17%
Cards like Vanquisher's Banner
6.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Vanquisher's Banner 28%
- Door of Destinies 11%
- Chronicle of Victory 9%
- Icon of Ancestry 4%
- Obelisk of Urd 2%
Other options: Instruments of War, Brass Herald
Cards like Jagged-Scar Archers
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Jagged-Scar Archers 29%
- Heedless One 11%
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Essence Warden
5.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Prosperous Innkeeper, Greenhouse Propagator, Social Climber
Cards like Fauna Shaman
6.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 30%
- Sylvan Tutor 5%
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Krosan Grip
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Grip 20%
- Naturalize 11%
Other options: Wilt, Relic Crush, Wear Away, Stomp and Howl, Break Asunder, Oxidize, Natural Reclamation, Verdigris
Cards like Vitalize
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Coat of Arms
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Sylvan Ranger
5.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards like Farhaven Elf
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Simulacrum Shaper, Wild Wanderer, Quirion Trailblazer, Yavimaya Granger, Ondu Giant, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Earthshaker Giant, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Sylvan Messenger
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.58 · 82.4% (1,114 of 1,352 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.58 · 76.6% (1,035 of 1,352 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.62 · 66.8% (903 of 1,352 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.65 · 62.1% (839 of 1,352 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.66 · 58.5% (791 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.64 · 59.6% (806 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.48 · 96.3% (1,302 of 1,352 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.56 · 71.7% (970 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.68 · 51.4% (695 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.60 · 63.2% (855 of 1,352 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.67 · 51.0% (690 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.61 · 59.5% (805 of 1,352 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.66 · 49.3% (667 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.56 · 63.1% (853 of 1,352 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.63 · 51.9% (702 of 1,352 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.65 · 47.0% (636 of 1,352 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.43 · 90.4% (1,222 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.66 · 42.1% (569 of 1,352 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.64 · 43.3% (586 of 1,352 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.62 · 46.1% (623 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.76 · 25.1% (339 of 1,352 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.73 · 28.8% (390 of 1,352 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.61 · 42.6% (576 of 1,352 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.53 · 55.0% (743 of 1,352 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (298 of 1,352 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.58 · 45.8% (619 of 1,352 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.64 · 33.6% (454 of 1,352 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.60 · 39.3% (532 of 1,352 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.66 · 29.2% (395 of 1,352 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.71 · 21.9% (296 of 1,352 decks)
- Skyshroud Poacher relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (238 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (239 of 1,352 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.70 · 22.6% (305 of 1,352 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.62 · 32.5% (439 of 1,352 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.63 · 28.6% (387 of 1,352 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.58 · 36.3% (491 of 1,352 decks)
- Gaea's Herald relevance 0.69 · 17.8% (240 of 1,352 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.55 · 39.5% (534 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Clancaller relevance 0.72 · 14.1% (191 of 1,352 decks)
- Drove of Elves relevance 0.69 · 16.4% (222 of 1,352 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.57 · 35.1% (475 of 1,352 decks)
- Nullmage Shepherd relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (246 of 1,352 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.65 · 21.2% (286 of 1,352 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.52 · 41.6% (562 of 1,352 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.73 · 11.4% (154 of 1,352 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (239 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.66 · 16.2% (219 of 1,352 decks)
- Nettle Sentinel relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (147 of 1,352 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.44 · 55.4% (749 of 1,352 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.65 · 15.8% (213 of 1,352 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.58 · 82.4% (1,114 of 1,352 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.58 · 76.6% (1,035 of 1,352 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.62 · 66.8% (903 of 1,352 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.65 · 62.1% (839 of 1,352 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.66 · 58.5% (791 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.64 · 59.6% (806 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.48 · 96.3% (1,302 of 1,352 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.56 · 71.7% (970 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.60 · 63.2% (855 of 1,352 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.67 · 51.0% (690 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.61 · 59.5% (805 of 1,352 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.66 · 49.3% (667 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.56 · 63.1% (853 of 1,352 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.63 · 51.9% (702 of 1,352 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.65 · 47.0% (636 of 1,352 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.43 · 90.4% (1,222 of 1,352 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.64 · 43.3% (586 of 1,352 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.62 · 46.1% (623 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.76 · 25.1% (339 of 1,352 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.73 · 28.8% (390 of 1,352 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.61 · 42.6% (576 of 1,352 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.53 · 55.0% (743 of 1,352 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (298 of 1,352 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.58 · 45.8% (619 of 1,352 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.60 · 39.3% (532 of 1,352 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.66 · 29.2% (395 of 1,352 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.71 · 21.9% (296 of 1,352 decks)
- Skyshroud Poacher relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (238 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (239 of 1,352 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.70 · 22.6% (305 of 1,352 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.62 · 32.5% (439 of 1,352 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.63 · 28.6% (387 of 1,352 decks)
- Gaea's Herald relevance 0.69 · 17.8% (240 of 1,352 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.55 · 39.5% (534 of 1,352 decks)
- Elvish Clancaller relevance 0.72 · 14.1% (191 of 1,352 decks)
- Drove of Elves relevance 0.69 · 16.4% (222 of 1,352 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.57 · 35.1% (475 of 1,352 decks)
- Nullmage Shepherd relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (246 of 1,352 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.65 · 21.2% (286 of 1,352 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.52 · 41.6% (562 of 1,352 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.73 · 11.4% (154 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.66 · 16.2% (219 of 1,352 decks)
- Nettle Sentinel relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (147 of 1,352 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.44 · 55.4% (749 of 1,352 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.65 · 15.8% (213 of 1,352 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.59 · 24.3% (328 of 1,352 decks)
- Viridian Zealot relevance 0.76 · 7.8% (105 of 1,352 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.33 · 78.0% (1,055 of 1,352 decks)
- Viridian Shaman relevance 0.72 · 9.2% (124 of 1,352 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.37 · 65.6% (887 of 1,352 decks)
All artifacts (33)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (239 of 1,352 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.51 · 33.1% (448 of 1,352 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.54 · 28.1% (380 of 1,352 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.46 · 34.6% (468 of 1,352 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.51 · 25.3% (342 of 1,352 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.66 · 6.1% (83 of 1,352 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.52 · 18.0% (244 of 1,352 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.56 · 11.2% (152 of 1,352 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.42 · 21.5% (291 of 1,352 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.39 · 25.2% (341 of 1,352 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.45 · 11.7% (158 of 1,352 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.50 · 5.0% (67 of 1,352 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.45 · 9.1% (123 of 1,352 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.52 · 4.3% (58 of 1,352 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.53 · 4.1% (56 of 1,352 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (49 of 1,352 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (110 of 1,352 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (101 of 1,352 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (90 of 1,352 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.54 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 33.4% (452 of 1,352 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (81 of 1,352 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (66 of 1,352 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (56 of 1,352 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.21 · 14.9% (202 of 1,352 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (43 of 1,352 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (35 of 1,352 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 22.0% (298 of 1,352 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (81 of 1,352 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.15 · 34.1% (461 of 1,352 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.18 · 11.0% (149 of 1,352 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (34 of 1,352 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 57.8% (781 of 1,352 decks)
All enchantments (39)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.68 · 51.4% (695 of 1,352 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.64 · 5.2% (70 of 1,352 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (234 of 1,352 decks)
- Crown of Skemfar relevance 0.62 · 5.0% (67 of 1,352 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.48 · 17.0% (230 of 1,352 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.57 · 6.4% (87 of 1,352 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.53 · 8.4% (114 of 1,352 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.36 · 26.0% (351 of 1,352 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.35 · 26.8% (363 of 1,352 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.34 · 29.7% (402 of 1,352 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.31 · 38.5% (520 of 1,352 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.57 · 3.9% (53 of 1,352 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.38 · 11.2% (151 of 1,352 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.43 · 6.4% (87 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.34 · 14.4% (195 of 1,352 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.33 · 14.5% (196 of 1,352 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.45 · 4.1% (56 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 27.4% (370 of 1,352 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (92 of 1,352 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.47 · 3.6% (49 of 1,352 decks)
- Steely Resolve relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (271 of 1,352 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (63 of 1,352 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (33 of 1,352 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.36 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (36 of 1,352 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.23 · 8.1% (109 of 1,352 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (116 of 1,352 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (47 of 1,352 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 12.3% (166 of 1,352 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (36 of 1,352 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (51 of 1,352 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (57 of 1,352 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (96 of 1,352 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (38 of 1,352 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (39 of 1,352 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (35 of 1,352 decks)
All instants (39)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.64 · 33.6% (454 of 1,352 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.57 · 25.1% (339 of 1,352 decks)
- Collected Company relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (143 of 1,352 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.56 · 18.5% (250 of 1,352 decks)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.65 · 7.7% (104 of 1,352 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.48 · 17.6% (238 of 1,352 decks)
- For the Ancestors relevance 0.61 · 5.5% (75 of 1,352 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.35 · 38.7% (523 of 1,352 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (122 of 1,352 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.42 · 16.2% (219 of 1,352 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.50 · 7.0% (95 of 1,352 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (146 of 1,352 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.35 · 15.1% (204 of 1,352 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (107 of 1,352 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.27 · 30.5% (412 of 1,352 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (128 of 1,352 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.29 · 20.4% (276 of 1,352 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (79 of 1,352 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.30 · 14.9% (202 of 1,352 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (93 of 1,352 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.30 · 14.5% (196 of 1,352 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.26 · 23.0% (311 of 1,352 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.30 · 11.1% (150 of 1,352 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (271 of 1,352 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.25 · 14.6% (198 of 1,352 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.21 · 21.5% (291 of 1,352 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 54.9% (742 of 1,352 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (88 of 1,352 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (84 of 1,352 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (34 of 1,352 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 59.1% (799 of 1,352 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (34 of 1,352 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.16 · 15.9% (215 of 1,352 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (95 of 1,352 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (43 of 1,352 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (36 of 1,352 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (65 of 1,352 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (44 of 1,352 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (45 of 1,352 decks)
All sorceries (44)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.66 · 42.1% (569 of 1,352 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.58 · 23.1% (312 of 1,352 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.65 · 10.8% (146 of 1,352 decks)
- Hunting Triad relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (85 of 1,352 decks)
- Bounty of Skemfar relevance 0.64 · 5.5% (75 of 1,352 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.39 · 39.3% (531 of 1,352 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.57 · 8.7% (118 of 1,352 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (156 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.58 · 6.0% (81 of 1,352 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.50 · 9.5% (128 of 1,352 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.30 · 41.4% (560 of 1,352 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.36 · 21.3% (288 of 1,352 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (103 of 1,352 decks)
- Whirlwind relevance 0.54 · 4.1% (56 of 1,352 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.47 · 5.1% (69 of 1,352 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.28 · 42.2% (571 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.41 · 9.6% (130 of 1,352 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.32 · 21.8% (295 of 1,352 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.38 · 10.6% (143 of 1,352 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.42 · 5.3% (71 of 1,352 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.28 · 28.5% (385 of 1,352 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.35 · 10.0% (135 of 1,352 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.35 · 9.1% (123 of 1,352 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.49 · 3.4% (46 of 1,352 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (84 of 1,352 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.33 · 9.9% (134 of 1,352 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (37 of 1,352 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.46 · 3.2% (43 of 1,352 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.46 · 3.0% (40 of 1,352 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.25 · 17.6% (238 of 1,352 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.23 · 25.7% (347 of 1,352 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (40 of 1,352 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.27 · 6.4% (86 of 1,352 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (35 of 1,352 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (78 of 1,352 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (91 of 1,352 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (121 of 1,352 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 10.8% (146 of 1,352 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 10.8% (146 of 1,352 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (76 of 1,352 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 16.1% (218 of 1,352 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (39 of 1,352 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.58 · 36.3% (491 of 1,352 decks)
- Nissa Revane relevance 0.70 · 9.8% (132 of 1,352 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (69 of 1,352 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (43 of 1,352 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (46 of 1,352 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.36 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.25 · 6.7% (91 of 1,352 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (74 of 1,352 decks)
All utility lands (35)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.51 · 66.9% (905 of 1,352 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (146 of 1,352 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.42 · 21.7% (294 of 1,352 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.39 · 27.7% (375 of 1,352 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (178 of 1,352 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (98 of 1,352 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (102 of 1,352 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.50 · 4.5% (61 of 1,352 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.35 · 19.7% (266 of 1,352 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.29 · 33.1% (448 of 1,352 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (149 of 1,352 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 40.6% (549 of 1,352 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (89 of 1,352 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.26 · 21.7% (294 of 1,352 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (70 of 1,352 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.27 · 13.0% (176 of 1,352 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (40 of 1,352 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.22 · 27.8% (376 of 1,352 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 26.3% (355 of 1,352 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (67 of 1,352 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (33 of 1,352 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 10.1% (136 of 1,352 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (67 of 1,352 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 12.2% (165 of 1,352 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (70 of 1,352 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (107 of 1,352 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (36 of 1,352 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (243 of 1,352 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (35 of 1,352 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (52 of 1,352 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (122 of 1,352 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (33 of 1,352 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 13.6% (184 of 1,352 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (33 of 1,352 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (167 of 1,352 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (19)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.36 · 47.9% (648 of 1,352 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.39 · 32.2% (435 of 1,352 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.33 · 20.7% (280 of 1,352 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.25 · 43.3% (586 of 1,352 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.28 · 12.6% (170 of 1,352 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.48 · 2.4% (33 of 1,352 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.29 · 8.1% (110 of 1,352 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (103 of 1,352 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (49 of 1,352 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (110 of 1,352 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (73 of 1,352 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (89 of 1,352 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.30 · 4.8% (65 of 1,352 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (47 of 1,352 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (62 of 1,352 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (61 of 1,352 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (41 of 1,352 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 94.5% (1,277 of 1,352 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ezuri, Renegade Leader, from 1,352 real Commander decks.