Drove of Elves
Played in 3,234 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
3.2K decks
- Green 1,546 · 47.8%
- Golgari 1,017 · 31.4%
- Sultai 183 · 5.7%
- Selesnya 167 · 5.2%
- Simic 110 · 3.4%
- Naya 85 · 2.6%
- Other (10) 126 · 3.9%
All commanders (30)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 4.25 · 31.3% (437 of 1,398 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 3.14 · 16.4% (222 of 1,355 decks)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 3.02 · 3.2% (96 of 3,013 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 2.56 · 17.4% (75 of 431 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.43 · 6.9% (290 of 4,211 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 2.38 · 5.9% (72 of 1,216 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.34 · 21.5% (40 of 186 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 2.25 · 2.1% (416 of 20,181 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.09 · 1.8% (378 of 20,818 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 2.08 · 1.5% (24 of 1,608 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 1.74 · 12.7% (25 of 197 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.58 · 3.8% (27 of 718 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.42 · 4.4% (55 of 1,263 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 1.35 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.29 · 2.8% (88 of 3,092 decks)
- Queen Allenal of Ruadach relevance 1.09 · 1.1% (9 of 797 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.02 · 8.4% (8 of 95 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.98 · 19.0% (4 of 21 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.96 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 0.94 · 1.2% (23 of 1,847 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.87 · 4.0% (5 of 125 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.86 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.84 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.82 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.81 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.74 · 2.7% (13 of 487 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.69 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.66 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.64 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.63 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
All parallel cards (3)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 3.24 · 80.9% (2,616 of 3,234 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 3.20 · 73.3% (2,371 of 3,234 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.97 · 60.9% (1,968 of 3,234 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.89 · 56.8% (1,838 of 3,234 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 2.89 · 54.5% (1,762 of 3,234 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 2.71 · 45.8% (1,482 of 3,234 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.70 · 68.8% (2,225 of 3,234 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 2.46 · 43.5% (1,408 of 3,234 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 2.24 · 39.4% (1,274 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 2.21 · 42.6% (1,378 of 3,234 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.05 · 41.5% (1,343 of 3,234 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 2.02 · 31.2% (1,008 of 3,234 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.94 · 36.0% (1,164 of 3,234 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.92 · 44.2% (1,429 of 3,234 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.90 · 40.5% (1,311 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.87 · 35.5% (1,147 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.84 · 41.0% (1,325 of 3,234 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.77 · 50.3% (1,628 of 3,234 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.75 · 76.1% (2,461 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.75 · 34.4% (1,114 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.73 · 34.4% (1,112 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.70 · 65.6% (2,123 of 3,234 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 1.65 · 21.1% (682 of 3,234 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 1.61 · 38.0% (1,229 of 3,234 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.59 · 29.4% (952 of 3,234 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.59 · 30.9% (1,000 of 3,234 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.45 · 45.6% (1,475 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.39 · 22.8% (736 of 3,234 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.37 · 26.2% (848 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 1.35 · 18.2% (589 of 3,234 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 3.24 · 80.9% (2,616 of 3,234 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 3.20 · 73.3% (2,371 of 3,234 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.97 · 60.9% (1,968 of 3,234 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 2.89 · 56.8% (1,838 of 3,234 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 2.89 · 54.5% (1,762 of 3,234 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 2.71 · 45.8% (1,482 of 3,234 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.70 · 68.8% (2,225 of 3,234 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 2.46 · 43.5% (1,408 of 3,234 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 2.24 · 39.4% (1,274 of 3,234 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.05 · 41.5% (1,343 of 3,234 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 2.02 · 31.2% (1,008 of 3,234 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.94 · 36.0% (1,164 of 3,234 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.92 · 44.2% (1,429 of 3,234 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.90 · 40.5% (1,311 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.87 · 35.5% (1,147 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.84 · 41.0% (1,325 of 3,234 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.77 · 50.3% (1,628 of 3,234 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.75 · 76.1% (2,461 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.75 · 34.4% (1,114 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.73 · 34.4% (1,112 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.70 · 65.6% (2,123 of 3,234 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 1.65 · 21.1% (682 of 3,234 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 1.61 · 38.0% (1,229 of 3,234 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.59 · 29.4% (952 of 3,234 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.45 · 45.6% (1,475 of 3,234 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 1.35 · 18.2% (589 of 3,234 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.34 · 33.5% (1,083 of 3,234 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.32 · 26.9% (869 of 3,234 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.32 · 23.3% (753 of 3,234 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.31 · 30.7% (993 of 3,234 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.28 · 21.4% (692 of 3,234 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.27 · 25.4% (821 of 3,234 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 1.23 · 26.3% (850 of 3,234 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 1.23 · 22.9% (740 of 3,234 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.21 · 24.6% (794 of 3,234 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 1.20 · 20.0% (648 of 3,234 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.20 · 31.1% (1,007 of 3,234 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.17 · 37.4% (1,210 of 3,234 decks)
- Titania's Chosen relevance 1.17 · 14.3% (462 of 3,234 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.15 · 22.4% (723 of 3,234 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.12 · 20.3% (658 of 3,234 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 1.08 · 16.1% (522 of 3,234 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.02 · 18.2% (588 of 3,234 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.39 · 22.8% (736 of 3,234 decks)
All instants (1)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.59 · 30.9% (1,000 of 3,234 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 2.21 · 42.6% (1,378 of 3,234 decks)
- Hunting Triad relevance 1.15 · 15.1% (489 of 3,234 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.37 · 26.2% (848 of 3,234 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.27 · 25.6% (828 of 3,234 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 1.09 · 26.9% (870 of 3,234 decks)
EDH data for Drove of Elves: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,234 real decks.