Cards like Elvish Archdruid
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
74% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Lys Alana Huntmaster
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Lys Alana Huntmaster 55%
- Elvish Promenade 30%
- Elven Ambush 30%
- Hunting Triad 14%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
79% of decks run two or more
vs. 44% of other green decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 82%
- Elvish Mystic 77%
- Fyndhorn Elves 52%
- Boreal Druid 12%
- Druid of the Cowl 7%
- Fyndhorn Elder 5%
- Greenweaver Druid 4%
- Leaf Gilder 3%
- Wirewood Elf 2%
Other options: Woodland Mystic, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Orochi Sustainer, Skyshroud Troopers, Nantuko Elder
Cards like Immaculate Magistrate
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Priest of Titania
13× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
8.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other green decks
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
15× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Warmaster 41%
- Wolverine Riders 16%
Cards like Elvish Visionary
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Wall of Blossoms, Multani's Acolyte, Owlbear, Kavu Climber, Carven Caryatid, Generous Stray, Striped Bears, Pyknite, Arctic Wolves, Rhox Oracle
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
8.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Vanquisher's Banner
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Vanquisher's Banner 21%
- Door of Destinies 10%
- Chronicle of Victory 8%
- Icon of Ancestry 3%
- Obelisk of Urd 1%
Other options: Instruments of War, Brass Herald
Cards like Doubling Season
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Doubling Season 26%
- Parallel Lives 13%
- Primal Vigor 6%
Cards like Elvish Champion
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Marwyn, the Nurturer
19× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Whisperer
2.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 40%
- Quirion Ranger 15%
- Scryb Ranger 2%
Cards like Eladamri, Korvecdal
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Eladamri, Korvecdal 21%
- Elven Chorus 11%
Cards like Essence Warden
5.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Prosperous Innkeeper, Greenhouse Propagator, Social Climber
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
2.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Jagged-Scar Archers
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Chord of Calling
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Heritage Druid
4.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
3.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Wild Wanderer, Quirion Trailblazer, Yavimaya Granger, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, Ondu Giant
Cards like Fog
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 23%
- Druid's Deliverance 3%
- Moment's Peace 2%
- Lull 1%
Other options: Root Snare, Defend the Hearth, Winds of Qal Sisma, Haze of Pollen, Commencement of Festivities, Terrifying Presence, Pause for Reflection, Thwart the Enemy, Tanglesap, Chameleon Blur, Serene Sunset, Vine Snare
Cards like Elvish Harbinger
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender
All top picks (50)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 63.3% (875 of 1,383 decks)
- Drove of Elves relevance 0.78 · 31.4% (434 of 1,383 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.60 · 54.9% (759 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.47 · 79.4% (1,098 of 1,383 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.59 · 55.2% (763 of 1,383 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.65 · 45.6% (631 of 1,383 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.56 · 59.1% (817 of 1,383 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.62 · 47.1% (652 of 1,383 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.62 · 47.3% (654 of 1,383 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.63 · 43.2% (597 of 1,383 decks)
- Titania's Chosen relevance 0.80 · 15.8% (219 of 1,383 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.63 · 38.8% (537 of 1,383 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.42 · 75.9% (1,050 of 1,383 decks)
- Hunting Triad relevance 0.79 · 14.2% (196 of 1,383 decks)
- Wren's Run Packmaster relevance 0.81 · 12.6% (174 of 1,383 decks)
- Grave Sifter relevance 0.84 · 10.6% (146 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.57 · 41.4% (572 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Skysweeper relevance 0.81 · 11.2% (155 of 1,383 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.58 · 38.2% (528 of 1,383 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.63 · 29.9% (413 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.62 · 30.0% (415 of 1,383 decks)
- Masked Admirers relevance 0.76 · 12.9% (178 of 1,383 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 44.9% (621 of 1,383 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.59 · 33.6% (465 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.59 · 33.7% (466 of 1,383 decks)
- Whirlwind relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (201 of 1,383 decks)
- Predator, Flagship relevance 0.83 · 7.5% (104 of 1,383 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.58 · 32.7% (452 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa Revane relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (172 of 1,383 decks)
- Grim Flowering relevance 0.82 · 7.7% (107 of 1,383 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (243 of 1,383 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.58 · 30.4% (420 of 1,383 decks)
- Creeperhulk relevance 0.81 · 7.7% (107 of 1,383 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.61 · 25.5% (352 of 1,383 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (195 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.61 · 24.9% (345 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.52 · 38.8% (536 of 1,383 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.61 · 22.8% (316 of 1,383 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.65 · 15.3% (212 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.55 · 30.7% (425 of 1,383 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.58 · 26.5% (366 of 1,383 decks)
- Loreseeker's Stone relevance 0.80 · 6.1% (84 of 1,383 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.54 · 31.6% (437 of 1,383 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.68 · 12.7% (176 of 1,383 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (313 of 1,383 decks)
- Fresh Meat relevance 0.71 · 10.0% (138 of 1,383 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (224 of 1,383 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.64 · 13.1% (181 of 1,383 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.69 · 9.5% (131 of 1,383 decks)
- Tornado Elemental relevance 0.72 · 7.9% (109 of 1,383 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 63.3% (875 of 1,383 decks)
- Drove of Elves relevance 0.78 · 31.4% (434 of 1,383 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.60 · 54.9% (759 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.47 · 79.4% (1,098 of 1,383 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.59 · 55.2% (763 of 1,383 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.65 · 45.6% (631 of 1,383 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.56 · 59.1% (817 of 1,383 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.62 · 47.1% (652 of 1,383 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.62 · 47.3% (654 of 1,383 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.63 · 43.2% (597 of 1,383 decks)
- Titania's Chosen relevance 0.80 · 15.8% (219 of 1,383 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.63 · 38.8% (537 of 1,383 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.42 · 75.9% (1,050 of 1,383 decks)
- Wren's Run Packmaster relevance 0.81 · 12.6% (174 of 1,383 decks)
- Grave Sifter relevance 0.84 · 10.6% (146 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.57 · 41.4% (572 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Skysweeper relevance 0.81 · 11.2% (155 of 1,383 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.58 · 38.2% (528 of 1,383 decks)
- Masked Admirers relevance 0.76 · 12.9% (178 of 1,383 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 44.9% (621 of 1,383 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.59 · 33.6% (465 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.59 · 33.7% (466 of 1,383 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.58 · 32.7% (452 of 1,383 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (243 of 1,383 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.58 · 30.4% (420 of 1,383 decks)
- Creeperhulk relevance 0.81 · 7.7% (107 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.52 · 38.8% (536 of 1,383 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.61 · 22.8% (316 of 1,383 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.65 · 15.3% (212 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.55 · 30.7% (425 of 1,383 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.54 · 31.6% (437 of 1,383 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.62 · 16.2% (224 of 1,383 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.64 · 13.1% (181 of 1,383 decks)
- Tornado Elemental relevance 0.72 · 7.9% (109 of 1,383 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.57 · 19.5% (270 of 1,383 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.53 · 25.9% (358 of 1,383 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.57 · 18.7% (259 of 1,383 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.66 · 9.8% (135 of 1,383 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.59 · 14.2% (197 of 1,383 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.63 · 11.3% (156 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Clancaller relevance 0.65 · 8.2% (113 of 1,383 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.43 · 39.3% (544 of 1,383 decks)
- Wolfbriar Elemental relevance 0.62 · 9.4% (130 of 1,383 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.51 · 20.8% (288 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa's Chosen relevance 0.68 · 5.0% (69 of 1,383 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.50 · 20.8% (288 of 1,383 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (199 of 1,383 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.63 · 7.7% (106 of 1,383 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.65 · 6.0% (83 of 1,383 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.53 · 13.8% (191 of 1,383 decks)
All artifacts (35)
- Predator, Flagship relevance 0.83 · 7.5% (104 of 1,383 decks)
- Loreseeker's Stone relevance 0.80 · 6.1% (84 of 1,383 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.51 · 20.8% (287 of 1,383 decks)
- Assault Suit relevance 0.66 · 5.9% (82 of 1,383 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.44 · 28.3% (392 of 1,383 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.51 · 13.4% (186 of 1,383 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.55 · 9.8% (135 of 1,383 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (163 of 1,383 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.48 · 12.3% (170 of 1,383 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.51 · 7.8% (108 of 1,383 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.38 · 20.5% (283 of 1,383 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.40 · 14.0% (193 of 1,383 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (127 of 1,383 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (145 of 1,383 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (136 of 1,383 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.42 · 9.3% (128 of 1,383 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (104 of 1,383 decks)
- Dawn-Blessed Pennant relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (38 of 1,383 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.38 · 7.9% (109 of 1,383 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (103 of 1,383 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (68 of 1,383 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (107 of 1,383 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (80 of 1,383 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.34 · 8.4% (116 of 1,383 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (37 of 1,383 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.44 · 3.0% (41 of 1,383 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.27 · 10.7% (148 of 1,383 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.16 · 52.6% (728 of 1,383 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.22 · 18.3% (253 of 1,383 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (247 of 1,383 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (116 of 1,383 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 21.0% (291 of 1,383 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (140 of 1,383 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (39 of 1,383 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 67.9% (939 of 1,383 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.61 · 24.9% (345 of 1,383 decks)
- Crown of Skemfar relevance 0.70 · 8.3% (115 of 1,383 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.52 · 27.3% (378 of 1,383 decks)
- Wolfcaller's Howl relevance 0.70 · 7.4% (103 of 1,383 decks)
- Arboreal Alliance relevance 0.68 · 5.5% (76 of 1,383 decks)
- Vivien's Talent relevance 0.75 · 3.8% (53 of 1,383 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.37 · 34.9% (482 of 1,383 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.38 · 30.4% (421 of 1,383 decks)
- Song of Freyalise relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (73 of 1,383 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (154 of 1,383 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.58 · 4.0% (56 of 1,383 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (260 of 1,383 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.32 · 26.5% (366 of 1,383 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (177 of 1,383 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.43 · 5.9% (81 of 1,383 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (59 of 1,383 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (88 of 1,383 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (99 of 1,383 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.30 · 14.7% (203 of 1,383 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (162 of 1,383 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (80 of 1,383 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.28 · 19.5% (270 of 1,383 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (78 of 1,383 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (92 of 1,383 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.25 · 16.4% (227 of 1,383 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.25 · 15.1% (209 of 1,383 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.24 · 14.0% (193 of 1,383 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (48 of 1,383 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (50 of 1,383 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (37 of 1,383 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (67 of 1,383 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (96 of 1,383 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.20 · 10.8% (150 of 1,383 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (71 of 1,383 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (81 of 1,383 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 10.6% (146 of 1,383 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (40 of 1,383 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (42 of 1,383 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (37 of 1,383 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (46 of 1,383 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (34 of 1,383 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.13 · 12.8% (177 of 1,383 decks)
All instants (40)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.63 · 29.9% (413 of 1,383 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.58 · 26.5% (366 of 1,383 decks)
- Fresh Meat relevance 0.71 · 10.0% (138 of 1,383 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.52 · 13.0% (180 of 1,383 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (106 of 1,383 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.44 · 10.8% (150 of 1,383 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.32 · 21.8% (302 of 1,383 decks)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.55 · 3.5% (49 of 1,383 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (98 of 1,383 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.29 · 19.3% (267 of 1,383 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (153 of 1,383 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.27 · 22.9% (317 of 1,383 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (117 of 1,383 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.30 · 11.4% (158 of 1,383 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (117 of 1,383 decks)
- Collected Company relevance 0.48 · 2.6% (36 of 1,383 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.26 · 15.5% (215 of 1,383 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.43 · 3.2% (44 of 1,383 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.25 · 18.5% (256 of 1,383 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.28 · 9.6% (133 of 1,383 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (56 of 1,383 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (57 of 1,383 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.27 · 8.7% (120 of 1,383 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (61 of 1,383 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (186 of 1,383 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (50 of 1,383 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (42 of 1,383 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.39 · 2.5% (35 of 1,383 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.23 · 11.4% (157 of 1,383 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.20 · 15.9% (220 of 1,383 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (55 of 1,383 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (87 of 1,383 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (40 of 1,383 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.17 · 22.1% (305 of 1,383 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 43.0% (595 of 1,383 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (63 of 1,383 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.19 · 6.5% (90 of 1,383 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 45.8% (634 of 1,383 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (68 of 1,383 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (45 of 1,383 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Hunting Triad relevance 0.79 · 14.2% (196 of 1,383 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.62 · 30.0% (415 of 1,383 decks)
- Whirlwind relevance 0.71 · 14.5% (201 of 1,383 decks)
- Grim Flowering relevance 0.82 · 7.7% (107 of 1,383 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.61 · 25.5% (352 of 1,383 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (195 of 1,383 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.68 · 12.7% (176 of 1,383 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (313 of 1,383 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.69 · 9.5% (131 of 1,383 decks)
- Bounty of Skemfar relevance 0.63 · 5.1% (70 of 1,383 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.42 · 28.3% (391 of 1,383 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (119 of 1,383 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.36 · 23.9% (331 of 1,383 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.29 · 37.4% (517 of 1,383 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (68 of 1,383 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.27 · 34.8% (481 of 1,383 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.33 · 13.0% (180 of 1,383 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (89 of 1,383 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (58 of 1,383 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (56 of 1,383 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.47 · 3.6% (50 of 1,383 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (111 of 1,383 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (71 of 1,383 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.29 · 13.4% (186 of 1,383 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.27 · 19.3% (267 of 1,383 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (70 of 1,383 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (277 of 1,383 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.24 · 28.9% (400 of 1,383 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (128 of 1,383 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (56 of 1,383 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (75 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (60 of 1,383 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (138 of 1,383 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.22 · 10.3% (142 of 1,383 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (40 of 1,383 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (42 of 1,383 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (41 of 1,383 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (36 of 1,383 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (45 of 1,383 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (40 of 1,383 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.17 · 19.3% (267 of 1,383 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (41 of 1,383 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (41 of 1,383 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (56 of 1,383 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 20.8% (287 of 1,383 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (153 of 1,383 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 33.0% (457 of 1,383 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 17.3% (239 of 1,383 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (110 of 1,383 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (37 of 1,383 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (14)
- Nissa Revane relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (172 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (85 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (105 of 1,383 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.49 · 6.1% (84 of 1,383 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (132 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.48 · 4.8% (67 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa, Genesis Mage relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (50 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.40 · 8.5% (118 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.31 · 22.2% (307 of 1,383 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (61 of 1,383 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (62 of 1,383 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (99 of 1,383 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.41 · 3.3% (45 of 1,383 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (38 of 1,383 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (43 of 1,383 decks)
All utility lands (34)
- Gargoyle Castle relevance 0.83 · 8.1% (112 of 1,383 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.72 · 11.4% (158 of 1,383 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.46 · 33.0% (456 of 1,383 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.52 · 14.8% (204 of 1,383 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (199 of 1,383 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.52 · 4.6% (64 of 1,383 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.36 · 22.7% (314 of 1,383 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.30 · 39.6% (547 of 1,383 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (173 of 1,383 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.26 · 27.3% (377 of 1,383 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.43 · 4.0% (55 of 1,383 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.34 · 7.2% (99 of 1,383 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (109 of 1,383 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.26 · 21.0% (290 of 1,383 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (69 of 1,383 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.23 · 28.1% (388 of 1,383 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (62 of 1,383 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.21 · 34.2% (473 of 1,383 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.27 · 12.7% (175 of 1,383 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (48 of 1,383 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (56 of 1,383 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (49 of 1,383 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (77 of 1,383 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 11.8% (163 of 1,383 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.20 · 19.5% (270 of 1,383 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.20 · 18.1% (250 of 1,383 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (97 of 1,383 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (224 of 1,383 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (74 of 1,383 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (47 of 1,383 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (40 of 1,383 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (41 of 1,383 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (37 of 1,383 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 11.6% (161 of 1,383 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (20)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.52 · 14.1% (195 of 1,383 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.48 · 12.3% (170 of 1,383 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.34 · 31.7% (439 of 1,383 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.37 · 21.6% (299 of 1,383 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (137 of 1,383 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (141 of 1,383 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.31 · 14.3% (198 of 1,383 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.29 · 15.9% (220 of 1,383 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.23 · 28.3% (392 of 1,383 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.26 · 14.9% (206 of 1,383 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (173 of 1,383 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (78 of 1,383 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (47 of 1,383 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (38 of 1,383 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (38 of 1,383 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (35 of 1,383 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (35 of 1,383 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (36 of 1,383 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (45 of 1,383 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.3% (1,290 of 1,383 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury, from 1,383 real Commander decks.