Birchlore Rangers
Played in 6,161 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
6.2K decks
3030+243+1+1+1+2+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 3.42 · 31.1% (185 of 595 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 3.40 · 22.4% (301 of 1,341 decks)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 3.06 · 2.0% (190 of 9,511 decks)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 2.89 · 4.4% (130 of 2,977 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.88 · 11.0% (461 of 4,180 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 2.82 · 5.1% (55 of 1,071 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 2.77 · 5.4% (1,083 of 20,030 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.54 · 9.6% (295 of 3,070 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 2.47 · 11.4% (180 of 1,574 decks)
- Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 2.44 · 1.4% (140 of 10,338 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.39 · 4.2% (862 of 20,730 decks)
- Emmara, Soul of the Accord relevance 2.35 · 2.8% (100 of 3,622 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 2.07 · 7.7% (93 of 1,204 decks)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.01 · 1.5% (398 of 26,982 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 2.00 · 8.6% (107 of 1,246 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 1.97 · 1.8% (218 of 12,220 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 1.96 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.93 · 2.2% (34 of 1,581 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.80 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.76 · 10.5% (45 of 430 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.75 · 7.2% (51 of 711 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.54 · 5.8% (10 of 172 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 1.54 · 12.7% (16 of 126 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 1.51 · 1.2% (29 of 2,398 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 1.47 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.46 · 1.6% (19 of 1,202 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.46 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.42 · 35.3% (6 of 17 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 1.37 · 1.3% (20 of 1,572 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.35 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All parallel cards (2)
All most relevant (30)
- Heritage Druid relevance 3.48 · 59.6% (3,670 of 6,161 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 3.29 · 84.0% (5,173 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 3.19 · 79.6% (4,907 of 6,161 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 2.67 · 50.7% (3,121 of 6,161 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.66 · 57.0% (3,509 of 6,161 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.65 · 53.7% (3,307 of 6,161 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.51 · 57.8% (3,564 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.48 · 55.1% (3,395 of 6,161 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 2.41 · 76.9% (4,736 of 6,161 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.36 · 47.9% (2,949 of 6,161 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 2.30 · 59.6% (3,675 of 6,161 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.26 · 51.7% (3,184 of 6,161 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 2.23 · 52.3% (3,221 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 2.20 · 85.3% (5,258 of 6,161 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.19 · 45.0% (2,775 of 6,161 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 2.16 · 67.7% (4,174 of 6,161 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 2.15 · 40.0% (2,463 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 2.10 · 41.4% (2,552 of 6,161 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 2.05 · 89.0% (5,485 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.99 · 39.7% (2,443 of 6,161 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.93 · 34.3% (2,112 of 6,161 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.92 · 54.7% (3,373 of 6,161 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.73 · 35.2% (2,168 of 6,161 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.72 · 34.2% (2,106 of 6,161 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.69 · 34.3% (2,114 of 6,161 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.61 · 33.6% (2,070 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.61 · 30.6% (1,885 of 6,161 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.58 · 27.9% (1,721 of 6,161 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.58 · 34.3% (2,114 of 6,161 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.54 · 27.2% (1,678 of 6,161 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Heritage Druid relevance 3.48 · 59.6% (3,670 of 6,161 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 3.29 · 84.0% (5,173 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 3.19 · 79.6% (4,907 of 6,161 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 2.67 · 50.7% (3,121 of 6,161 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.66 · 57.0% (3,509 of 6,161 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.65 · 53.7% (3,307 of 6,161 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.51 · 57.8% (3,564 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.48 · 55.1% (3,395 of 6,161 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 2.41 · 76.9% (4,736 of 6,161 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.36 · 47.9% (2,949 of 6,161 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 2.30 · 59.6% (3,675 of 6,161 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.26 · 51.7% (3,184 of 6,161 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 2.23 · 52.3% (3,221 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 2.20 · 85.3% (5,258 of 6,161 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.19 · 45.0% (2,775 of 6,161 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 2.16 · 67.7% (4,174 of 6,161 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 2.15 · 40.0% (2,463 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 2.10 · 41.4% (2,552 of 6,161 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 2.05 · 89.0% (5,485 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.99 · 39.7% (2,443 of 6,161 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.93 · 34.3% (2,112 of 6,161 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.92 · 54.7% (3,373 of 6,161 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.73 · 35.2% (2,168 of 6,161 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.72 · 34.2% (2,106 of 6,161 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.69 · 34.3% (2,114 of 6,161 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.61 · 33.6% (2,070 of 6,161 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.61 · 30.6% (1,885 of 6,161 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.58 · 27.9% (1,721 of 6,161 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.58 · 34.3% (2,114 of 6,161 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.54 · 27.2% (1,678 of 6,161 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.44 · 24.2% (1,490 of 6,161 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.43 · 37.7% (2,324 of 6,161 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 1.40 · 28.7% (1,766 of 6,161 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.40 · 31.1% (1,914 of 6,161 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.32 · 33.6% (2,072 of 6,161 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 1.32 · 33.1% (2,039 of 6,161 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.27 · 21.5% (1,324 of 6,161 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.27 · 23.0% (1,420 of 6,161 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.27 · 22.3% (1,374 of 6,161 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.25 · 37.9% (2,333 of 6,161 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.24 · 22.6% (1,391 of 6,161 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 1.18 · 30.8% (1,899 of 6,161 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.16 · 21.4% (1,321 of 6,161 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.22 · 29.0% (1,784 of 6,161 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.43 · 23.4% (1,439 of 6,161 decks)
All instants (1)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.43 · 28.0% (1,722 of 6,161 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.51 · 29.1% (1,794 of 6,161 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.20 · 19.5% (1,202 of 6,161 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 2.38 · 47.9% (2,949 of 6,161 decks)
All lands (1)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 1.15 · 20.5% (1,264 of 6,161 decks)
EDH data for Birchlore Rangers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,161 real decks.

























































