Cards like Frilled Mystic
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Frilled Mystic 41%
- Mystic Snake 37%
Other options: Voracious Greatshark, Voidmage Husher, Sister of Silence
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 51%
- Elvish Mystic 46%
- Gyre Engineer 39%
- Fyndhorn Elves 33%
- Boreal Druid 7%
Other options: Fyndhorn Elder, Druid of the Cowl, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Pond Prophet
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards like Maraleaf Pixie
9.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Maraleaf Pixie 42%
- Birds of Paradise 38%
Cards like Eternal Witness
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Wood Elves
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Vizier of the Menagerie
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
3.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Indrik Stomphowler, Viridian Shaman, Conclave Naturalists, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender
Cards like Coiling Oracle
7.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 65%
- Risen Reef 6%
Cards like Arbor Elf
8.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 20%
- Quirion Ranger 7%
- Scryb Ranger 1%
Cards like Beast Whisperer
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Priest of Titania
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Incubation Druid
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri, Korvecdal
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Prime Speaker Vannifar
8.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Fathom Mage
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Malanthrope relevance 0.80 · 17.2% (187 of 1,087 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.62 · 40.7% (442 of 1,087 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.62 · 39.4% (428 of 1,087 decks)
- Ice-Fang Coatl relevance 0.71 · 24.1% (262 of 1,087 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.63 · 32.7% (355 of 1,087 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.59 · 37.4% (406 of 1,087 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.70 · 20.3% (221 of 1,087 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.69 · 19.8% (215 of 1,087 decks)
- Rootcoil Creeper relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (155 of 1,087 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 0.57 · 32.8% (356 of 1,087 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.54 · 37.5% (408 of 1,087 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.76 · 10.0% (109 of 1,087 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.51 · 41.7% (453 of 1,087 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.40 · 64.9% (705 of 1,087 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.65 · 16.4% (178 of 1,087 decks)
- Weaver of Currents relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (137 of 1,087 decks)
- Sleight of Mind relevance 0.81 · 6.0% (65 of 1,087 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.74 · 8.9% (97 of 1,087 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.58 · 22.9% (249 of 1,087 decks)
- Hermitic Herbalist relevance 0.71 · 9.9% (108 of 1,087 decks)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.65 · 13.7% (149 of 1,087 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.58 · 21.3% (231 of 1,087 decks)
- Mind Bend relevance 0.76 · 5.9% (64 of 1,087 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.57 · 21.3% (232 of 1,087 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.51 · 29.3% (319 of 1,087 decks)
- Pond Prophet relevance 0.50 · 29.9% (325 of 1,087 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.48 · 34.2% (372 of 1,087 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.67 · 8.8% (96 of 1,087 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 8.8% (96 of 1,087 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.53 · 22.0% (239 of 1,087 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.63 · 10.1% (110 of 1,087 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (160 of 1,087 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (119 of 1,087 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.70 · 5.1% (55 of 1,087 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (69 of 1,087 decks)
- Glamerdye relevance 0.75 · 4.4% (48 of 1,087 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.65 · 7.3% (79 of 1,087 decks)
- Nettle Sentinel relevance 0.76 · 4.2% (46 of 1,087 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.49 · 24.4% (265 of 1,087 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.53 · 16.6% (180 of 1,087 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.42 · 38.2% (415 of 1,087 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.62 · 8.0% (87 of 1,087 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.61 · 9.0% (98 of 1,087 decks)
- Wistful Selkie relevance 0.68 · 4.8% (52 of 1,087 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.54 · 13.5% (147 of 1,087 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.56 · 11.5% (125 of 1,087 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.58 · 9.7% (105 of 1,087 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (121 of 1,087 decks)
- Scuttling Sentinel relevance 0.68 · 4.5% (49 of 1,087 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.54 · 11.3% (123 of 1,087 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Malanthrope relevance 0.80 · 17.2% (187 of 1,087 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.62 · 40.7% (442 of 1,087 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.62 · 39.4% (428 of 1,087 decks)
- Ice-Fang Coatl relevance 0.71 · 24.1% (262 of 1,087 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.63 · 32.7% (355 of 1,087 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.59 · 37.4% (406 of 1,087 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.70 · 20.3% (221 of 1,087 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.69 · 19.8% (215 of 1,087 decks)
- Rootcoil Creeper relevance 0.70 · 14.3% (155 of 1,087 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 0.57 · 32.8% (356 of 1,087 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.54 · 37.5% (408 of 1,087 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.76 · 10.0% (109 of 1,087 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.51 · 41.7% (453 of 1,087 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.40 · 64.9% (705 of 1,087 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.65 · 16.4% (178 of 1,087 decks)
- Weaver of Currents relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (137 of 1,087 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.74 · 8.9% (97 of 1,087 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.58 · 22.9% (249 of 1,087 decks)
- Hermitic Herbalist relevance 0.71 · 9.9% (108 of 1,087 decks)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.65 · 13.7% (149 of 1,087 decks)
- Skyserpent Seeker relevance 0.58 · 21.3% (231 of 1,087 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.57 · 21.3% (232 of 1,087 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.51 · 29.3% (319 of 1,087 decks)
- Pond Prophet relevance 0.50 · 29.9% (325 of 1,087 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.48 · 34.2% (372 of 1,087 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.67 · 8.8% (96 of 1,087 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 8.8% (96 of 1,087 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.53 · 22.0% (239 of 1,087 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.63 · 10.1% (110 of 1,087 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (160 of 1,087 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (119 of 1,087 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.70 · 5.1% (55 of 1,087 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.67 · 6.3% (69 of 1,087 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.65 · 7.3% (79 of 1,087 decks)
- Nettle Sentinel relevance 0.76 · 4.2% (46 of 1,087 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.49 · 24.4% (265 of 1,087 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.53 · 16.6% (180 of 1,087 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.42 · 38.2% (415 of 1,087 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.62 · 8.0% (87 of 1,087 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.61 · 9.0% (98 of 1,087 decks)
- Wistful Selkie relevance 0.68 · 4.8% (52 of 1,087 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.54 · 13.5% (147 of 1,087 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.56 · 11.5% (125 of 1,087 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.58 · 9.7% (105 of 1,087 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (121 of 1,087 decks)
- Scuttling Sentinel relevance 0.68 · 4.5% (49 of 1,087 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.54 · 11.3% (123 of 1,087 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.56 · 8.7% (95 of 1,087 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.57 · 8.2% (89 of 1,087 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.55 · 9.8% (107 of 1,087 decks)
All artifacts (28)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.52 · 6.0% (65 of 1,087 decks)
- Veilstone Amulet relevance 0.70 · 2.6% (28 of 1,087 decks)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 0.54 · 3.4% (37 of 1,087 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (49 of 1,087 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.47 · 3.4% (37 of 1,087 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (42 of 1,087 decks)
- Simic Cluestone relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (31 of 1,087 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (74 of 1,087 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (67 of 1,087 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 21.1% (229 of 1,087 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (31 of 1,087 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (71 of 1,087 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (53 of 1,087 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (61 of 1,087 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.21 · 24.8% (270 of 1,087 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (55 of 1,087 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.21 · 14.1% (153 of 1,087 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (38 of 1,087 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (36 of 1,087 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (101 of 1,087 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 12.6% (137 of 1,087 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (51 of 1,087 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (30 of 1,087 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (44 of 1,087 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (29 of 1,087 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (30 of 1,087 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 39.4% (428 of 1,087 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 61.8% (672 of 1,087 decks)
All enchantments (33)
- Aluren relevance 0.61 · 5.2% (57 of 1,087 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.40 · 17.8% (194 of 1,087 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 0.64 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.42 · 6.9% (75 of 1,087 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.36 · 13.0% (141 of 1,087 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (95 of 1,087 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.33 · 14.8% (161 of 1,087 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (59 of 1,087 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.50 · 3.3% (36 of 1,087 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (62 of 1,087 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (127 of 1,087 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (67 of 1,087 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (46 of 1,087 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (63 of 1,087 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.48 · 2.7% (29 of 1,087 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (40 of 1,087 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.27 · 13.9% (151 of 1,087 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (48 of 1,087 decks)
- Fable of Wolf and Owl relevance 0.49 · 2.5% (27 of 1,087 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 12.3% (134 of 1,087 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (42 of 1,087 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (35 of 1,087 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.23 · 14.8% (161 of 1,087 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (96 of 1,087 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (36 of 1,087 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (51 of 1,087 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (43 of 1,087 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (49 of 1,087 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (79 of 1,087 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (32 of 1,087 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (35 of 1,087 decks)
All instants (50)
- Sleight of Mind relevance 0.81 · 6.0% (65 of 1,087 decks)
- Mind Bend relevance 0.76 · 5.9% (64 of 1,087 decks)
- Glamerdye relevance 0.75 · 4.4% (48 of 1,087 decks)
- Alter Reality relevance 0.75 · 3.9% (42 of 1,087 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.46 · 20.6% (224 of 1,087 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (132 of 1,087 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (189 of 1,087 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (83 of 1,087 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.48 · 6.6% (72 of 1,087 decks)
- Cytoshape relevance 0.67 · 3.1% (34 of 1,087 decks)
- Whim of Volrath relevance 0.68 · 2.9% (32 of 1,087 decks)
- Spectral Shift relevance 0.71 · 2.7% (29 of 1,087 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.39 · 9.0% (98 of 1,087 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.34 · 14.8% (161 of 1,087 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.34 · 10.5% (114 of 1,087 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.52 · 3.0% (33 of 1,087 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.56 · 2.6% (28 of 1,087 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.52 · 2.9% (32 of 1,087 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (44 of 1,087 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (102 of 1,087 decks)
- Memory's Journey relevance 0.52 · 2.8% (30 of 1,087 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.37 · 4.6% (50 of 1,087 decks)
- Twincast relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (31 of 1,087 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (90 of 1,087 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (65 of 1,087 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.29 · 10.4% (113 of 1,087 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (42 of 1,087 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.34 · 4.6% (50 of 1,087 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.41 · 3.5% (38 of 1,087 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (150 of 1,087 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.30 · 8.6% (93 of 1,087 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.23 · 19.9% (216 of 1,087 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (49 of 1,087 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.41 · 3.2% (35 of 1,087 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (47 of 1,087 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (51 of 1,087 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.27 · 9.6% (104 of 1,087 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (58 of 1,087 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (70 of 1,087 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (74 of 1,087 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.23 · 18.3% (199 of 1,087 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.42 · 2.8% (30 of 1,087 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (62 of 1,087 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.22 · 18.4% (200 of 1,087 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (51 of 1,087 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.24 · 12.6% (137 of 1,087 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (33 of 1,087 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.22 · 18.1% (197 of 1,087 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 10.1% (110 of 1,087 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (111 of 1,087 decks)
All sorceries (40)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.46 · 20.8% (226 of 1,087 decks)
- Trait Doctoring relevance 0.74 · 3.2% (35 of 1,087 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.56 · 4.6% (50 of 1,087 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.55 · 4.4% (48 of 1,087 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.38 · 17.9% (195 of 1,087 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (109 of 1,087 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (81 of 1,087 decks)
- Biomantic Mastery relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.48 · 4.1% (45 of 1,087 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (63 of 1,087 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (146 of 1,087 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.33 · 11.5% (125 of 1,087 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.40 · 4.2% (46 of 1,087 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (40 of 1,087 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (35 of 1,087 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.45 · 3.0% (33 of 1,087 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.27 · 13.1% (142 of 1,087 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (53 of 1,087 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.30 · 6.5% (71 of 1,087 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (38 of 1,087 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (29 of 1,087 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (44 of 1,087 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (65 of 1,087 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (40 of 1,087 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.19 · 25.8% (280 of 1,087 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (256 of 1,087 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (49 of 1,087 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (70 of 1,087 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.17 · 30.2% (328 of 1,087 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (49 of 1,087 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.19 · 15.3% (166 of 1,087 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (37 of 1,087 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.16 · 25.8% (280 of 1,087 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.15 · 35.0% (380 of 1,087 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (45 of 1,087 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (27 of 1,087 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (76 of 1,087 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (33 of 1,087 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (29 of 1,087 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (42 of 1,087 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (67 of 1,087 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.44 · 2.9% (31 of 1,087 decks)
All utility lands (40)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.45 · 11.3% (123 of 1,087 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.49 · 6.6% (72 of 1,087 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.39 · 9.9% (108 of 1,087 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.47 · 4.1% (45 of 1,087 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (102 of 1,087 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (81 of 1,087 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.26 · 23.0% (250 of 1,087 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (58 of 1,087 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.24 · 22.5% (245 of 1,087 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (54 of 1,087 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.23 · 25.7% (279 of 1,087 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (101 of 1,087 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.24 · 18.3% (199 of 1,087 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (43 of 1,087 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (51 of 1,087 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (52 of 1,087 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.27 · 8.5% (92 of 1,087 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.23 · 14.4% (157 of 1,087 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (105 of 1,087 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (69 of 1,087 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 18.0% (196 of 1,087 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (75 of 1,087 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (38 of 1,087 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.17 · 30.5% (331 of 1,087 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.37 · 2.5% (27 of 1,087 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (40 of 1,087 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (34 of 1,087 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.22 · 7.2% (78 of 1,087 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (31 of 1,087 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (73 of 1,087 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (90 of 1,087 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (46 of 1,087 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (31 of 1,087 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (39 of 1,087 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 33.9% (368 of 1,087 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (85 of 1,087 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (34 of 1,087 decks)
All lands (50)
- Pillar of the Paruns relevance 0.78 · 3.5% (38 of 1,087 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (184 of 1,087 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (182 of 1,087 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (90 of 1,087 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (90 of 1,087 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.34 · 10.5% (114 of 1,087 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.33 · 11.2% (122 of 1,087 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (80 of 1,087 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (163 of 1,087 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.27 · 16.7% (182 of 1,087 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (69 of 1,087 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (171 of 1,087 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.29 · 10.9% (119 of 1,087 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (56 of 1,087 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.31 · 6.4% (70 of 1,087 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.28 · 10.9% (119 of 1,087 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (100 of 1,087 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.28 · 9.9% (108 of 1,087 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (47 of 1,087 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (94 of 1,087 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (92 of 1,087 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (86 of 1,087 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.24 · 17.1% (186 of 1,087 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (60 of 1,087 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (54 of 1,087 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.23 · 16.6% (180 of 1,087 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (54 of 1,087 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.16 · 45.4% (493 of 1,087 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.24 · 9.7% (105 of 1,087 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.21 · 17.4% (189 of 1,087 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.18 · 26.2% (285 of 1,087 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.21 · 15.2% (165 of 1,087 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 13.9% (151 of 1,087 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.15 · 43.1% (468 of 1,087 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.19 · 20.9% (227 of 1,087 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.13 · 56.9% (619 of 1,087 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.14 · 48.9% (532 of 1,087 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (109 of 1,087 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.15 · 34.2% (372 of 1,087 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (33 of 1,087 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 10.1% (110 of 1,087 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 6.5% (71 of 1,087 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (28 of 1,087 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.13 · 42.1% (458 of 1,087 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.11 · 46.0% (500 of 1,087 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (45 of 1,087 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 56.6% (615 of 1,087 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 73.8% (802 of 1,087 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 82.3% (895 of 1,087 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 75.9% (825 of 1,087 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Momir Vig, Simic Visionary, from 1,087 real Commander decks.