Tip: use − and + on any card to filter by it

Brokers Hideout

Played in 60,600 decks

Brokers Hideout
$0.80 €0.83

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 4.08 · 23.7% (477 of 2,016 decks)
  2. Trostani, Selesnya's Voice relevance 3.88 · 46.1% (4,793 of 10,388 decks)
  3. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.81 · 17.1% (901 of 5,279 decks)
  4. Kirol, Attentive First-Year relevance 3.62 · 11.3% (126 of 1,114 decks)
  5. The Unluckiest Planeswalker relevance 3.59 · 4.3% (48 of 1,108 decks)
  6. Tifa Lockhart relevance 3.46 · 44.6% (4,396 of 9,866 decks)
  7. Valko Indorian relevance 3.29 · 4.0% (35 of 865 decks)
  8. Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.88 · 23.6% (1,651 of 7,007 decks)
  9. Cosima, God of the Voyage // The Omenkeel relevance 2.79 · 18.1% (94 of 520 decks)
  10. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.69 · 12.1% (414 of 3,408 decks)
  11. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 2.65 · 52.0% (421 of 810 decks)
  12. Koth of the Homestead relevance 2.53 · 32.0% (33 of 103 decks)
  13. Perrie, the Pulverizer relevance 2.49 · 42.3% (404 of 956 decks)
  14. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.47 · 20.0% (934 of 4,680 decks)
  15. Dina, Soul Steeper relevance 2.45 · 4.9% (281 of 5,779 decks)
  16. Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.43 · 13.3% (22 of 166 decks)
  17. Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 2.42 · 41.3% (420 of 1,016 decks)
  18. Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 2.37 · 23.5% (447 of 1,903 decks)
  19. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.31 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
  20. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.24 · 6.8% (275 of 4,053 decks)
  21. Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Street Urchin relevance 2.23 · 11.4% (95 of 834 decks)
  22. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 2.21 · 5.7% (119 of 2,096 decks)
  23. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.19 · 7.0% (137 of 1,960 decks)
  24. Aerith Gainsborough relevance 2.15 · 6.6% (141 of 2,132 decks)
  25. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.15 · 4.0% (465 of 11,715 decks)
  26. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.15 · 5.4% (96 of 1,789 decks)
  27. Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.10 · 35.3% (273 of 774 decks)
  28. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.08 · 23.8% (207 of 871 decks)
  29. Homer, the Hermit relevance 2.07 · 7.1% (331 of 4,654 decks)
  30. Hope Estheim relevance 2.07 · 6.9% (669 of 9,739 decks)

Parallel Cards

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
All parallel cards (8)
  1. Obscura Storefront
  2. Cabaretti Courtyard
  3. Maestros Theater
  4. Riveteers Overlook
  5. Windswept Heath
  6. Misty Rainforest
  7. Flooded Strand
  8. Bant Panorama

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Harrow
    0.90 27.3%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Scute Swarm
    0.81 25.0%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Explore
    0.81 24.6%
    $0.19 €0.27
  • Cultivate
    0.80 45.5%
    $0.41 €0.48
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.79 19.3%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.79 22.1%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.76 22.0%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.75 20.7%
    $0.27 €0.31
  • Entish Restoration
    0.73 19.4%
    $2.62 €1.95
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.72 18.7%
    $4.84 €3.63
All most relevant (30)
  1. Harrow relevance 0.90 · 27.3% (16,566 of 60,600 decks)
  2. Scute Swarm relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (15,131 of 60,600 decks)
  3. Explore relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (14,905 of 60,600 decks)
  4. Cultivate relevance 0.80 · 45.5% (27,550 of 60,600 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.79 · 19.3% (11,710 of 60,600 decks)
  6. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.79 · 22.1% (13,420 of 60,600 decks)
  7. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.76 · 22.0% (13,306 of 60,600 decks)
  8. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (12,525 of 60,600 decks)
  9. Entish Restoration relevance 0.73 · 19.4% (11,768 of 60,600 decks)
  10. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 18.7% (11,308 of 60,600 decks)
  11. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.68 · 21.7% (13,171 of 60,600 decks)
  12. Nature's Lore relevance 0.66 · 33.3% (20,158 of 60,600 decks)
  13. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (9,201 of 60,600 decks)
  14. Rampant Growth relevance 0.65 · 31.2% (18,919 of 60,600 decks)
  15. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.63 · 16.8% (10,205 of 60,600 decks)
  16. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (13,283 of 60,600 decks)
  17. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (8,998 of 60,600 decks)
  18. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (7,696 of 60,600 decks)
  19. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (10,403 of 60,600 decks)
  20. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (9,862 of 60,600 decks)
  21. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (8,086 of 60,600 decks)
  22. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (9,015 of 60,600 decks)
  23. Beast Within relevance 0.57 · 28.3% (17,160 of 60,600 decks)
  24. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (8,605 of 60,600 decks)
  25. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.57 · 24.2% (14,668 of 60,600 decks)
  26. Farseek relevance 0.56 · 30.0% (18,200 of 60,600 decks)
  27. Crop Rotation relevance 0.55 · 17.5% (10,604 of 60,600 decks)
  28. Exploration relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (9,500 of 60,600 decks)
  29. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (8,223 of 60,600 decks)
  30. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.49 · 21.3% (12,911 of 60,600 decks)

Creatures

17

Showing 1-10 of 17

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    0.81 25.0%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.79 19.3%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.79 22.1%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.76 22.0%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.75 20.7%
    $0.27 €0.31
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.72 18.7%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.68 21.7%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.63 16.8%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.61 21.9%
    $0.47 €0.58
  • Mossborn Hydra
    0.61 14.8%
    $13.33 €11.28
All creatures (17)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (15,131 of 60,600 decks)
  2. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.79 · 19.3% (11,710 of 60,600 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.79 · 22.1% (13,420 of 60,600 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.76 · 22.0% (13,306 of 60,600 decks)
  5. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (12,525 of 60,600 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 18.7% (11,308 of 60,600 decks)
  7. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.68 · 21.7% (13,171 of 60,600 decks)
  8. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.63 · 16.8% (10,205 of 60,600 decks)
  9. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (13,283 of 60,600 decks)
  10. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (8,998 of 60,600 decks)
  11. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (7,696 of 60,600 decks)
  12. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (10,403 of 60,600 decks)
  13. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (9,862 of 60,600 decks)
  14. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (8,086 of 60,600 decks)
  15. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (8,605 of 60,600 decks)
  16. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (8,223 of 60,600 decks)
  17. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.49 · 21.3% (12,911 of 60,600 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.58 14.9%
    $1.12 €1.38
All artifacts (1)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (9,015 of 60,600 decks)

Enchantments

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.54 15.7%
    $29.98 €27.12
All enchantments (1)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (9,500 of 60,600 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Harrow
    0.90 27.3%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Entish Restoration
    0.73 19.4%
    $2.62 €1.95
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.65 15.2%
    $0.34 €0.30
  • Beast Within
    0.57 28.3%
    $0.65 €0.84
  • Crop Rotation
    0.55 17.5%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Break Down
    0.48 7.7%
    $2.88 €2.22
All instants (6)
  1. Harrow relevance 0.90 · 27.3% (16,566 of 60,600 decks)
  2. Entish Restoration relevance 0.73 · 19.4% (11,768 of 60,600 decks)
  3. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (9,201 of 60,600 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.57 · 28.3% (17,160 of 60,600 decks)
  5. Crop Rotation relevance 0.55 · 17.5% (10,604 of 60,600 decks)
  6. Break Down relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (4,649 of 60,600 decks)

Sorceries

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Explore
    0.81 24.6%
    $0.19 €0.27
  • Cultivate
    0.80 45.5%
    $0.41 €0.48
  • Nature's Lore
    0.66 33.3%
    $2.23 €2.81
  • Rampant Growth
    0.65 31.2%
    $1.28 €0.51
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.57 24.2%
    $1.77 €1.50
  • Farseek
    0.56 30.0%
    $0.46 €0.82
All sorceries (6)
  1. Explore relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (14,905 of 60,600 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.80 · 45.5% (27,550 of 60,600 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.66 · 33.3% (20,158 of 60,600 decks)
  4. Rampant Growth relevance 0.65 · 31.2% (18,919 of 60,600 decks)
  5. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.57 · 24.2% (14,668 of 60,600 decks)
  6. Farseek relevance 0.56 · 30.0% (18,200 of 60,600 decks)

Utility Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Escape Tunnel
    0.84 21.7%
    $0.28 €0.10
  • Myriad Landscape
    0.72 32.9%
    $0.34 €0.24
  • Blighted Woodland
    0.58 13.1%
    $0.40 €0.25
  • Krosan Verge
    0.51 11.5%
    $0.31 €0.17
  • Radiant Fountain
    0.49 10.8%
    $3.52 €0.21
All utility lands (5)
  1. Escape Tunnel relevance 0.84 · 21.7% (13,173 of 60,600 decks)
  2. Myriad Landscape relevance 0.72 · 32.9% (19,967 of 60,600 decks)
  3. Blighted Woodland relevance 0.58 · 13.1% (7,952 of 60,600 decks)
  4. Krosan Verge relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (6,981 of 60,600 decks)
  5. Radiant Fountain relevance 0.49 · 10.8% (6,536 of 60,600 decks)

Lands

14

Showing 1-10 of 14

Page size
  • Cabaretti Courtyard
    1.88 44.4%
    $0.36 €0.33
  • Riveteers Overlook
    1.42 36.3%
    $0.30 €0.17
  • Obscura Storefront
    1.05 21.6%
    $0.31 €0.29
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    1.03 51.1%
    $0.26 €0.11
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.99 57.8%
    $0.29 €0.14
  • Maestros Theater
    0.89 19.9%
    $0.31 €0.27
  • Fabled Passage
    0.83 39.6%
    $0.64 €0.95
  • Vibrant Cityscape
    0.62 15.2%
    $0.34 €0.18
  • Canopy Vista
    0.62 23.2%
    $0.30 €0.24
  • Selesnya Sanctuary
    0.57 14.3%
    $0.32 €0.18
All lands (14)
  1. Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 1.88 · 44.4% (26,880 of 60,600 decks)
  2. Riveteers Overlook relevance 1.42 · 36.3% (21,985 of 60,600 decks)
  3. Obscura Storefront relevance 1.05 · 21.6% (13,073 of 60,600 decks)
  4. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 1.03 · 51.1% (30,973 of 60,600 decks)
  5. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.99 · 57.8% (35,013 of 60,600 decks)
  6. Maestros Theater relevance 0.89 · 19.9% (12,080 of 60,600 decks)
  7. Fabled Passage relevance 0.83 · 39.6% (23,998 of 60,600 decks)
  8. Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.62 · 15.2% (9,241 of 60,600 decks)
  9. Canopy Vista relevance 0.62 · 23.2% (14,052 of 60,600 decks)
  10. Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.57 · 14.3% (8,659 of 60,600 decks)
  11. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (9,247 of 60,600 decks)
  12. Blossoming Sands relevance 0.51 · 11.7% (7,090 of 60,600 decks)
  13. Bant Panorama relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (5,092 of 60,600 decks)
  14. Seaside Citadel relevance 0.48 · 13.3% (8,052 of 60,600 decks)

EDH data for Brokers Hideout: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 60,600 real decks.