Color Identity Spread
3030+25+1+3+5+11+4+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 4.02 · 74.6% (1,483 of 1,988 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of All relevance 3.51 · 10.5% (733 of 7,003 decks)
- Raggadragga, Goreguts Boss relevance 3.39 · 35.8% (1,559 of 4,351 decks)
- Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 3.07 · 10.9% (1,136 of 10,468 decks)
- Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 2.86 · 18.5% (3,952 of 21,364 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 2.71 · 32.2% (803 of 2,493 decks)
- Kwia Vigorbloom relevance 2.68 · 16.7% (866 of 5,176 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.46 · 9.8% (1,217 of 12,450 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 2.40 · 51.3% (141 of 275 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.38 · 42.5% (1,789 of 4,211 decks)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 2.33 · 7.0% (335 of 4,767 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.31 · 19.0% (1,337 of 7,020 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 2.22 · 27.6% (206 of 746 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 2.22 · 36.6% (1,835 of 5,018 decks)
- Magus Lucea Kane relevance 2.19 · 5.8% (502 of 8,676 decks)
- Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence relevance 2.17 · 56.4% (401 of 711 decks)
- The Notary Hobbits relevance 2.12 · 40.3% (935 of 2,320 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 2.06 · 11.0% (2,230 of 20,181 decks)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.02 · 3.3% (394 of 11,900 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.01 · 11.5% (401 of 3,484 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.98 · 18.0% (332 of 1,847 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.95 · 5.9% (149 of 2,518 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 1.93 · 48.9% (296 of 605 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.92 · 39.2% (531 of 1,355 decks)
- Yurlok of Scorch Thrash relevance 1.88 · 4.5% (309 of 6,900 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.88 · 30.4% (1,099 of 3,618 decks)
- Meria, Scholar of Antiquity relevance 1.85 · 16.4% (267 of 1,630 decks)
- Teval, Arbiter of Virtue relevance 1.85 · 9.0% (261 of 2,915 decks)
- Brigid, Clachan's Heart // Brigid, Doun's Mind relevance 1.80 · 7.9% (642 of 8,154 decks)
- Klauth, Unrivaled Ancient relevance 1.77 · 16.0% (221 of 1,377 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.14 · 44.3% (29,701 of 67,095 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.11 · 48.0% (32,195 of 67,095 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (16,476 of 67,095 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.92 · 45.6% (30,607 of 67,095 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (14,827 of 67,095 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.86 · 22.4% (15,053 of 67,095 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.86 · 24.4% (16,391 of 67,095 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.85 · 27.3% (18,297 of 67,095 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.84 · 42.6% (28,563 of 67,095 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.82 · 25.8% (17,288 of 67,095 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 24.8% (16,658 of 67,095 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (10,299 of 67,095 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.69 · 21.1% (14,134 of 67,095 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.69 · 22.4% (15,015 of 67,095 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.68 · 39.0% (26,134 of 67,095 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.67 · 18.9% (12,662 of 67,095 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.66 · 15.4% (10,332 of 67,095 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.63 · 16.8% (11,253 of 67,095 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.63 · 19.1% (12,821 of 67,095 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.62 · 30.0% (20,105 of 67,095 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.61 · 23.9% (16,011 of 67,095 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (14,688 of 67,095 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (9,295 of 67,095 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.60 · 17.5% (11,750 of 67,095 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.59 · 16.1% (10,807 of 67,095 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (7,968 of 67,095 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (9,504 of 67,095 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.56 · 15.4% (10,330 of 67,095 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.55 · 16.9% (11,338 of 67,095 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.54 · 12.4% (8,289 of 67,095 decks)
All creatures (25)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.14 · 44.3% (29,701 of 67,095 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.11 · 48.0% (32,195 of 67,095 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (16,476 of 67,095 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.87 · 22.1% (14,827 of 67,095 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.86 · 22.4% (15,053 of 67,095 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.86 · 24.4% (16,391 of 67,095 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.85 · 27.3% (18,297 of 67,095 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.82 · 25.8% (17,288 of 67,095 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 24.8% (16,658 of 67,095 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (10,299 of 67,095 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.66 · 15.4% (10,332 of 67,095 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (14,688 of 67,095 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (9,295 of 67,095 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.60 · 17.5% (11,750 of 67,095 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (9,504 of 67,095 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.55 · 16.9% (11,338 of 67,095 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.54 · 12.4% (8,289 of 67,095 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (7,617 of 67,095 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.52 · 25.3% (16,982 of 67,095 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.51 · 14.0% (9,407 of 67,095 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.51 · 13.5% (9,025 of 67,095 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.51 · 10.1% (6,755 of 67,095 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (10,085 of 67,095 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.49 · 14.2% (9,500 of 67,095 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (10,432 of 67,095 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.51 · 13.2% (8,831 of 67,095 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.61 · 23.9% (16,011 of 67,095 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.50 · 11.0% (7,404 of 67,095 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.49 · 14.2% (9,511 of 67,095 decks)
All instants (5)
- Beast Within relevance 0.92 · 45.6% (30,607 of 67,095 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.84 · 42.6% (28,563 of 67,095 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.69 · 22.4% (15,015 of 67,095 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (7,968 of 67,095 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.56 · 15.4% (10,330 of 67,095 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.69 · 21.1% (14,134 of 67,095 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.68 · 39.0% (26,134 of 67,095 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.67 · 18.9% (12,662 of 67,095 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.63 · 16.8% (11,253 of 67,095 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.63 · 19.1% (12,821 of 67,095 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.62 · 30.0% (20,105 of 67,095 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.59 · 16.1% (10,807 of 67,095 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.52 · 26.3% (17,671 of 67,095 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.52 · 22.1% (14,835 of 67,095 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.48 · 10.8% (7,275 of 67,095 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (9,368 of 67,095 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.62 · 24.5% (16,463 of 67,095 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.52 · 14.5% (9,708 of 67,095 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.49 · 19.5% (13,088 of 67,095 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.48 · 15.4% (10,301 of 67,095 decks)
All lands (1)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.48 · 12.5% (8,365 of 67,095 decks)
EDH data for Genesis Wave: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 67,095 real decks.










































































