Cards like Elvish Archdruid
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
88% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
3.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other green decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 66%
- Quirion Ranger 61%
- Scryb Ranger 24%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
96% of decks run one or more
vs. 58% of other green decks
91% of decks run two or more
vs. 44% of other green decks
3.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 92%
- Elvish Mystic 88%
- Fyndhorn Elves 73%
- Boreal Druid 35%
- Druid of the Cowl 7%
- Leaf Gilder 5%
- Fyndhorn Elder 3%
- Greenweaver Druid 3%
- Wirewood Elf 2%
- Woodland Mystic 1%
Other options: Skyshroud Troopers, Rootrider Faun, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Golden Hind, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Lys Alana Huntmaster
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Priest of Titania
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Immaculate Magistrate
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Green Sun's Zenith
3.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards like Elvish Visionary
7.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Shaman of Spring, Wall of Blossoms, Owlbear, Generous Stray, Pyknite, Kavu Climber, Striped Bears, Carven Caryatid, Arctic Wolves, Rhox Oracle
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Warmaster 60%
- Wolverine Riders 19%
Cards like Beast Whisperer
4.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fierce Empath
8.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Fierce Empath 35%
- Woodland Bellower 12%
Cards like Elvish Champion
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Heritage Druid
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Heritage Druid 28%
- Birchlore Rangers 11%
Cards like Eladamri, Korvecdal
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
- Eladamri, Korvecdal 40%
- Elven Chorus 15%
Cards like Vanquisher's Banner
3.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Obelisk of Urd, Instruments of War, Brass Herald
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
2.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
4.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
2.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other green decks
Cards like Sol Ring
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other green decks
Cards like Fauna Shaman
7.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Acidic Slime, Conclave Naturalists, Foundation Breaker, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Essence Warden
4.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Essence Warden 21%
- Virulent Emissary 10%
Other options: Prosperous Innkeeper, Social Climber, Greenhouse Propagator
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 34%
- Lightning Greaves 29%
Cards like Elvish Harbinger
9.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Vitalize
4.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Dwynen's Elite
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards like Worldly Tutor
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 37%
- Sylvan Tutor 4%
Cards like Tooth and Nail
5.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.71 · 67.0% (2,802 of 4,180 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.66 · 72.7% (3,038 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.55 · 90.8% (3,794 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.70 · 59.5% (2,489 of 4,180 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.66 · 64.1% (2,680 of 4,180 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.73 · 51.9% (2,169 of 4,180 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.71 · 55.2% (2,308 of 4,180 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.49 · 87.6% (3,662 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.63 · 62.1% (2,596 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.65 · 58.9% (2,463 of 4,180 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.72 · 46.1% (1,927 of 4,180 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.74 · 40.2% (1,682 of 4,180 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.72 · 42.6% (1,779 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.72 · 41.8% (1,749 of 4,180 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.76 · 34.0% (1,420 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.75 · 34.0% (1,422 of 4,180 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.72 · 36.9% (1,544 of 4,180 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.58 · 56.3% (2,353 of 4,180 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.63 · 47.9% (2,001 of 4,180 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.70 · 35.6% (1,490 of 4,180 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (1,080 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.67 · 38.6% (1,613 of 4,180 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.75 · 27.7% (1,158 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.70 · 33.5% (1,400 of 4,180 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.72 · 29.9% (1,248 of 4,180 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.52 · 61.4% (2,567 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.73 · 27.4% (1,145 of 4,180 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.65 · 38.8% (1,623 of 4,180 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.72 · 28.2% (1,180 of 4,180 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.71 · 28.6% (1,195 of 4,180 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.71 · 27.0% (1,128 of 4,180 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.77 · 19.3% (807 of 4,180 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.79 · 15.1% (630 of 4,180 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.67 · 29.5% (1,233 of 4,180 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.78 · 13.7% (574 of 4,180 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.76 · 14.2% (592 of 4,180 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.57 · 39.9% (1,666 of 4,180 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.63 · 30.1% (1,258 of 4,180 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.80 · 11.1% (465 of 4,180 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.78 · 12.2% (508 of 4,180 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.60 · 33.9% (1,417 of 4,180 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.67 · 22.7% (947 of 4,180 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.68 · 20.3% (847 of 4,180 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 0.69 · 15.4% (643 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.82 · 8.1% (339 of 4,180 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.38 · 73.2% (3,058 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.78 · 9.8% (408 of 4,180 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.84 · 6.3% (264 of 4,180 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.75 · 11.0% (461 of 4,180 decks)
- Crown of Skemfar relevance 0.83 · 6.5% (271 of 4,180 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.71 · 67.0% (2,802 of 4,180 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.66 · 72.7% (3,038 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.55 · 90.8% (3,794 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.70 · 59.5% (2,489 of 4,180 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.66 · 64.1% (2,680 of 4,180 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.73 · 51.9% (2,169 of 4,180 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.71 · 55.2% (2,308 of 4,180 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.49 · 87.6% (3,662 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.63 · 62.1% (2,596 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.65 · 58.9% (2,463 of 4,180 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.72 · 46.1% (1,927 of 4,180 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.74 · 40.2% (1,682 of 4,180 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.72 · 42.6% (1,779 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.72 · 41.8% (1,749 of 4,180 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.72 · 36.9% (1,544 of 4,180 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.70 · 35.6% (1,490 of 4,180 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (1,080 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.67 · 38.6% (1,613 of 4,180 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.75 · 27.7% (1,158 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.70 · 33.5% (1,400 of 4,180 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.72 · 29.9% (1,248 of 4,180 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.52 · 61.4% (2,567 of 4,180 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.65 · 38.8% (1,623 of 4,180 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.72 · 28.2% (1,180 of 4,180 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.71 · 28.6% (1,195 of 4,180 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.71 · 27.0% (1,128 of 4,180 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.77 · 19.3% (807 of 4,180 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.79 · 15.1% (630 of 4,180 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.78 · 13.7% (574 of 4,180 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.57 · 39.9% (1,666 of 4,180 decks)
- Sylvan Messenger relevance 0.80 · 11.1% (465 of 4,180 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 0.78 · 12.2% (508 of 4,180 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.60 · 33.9% (1,417 of 4,180 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.68 · 20.3% (847 of 4,180 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 0.69 · 15.4% (643 of 4,180 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.38 · 73.2% (3,058 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Herald relevance 0.78 · 9.8% (408 of 4,180 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.84 · 6.3% (264 of 4,180 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.75 · 11.0% (461 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Clancaller relevance 0.80 · 7.9% (332 of 4,180 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.62 · 23.9% (999 of 4,180 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.63 · 20.9% (875 of 4,180 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.54 · 35.2% (1,472 of 4,180 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.43 · 57.5% (2,404 of 4,180 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.60 · 23.9% (1,001 of 4,180 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.47 · 46.1% (1,929 of 4,180 decks)
- Elvish Vanguard relevance 0.77 · 7.4% (308 of 4,180 decks)
- Nettle Sentinel relevance 0.80 · 5.5% (230 of 4,180 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.60 · 19.6% (818 of 4,180 decks)
- Heedless One relevance 0.79 · 5.5% (231 of 4,180 decks)
All artifacts (34)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.58 · 56.3% (2,353 of 4,180 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.63 · 47.9% (2,001 of 4,180 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.76 · 14.2% (592 of 4,180 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.59 · 17.3% (723 of 4,180 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.58 · 18.8% (786 of 4,180 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.67 · 6.9% (288 of 4,180 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.63 · 7.0% (292 of 4,180 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (608 of 4,180 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.46 · 21.6% (903 of 4,180 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.54 · 10.1% (423 of 4,180 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.55 · 8.2% (343 of 4,180 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (341 of 4,180 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.52 · 7.6% (317 of 4,180 decks)
- Malachite Talisman relevance 0.77 · 2.8% (116 of 4,180 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.49 · 7.9% (330 of 4,180 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (391 of 4,180 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (440 of 4,180 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (296 of 4,180 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.43 · 6.1% (256 of 4,180 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (177 of 4,180 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (195 of 4,180 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (243 of 4,180 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.27 · 29.1% (1,217 of 4,180 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.27 · 20.9% (874 of 4,180 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (419 of 4,180 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.23 · 33.7% (1,408 of 4,180 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.43 · 3.5% (147 of 4,180 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (106 of 4,180 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (437 of 4,180 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (169 of 4,180 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.23 · 15.7% (656 of 4,180 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.17 · 29.4% (1,231 of 4,180 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (110 of 4,180 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.08 · 72.6% (3,034 of 4,180 decks)
All enchantments (39)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.73 · 27.4% (1,145 of 4,180 decks)
- Crown of Skemfar relevance 0.83 · 6.5% (271 of 4,180 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.77 · 5.1% (214 of 4,180 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.67 · 9.4% (391 of 4,180 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.57 · 14.7% (615 of 4,180 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (580 of 4,180 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.57 · 9.0% (375 of 4,180 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.54 · 6.3% (265 of 4,180 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.40 · 25.6% (1,071 of 4,180 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.36 · 33.0% (1,380 of 4,180 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.70 · 2.7% (114 of 4,180 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (203 of 4,180 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.33 · 28.3% (1,185 of 4,180 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.57 · 3.9% (162 of 4,180 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.40 · 11.4% (475 of 4,180 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.35 · 18.2% (759 of 4,180 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.59 · 3.4% (142 of 4,180 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.39 · 12.1% (507 of 4,180 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.33 · 21.9% (916 of 4,180 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (468 of 4,180 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.32 · 20.8% (871 of 4,180 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (233 of 4,180 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.27 · 30.8% (1,287 of 4,180 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.36 · 9.4% (392 of 4,180 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (357 of 4,180 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.33 · 11.0% (461 of 4,180 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.33 · 6.6% (274 of 4,180 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.42 · 3.4% (141 of 4,180 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (417 of 4,180 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.41 · 3.3% (140 of 4,180 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.39 · 3.6% (150 of 4,180 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (175 of 4,180 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (143 of 4,180 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (138 of 4,180 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.23 · 8.0% (334 of 4,180 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (111 of 4,180 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (137 of 4,180 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (110 of 4,180 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.15 · 8.9% (374 of 4,180 decks)
All instants (50)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.76 · 34.0% (1,420 of 4,180 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.63 · 30.1% (1,258 of 4,180 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.67 · 22.7% (947 of 4,180 decks)
- Wirewood Pride relevance 0.82 · 8.1% (339 of 4,180 decks)
- Boon of Boseiju relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (463 of 4,180 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.65 · 14.0% (587 of 4,180 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.59 · 20.5% (858 of 4,180 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 0.74 · 6.6% (276 of 4,180 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 0.75 · 5.6% (235 of 4,180 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (523 of 4,180 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.51 · 27.7% (1,156 of 4,180 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 0.72 · 5.9% (245 of 4,180 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (806 of 4,180 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.56 · 15.7% (658 of 4,180 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.52 · 19.9% (831 of 4,180 decks)
- Collected Company relevance 0.70 · 4.8% (201 of 4,180 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.53 · 14.5% (607 of 4,180 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.42 · 37.7% (1,577 of 4,180 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.62 · 7.4% (311 of 4,180 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (265 of 4,180 decks)
- Witch's Web relevance 0.76 · 3.8% (160 of 4,180 decks)
- Might of Old Krosa relevance 0.61 · 4.5% (190 of 4,180 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.40 · 27.4% (1,145 of 4,180 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.52 · 5.5% (229 of 4,180 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.39 · 21.0% (877 of 4,180 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 37.1% (1,549 of 4,180 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (352 of 4,180 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (378 of 4,180 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.60 · 3.4% (144 of 4,180 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.37 · 13.4% (559 of 4,180 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.43 · 5.5% (228 of 4,180 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.31 · 24.8% (1,037 of 4,180 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (294 of 4,180 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (397 of 4,180 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.31 · 23.3% (974 of 4,180 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (501 of 4,180 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.22 · 47.4% (1,980 of 4,180 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (175 of 4,180 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (498 of 4,180 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.26 · 25.1% (1,048 of 4,180 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.54 · 2.5% (104 of 4,180 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.29 · 13.4% (560 of 4,180 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (150 of 4,180 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 17.3% (722 of 4,180 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (366 of 4,180 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (126 of 4,180 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (206 of 4,180 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.26 · 13.0% (542 of 4,180 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.39 · 3.6% (150 of 4,180 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (311 of 4,180 decks)
All sorceries (44)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.75 · 34.0% (1,422 of 4,180 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.65 · 13.7% (571 of 4,180 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.62 · 16.0% (670 of 4,180 decks)
- Bounty of Skemfar relevance 0.79 · 4.9% (206 of 4,180 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.46 · 42.5% (1,775 of 4,180 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.55 · 18.3% (764 of 4,180 decks)
- Hunting Triad relevance 0.77 · 4.1% (173 of 4,180 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.69 · 4.7% (196 of 4,180 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.62 · 7.3% (306 of 4,180 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.61 · 8.0% (336 of 4,180 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.49 · 14.8% (618 of 4,180 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (747 of 4,180 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.35 · 38.1% (1,594 of 4,180 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (442 of 4,180 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.39 · 26.3% (1,100 of 4,180 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.34 · 38.5% (1,608 of 4,180 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.33 · 39.7% (1,658 of 4,180 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (502 of 4,180 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.41 · 14.8% (618 of 4,180 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.44 · 11.8% (494 of 4,180 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.38 · 17.7% (739 of 4,180 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.61 · 3.5% (145 of 4,180 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.32 · 26.0% (1,087 of 4,180 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (177 of 4,180 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.52 · 4.0% (167 of 4,180 decks)
- Wildest Dreams relevance 0.65 · 2.5% (105 of 4,180 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (295 of 4,180 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.62 · 2.7% (113 of 4,180 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.60 · 2.8% (118 of 4,180 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.54 · 3.3% (140 of 4,180 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.25 · 39.4% (1,645 of 4,180 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.27 · 25.3% (1,057 of 4,180 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (121 of 4,180 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (127 of 4,180 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (150 of 4,180 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (128 of 4,180 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (165 of 4,180 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (198 of 4,180 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (200 of 4,180 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (320 of 4,180 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.17 · 12.4% (520 of 4,180 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.17 · 12.9% (538 of 4,180 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (371 of 4,180 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.14 · 17.6% (735 of 4,180 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.67 · 29.5% (1,233 of 4,180 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.64 · 7.3% (306 of 4,180 decks)
- Nissa Revane relevance 0.74 · 4.3% (178 of 4,180 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.41 · 11.0% (458 of 4,180 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (113 of 4,180 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (209 of 4,180 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (108 of 4,180 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.48 · 12.3% (515 of 4,180 decks)
All utility lands (32)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.60 · 64.2% (2,685 of 4,180 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.46 · 28.2% (1,178 of 4,180 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.60 · 6.7% (280 of 4,180 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.48 · 16.0% (667 of 4,180 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.48 · 13.1% (546 of 4,180 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.54 · 5.2% (219 of 4,180 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.29 · 40.1% (1,676 of 4,180 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.32 · 29.4% (1,231 of 4,180 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (283 of 4,180 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.39 · 11.4% (477 of 4,180 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.32 · 21.6% (903 of 4,180 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (205 of 4,180 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (574 of 4,180 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.51 · 3.7% (154 of 4,180 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.33 · 13.3% (557 of 4,180 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (175 of 4,180 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 30.2% (1,261 of 4,180 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.26 · 28.4% (1,188 of 4,180 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (434 of 4,180 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.48 · 3.1% (131 of 4,180 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.24 · 23.6% (987 of 4,180 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (121 of 4,180 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (429 of 4,180 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (944 of 4,180 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (118 of 4,180 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (130 of 4,180 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.21 · 12.3% (515 of 4,180 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (152 of 4,180 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (266 of 4,180 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (104 of 4,180 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (131 of 4,180 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (106 of 4,180 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (17)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.46 · 27.2% (1,138 of 4,180 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.39 · 28.3% (1,183 of 4,180 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.49 · 9.6% (402 of 4,180 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (881 of 4,180 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.41 · 14.2% (593 of 4,180 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.28 · 34.8% (1,453 of 4,180 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.33 · 11.4% (475 of 4,180 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (222 of 4,180 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (258 of 4,180 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (240 of 4,180 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (243 of 4,180 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (270 of 4,180 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.37 · 4.5% (187 of 4,180 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (148 of 4,180 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (123 of 4,180 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (107 of 4,180 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 94.2% (3,937 of 4,180 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Marwyn, the Nurturer, from 4,180 real Commander decks.