Cards like Ramunap Excavator
5.9× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Jund decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Jund decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
5.3× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Jund decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Jund decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
2.8× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Jund decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Jund decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Harrow 56%
- Scapeshift 48%
- Roiling Regrowth 18%
- Entish Restoration 16%
- Planar Engineering 8%
- Cycle of Renewal 3%
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
7.1× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Jund decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Jund decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.7× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Jund decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other Jund decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.82 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Cultivate 48%
- Kodama's Reach 26%
- Rampant Growth 18%
- Far Wanderings 11%
- Explosive Vegetation 9%
- Shared Roots 2%
- Migration Path 1%
- Search for Tomorrow 1%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Grow from the Ashes, Reach the Horizon, New Generation's Technique, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery, Roamer's Routine, Primal Growth, Path to the Festival, Peregrination, Deep Reconnaissance, Beneath the Sands, They Went This Way, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes
Cards like Tannuk, Memorial Ensign
3.5× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Jund decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Jund decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign 35%
- Sabotender 16%
- Iridescent Vinelasher 15%
- Spitfire Lagac 7%
- Tunneling Geopede 6%
- Akoum Hellkite 2%
- Koth, the Geomancer 1%
Other options: Cosi's Ravager
Cards like Scute Swarm
4.5× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Jund decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Jund decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 57%
- Springheart Nantuko 18%
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
3.6× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Jund decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Jund decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 38%
- World Shaper 30%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Jund decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Jund decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 44%
- Three Visits 33%
- Skyshroud Claim 14%
- Hunting Wilds 4%
Other options: Nissa's Pilgrimage, Ranger's Path, Glimpse the Core, Field Trip
Cards like Avenger of Zendikar
Over 20× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Jund decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
Over 20× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Jund decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
5.4× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Jund decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Jund decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 18%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 5%
- Scythecat Cub 4%
- Sazh's Chocobo 2%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 2%
- Territorial Scythecat 2%
- Undergrowth Champion 2%
Other options: Floral Evoker, Seedship Agrarian, Vinelasher Kudzu, Murasa Ranger, Foe-liage
Cards like Exploration
6.1× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Jund decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Jund decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Decimate
6.7× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Jund decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Jund decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Decimate 22%
- Casualties of War 7%
- Hull Breach 3%
Cards like Realms Uncharted
Over 20× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Jund decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Vital Force
Over 20× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Jund decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
1.6× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Jund decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Jund decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Jund decks
Cards like Assassin's Trophy
6.1× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Jund decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Assassin's Trophy 53%
- Deathsprout 5%
Cards like Mina and Denn, Wildborn
9.6× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Jund decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Jund decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.88 · 15.2% (724 of 4,767 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.58 · 55.9% (2,663 of 4,767 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.73 · 30.7% (1,462 of 4,767 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 0.81 · 20.9% (995 of 4,767 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.73 · 30.0% (1,431 of 4,767 decks)
- Worm Harvest relevance 0.89 · 12.7% (604 of 4,767 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.70 · 30.8% (1,469 of 4,767 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.79 · 18.0% (858 of 4,767 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (935 of 4,767 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.86 · 11.1% (527 of 4,767 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.59 · 43.7% (2,083 of 4,767 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.51 · 54.8% (2,613 of 4,767 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 0.89 · 9.2% (440 of 4,767 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.62 · 36.3% (1,732 of 4,767 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.80 · 13.6% (648 of 4,767 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.54 · 50.0% (2,382 of 4,767 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (865 of 4,767 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 0.89 · 8.4% (402 of 4,767 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.46 · 63.0% (3,002 of 4,767 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.82 · 11.5% (547 of 4,767 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.91 · 7.0% (332 of 4,767 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.82 · 11.3% (540 of 4,767 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.88 · 7.9% (378 of 4,767 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.53 · 47.9% (2,284 of 4,767 decks)
- Consign to Dust relevance 0.94 · 5.2% (248 of 4,767 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.50 · 52.9% (2,522 of 4,767 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.88 · 7.4% (355 of 4,767 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.43 · 66.3% (3,162 of 4,767 decks)
- Savage Twister relevance 0.88 · 6.6% (315 of 4,767 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.83 · 9.3% (444 of 4,767 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.44 · 62.5% (2,980 of 4,767 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.59 · 33.3% (1,589 of 4,767 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.49 · 51.9% (2,475 of 4,767 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.78 · 10.8% (517 of 4,767 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.81 · 8.5% (406 of 4,767 decks)
- Ruinous Path relevance 0.91 · 4.7% (226 of 4,767 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.82 · 7.7% (365 of 4,767 decks)
- Baloth Woodcrasher relevance 0.89 · 4.9% (232 of 4,767 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 0.58 · 31.8% (1,516 of 4,767 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.60 · 28.0% (1,337 of 4,767 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.49 · 49.3% (2,348 of 4,767 decks)
- Crash of Rhino Beetles relevance 0.85 · 6.0% (287 of 4,767 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.80 · 8.2% (390 of 4,767 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.83 · 6.7% (318 of 4,767 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.86 · 4.9% (232 of 4,767 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.83 · 5.9% (280 of 4,767 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.75 · 10.0% (477 of 4,767 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.73 · 10.7% (508 of 4,767 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.43 · 56.6% (2,696 of 4,767 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (519 of 4,767 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.58 · 55.9% (2,663 of 4,767 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 0.81 · 20.9% (995 of 4,767 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.73 · 30.0% (1,431 of 4,767 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (935 of 4,767 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.86 · 11.1% (527 of 4,767 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.59 · 43.7% (2,083 of 4,767 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.51 · 54.8% (2,613 of 4,767 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.54 · 50.0% (2,382 of 4,767 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.46 · 63.0% (3,002 of 4,767 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.91 · 7.0% (332 of 4,767 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.88 · 7.4% (355 of 4,767 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.43 · 66.3% (3,162 of 4,767 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.44 · 62.5% (2,980 of 4,767 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.78 · 10.8% (517 of 4,767 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.81 · 8.5% (406 of 4,767 decks)
- Baloth Woodcrasher relevance 0.89 · 4.9% (232 of 4,767 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.60 · 28.0% (1,337 of 4,767 decks)
- Crash of Rhino Beetles relevance 0.85 · 6.0% (287 of 4,767 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.83 · 6.7% (318 of 4,767 decks)
- Whiptongue Hydra relevance 0.86 · 4.9% (232 of 4,767 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.83 · 5.9% (280 of 4,767 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.75 · 10.0% (477 of 4,767 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.73 · 10.7% (508 of 4,767 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.43 · 56.6% (2,696 of 4,767 decks)
- Scute Mob relevance 0.79 · 7.1% (340 of 4,767 decks)
- Zendikar Incarnate relevance 0.90 · 4.4% (211 of 4,767 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.34 · 76.4% (3,643 of 4,767 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.42 · 56.7% (2,703 of 4,767 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.62 · 17.6% (841 of 4,767 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.63 · 15.1% (721 of 4,767 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.60 · 15.2% (726 of 4,767 decks)
- Soul of Innistrad relevance 0.89 · 4.0% (193 of 4,767 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (709 of 4,767 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.52 · 30.1% (1,437 of 4,767 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (649 of 4,767 decks)
- Charnelhoard Wurm relevance 0.76 · 4.9% (233 of 4,767 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.42 · 48.9% (2,333 of 4,767 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.68 · 8.1% (388 of 4,767 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.38 · 55.7% (2,655 of 4,767 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.51 · 27.5% (1,311 of 4,767 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.38 · 54.0% (2,576 of 4,767 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.69 · 7.2% (345 of 4,767 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.70 · 6.2% (294 of 4,767 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.55 · 18.0% (859 of 4,767 decks)
- Six relevance 0.44 · 37.6% (1,792 of 4,767 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 0.45 · 36.2% (1,724 of 4,767 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (700 of 4,767 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.46 · 32.3% (1,538 of 4,767 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.64 · 8.8% (420 of 4,767 decks)
- Dread Presence relevance 0.85 · 3.8% (181 of 4,767 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All artifacts (19)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.88 · 7.9% (378 of 4,767 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.50 · 52.9% (2,522 of 4,767 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 0.58 · 31.8% (1,516 of 4,767 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.71 · 9.1% (434 of 4,767 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.46 · 38.3% (1,827 of 4,767 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.57 · 17.5% (832 of 4,767 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.64 · 9.2% (438 of 4,767 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.40 · 42.9% (2,043 of 4,767 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.54 · 6.2% (294 of 4,767 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.49 · 5.5% (264 of 4,767 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.72 · 2.6% (125 of 4,767 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.53 · 4.1% (194 of 4,767 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.47 · 4.3% (207 of 4,767 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (209 of 4,767 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (779 of 4,767 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.47 · 3.9% (184 of 4,767 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (181 of 4,767 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 34.5% (1,645 of 4,767 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 71.9% (3,429 of 4,767 decks)
All enchantments (37)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.62 · 36.3% (1,732 of 4,767 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.80 · 13.6% (648 of 4,767 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.82 · 11.5% (547 of 4,767 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.83 · 9.3% (444 of 4,767 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.49 · 49.3% (2,348 of 4,767 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.80 · 8.2% (390 of 4,767 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.60 · 23.3% (1,112 of 4,767 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.52 · 36.5% (1,738 of 4,767 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.57 · 24.5% (1,166 of 4,767 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (485 of 4,767 decks)
- Pernicious Deed relevance 0.72 · 6.6% (313 of 4,767 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.51 · 26.1% (1,242 of 4,767 decks)
- Liliana's Talent relevance 0.92 · 3.5% (166 of 4,767 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.68 · 6.0% (286 of 4,767 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.71 · 4.8% (227 of 4,767 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.53 · 14.7% (701 of 4,767 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.64 · 6.2% (297 of 4,767 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.70 · 4.4% (212 of 4,767 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.48 · 20.2% (965 of 4,767 decks)
- Seismic Assault relevance 0.81 · 3.1% (148 of 4,767 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.59 · 5.4% (256 of 4,767 decks)
- Destructive Flow relevance 0.70 · 3.6% (172 of 4,767 decks)
- Tectonic Reformation relevance 0.80 · 2.7% (129 of 4,767 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.60 · 3.7% (175 of 4,767 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (357 of 4,767 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.47 · 4.6% (221 of 4,767 decks)
- Deathreap Ritual relevance 0.42 · 5.5% (262 of 4,767 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 0.57 · 3.1% (149 of 4,767 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (253 of 4,767 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.54 · 2.7% (129 of 4,767 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.48 · 2.6% (125 of 4,767 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (129 of 4,767 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (161 of 4,767 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (128 of 4,767 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (168 of 4,767 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (157 of 4,767 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (154 of 4,767 decks)
All instants (43)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.73 · 30.7% (1,462 of 4,767 decks)
- Consign to Dust relevance 0.94 · 5.2% (248 of 4,767 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.59 · 33.3% (1,589 of 4,767 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.41 · 59.5% (2,836 of 4,767 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.73 · 5.7% (272 of 4,767 decks)
- Moonlight Bargain relevance 0.88 · 3.6% (170 of 4,767 decks)
- Windgrace's Judgment relevance 0.46 · 29.9% (1,426 of 4,767 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.60 · 7.8% (374 of 4,767 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.63 · 5.0% (240 of 4,767 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.56 · 9.6% (456 of 4,767 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.32 · 56.0% (2,669 of 4,767 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (452 of 4,767 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.56 · 7.2% (344 of 4,767 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.46 · 16.4% (782 of 4,767 decks)
- Fury Storm relevance 0.83 · 2.7% (130 of 4,767 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (589 of 4,767 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (400 of 4,767 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.40 · 18.5% (880 of 4,767 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.45 · 10.9% (521 of 4,767 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.49 · 6.1% (292 of 4,767 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.39 · 15.3% (730 of 4,767 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (252 of 4,767 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.36 · 17.9% (855 of 4,767 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.40 · 10.6% (506 of 4,767 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (253 of 4,767 decks)
- Bedevil relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (228 of 4,767 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.51 · 4.1% (196 of 4,767 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.32 · 21.4% (1,021 of 4,767 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.35 · 13.2% (629 of 4,767 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.27 · 28.8% (1,371 of 4,767 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.32 · 13.7% (655 of 4,767 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (330 of 4,767 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (185 of 4,767 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.30 · 12.8% (609 of 4,767 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.50 · 2.7% (131 of 4,767 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.23 · 28.0% (1,333 of 4,767 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.20 · 39.0% (1,861 of 4,767 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.30 · 7.6% (360 of 4,767 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (126 of 4,767 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.15 · 52.7% (2,513 of 4,767 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (299 of 4,767 decks)
- Terminate relevance 0.21 · 11.3% (539 of 4,767 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (208 of 4,767 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Worm Harvest relevance 0.89 · 12.7% (604 of 4,767 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 0.89 · 9.2% (440 of 4,767 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 0.89 · 8.4% (402 of 4,767 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.82 · 11.3% (540 of 4,767 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.53 · 47.9% (2,284 of 4,767 decks)
- Savage Twister relevance 0.88 · 6.6% (315 of 4,767 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.49 · 51.9% (2,475 of 4,767 decks)
- Ruinous Path relevance 0.91 · 4.7% (226 of 4,767 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.60 · 23.7% (1,129 of 4,767 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (618 of 4,767 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.69 · 12.1% (575 of 4,767 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.89 · 4.4% (208 of 4,767 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (1,068 of 4,767 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.79 · 5.5% (263 of 4,767 decks)
- Wildfire relevance 0.77 · 6.1% (292 of 4,767 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.58 · 20.7% (986 of 4,767 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.70 · 9.1% (435 of 4,767 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.36 · 65.6% (3,126 of 4,767 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.69 · 8.9% (425 of 4,767 decks)
- Lavalanche relevance 0.63 · 12.2% (583 of 4,767 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.71 · 7.0% (335 of 4,767 decks)
- Decree of Annihilation relevance 0.85 · 4.0% (193 of 4,767 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.79 · 4.4% (208 of 4,767 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.76 · 4.4% (210 of 4,767 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.55 · 13.4% (640 of 4,767 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.62 · 8.3% (397 of 4,767 decks)
- Casualties of War relevance 0.64 · 7.0% (336 of 4,767 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (608 of 4,767 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (502 of 4,767 decks)
- Reality Scramble relevance 0.86 · 2.8% (135 of 4,767 decks)
- Gaze of Granite relevance 0.48 · 14.5% (689 of 4,767 decks)
- Ruination relevance 0.79 · 3.2% (152 of 4,767 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 0.79 · 3.1% (150 of 4,767 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (472 of 4,767 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.48 · 11.6% (552 of 4,767 decks)
- Pillage the Bog relevance 0.68 · 3.7% (178 of 4,767 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.51 · 8.4% (402 of 4,767 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.65 · 4.0% (190 of 4,767 decks)
- Death Cloud relevance 0.78 · 2.8% (134 of 4,767 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.37 · 29.6% (1,409 of 4,767 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.38 · 24.0% (1,143 of 4,767 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.78 · 2.5% (120 of 4,767 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.55 · 4.6% (219 of 4,767 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (372 of 4,767 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.56 · 4.4% (208 of 4,767 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.53 · 4.7% (223 of 4,767 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (720 of 4,767 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.44 · 10.7% (510 of 4,767 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.36 · 23.3% (1,112 of 4,767 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.35 · 26.2% (1,248 of 4,767 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.88 · 15.2% (724 of 4,767 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.70 · 30.8% (1,469 of 4,767 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.79 · 18.0% (858 of 4,767 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (865 of 4,767 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.82 · 7.7% (365 of 4,767 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (519 of 4,767 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.78 · 3.1% (150 of 4,767 decks)
- Vraska, Golgari Queen relevance 0.63 · 4.0% (190 of 4,767 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.69 · 31.3% (1,493 of 4,767 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.77 · 18.8% (896 of 4,767 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.77 · 14.6% (694 of 4,767 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.53 · 49.5% (2,359 of 4,767 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.90 · 6.7% (318 of 4,767 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.87 · 6.4% (307 of 4,767 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.64 · 25.5% (1,217 of 4,767 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.52 · 39.3% (1,872 of 4,767 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.60 · 26.0% (1,238 of 4,767 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.65 · 16.5% (786 of 4,767 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.74 · 9.9% (472 of 4,767 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.66 · 14.5% (690 of 4,767 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.65 · 14.3% (683 of 4,767 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.68 · 12.4% (591 of 4,767 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.80 · 5.1% (243 of 4,767 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.68 · 11.1% (528 of 4,767 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.75 · 6.1% (289 of 4,767 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.71 · 7.6% (363 of 4,767 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.64 · 11.7% (560 of 4,767 decks)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.72 · 5.6% (266 of 4,767 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.72 · 4.8% (229 of 4,767 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.65 · 6.1% (289 of 4,767 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.67 · 4.4% (212 of 4,767 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.55 · 9.5% (452 of 4,767 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (515 of 4,767 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.58 · 5.3% (254 of 4,767 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.35 · 41.4% (1,972 of 4,767 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.38 · 35.0% (1,667 of 4,767 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.42 · 22.7% (1,084 of 4,767 decks)
- Grim Backwoods relevance 0.61 · 4.6% (218 of 4,767 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.57 · 5.1% (242 of 4,767 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (669 of 4,767 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.57 · 4.8% (229 of 4,767 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.76 · 3.0% (143 of 4,767 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.35 · 34.6% (1,651 of 4,767 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.38 · 25.4% (1,211 of 4,767 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (641 of 4,767 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (370 of 4,767 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.36 · 27.1% (1,294 of 4,767 decks)
- Raucous Theater relevance 0.39 · 20.9% (994 of 4,767 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.37 · 23.8% (1,134 of 4,767 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.63 · 3.4% (164 of 4,767 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.53 · 4.3% (206 of 4,767 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.62 · 3.3% (156 of 4,767 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.23 · 59.9% (2,854 of 4,767 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.34 · 22.8% (1,086 of 4,767 decks)
- Twisted Landscape relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (822 of 4,767 decks)
- Volrath's Stronghold relevance 0.57 · 2.8% (133 of 4,767 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (673 of 4,767 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.45 · 3.8% (183 of 4,767 decks)
All lands (50)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.73 · 24.6% (1,174 of 4,767 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.69 · 22.3% (1,063 of 4,767 decks)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.85 · 5.8% (276 of 4,767 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.62 · 20.5% (975 of 4,767 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.63 · 19.2% (914 of 4,767 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.62 · 18.9% (902 of 4,767 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.62 · 16.9% (804 of 4,767 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.50 · 32.3% (1,542 of 4,767 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (507 of 4,767 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (647 of 4,767 decks)
- Akoum Refuge relevance 0.68 · 5.1% (242 of 4,767 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.54 · 12.3% (584 of 4,767 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.49 · 18.5% (880 of 4,767 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.38 · 36.8% (1,752 of 4,767 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.43 · 22.8% (1,089 of 4,767 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.45 · 19.9% (948 of 4,767 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.36 · 38.2% (1,823 of 4,767 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.45 · 14.6% (696 of 4,767 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.53 · 7.6% (360 of 4,767 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (740 of 4,767 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.44 · 15.0% (714 of 4,767 decks)
- Rakdos Carnarium relevance 0.38 · 28.6% (1,365 of 4,767 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (572 of 4,767 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.45 · 11.7% (558 of 4,767 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.50 · 5.1% (243 of 4,767 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.39 · 16.0% (761 of 4,767 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.39 · 15.9% (756 of 4,767 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.39 · 15.1% (719 of 4,767 decks)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.70 · 2.8% (135 of 4,767 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.60 · 3.7% (176 of 4,767 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (596 of 4,767 decks)
- Rocky Tar Pit relevance 0.40 · 11.8% (562 of 4,767 decks)
- Lake of the Dead relevance 0.69 · 2.7% (127 of 4,767 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.24 · 52.9% (2,520 of 4,767 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.25 · 46.5% (2,215 of 4,767 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.23 · 55.7% (2,656 of 4,767 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.23 · 53.3% (2,542 of 4,767 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (222 of 4,767 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (129 of 4,767 decks)
- Darigaaz's Caldera relevance 0.52 · 3.5% (165 of 4,767 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.59 · 2.7% (130 of 4,767 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.40 · 5.2% (249 of 4,767 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (172 of 4,767 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (233 of 4,767 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.23 · 35.4% (1,688 of 4,767 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (138 of 4,767 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.32 · 7.5% (356 of 4,767 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.20 · 40.8% (1,947 of 4,767 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (302 of 4,767 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.16 · 60.2% (2,871 of 4,767 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lord Windgrace, from 4,767 real Commander decks.