Cards like Ramunap Excavator
12× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
6.7× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Gruul decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Tannuk, Memorial Ensign
5.5× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Fierce Empath
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Fierce Empath 27%
- Woodland Bellower 20%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Gruul decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 27% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.79 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 50%
- Three Visits 42%
- Skyshroud Claim 8%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 6%
- Glimpse the Core 2%
- Ranger's Path 1%
Other options: Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Eternal Witness
18× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Gruul decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Harrow
2.8× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Gruul decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Harrow 30%
- Entish Restoration 20%
- Scapeshift 18%
- Roiling Regrowth 13%
- Planar Engineering 5%
- Cycle of Renewal 3%
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
6.9× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 21%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 9%
- Sazh's Chocobo 7%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 7%
- Undergrowth Champion 6%
- Territorial Scythecat 4%
- Scythecat Cub 3%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 3%
- Floral Evoker 1%
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Avenger of Zendikar
9.9× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Gruul decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 44% of other Gruul decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 53%
- Cultivate 53%
- Kodama's Reach 46%
- Search for Tomorrow 15%
- Shared Roots 7%
- Explosive Vegetation 5%
- Migration Path 3%
- Far Wanderings 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 1%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Roamer's Routine, Beneath the Sands, Terramorph, Verdant Mastery, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Primal Growth, Deep Reconnaissance, New Generation's Technique, They Went This Way, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, Untamed Wilds
Cards like Scute Swarm
7.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 35%
- Springheart Nantuko 17%
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
7.7× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Ulvenwald Hydra
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
7.8× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
3.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Gruul decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
4.9× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Gruul decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Borborygmos Enraged
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
4.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Mirkwood Pathmaker, Flora Colossus
All top picks (50)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.70 · 28.1% (211 of 751 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.64 · 37.8% (284 of 751 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.72 · 23.8% (179 of 751 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.46 · 65.4% (491 of 751 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 44.3% (333 of 751 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.70 · 15.2% (114 of 751 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.69 · 16.9% (127 of 751 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.48 · 51.0% (383 of 751 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.48 · 50.9% (382 of 751 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.64 · 20.4% (153 of 751 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.57 · 31.3% (235 of 751 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (116 of 751 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.52 · 37.7% (283 of 751 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.46 · 48.2% (362 of 751 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.63 · 16.6% (125 of 751 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.50 · 38.2% (287 of 751 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.49 · 39.1% (294 of 751 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.60 · 15.6% (117 of 751 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.58 · 18.8% (141 of 751 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.59 · 16.9% (127 of 751 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.52 · 26.6% (200 of 751 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.57 · 17.8% (134 of 751 decks)
- Seismic Assault relevance 0.68 · 8.4% (63 of 751 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.46 · 36.6% (275 of 751 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.46 · 36.0% (270 of 751 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.53 · 20.9% (157 of 751 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (103 of 751 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.44 · 37.8% (284 of 751 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.51 · 21.7% (163 of 751 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.52 · 18.6% (140 of 751 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.63 · 8.9% (67 of 751 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.47 · 27.7% (208 of 751 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.51 · 17.7% (133 of 751 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.39 · 42.9% (322 of 751 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.51 · 18.1% (136 of 751 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.51 · 17.3% (130 of 751 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 29.7% (223 of 751 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.54 · 12.3% (92 of 751 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (81 of 751 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.43 · 31.7% (238 of 751 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.41 · 33.3% (250 of 751 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (120 of 751 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.41 · 34.8% (261 of 751 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.53 · 12.1% (91 of 751 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.47 · 19.7% (148 of 751 decks)
- Vexing Shusher relevance 0.47 · 20.2% (152 of 751 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (110 of 751 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.41 · 33.6% (252 of 751 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 36.1% (271 of 751 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.50 · 13.4% (101 of 751 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.70 · 28.1% (211 of 751 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.64 · 37.8% (284 of 751 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.46 · 65.4% (491 of 751 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 44.3% (333 of 751 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.70 · 15.2% (114 of 751 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.48 · 51.0% (383 of 751 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.48 · 50.9% (382 of 751 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.64 · 20.4% (153 of 751 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (116 of 751 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.46 · 48.2% (362 of 751 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.50 · 38.2% (287 of 751 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.60 · 15.6% (117 of 751 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.59 · 16.9% (127 of 751 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.52 · 26.6% (200 of 751 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.57 · 17.8% (134 of 751 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.46 · 36.0% (270 of 751 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.53 · 20.9% (157 of 751 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.44 · 37.8% (284 of 751 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.52 · 18.6% (140 of 751 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.63 · 8.9% (67 of 751 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.51 · 18.1% (136 of 751 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.51 · 17.3% (130 of 751 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 29.7% (223 of 751 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.54 · 12.3% (92 of 751 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (81 of 751 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.43 · 31.7% (238 of 751 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.41 · 33.3% (250 of 751 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.41 · 34.8% (261 of 751 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.47 · 19.7% (148 of 751 decks)
- Vexing Shusher relevance 0.47 · 20.2% (152 of 751 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (110 of 751 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.41 · 33.6% (252 of 751 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 36.1% (271 of 751 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.50 · 13.4% (101 of 751 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.45 · 21.0% (158 of 751 decks)
- Baloth Woodcrasher relevance 0.58 · 6.5% (49 of 751 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.46 · 16.8% (126 of 751 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.54 · 8.5% (64 of 751 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.57 · 6.4% (48 of 751 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (147 of 751 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.46 · 14.8% (111 of 751 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.47 · 14.4% (108 of 751 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.42 · 23.4% (176 of 751 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.40 · 26.0% (195 of 751 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.43 · 20.5% (154 of 751 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.42 · 22.5% (169 of 751 decks)
- Living Twister relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (62 of 751 decks)
- Brushfire Elemental relevance 0.55 · 6.4% (48 of 751 decks)
- Akoum Hellhound relevance 0.57 · 4.8% (36 of 751 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (90 of 751 decks)
All artifacts (29)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.52 · 37.7% (283 of 751 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (103 of 751 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.53 · 12.1% (91 of 751 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.43 · 21.3% (160 of 751 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.49 · 9.5% (71 of 751 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.45 · 12.9% (97 of 751 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (39 of 751 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (85 of 751 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.45 · 5.7% (43 of 751 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.53 · 3.6% (27 of 751 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (51 of 751 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.28 · 23.8% (179 of 751 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (61 of 751 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (26 of 751 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.37 · 5.9% (44 of 751 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.45 · 3.3% (25 of 751 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (21 of 751 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (22 of 751 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (21 of 751 decks)
- Skyclave Pick-Axe relevance 0.47 · 2.4% (18 of 751 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (27 of 751 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (19 of 751 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (18 of 751 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (58 of 751 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (41 of 751 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (58 of 751 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.12 · 3.5% (26 of 751 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 20.9% (157 of 751 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 40.7% (306 of 751 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.69 · 16.9% (127 of 751 decks)
- Seismic Assault relevance 0.68 · 8.4% (63 of 751 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.46 · 36.6% (275 of 751 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.51 · 21.7% (163 of 751 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.39 · 42.9% (322 of 751 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (120 of 751 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.42 · 27.7% (208 of 751 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (85 of 751 decks)
- Tectonic Reformation relevance 0.59 · 5.7% (43 of 751 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.48 · 13.2% (99 of 751 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (54 of 751 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (62 of 751 decks)
- Retreat to Valakut relevance 0.56 · 4.3% (32 of 751 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (72 of 751 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (60 of 751 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.45 · 9.5% (71 of 751 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.41 · 10.8% (81 of 751 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.33 · 27.2% (204 of 751 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (40 of 751 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.30 · 27.0% (203 of 751 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.59 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.45 · 4.3% (32 of 751 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.36 · 8.4% (63 of 751 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.32 · 8.4% (63 of 751 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (31 of 751 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.26 · 12.9% (97 of 751 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (46 of 751 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (47 of 751 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (25 of 751 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (24 of 751 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (56 of 751 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (30 of 751 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (32 of 751 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (30 of 751 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (19 of 751 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (30 of 751 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (37 of 751 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.13 · 27.6% (207 of 751 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.13 · 14.8% (111 of 751 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (19 of 751 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (18 of 751 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (27 of 751 decks)
All instants (42)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.58 · 18.8% (141 of 751 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.35 · 43.8% (329 of 751 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.40 · 31.6% (237 of 751 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.55 · 7.1% (53 of 751 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (175 of 751 decks)
- Struggle // Survive relevance 0.53 · 4.4% (33 of 751 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (63 of 751 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.32 · 30.0% (225 of 751 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (41 of 751 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (100 of 751 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.32 · 19.7% (148 of 751 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.45 · 4.3% (32 of 751 decks)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (38 of 751 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (58 of 751 decks)
- Road // Ruin relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (25 of 751 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (37 of 751 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (29 of 751 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 24.0% (180 of 751 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (74 of 751 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (46 of 751 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (23 of 751 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.23 · 6.4% (48 of 751 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (67 of 751 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (34 of 751 decks)
- Signal the Clans relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (19 of 751 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (30 of 751 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (39 of 751 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.12 · 53.1% (399 of 751 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (37 of 751 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (33 of 751 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (56 of 751 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (23 of 751 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (62 of 751 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.13 · 24.6% (185 of 751 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (27 of 751 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 17.0% (128 of 751 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (19 of 751 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (19 of 751 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (19 of 751 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.72 · 23.8% (179 of 751 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.57 · 31.3% (235 of 751 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.63 · 16.6% (125 of 751 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.49 · 39.1% (294 of 751 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.47 · 27.7% (208 of 751 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.51 · 17.7% (133 of 751 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.46 · 18.2% (137 of 751 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (117 of 751 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (113 of 751 decks)
- Ground Assault relevance 0.53 · 7.7% (58 of 751 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.42 · 14.8% (111 of 751 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (48 of 751 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.47 · 6.5% (49 of 751 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (69 of 751 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (62 of 751 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (47 of 751 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (40 of 751 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (39 of 751 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (52 of 751 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (37 of 751 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (34 of 751 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (94 of 751 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.48 · 3.9% (29 of 751 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.34 · 11.5% (86 of 751 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.38 · 6.8% (51 of 751 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.24 · 39.4% (296 of 751 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (32 of 751 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.26 · 27.6% (207 of 751 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (38 of 751 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 45.8% (344 of 751 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (43 of 751 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 0.46 · 3.1% (23 of 751 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.20 · 42.3% (318 of 751 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.25 · 18.0% (135 of 751 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (50 of 751 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (26 of 751 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (39 of 751 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- Hull Breach relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (59 of 751 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (53 of 751 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.16 · 50.5% (379 of 751 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (55 of 751 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (21 of 751 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 53.4% (401 of 751 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (31 of 751 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (31 of 751 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (62 of 751 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (24 of 751 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.24 · 8.4% (63 of 751 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (78 of 751 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (56 of 751 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (60 of 751 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (45 of 751 decks)
- Koth, Fire of Resistance relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (27 of 751 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (25 of 751 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.36 · 4.1% (31 of 751 decks)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.82 · 14.0% (105 of 751 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.61 · 39.1% (294 of 751 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.66 · 23.4% (176 of 751 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.56 · 36.2% (272 of 751 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.64 · 20.8% (156 of 751 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.55 · 33.4% (251 of 751 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.54 · 33.2% (249 of 751 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.50 · 30.8% (231 of 751 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.56 · 13.7% (103 of 751 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.43 · 27.0% (203 of 751 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (57 of 751 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.38 · 14.4% (108 of 751 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.50 · 4.4% (33 of 751 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.45 · 5.5% (41 of 751 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (52 of 751 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.33 · 18.0% (135 of 751 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (43 of 751 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.24 · 43.4% (326 of 751 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.38 · 8.0% (60 of 751 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.32 · 13.6% (102 of 751 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.49 · 3.5% (26 of 751 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.30 · 16.4% (123 of 751 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.28 · 19.2% (144 of 751 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.24 · 35.4% (266 of 751 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.45 · 3.5% (26 of 751 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.27 · 15.7% (118 of 751 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (58 of 751 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.21 · 36.8% (276 of 751 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (27 of 751 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (51 of 751 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (41 of 751 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (49 of 751 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (35 of 751 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (25 of 751 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (37 of 751 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.23 · 22.8% (171 of 751 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (18 of 751 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (45 of 751 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (32 of 751 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (38 of 751 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (32 of 751 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (20 of 751 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.17 · 41.9% (315 of 751 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (24 of 751 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.21 · 18.0% (135 of 751 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.22 · 13.8% (104 of 751 decks)
- Shatterskull Smashing // Shatterskull, the Hammer Pass relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (29 of 751 decks)
- Dwarven Mine relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (18 of 751 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (54 of 751 decks)
All lands (50)
- Vesuva relevance 0.58 · 35.8% (269 of 751 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.62 · 19.6% (147 of 751 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.45 · 28.8% (216 of 751 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.45 · 28.1% (211 of 751 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.48 · 19.7% (148 of 751 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 26.4% (198 of 751 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.50 · 6.7% (50 of 751 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.35 · 25.3% (190 of 751 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.33 · 27.6% (207 of 751 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.33 · 27.0% (203 of 751 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.33 · 27.6% (207 of 751 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (92 of 751 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.32 · 29.8% (224 of 751 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (60 of 751 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.33 · 25.8% (194 of 751 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.38 · 10.9% (82 of 751 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (94 of 751 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (35 of 751 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.42 · 5.2% (39 of 751 decks)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 0.31 · 20.1% (151 of 751 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.27 · 26.5% (199 of 751 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.27 · 28.2% (212 of 751 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 27.6% (207 of 751 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 32.6% (245 of 751 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.24 · 25.2% (189 of 751 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (70 of 751 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.18 · 47.3% (355 of 751 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.26 · 11.1% (83 of 751 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (31 of 751 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.18 · 40.2% (302 of 751 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (31 of 751 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (34 of 751 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (61 of 751 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (35 of 751 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (25 of 751 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (23 of 751 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.15 · 34.8% (261 of 751 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.11 · 54.2% (407 of 751 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (55 of 751 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (18 of 751 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.15 · 12.6% (95 of 751 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.15 · 8.5% (64 of 751 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (41 of 751 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.09 · 48.3% (363 of 751 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.08 · 64.4% (484 of 751 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.12 · 19.0% (143 of 751 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 7.3% (55 of 751 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.12 · 18.9% (142 of 751 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (25 of 751 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.11 · 20.1% (151 of 751 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Mina and Denn, Wildborn, from 751 real Commander decks.