Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.87 · 76.3% (1,195 of 1,566 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.76 · 72.1% (1,129 of 1,566 decks)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.92 · 51.7% (809 of 1,566 decks)
- Treetop Scout relevance 0.97 · 45.3% (710 of 1,566 decks)
- Spire Tracer relevance 0.97 · 45.7% (716 of 1,566 decks)
- Wingcrafter relevance 0.96 · 45.9% (719 of 1,566 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.86 · 56.6% (886 of 1,566 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.90 · 50.8% (796 of 1,566 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.78 · 62.8% (984 of 1,566 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.83 · 56.4% (883 of 1,566 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.92 · 45.3% (709 of 1,566 decks)
- Hope of Ghirapur relevance 0.96 · 36.2% (567 of 1,566 decks)
- Mausoleum Wanderer relevance 0.91 · 41.5% (650 of 1,566 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.79 · 53.1% (832 of 1,566 decks)
- Hypnotic Siren relevance 0.92 · 37.3% (584 of 1,566 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.72 · 60.7% (951 of 1,566 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.91 · 37.5% (588 of 1,566 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.91 · 36.3% (568 of 1,566 decks)
- Jace's Phantasm relevance 0.96 · 31.3% (490 of 1,566 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.70 · 61.6% (964 of 1,566 decks)
- Network Disruptor relevance 0.95 · 31.5% (493 of 1,566 decks)
- Scryb Sprites relevance 0.97 · 27.4% (429 of 1,566 decks)
- Unified Will relevance 0.95 · 29.3% (459 of 1,566 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.92 · 29.5% (462 of 1,566 decks)
- Snaremaster Sprite relevance 0.95 · 22.9% (359 of 1,566 decks)
- Zephyr Sprite relevance 0.97 · 19.6% (307 of 1,566 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.81 · 36.9% (578 of 1,566 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 0.87 · 29.5% (462 of 1,566 decks)
- Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.85 · 31.3% (490 of 1,566 decks)
- Faerie Miscreant relevance 0.96 · 18.5% (290 of 1,566 decks)
- Cloud Sprite relevance 0.97 · 15.4% (241 of 1,566 decks)
- Harrier Strix relevance 0.89 · 23.2% (363 of 1,566 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.78 · 35.6% (558 of 1,566 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.81 · 31.6% (495 of 1,566 decks)
- Spiketail Hatchling relevance 0.95 · 16.2% (254 of 1,566 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 0.87 · 24.2% (379 of 1,566 decks)
- Jhessian Infiltrator relevance 0.92 · 18.9% (296 of 1,566 decks)
- Pixie Illusionist relevance 0.93 · 16.7% (261 of 1,566 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.85 · 23.6% (369 of 1,566 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.84 · 23.9% (374 of 1,566 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.63 · 51.3% (803 of 1,566 decks)
- Suspicious Stowaway // Seafaring Werewolf relevance 0.89 · 17.1% (268 of 1,566 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.89 · 16.7% (262 of 1,566 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.73 · 35.1% (550 of 1,566 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.86 · 19.2% (301 of 1,566 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.86 · 17.9% (280 of 1,566 decks)
- Lantern Bearer // Lanterns' Lift relevance 0.91 · 13.9% (217 of 1,566 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.78 · 27.5% (430 of 1,566 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.73 · 31.7% (496 of 1,566 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.68 · 36.7% (575 of 1,566 decks)
Card Stacks
29
Card Stacks
29Showing 1-2 of 29
Cards like Slither Blade
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
76% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Slither Blade 76%
- Triton Shorestalker 72%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 62%
- Gudul Lurker 51%
- Invisible Stalker 35%
- Jhessian Infiltrator 19%
- Phantom Warrior 2%
- Phantom Ninja 2%
- Metathran Soldier 2%
- Latch Seeker 1%
Other options: Tidal Kraken, Talas Warrior, Hazy Homunculus, Mystic of the Hidden Way, Plasma Elemental, Covert Operative
Cards like Spire Tracer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.00 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Spire Tracer 46%
- Treetop Scout 45%
- Silhana Ledgewalker 8%
Other options: Skyscythe Engulfer, Orchard Spirit, Treetop Rangers, Elven Riders, Gloomwidow
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 66%
- Elvish Mystic 59%
- Fyndhorn Elves 43%
- Boreal Druid 13%
Other options: Gyre Engineer, Druid of the Cowl, Leaf Gilder, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Orochi Sustainer, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Golden Hind, Nantuko Elder, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener
Cards like Bident of Thassa
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity
Cards like Time Warp
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Savor the Moment
Cards like Faerie Seer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Faerie Seer 56%
- Silver Raven 24%
- Augury Owl 1%
Other options: Omenspeaker, Chrome Cat, Grey Havens Navigator, Horizon Scholar, Bronze Walrus, Sage's Row Savant, Thaumaturge's Familiar, Galadhrim Guide, Octoprophet, Cloudreader Sphinx, Archive Dragon, Prophet of the Peak, Automatic Librarian, Willow-Wind
Cards like Counterspell
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 51%
- Negate 48%
- Wash Away 7%
- Spell Snare 2%
- Essence Scatter 2%
Other options: Stern Scolding, Envelop, Remove Soul, Wild Unraveling, Disruption Protocol, Minor Misstep, False Summoning, Nullify, Preemptive Strike, Intervene, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Siren Stormtamer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Part the Waterveil
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Scryb Sprites
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Spell Pierce
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 29%
- Mana Leak 23%
Other options: Force Spike, Quench, Make Disappear, Lose Focus, It'll Quench Ya!, Logic Knot, Clash of Wills, Don't Make a Sound, Reasonable Doubt, Revolutionary Rebuff, Metallic Rebuke, Rethink
Cards like Reclaim
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Hypnotic Siren
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Dispel
5.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards like Mystical Tutor
6.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Shoreline Looter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 30%
- Pongify 27%
Cards like Thought Vessel
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Flare of Denial
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Force of Will
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Force of Will 18%
- Force of Negation 15%
Cards like Regrowth
4.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Unnatural Restoration, Recollect, Nature's Spiral, Call to Mind, Revive, Divergent Equation, Relearn, True Ancestry, Said // Done, Déjà Vu, Elven Cache, Sage's Knowledge
Cards like Unified Will
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Ultimecia, Temporal Threat, Spider-Man 2099, Miguel O'Hara
Cards like Overrun
6.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Silent Hallcreeper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 40%
- Scryb Ranger 3%
- Quirion Ranger 2%
Cards like Priest of Titania
7.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cloud Sprite
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cloud Sprite 15%
- Cloud Pirates 2%
Other options: Vaporkin, Welkin Tern, Tattered Haunter, Cloud Spirit, Shacklegeist, Cloud Elemental, Rishadan Airship, Cloud Dragon, Cloud Djinn, Hoverguard Observer, Ascending Aven, Wanderlight Spirit, Scrapskin Drake, Long-Finned Skywhale, Stormbound Geist, Stronghold Zeppelin, Skywinder Drake, Stratozeppelid
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.87 · 76.3% (1,195 of 1,566 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.76 · 72.1% (1,129 of 1,566 decks)
- Treetop Scout relevance 0.97 · 45.3% (710 of 1,566 decks)
- Spire Tracer relevance 0.97 · 45.7% (716 of 1,566 decks)
- Wingcrafter relevance 0.96 · 45.9% (719 of 1,566 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.86 · 56.6% (886 of 1,566 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.90 · 50.8% (796 of 1,566 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.78 · 62.8% (984 of 1,566 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.83 · 56.4% (883 of 1,566 decks)
- Hope of Ghirapur relevance 0.96 · 36.2% (567 of 1,566 decks)
- Mausoleum Wanderer relevance 0.91 · 41.5% (650 of 1,566 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.79 · 53.1% (832 of 1,566 decks)
- Hypnotic Siren relevance 0.92 · 37.3% (584 of 1,566 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.72 · 60.7% (951 of 1,566 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.91 · 37.5% (588 of 1,566 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.91 · 36.3% (568 of 1,566 decks)
- Jace's Phantasm relevance 0.96 · 31.3% (490 of 1,566 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.70 · 61.6% (964 of 1,566 decks)
- Network Disruptor relevance 0.95 · 31.5% (493 of 1,566 decks)
- Scryb Sprites relevance 0.97 · 27.4% (429 of 1,566 decks)
- Snaremaster Sprite relevance 0.95 · 22.9% (359 of 1,566 decks)
- Zephyr Sprite relevance 0.97 · 19.6% (307 of 1,566 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.81 · 36.9% (578 of 1,566 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 0.87 · 29.5% (462 of 1,566 decks)
- Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.85 · 31.3% (490 of 1,566 decks)
- Faerie Miscreant relevance 0.96 · 18.5% (290 of 1,566 decks)
- Cloud Sprite relevance 0.97 · 15.4% (241 of 1,566 decks)
- Harrier Strix relevance 0.89 · 23.2% (363 of 1,566 decks)
- Spiketail Hatchling relevance 0.95 · 16.2% (254 of 1,566 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 0.87 · 24.2% (379 of 1,566 decks)
- Jhessian Infiltrator relevance 0.92 · 18.9% (296 of 1,566 decks)
- Pixie Illusionist relevance 0.93 · 16.7% (261 of 1,566 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.85 · 23.6% (369 of 1,566 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.84 · 23.9% (374 of 1,566 decks)
- Suspicious Stowaway // Seafaring Werewolf relevance 0.89 · 17.1% (268 of 1,566 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.73 · 35.1% (550 of 1,566 decks)
- Flitterwing Nuisance relevance 0.86 · 19.2% (301 of 1,566 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.86 · 17.9% (280 of 1,566 decks)
- Lantern Bearer // Lanterns' Lift relevance 0.91 · 13.9% (217 of 1,566 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.78 · 27.5% (430 of 1,566 decks)
- Faerie Vandal relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (228 of 1,566 decks)
- Nightveil Sprite relevance 0.92 · 10.5% (164 of 1,566 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 0.69 · 32.0% (501 of 1,566 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (291 of 1,566 decks)
- Spyglass Siren relevance 0.80 · 15.3% (240 of 1,566 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (278 of 1,566 decks)
- Pteramander relevance 0.85 · 10.8% (169 of 1,566 decks)
- Flying Men relevance 0.91 · 7.1% (111 of 1,566 decks)
- Illvoi Galeblade relevance 0.85 · 9.6% (151 of 1,566 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.77 · 13.0% (204 of 1,566 decks)
Artifacts
23
Artifacts
23 Showing 1-10 of 23
All artifacts (23)
- Meekstone relevance 0.78 · 7.3% (115 of 1,566 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.74 · 8.9% (140 of 1,566 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.48 · 36.7% (574 of 1,566 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.71 · 6.7% (105 of 1,566 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.62 · 8.5% (133 of 1,566 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.62 · 6.4% (101 of 1,566 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.71 · 2.9% (46 of 1,566 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.43 · 6.7% (105 of 1,566 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.28 · 28.5% (446 of 1,566 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (152 of 1,566 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.57 · 2.6% (41 of 1,566 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (112 of 1,566 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 6.6% (104 of 1,566 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (48 of 1,566 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.23 · 14.8% (231 of 1,566 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (69 of 1,566 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (196 of 1,566 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (62 of 1,566 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.20 · 16.0% (250 of 1,566 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (64 of 1,566 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (130 of 1,566 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 35.1% (549 of 1,566 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 60.9% (954 of 1,566 decks)
Enchantments
35
Enchantments
35 Showing 1-10 of 35
All enchantments (35)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.92 · 51.7% (809 of 1,566 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.63 · 51.3% (803 of 1,566 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.89 · 16.7% (262 of 1,566 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.70 · 29.7% (465 of 1,566 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.69 · 20.8% (326 of 1,566 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.67 · 13.7% (214 of 1,566 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.66 · 13.6% (213 of 1,566 decks)
- Teferi's Veil relevance 0.70 · 5.2% (81 of 1,566 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.68 · 6.5% (102 of 1,566 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (235 of 1,566 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.64 · 7.9% (123 of 1,566 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.53 · 12.6% (198 of 1,566 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.62 · 5.8% (91 of 1,566 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.59 · 7.0% (110 of 1,566 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.38 · 22.7% (356 of 1,566 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (211 of 1,566 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (130 of 1,566 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.51 · 4.9% (76 of 1,566 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.47 · 7.6% (119 of 1,566 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.61 · 3.1% (49 of 1,566 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.37 · 10.9% (170 of 1,566 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.33 · 17.7% (277 of 1,566 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (128 of 1,566 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (74 of 1,566 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 17.7% (277 of 1,566 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.35 · 8.0% (126 of 1,566 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.33 · 9.7% (152 of 1,566 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (46 of 1,566 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (68 of 1,566 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.43 · 3.2% (50 of 1,566 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (226 of 1,566 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (57 of 1,566 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (48 of 1,566 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (40 of 1,566 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (51 of 1,566 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Unified Will relevance 0.95 · 29.3% (459 of 1,566 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.73 · 31.7% (496 of 1,566 decks)
- Lofty Denial relevance 0.87 · 13.5% (212 of 1,566 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.76 · 19.9% (312 of 1,566 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.73 · 22.1% (346 of 1,566 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.61 · 22.7% (356 of 1,566 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.71 · 11.8% (185 of 1,566 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.48 · 45.1% (706 of 1,566 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.59 · 20.9% (328 of 1,566 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.56 · 24.5% (384 of 1,566 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.53 · 29.2% (457 of 1,566 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.53 · 28.9% (453 of 1,566 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (219 of 1,566 decks)
- Mystical Dispute relevance 0.72 · 5.6% (88 of 1,566 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.43 · 37.8% (592 of 1,566 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (170 of 1,566 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.60 · 8.9% (139 of 1,566 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.57 · 11.1% (174 of 1,566 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.58 · 8.5% (133 of 1,566 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.47 · 21.4% (335 of 1,566 decks)
- Rites of Refusal relevance 0.80 · 3.4% (53 of 1,566 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.55 · 7.3% (114 of 1,566 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.56 · 5.4% (85 of 1,566 decks)
- Concerted Defense relevance 0.71 · 3.3% (52 of 1,566 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.46 · 11.7% (184 of 1,566 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.56 · 4.5% (71 of 1,566 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.38 · 21.6% (339 of 1,566 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (111 of 1,566 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (168 of 1,566 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.27 · 48.1% (754 of 1,566 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (160 of 1,566 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (126 of 1,566 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (133 of 1,566 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.51 · 4.5% (70 of 1,566 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (217 of 1,566 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (137 of 1,566 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (153 of 1,566 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.35 · 18.3% (287 of 1,566 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.39 · 11.0% (172 of 1,566 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.36 · 14.9% (234 of 1,566 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (133 of 1,566 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.37 · 11.9% (186 of 1,566 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (120 of 1,566 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (96 of 1,566 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.59 · 2.9% (45 of 1,566 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.37 · 10.5% (164 of 1,566 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.32 · 16.9% (265 of 1,566 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.25 · 39.5% (619 of 1,566 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.40 · 5.2% (81 of 1,566 decks)
- Seedtime relevance 0.59 · 2.6% (40 of 1,566 decks)
Sorceries
40
Sorceries
40 Showing 1-10 of 40
All sorceries (40)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.92 · 45.3% (709 of 1,566 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.92 · 29.5% (462 of 1,566 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.78 · 35.6% (558 of 1,566 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.81 · 31.6% (495 of 1,566 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.68 · 36.7% (575 of 1,566 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.70 · 25.5% (399 of 1,566 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.73 · 19.6% (307 of 1,566 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.74 · 17.9% (281 of 1,566 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.71 · 20.2% (317 of 1,566 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.66 · 24.0% (376 of 1,566 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.63 · 26.0% (407 of 1,566 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.64 · 21.5% (336 of 1,566 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.66 · 14.8% (231 of 1,566 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.56 · 28.9% (453 of 1,566 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.59 · 17.4% (273 of 1,566 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.66 · 6.5% (102 of 1,566 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (264 of 1,566 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.60 · 9.5% (148 of 1,566 decks)
- Predatory Rampage relevance 0.75 · 3.1% (49 of 1,566 decks)
- Nostalgic Dreams relevance 0.73 · 3.0% (47 of 1,566 decks)
- Storm the Citadel relevance 0.74 · 2.8% (44 of 1,566 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (77 of 1,566 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.34 · 12.6% (198 of 1,566 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.46 · 3.9% (61 of 1,566 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.49 · 3.3% (52 of 1,566 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (52 of 1,566 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (146 of 1,566 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (97 of 1,566 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (57 of 1,566 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (67 of 1,566 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (110 of 1,566 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (59 of 1,566 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (105 of 1,566 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (209 of 1,566 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 7.5% (118 of 1,566 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (41 of 1,566 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.16 · 7.9% (124 of 1,566 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (174 of 1,566 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.16 · 7.4% (116 of 1,566 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 11.9% (187 of 1,566 decks)
Planeswalkers
4
Planeswalkers
4 Showing 1-4 of 4
All planeswalkers (4)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.62 · 3.3% (52 of 1,566 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (96 of 1,566 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (40 of 1,566 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (42 of 1,566 decks)
Utility Lands
32
Utility Lands
32 Showing 1-10 of 32
All utility lands (32)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.57 · 7.6% (119 of 1,566 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.61 · 3.9% (61 of 1,566 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.54 · 4.3% (67 of 1,566 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (367 of 1,566 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.28 · 38.8% (607 of 1,566 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (74 of 1,566 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (97 of 1,566 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.31 · 11.5% (180 of 1,566 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.29 · 13.0% (204 of 1,566 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.26 · 20.4% (319 of 1,566 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.26 · 18.2% (285 of 1,566 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.49 · 2.6% (40 of 1,566 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.31 · 8.4% (132 of 1,566 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.24 · 22.8% (357 of 1,566 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (42 of 1,566 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (173 of 1,566 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (60 of 1,566 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 55.2% (865 of 1,566 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (63 of 1,566 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (42 of 1,566 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (46 of 1,566 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (51 of 1,566 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (150 of 1,566 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (39 of 1,566 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (158 of 1,566 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (42 of 1,566 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.16 · 16.0% (251 of 1,566 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (99 of 1,566 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (45 of 1,566 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (58 of 1,566 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (39 of 1,566 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (50 of 1,566 decks)
Lands
44
Lands
44 Showing 1-10 of 44
All lands (44)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (131 of 1,566 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.42 · 12.6% (197 of 1,566 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (186 of 1,566 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.31 · 19.9% (311 of 1,566 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.33 · 14.5% (227 of 1,566 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (85 of 1,566 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.32 · 15.6% (245 of 1,566 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.34 · 12.8% (200 of 1,566 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (152 of 1,566 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.34 · 12.8% (201 of 1,566 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.33 · 14.4% (225 of 1,566 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.33 · 12.9% (202 of 1,566 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.36 · 8.7% (137 of 1,566 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (130 of 1,566 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.29 · 17.0% (266 of 1,566 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (333 of 1,566 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (97 of 1,566 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.25 · 19.6% (307 of 1,566 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (112 of 1,566 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (71 of 1,566 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.23 · 20.9% (327 of 1,566 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.20 · 30.6% (479 of 1,566 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.20 · 22.2% (347 of 1,566 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.15 · 52.7% (826 of 1,566 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (119 of 1,566 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (626 of 1,566 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.12 · 66.0% (1,034 of 1,566 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.16 · 39.3% (615 of 1,566 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (55 of 1,566 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.21 · 12.1% (190 of 1,566 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.13 · 49.4% (774 of 1,566 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (61 of 1,566 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (130 of 1,566 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (40 of 1,566 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (72 of 1,566 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.13 · 35.3% (553 of 1,566 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 65.6% (1,027 of 1,566 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (93 of 1,566 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (75 of 1,566 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.14 · 16.3% (255 of 1,566 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (51 of 1,566 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 80.8% (1,265 of 1,566 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 90.2% (1,413 of 1,566 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.1% (1,427 of 1,566 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Edric, Spymaster of Trest, from 1,566 real Commander decks.