Preemptive Strike

Played in 207 decks

Preemptive Strike
$6.27 €0.93

Change per day

Commanders

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
All commanders (6)
  1. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.20 · 4.2% (39 of 926 decks)
  2. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.05 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
  3. Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 1.91 · 4.1% (3 of 73 decks)
  4. Tobias Andrion relevance 1.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
  5. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.73 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
  6. Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.62 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)

Parallel Cards

30

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Sun Ce, Young Conquerer
    4.18 43.5%
    $114.40 €33.40
  • Mystic Denial
    4.10 39.6%
    $10.72 €3.85
  • Wu Scout
    4.08 44.4%
    $4.55 €1.26
  • Lu Meng, Wu General
    3.97 40.6%
    $66.92 €19.46
  • Broken Dam
    3.89 40.6%
    $7.97 €2.20
  • Lu Xun, Scholar General
    3.89 48.3%
    $0.31 €0.32
  • Wu Light Cavalry
    3.88 41.1%
    $3.84 €1.02
  • Champion's Victory
    3.86 37.2%
    $10.11 €4.27
  • Lady Sun
    3.79 37.7%
    $104.99 €55.18
  • Extinguish
    3.62 35.7%
    $0.25 €0.33
All most relevant (30)
  1. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.18 · 43.5% (90 of 207 decks)
  2. Mystic Denial relevance 4.10 · 39.6% (82 of 207 decks)
  3. Wu Scout relevance 4.08 · 44.4% (92 of 207 decks)
  4. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 3.97 · 40.6% (84 of 207 decks)
  5. Broken Dam relevance 3.89 · 40.6% (84 of 207 decks)
  6. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.89 · 48.3% (100 of 207 decks)
  7. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 3.88 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
  8. Champion's Victory relevance 3.86 · 37.2% (77 of 207 decks)
  9. Lady Sun relevance 3.79 · 37.7% (78 of 207 decks)
  10. Extinguish relevance 3.62 · 35.7% (74 of 207 decks)
  11. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 3.49 · 35.3% (73 of 207 decks)
  12. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 3.39 · 33.3% (69 of 207 decks)
  13. Forced Retreat relevance 3.16 · 31.4% (65 of 207 decks)
  14. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 3.04 · 30.0% (62 of 207 decks)
  15. Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.98 · 28.5% (59 of 207 decks)
  16. Exhaustion relevance 2.87 · 35.7% (74 of 207 decks)
  17. Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 2.68 · 28.0% (58 of 207 decks)
  18. Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 2.67 · 27.1% (56 of 207 decks)
  19. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 2.61 · 44.0% (91 of 207 decks)
  20. Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.58 · 40.1% (83 of 207 decks)
  21. Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 2.57 · 26.6% (55 of 207 decks)
  22. Brilliant Plan relevance 2.52 · 29.0% (60 of 207 decks)
  23. Counterintelligence relevance 2.50 · 24.6% (51 of 207 decks)
  24. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.50 · 37.7% (78 of 207 decks)
  25. Wu Spy relevance 2.48 · 23.2% (48 of 207 decks)
  26. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 2.45 · 22.7% (47 of 207 decks)
  27. Balance of Power relevance 2.45 · 26.1% (54 of 207 decks)
  28. Council of Advisors relevance 2.41 · 24.2% (50 of 207 decks)
  29. Zhao Zilong, Tiger General relevance 2.30 · 23.2% (48 of 207 decks)
  30. Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 2.05 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)

Creatures

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Sun Ce, Young Conquerer
    4.18 43.5%
    $114.40 €33.40
  • Wu Scout
    4.08 44.4%
    $4.55 €1.26
  • Lu Meng, Wu General
    3.97 40.6%
    $66.92 €19.46
  • Lu Xun, Scholar General
    3.89 48.3%
    $0.31 €0.32
  • Wu Light Cavalry
    3.88 41.1%
    $3.84 €1.02
  • Lady Sun
    3.79 37.7%
    $104.99 €55.18
  • Wu Elite Cavalry
    3.49 35.3%
    $2.20 €0.76
  • Lu Su, Wu Advisor
    3.39 33.3%
    $42.43 €19.53
  • Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist
    3.04 30.0%
    $76.91 €42.46
  • Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior
    2.68 28.0%
    $55.19 €16.08
All creatures (30)
  1. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.18 · 43.5% (90 of 207 decks)
  2. Wu Scout relevance 4.08 · 44.4% (92 of 207 decks)
  3. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 3.97 · 40.6% (84 of 207 decks)
  4. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.89 · 48.3% (100 of 207 decks)
  5. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 3.88 · 41.1% (85 of 207 decks)
  6. Lady Sun relevance 3.79 · 37.7% (78 of 207 decks)
  7. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 3.49 · 35.3% (73 of 207 decks)
  8. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 3.39 · 33.3% (69 of 207 decks)
  9. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 3.04 · 30.0% (62 of 207 decks)
  10. Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 2.68 · 28.0% (58 of 207 decks)
  11. Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 2.67 · 27.1% (56 of 207 decks)
  12. Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 2.57 · 26.6% (55 of 207 decks)
  13. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.50 · 37.7% (78 of 207 decks)
  14. Wu Spy relevance 2.48 · 23.2% (48 of 207 decks)
  15. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 2.45 · 22.7% (47 of 207 decks)
  16. Council of Advisors relevance 2.41 · 24.2% (50 of 207 decks)
  17. Zhao Zilong, Tiger General relevance 2.30 · 23.2% (48 of 207 decks)
  18. Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 2.05 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
  19. Pang Tong, "Young Phoenix" relevance 2.01 · 18.4% (38 of 207 decks)
  20. Kongming, "Sleeping Dragon" relevance 1.97 · 23.7% (49 of 207 decks)
  21. Shu Cavalry relevance 1.96 · 20.3% (42 of 207 decks)
  22. Wu Infantry relevance 1.95 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)
  23. Shu General relevance 1.91 · 19.3% (40 of 207 decks)
  24. Wu Longbowman relevance 1.88 · 18.8% (39 of 207 decks)
  25. Shu Elite Companions relevance 1.81 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
  26. Red Cliffs Armada relevance 1.81 · 15.9% (33 of 207 decks)
  27. Lu Bu, Master-at-Arms relevance 1.73 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
  28. Wu Admiral relevance 1.72 · 15.0% (31 of 207 decks)
  29. Zhang He, Wei General relevance 1.69 · 16.9% (35 of 207 decks)
  30. Yuan Shao, the Indecisive relevance 1.68 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Mystic Denial
    4.10 39.6%
    $10.72 €3.85
  • Champion's Victory
    3.86 37.2%
    $10.11 €4.27
  • Extinguish
    3.62 35.7%
    $0.25 €0.33
  • Eightfold Maze
    1.78 16.4%
    $50.51 €14.89
  • Rally the Troops
    1.71 17.4%
    $11.38 €4.17
All instants (5)
  1. Mystic Denial relevance 4.10 · 39.6% (82 of 207 decks)
  2. Champion's Victory relevance 3.86 · 37.2% (77 of 207 decks)
  3. Extinguish relevance 3.62 · 35.7% (74 of 207 decks)
  4. Eightfold Maze relevance 1.78 · 16.4% (34 of 207 decks)
  5. Rally the Troops relevance 1.71 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)

Sorceries

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Broken Dam
    3.89 40.6%
    $7.97 €2.20
  • Forced Retreat
    3.16 31.4%
    $2.71 €0.54
  • Sage's Knowledge
    2.98 28.5%
    $3.43 €2.17
  • Exhaustion
    2.87 35.7%
    $0.28 €0.33
  • Capture of Jingzhou
    2.61 44.0%
    $7.68 €7.11
  • Borrowing 100,000 Arrows
    2.58 40.1%
    $0.42 €0.29
  • Brilliant Plan
    2.52 29.0%
    $0.21 €0.13
  • Counterintelligence
    2.50 24.6%
    $10.49 €5.21
  • Balance of Power
    2.45 26.1%
    $0.32 €0.28
  • Riding Red Hare
    2.02 20.8%
    $12.33 €3.82
All sorceries (15)
  1. Broken Dam relevance 3.89 · 40.6% (84 of 207 decks)
  2. Forced Retreat relevance 3.16 · 31.4% (65 of 207 decks)
  3. Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.98 · 28.5% (59 of 207 decks)
  4. Exhaustion relevance 2.87 · 35.7% (74 of 207 decks)
  5. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 2.61 · 44.0% (91 of 207 decks)
  6. Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.58 · 40.1% (83 of 207 decks)
  7. Brilliant Plan relevance 2.52 · 29.0% (60 of 207 decks)
  8. Counterintelligence relevance 2.50 · 24.6% (51 of 207 decks)
  9. Balance of Power relevance 2.45 · 26.1% (54 of 207 decks)
  10. Riding Red Hare relevance 2.02 · 20.8% (43 of 207 decks)
  11. False Defeat relevance 2.01 · 23.2% (48 of 207 decks)
  12. Guan Yu's 1,000-Li March relevance 1.80 · 17.4% (36 of 207 decks)
  13. Peach Garden Oath relevance 1.80 · 20.8% (43 of 207 decks)
  14. Return to Battle relevance 1.78 · 17.9% (37 of 207 decks)
  15. Strategic Planning relevance 1.71 · 26.6% (55 of 207 decks)

EDH data for Preemptive Strike: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 207 real decks.