Color Identity Spread
All commanders (14)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.13 · 3.3% (32 of 956 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.95 · 5.9% (6 of 101 decks)
- Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 0.91 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Folk Hero relevance 0.90 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.85 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 0.82 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.78 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.72 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.62 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.60 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.59 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.51 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- Vendilion Clique relevance 0.49 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.47 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All parallel cards (2)
All most relevant (30)
- Wu Scout relevance 5.81 · 63.2% (86 of 136 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 5.00 · 52.9% (72 of 136 decks)
- Wu Infantry relevance 4.78 · 42.6% (58 of 136 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 4.65 · 47.1% (64 of 136 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 4.63 · 45.6% (62 of 136 decks)
- Wu Longbowman relevance 4.55 · 45.6% (62 of 136 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.45 · 46.3% (63 of 136 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 4.18 · 41.2% (56 of 136 decks)
- Wu Admiral relevance 4.15 · 36.0% (49 of 136 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 4.09 · 41.9% (57 of 136 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.95 · 49.3% (67 of 136 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 3.92 · 37.5% (51 of 136 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 3.92 · 39.0% (53 of 136 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 3.72 · 34.6% (47 of 136 decks)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.70 · 36.0% (49 of 136 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 3.52 · 35.3% (48 of 136 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 3.50 · 33.8% (46 of 136 decks)
- Wu Warship relevance 3.39 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 3.31 · 34.6% (47 of 136 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 3.21 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 3.03 · 30.1% (41 of 136 decks)
- Straw Soldiers relevance 3.02 · 28.7% (39 of 136 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.99 · 29.4% (40 of 136 decks)
- Extinguish relevance 2.97 · 29.4% (40 of 136 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.62 · 30.1% (41 of 136 decks)
- Red Cliffs Armada relevance 2.50 · 22.1% (30 of 136 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.48 · 26.5% (36 of 136 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.48 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Eye Spy relevance 2.46 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.46 · 38.2% (52 of 136 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Wu Scout relevance 5.81 · 63.2% (86 of 136 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 5.00 · 52.9% (72 of 136 decks)
- Wu Infantry relevance 4.78 · 42.6% (58 of 136 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 4.65 · 47.1% (64 of 136 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 4.63 · 45.6% (62 of 136 decks)
- Wu Longbowman relevance 4.55 · 45.6% (62 of 136 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.45 · 46.3% (63 of 136 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 4.18 · 41.2% (56 of 136 decks)
- Wu Admiral relevance 4.15 · 36.0% (49 of 136 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 4.09 · 41.9% (57 of 136 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.95 · 49.3% (67 of 136 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 3.92 · 39.0% (53 of 136 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 3.72 · 34.6% (47 of 136 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 3.52 · 35.3% (48 of 136 decks)
- Wu Warship relevance 3.39 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Straw Soldiers relevance 3.02 · 28.7% (39 of 136 decks)
- Red Cliffs Armada relevance 2.50 · 22.1% (30 of 136 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.30 · 34.6% (47 of 136 decks)
- Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 2.27 · 23.5% (32 of 136 decks)
- Zhao Zilong, Tiger General relevance 2.11 · 21.3% (29 of 136 decks)
- Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 1.90 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 1.81 · 18.4% (25 of 136 decks)
- Draugr Thought-Thief relevance 1.80 · 19.1% (26 of 136 decks)
- Kongming's Contraptions relevance 1.72 · 15.4% (21 of 136 decks)
- Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 1.71 · 16.2% (22 of 136 decks)
- Coral Fighters relevance 1.70 · 16.9% (23 of 136 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Wand of Denial relevance 1.70 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Precognition relevance 1.98 · 20.6% (28 of 136 decks)
All instants (7)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.70 · 36.0% (49 of 136 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 3.50 · 33.8% (46 of 136 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 3.21 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Extinguish relevance 2.97 · 29.4% (40 of 136 decks)
- Warrior's Stand relevance 2.01 · 18.4% (25 of 136 decks)
- Eightfold Maze relevance 1.67 · 15.4% (21 of 136 decks)
- Spin into Myth relevance 1.64 · 17.6% (24 of 136 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 3.92 · 37.5% (51 of 136 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 3.31 · 34.6% (47 of 136 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 3.03 · 30.1% (41 of 136 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.99 · 29.4% (40 of 136 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.62 · 30.1% (41 of 136 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.48 · 26.5% (36 of 136 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.48 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Eye Spy relevance 2.46 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.46 · 38.2% (52 of 136 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 2.40 · 40.4% (55 of 136 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 2.08 · 32.4% (44 of 136 decks)
- Ransack relevance 2.07 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Cruel Fate relevance 1.90 · 17.6% (24 of 136 decks)
- Riding Red Hare relevance 1.58 · 16.2% (22 of 136 decks)
- Virtuous Charge relevance 1.57 · 14.0% (19 of 136 decks)
EDH data for Wu Spy: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 136 real decks.