Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Brass Squire relevance 0.46 · 35.2% (32 of 91 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 0.53 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 0.53 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Butcher's Cleaver relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 0.51 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.45 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.45 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.42 · 31.9% (29 of 91 decks)
- Golem-Skin Gauntlets relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.34 · 49.5% (45 of 91 decks)
- Deadeye Quartermaster relevance 0.45 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.37 · 39.6% (36 of 91 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.35 · 45.1% (41 of 91 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.40 · 27.5% (25 of 91 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.35 · 41.8% (38 of 91 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.37 · 35.2% (32 of 91 decks)
- Bladed Bracers relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.42 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Rogue's Gloves relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.40 · 22.0% (20 of 91 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.42 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.39 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.39 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.36 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.39 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.36 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Wu Longbowman relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (21 of 91 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.40 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.31 · 40.7% (37 of 91 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Inquisitor's Flail relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.44 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.37 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Wu Admiral relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 0.42 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Extinguish relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
Card Stacks
28
Card Stacks
28Showing 1-2 of 28
Cards like Trophy Mage
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trophy Mage 27%
- Tribute Mage 25%
- Trinket Mage 24%
- Treasure Mage 3%
- Transit Mage 1%
Cards like Counterspell
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 68%
- Negate 49%
- Preemptive Strike 8%
- Extinguish 8%
- Mystic Denial 5%
- Flash Counter 4%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Disruption Protocol 2%
- Wash Away 2%
- Remove Soul 2%
- Intervene 1%
- Spell Snare 1%
- Nullify 1%
- Wild Unraveling 1%
Other options: Envelop, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Second Guess, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Sword of Feast and Famine
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Mask of Memory
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Combat Research
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Combat Research 40%
- Curious Obsession 21%
Cards like Wu Light Cavalry
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Empyrial Plate
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Empyrial Plate 35%
- Golem-Skin Gauntlets 16%
- Darksteel Axe 3%
- Bonesplitter 3%
- Marauder's Axe 2%
- Short Sword 2%
- Bronze Sword 1%
- Bone Saw 1%
- Cultist's Staff 1%
- Greataxe 1%
- Leonin Scimitar 1%
- Veteran's Sidearm 1%
- Vanquisher's Axe 1%
Other options: Torch Gauntlet, Vulshok Morningstar, Trusty Machete, Riot Gear, Silverskin Armor, Shuko, Thinking Cap, Vibranium Energy Daggers, Ogre's Cleaver, Murderer's Axe, Honed Khopesh
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.63 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 60%
- Lightning Greaves 25%
Cards like Bident of Thassa
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 36%
- Foundry Inspector 26%
- Cloud Key 2%
- Planar Gate 1%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Helm of Awakening
Cards like Champion's Helm
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Champion's Helm 26%
- Hero's Blade 14%
- Hero's Heirloom 2%
Cards like Sun Quan, Lord of Wu
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 60%
- Commander's Sphere 11%
Cards like Mithril Coat
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mithril Coat 19%
- Darksteel Plate 13%
Cards like Fog Bank
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fog Bank 18%
- Guard Gomazoa 5%
Cards like Sword of the Animist
8.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Wizard Class
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Curiosity
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Curiosity 45%
- Ophidian Eye 3%
Cards like Basilisk Collar
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Triskaidekaphile
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Nettlecyst
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 15%
- Adaptive Omnitool 9%
Cards like Silent Arbiter
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Silent Arbiter 24%
- Crawlspace 4%
Cards like Ponder
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Wu Scout
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Wu Scout 18%
- Telepathic Spies 1%
- Talas Explorer 1%
Other options: Ingenious Thief, Wanderguard Sentry
Cards like Imprisoned in the Moon
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.16 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Power Suit
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like The Key to the Vault
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Brass Squire relevance 0.46 · 35.2% (32 of 91 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 0.53 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 0.53 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 0.51 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.45 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Deadeye Quartermaster relevance 0.45 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Wu Longbowman relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.44 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Wu Admiral relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 0.42 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Wu Spy relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.31 · 24.2% (22 of 91 decks)
- Straw Soldiers relevance 0.42 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Wu Infantry relevance 0.40 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Red Cliffs Armada relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.26 · 27.5% (25 of 91 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Wu Warship relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Protocol Knight relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.24 · 25.3% (23 of 91 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.26 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.21 · 35.2% (32 of 91 decks)
- Minas Tirith Garrison relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Daring Apprentice relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.21 · 24.2% (22 of 91 decks)
- Knights of Dol Amroth relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.19 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Archivist relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Renowned Weaponsmith relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.17 · 36.3% (33 of 91 decks)
- Sea Scryer relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.19 · 19.8% (18 of 91 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.17 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.17 · 24.2% (22 of 91 decks)
- Armory Automaton relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Butcher's Cleaver relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.45 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.42 · 31.9% (29 of 91 decks)
- Golem-Skin Gauntlets relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.34 · 49.5% (45 of 91 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.40 · 27.5% (25 of 91 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.35 · 41.8% (38 of 91 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.37 · 35.2% (32 of 91 decks)
- Bladed Bracers relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Rogue's Gloves relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.40 · 22.0% (20 of 91 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.39 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.36 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.39 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.38 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.36 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.40 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.31 · 40.7% (37 of 91 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Inquisitor's Flail relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.37 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Mask of Avacyn relevance 0.37 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.33 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- True-Faith Censer relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.32 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.31 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.32 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Sword of Sinew and Steel relevance 0.34 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.27 · 23.1% (21 of 91 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.28 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Masterwork of Ingenuity relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.32 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.31 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.31 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Batterbone relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Sword of Forge and Frontier relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.26 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.28 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Bloodforged Battle-Axe relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 60.4% (55 of 91 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.19 · 34.1% (31 of 91 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.17 · 42.9% (39 of 91 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Combat Research relevance 0.37 · 39.6% (36 of 91 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.35 · 45.1% (41 of 91 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.42 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.42 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.39 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (21 of 91 decks)
- Drake Umbra relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.17 · 35.2% (32 of 91 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.20 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.16 · 30.8% (28 of 91 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Teferi's Veil relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Spectral Flight relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.18 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Cradle of Safety relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.16 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.11 · 35.2% (32 of 91 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Unstable Mutation relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Illusionary Armor relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Treasure Trove relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Military Intelligence relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Backfire relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Astral Wingspan relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Take Possession relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.10 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Abduction relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.13 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Extinguish relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Fumble relevance 0.35 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 0.38 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.21 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.20 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Liquify relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.11 · 49.5% (45 of 91 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.13 · 29.7% (27 of 91 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.12 · 41.8% (38 of 91 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.16 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Redirect relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Rune Snag relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.15 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.13 · 25.3% (23 of 91 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.12 · 27.5% (25 of 91 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Hurkyl's Recall relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.10 · 33.0% (30 of 91 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.12 · 16.5% (15 of 91 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.13 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.09 · 41.8% (38 of 91 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.09 · 45.1% (41 of 91 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.13 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.12 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Deflection relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.13 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.10 · 31.9% (29 of 91 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.12 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Interdict relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Sift Through Sands relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Forced Retreat relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.33 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.28 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.19 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 12.1% (11 of 91 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.17 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (21 of 91 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.13 · 26.4% (24 of 91 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 33.0% (30 of 91 decks)
- Temporal Machinations relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.15 · 9.9% (9 of 91 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.17 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Déjà Vu relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Ancestral Memories relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Omen relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Prosperity relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Last Thoughts relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.13 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.12 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Index relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Eagle Vision relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.12 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.12 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Mass Appeal relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.11 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.11 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
Planeswalkers
9
Planeswalkers
9 Showing 1-9 of 9
All planeswalkers (9)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.16 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.12 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.12 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.10 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All utility lands (50)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.16 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.16 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.15 · 18.7% (17 of 91 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 25.3% (23 of 91 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 20.9% (19 of 91 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.16 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.14 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.16 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.13 · 13.2% (12 of 91 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.14 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 11.0% (10 of 91 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.14 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 59.3% (54 of 91 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.11 · 17.6% (16 of 91 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.13 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 44.0% (40 of 91 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (13 of 91 decks)
- Nephalia Academy relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.12 · 5.5% (5 of 91 decks)
- Tolaria relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.11 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Memorial to Genius relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
Lands
31
Lands
31 Showing 1-10 of 31
All lands (31)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (7 of 91 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.17 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.17 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.17 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (14 of 91 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.13 · 19.8% (18 of 91 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (8 of 91 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.14 · 6.6% (6 of 91 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.08 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.09 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.09 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.08 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.08 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.08 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.07 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 93.4% (85 of 91 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lu Xun, Scholar General, from 91 real Commander decks.