Capture of Jingzhou
Played in 15,888 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Narset, Enlightened Master relevance 4.66 · 26.3% (776 of 2,955 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 3.58 · 19.7% (310 of 1,577 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.00 · 31.2% (293 of 938 decks)
- Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 2.99 · 9.3% (364 of 3,894 decks)
- Emet-Selch, Unsundered // Hades, Sorcerer of Eld relevance 2.96 · 8.5% (206 of 2,432 decks)
- Taigam, Ojutai Master relevance 2.94 · 16.0% (120 of 751 decks)
- Myra the Magnificent relevance 2.49 · 11.2% (237 of 2,111 decks)
- Yennett, Cryptic Sovereign relevance 2.47 · 3.8% (193 of 5,115 decks)
- Tetsuo, Imperial Champion relevance 2.43 · 5.2% (76 of 1,468 decks)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 2.30 · 30.5% (80 of 262 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 2.27 · 5.2% (326 of 6,234 decks)
- Kang Prime relevance 2.27 · 11.6% (40 of 345 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 2.21 · 5.3% (219 of 4,133 decks)
- Storm, Force of Nature relevance 2.15 · 4.6% (263 of 5,732 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.11 · 9.2% (695 of 7,581 decks)
- Medomai the Ageless relevance 2.03 · 12.3% (35 of 284 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 1.95 · 1.8% (51 of 2,779 decks)
- Ultimecia, Time Sorceress // Ultimecia, Omnipotent relevance 1.95 · 7.5% (38 of 508 decks)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 1.78 · 3.2% (195 of 6,061 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 1.72 · 13.5% (87 of 645 decks)
- Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 1.71 · 8.7% (63 of 726 decks)
- Gandalf, Party Guest relevance 1.67 · 3.1% (157 of 5,006 decks)
- Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger relevance 1.66 · 7.6% (70 of 922 decks)
- Elminster relevance 1.65 · 3.5% (112 of 3,246 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.64 · 12.3% (85 of 692 decks)
- Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 1.62 · 1.1% (59 of 5,566 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 1.59 · 10.6% (100 of 941 decks)
- Jin Sakai, Ghost of Tsushima relevance 1.59 · 1.3% (193 of 14,297 decks)
- Kess, Dissident Mage relevance 1.58 · 1.6% (77 of 4,685 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 1.53 · 3.5% (107 of 3,067 decks)
All parallel cards (4)
All most relevant (30)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 3.26 · 61.1% (9,715 of 15,888 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 2.78 · 56.6% (8,997 of 15,888 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.78 · 35.3% (5,605 of 15,888 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.56 · 29.9% (4,747 of 15,888 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 1.30 · 24.2% (3,843 of 15,888 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.30 · 44.1% (6,999 of 15,888 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 1.23 · 23.6% (3,751 of 15,888 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 1.10 · 45.0% (7,155 of 15,888 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.07 · 18.7% (2,972 of 15,888 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 1.06 · 38.4% (6,106 of 15,888 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.06 · 41.7% (6,619 of 15,888 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 1.04 · 44.9% (7,131 of 15,888 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.03 · 33.3% (5,290 of 15,888 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 1.01 · 18.9% (3,007 of 15,888 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 1.00 · 15.9% (2,522 of 15,888 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.98 · 39.3% (6,251 of 15,888 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (2,429 of 15,888 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.93 · 35.6% (5,657 of 15,888 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (2,376 of 15,888 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.89 · 27.2% (4,327 of 15,888 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.88 · 36.9% (5,862 of 15,888 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.84 · 51.2% (8,138 of 15,888 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.83 · 40.3% (6,402 of 15,888 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.82 · 23.3% (3,698 of 15,888 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.80 · 16.5% (2,614 of 15,888 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (1,880 of 15,888 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.78 · 26.7% (4,238 of 15,888 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.74 · 28.6% (4,551 of 15,888 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.69 · 17.6% (2,802 of 15,888 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.67 · 15.5% (2,464 of 15,888 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.67 · 21.1% (3,358 of 15,888 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.62 · 18.6% (2,959 of 15,888 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.82 · 23.3% (3,698 of 15,888 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.67 · 25.2% (3,999 of 15,888 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.65 · 22.7% (3,601 of 15,888 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.64 · 22.1% (3,514 of 15,888 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Rhystic Study relevance 1.04 · 44.9% (7,131 of 15,888 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.93 · 35.6% (5,657 of 15,888 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.67 · 15.5% (2,464 of 15,888 decks)
All instants (15)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.78 · 35.3% (5,605 of 15,888 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.30 · 44.1% (6,999 of 15,888 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 1.10 · 45.0% (7,155 of 15,888 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 1.06 · 38.4% (6,106 of 15,888 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.06 · 41.7% (6,619 of 15,888 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.03 · 33.3% (5,290 of 15,888 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.98 · 39.3% (6,251 of 15,888 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.89 · 27.2% (4,327 of 15,888 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.88 · 36.9% (5,862 of 15,888 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.84 · 51.2% (8,138 of 15,888 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.83 · 40.3% (6,402 of 15,888 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.74 · 28.6% (4,551 of 15,888 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.69 · 17.6% (2,802 of 15,888 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (3,433 of 15,888 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.64 · 19.0% (3,018 of 15,888 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 3.26 · 61.1% (9,715 of 15,888 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 2.78 · 56.6% (8,997 of 15,888 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.56 · 29.9% (4,747 of 15,888 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 1.30 · 24.2% (3,843 of 15,888 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 1.23 · 23.6% (3,751 of 15,888 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.07 · 18.7% (2,972 of 15,888 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 1.01 · 18.9% (3,007 of 15,888 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 1.00 · 15.9% (2,522 of 15,888 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (2,429 of 15,888 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (2,376 of 15,888 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.80 · 16.5% (2,614 of 15,888 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.78 · 11.8% (1,880 of 15,888 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.78 · 26.7% (4,238 of 15,888 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.66 · 20.8% (3,312 of 15,888 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.65 · 15.6% (2,481 of 15,888 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.00 · 32.8% (5,205 of 15,888 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.87 · 33.3% (5,293 of 15,888 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.78 · 26.1% (4,147 of 15,888 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.78 · 19.5% (3,093 of 15,888 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.61 · 17.5% (2,775 of 15,888 decks)
All lands (6)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.80 · 34.5% (5,480 of 15,888 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.73 · 32.6% (5,182 of 15,888 decks)
- Steam Vents relevance 0.70 · 29.1% (4,630 of 15,888 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.68 · 28.1% (4,466 of 15,888 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.68 · 31.2% (4,962 of 15,888 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.66 · 29.3% (4,659 of 15,888 decks)
EDH data for Capture of Jingzhou: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 15,888 real decks.