Change per day
Archetypes
79% of decks lean toward it
79% of decks lean toward it
44% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Kozilek, the Great Distortion
79% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Experimental Augury
79% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Time Stretch
44% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Fireshrieker
29% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Pathrazer of Ulamog
29% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Ripples of Potential
12% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 263 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Contentious Plan
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Flux Channeler
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 46%
- Dreamtide Whale 45%
Cards like Thrummingbird
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 52%
- Lightning Greaves 43%
Cards like Time Stretch
6.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Time Stretch 38%
- Time Warp 16%
- Temporal Manipulation 14%
- Capture of Jingzhou 12%
Other options: Savor the Moment
Cards like Experimental Augury
6.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other blue decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 69%
- Negate 41%
- Spell Snare 4%
- Stern Scolding 3%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Intervene 1%
Other options: Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Combat Research
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Combat Research 35%
- Curious Obsession 11%
Cards like Temporal Mastery
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Reject Imperfection
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Convolute, Out of Bounds, Mindstatic, Frazzle, Thoughtbind
Cards like Pongify
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 41%
- Rapid Hybridization 35%
Cards like Aqueous Form
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 34%
- Security Bypass 6%
Cards like Spell Pierce
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 16%
- Mana Leak 11%
- Lose Focus 4%
- Force Spike 2%
- Logic Knot 1%
- It'll Quench Ya! 1%
Other options: Don't Make a Sound, Make Disappear, Reasonable Doubt, Quench, Revolutionary Rebuff, Metallic Rebuke, Rethink
Cards like Treasure Cruise
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Tidings, Unexplained Vision, Concentrate, Universal Surveillance, Brilliant Plan, Shared Discovery, Reverse Engineer
Cards like Force of Negation
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 20%
- Force of Will 19%
Cards like Strionic Resonator
8.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Fireshrieker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fireshrieker 31%
- Rover Blades 2%
All top picks (50)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.51 · 68.2% (479 of 702 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.53 · 63.1% (443 of 702 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.56 · 56.4% (396 of 702 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.51 · 63.7% (447 of 702 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.57 · 51.6% (362 of 702 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.51 · 56.8% (399 of 702 decks)
- Skyship Plunderer relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (128 of 702 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.71 · 22.2% (156 of 702 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.69 · 25.5% (179 of 702 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.61 · 35.0% (246 of 702 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.58 · 39.7% (279 of 702 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.66 · 22.9% (161 of 702 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.69 · 18.5% (130 of 702 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.58 · 35.5% (249 of 702 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.64 · 24.4% (171 of 702 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.52 · 45.2% (317 of 702 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.56 · 34.8% (244 of 702 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.51 · 37.9% (266 of 702 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (144 of 702 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.46 · 46.3% (325 of 702 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.54 · 30.6% (215 of 702 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (166 of 702 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.59 · 19.1% (134 of 702 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.41 · 54.6% (383 of 702 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.65 · 12.1% (85 of 702 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.55 · 20.4% (143 of 702 decks)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (90 of 702 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.56 · 17.4% (122 of 702 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.55 · 17.9% (126 of 702 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.52 · 22.2% (156 of 702 decks)
- Desolation Twin relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (53 of 702 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.54 · 17.7% (124 of 702 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.47 · 30.6% (215 of 702 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.53 · 19.2% (135 of 702 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (91 of 702 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.49 · 25.6% (180 of 702 decks)
- Eagle Vision relevance 0.62 · 9.5% (67 of 702 decks)
- Pathrazer of Ulamog relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (91 of 702 decks)
- Benthic Anomaly relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (83 of 702 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.56 · 13.2% (93 of 702 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.55 · 13.4% (94 of 702 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.41 · 41.6% (292 of 702 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.43 · 34.5% (242 of 702 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.48 · 23.1% (162 of 702 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (94 of 702 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.45 · 26.5% (186 of 702 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (75 of 702 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.49 · 18.2% (128 of 702 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 0.58 · 8.3% (58 of 702 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.44 · 25.4% (178 of 702 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.51 · 56.8% (399 of 702 decks)
- Skyship Plunderer relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (128 of 702 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.69 · 25.5% (179 of 702 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.66 · 22.9% (161 of 702 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.69 · 18.5% (130 of 702 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.64 · 24.4% (171 of 702 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.52 · 45.2% (317 of 702 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (144 of 702 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.46 · 46.3% (325 of 702 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.65 · 12.1% (85 of 702 decks)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (90 of 702 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.55 · 17.9% (126 of 702 decks)
- Desolation Twin relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (53 of 702 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.54 · 17.7% (124 of 702 decks)
- Pathrazer of Ulamog relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (91 of 702 decks)
- Benthic Anomaly relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (83 of 702 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.56 · 13.2% (93 of 702 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.55 · 13.4% (94 of 702 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.45 · 26.5% (186 of 702 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 0.58 · 8.3% (58 of 702 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.41 · 32.1% (225 of 702 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.42 · 29.5% (207 of 702 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.47 · 16.8% (118 of 702 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (63 of 702 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.47 · 15.5% (109 of 702 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.40 · 27.8% (195 of 702 decks)
- Kozilek, the Broken Reality relevance 0.54 · 7.1% (50 of 702 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.35 · 35.8% (251 of 702 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.43 · 13.7% (96 of 702 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.42 · 14.1% (99 of 702 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (112 of 702 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.37 · 23.9% (168 of 702 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.45 · 10.4% (73 of 702 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (65 of 702 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 6.3% (44 of 702 decks)
- Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.50 · 4.6% (32 of 702 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (64 of 702 decks)
- Flayer of Loyalties relevance 0.54 · 3.8% (27 of 702 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (32 of 702 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (55 of 702 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.49 · 4.3% (30 of 702 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (80 of 702 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.23 · 48.9% (343 of 702 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (74 of 702 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (42 of 702 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (71 of 702 decks)
- Breaker of Creation relevance 0.52 · 3.3% (23 of 702 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.34 · 11.8% (83 of 702 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (41 of 702 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias // The Great Synthesis relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (42 of 702 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (166 of 702 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.59 · 19.1% (134 of 702 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.55 · 20.4% (143 of 702 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.52 · 22.2% (156 of 702 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.47 · 30.6% (215 of 702 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (94 of 702 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (65 of 702 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.55 · 6.8% (48 of 702 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (79 of 702 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.46 · 14.4% (101 of 702 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (69 of 702 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (43 of 702 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.50 · 6.3% (44 of 702 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (52 of 702 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.44 · 8.8% (62 of 702 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.38 · 15.5% (109 of 702 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (60 of 702 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (69 of 702 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (65 of 702 decks)
- Silver Shroud Costume relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (36 of 702 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (74 of 702 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 51.6% (362 of 702 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (64 of 702 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.32 · 13.8% (97 of 702 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (32 of 702 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.46 · 3.6% (25 of 702 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.22 · 43.2% (303 of 702 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (27 of 702 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (28 of 702 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.28 · 17.7% (124 of 702 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.26 · 22.4% (157 of 702 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (46 of 702 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.24 · 18.2% (128 of 702 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.39 · 3.6% (25 of 702 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (28 of 702 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.28 · 9.7% (68 of 702 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (37 of 702 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (43 of 702 decks)
- Sword of Wealth and Power relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (18 of 702 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (82 of 702 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.43 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Ghost Vacuum relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (21 of 702 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (25 of 702 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (87 of 702 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.24 · 11.1% (78 of 702 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (48 of 702 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (20 of 702 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (36 of 702 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (23 of 702 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (47 of 702 decks)
All enchantments (43)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.58 · 35.5% (249 of 702 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.56 · 34.8% (244 of 702 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.41 · 54.6% (383 of 702 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.57 · 13.0% (91 of 702 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.43 · 34.5% (242 of 702 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.48 · 23.1% (162 of 702 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (75 of 702 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.56 · 9.0% (63 of 702 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.51 · 11.4% (80 of 702 decks)
- Teferi's Veil relevance 0.55 · 5.8% (41 of 702 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.42 · 16.4% (115 of 702 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (55 of 702 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.42 · 11.8% (83 of 702 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (39 of 702 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (38 of 702 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (35 of 702 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (82 of 702 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (46 of 702 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (43 of 702 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Curse of Unbinding relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (23 of 702 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (28 of 702 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (100 of 702 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.31 · 8.8% (62 of 702 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.24 · 21.8% (153 of 702 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.31 · 7.1% (50 of 702 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (20 of 702 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (27 of 702 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (76 of 702 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (37 of 702 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (24 of 702 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (24 of 702 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (166 of 702 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (19 of 702 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (24 of 702 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (33 of 702 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 24.8% (174 of 702 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (30 of 702 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (61 of 702 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.16 · 21.5% (151 of 702 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (23 of 702 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (22 of 702 decks)
All instants (50)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.51 · 68.2% (479 of 702 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.56 · 56.4% (396 of 702 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.57 · 51.6% (362 of 702 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.58 · 39.7% (279 of 702 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.54 · 30.6% (215 of 702 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.41 · 41.6% (292 of 702 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.40 · 20.4% (143 of 702 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.50 · 7.4% (52 of 702 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (54 of 702 decks)
- Reenact the Crime relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (57 of 702 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (148 of 702 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.43 · 8.1% (57 of 702 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.36 · 15.0% (105 of 702 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (126 of 702 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (58 of 702 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.40 · 8.7% (61 of 702 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (57 of 702 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (99 of 702 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.36 · 9.1% (64 of 702 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (82 of 702 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.34 · 10.8% (76 of 702 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (50 of 702 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.30 · 15.5% (109 of 702 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (88 of 702 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.34 · 8.1% (57 of 702 decks)
- Reality Ripple relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (26 of 702 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.31 · 11.8% (83 of 702 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (41 of 702 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.31 · 11.0% (77 of 702 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (30 of 702 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (26 of 702 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.27 · 14.7% (103 of 702 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (77 of 702 decks)
- Lofty Denial relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (33 of 702 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (142 of 702 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (39 of 702 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (33 of 702 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.35 · 4.4% (31 of 702 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (31 of 702 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (30 of 702 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (60 of 702 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.42 · 3.1% (22 of 702 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.27 · 10.8% (76 of 702 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (162 of 702 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.24 · 18.7% (131 of 702 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.22 · 26.4% (185 of 702 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.21 · 28.8% (202 of 702 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.24 · 17.5% (123 of 702 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.53 · 63.1% (443 of 702 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.51 · 63.7% (447 of 702 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.71 · 22.2% (156 of 702 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.61 · 35.0% (246 of 702 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.51 · 37.9% (266 of 702 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.56 · 17.4% (122 of 702 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.53 · 19.2% (135 of 702 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.49 · 25.6% (180 of 702 decks)
- Eagle Vision relevance 0.62 · 9.5% (67 of 702 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.49 · 18.2% (128 of 702 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.44 · 25.4% (178 of 702 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.49 · 14.1% (99 of 702 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.49 · 12.0% (84 of 702 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.50 · 10.7% (75 of 702 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (85 of 702 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (52 of 702 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.42 · 14.2% (100 of 702 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (56 of 702 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (50 of 702 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (55 of 702 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (67 of 702 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.38 · 15.5% (109 of 702 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (54 of 702 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.32 · 19.4% (136 of 702 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.37 · 10.8% (76 of 702 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (36 of 702 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.37 · 9.7% (68 of 702 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (106 of 702 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (48 of 702 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (37 of 702 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.32 · 10.7% (75 of 702 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.34 · 7.0% (49 of 702 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (50 of 702 decks)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (24 of 702 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (27 of 702 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.31 · 7.8% (55 of 702 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.36 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (67 of 702 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (76 of 702 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (63 of 702 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (28 of 702 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 20.7% (145 of 702 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.19 · 28.1% (197 of 702 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (27 of 702 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (44 of 702 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (38 of 702 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (24 of 702 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (88 of 702 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (37 of 702 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.43 · 4.0% (28 of 702 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (52 of 702 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (45 of 702 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (63 of 702 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (88 of 702 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (19 of 702 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (22 of 702 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (19 of 702 decks)
All utility lands (38)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.46 · 37.9% (266 of 702 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.54 · 20.2% (142 of 702 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.28 · 33.9% (238 of 702 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.32 · 17.8% (125 of 702 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.27 · 27.4% (192 of 702 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.27 · 25.5% (179 of 702 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (58 of 702 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (132 of 702 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (80 of 702 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (48 of 702 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (68 of 702 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.28 · 9.7% (68 of 702 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.21 · 30.6% (215 of 702 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 30.8% (216 of 702 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.24 · 14.0% (98 of 702 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (49 of 702 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (24 of 702 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.27 · 5.8% (41 of 702 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 13.0% (91 of 702 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.23 · 9.5% (67 of 702 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.20 · 14.8% (104 of 702 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (54 of 702 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (20 of 702 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 53.6% (376 of 702 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (30 of 702 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (19 of 702 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (19 of 702 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (21 of 702 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 47.3% (332 of 702 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (19 of 702 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (40 of 702 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (18 of 702 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (18)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (82 of 702 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.30 · 9.7% (68 of 702 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (72 of 702 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (72 of 702 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (66 of 702 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (98 of 702 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (68 of 702 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.27 · 6.4% (45 of 702 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (29 of 702 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (19 of 702 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (18 of 702 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (17 of 702 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (30 of 702 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 89.5% (628 of 702 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel, from 702 real Commander decks.