Walk the Aeons

Played in 11,145 decks

Walk the Aeons
$1.51 €0.76

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Narset, Enlightened Master relevance 4.80 · 23.4% (687 of 2,936 decks)
  2. Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 3.78 · 36.7% (575 of 1,566 decks)
  3. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.98 · 27.6% (240 of 871 decks)
  4. Taigam, Ojutai Master relevance 2.91 · 11.3% (84 of 745 decks)
  5. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.75 · 11.6% (1,062 of 9,125 decks)
  6. Myra the Magnificent relevance 2.61 · 7.6% (160 of 2,095 decks)
  7. Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 2.57 · 1.4% (75 of 5,531 decks)
  8. God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 2.53 · 27.7% (72 of 260 decks)
  9. Kang Prime relevance 2.40 · 9.6% (33 of 342 decks)
  10. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.37 · 10.7% (499 of 4,673 decks)
  11. Jhoira of the Ghitu relevance 2.36 · 6.2% (139 of 2,239 decks)
  12. Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 2.29 · 3.0% (124 of 4,098 decks)
  13. Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.14 · 6.6% (496 of 7,509 decks)
  14. Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.94 · 3.1% (59 of 1,934 decks)
  15. Anhelo, the Painter relevance 1.93 · 1.4% (47 of 3,277 decks)
  16. Elminster relevance 1.86 · 2.8% (91 of 3,226 decks)
  17. Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.85 · 10.9% (75 of 685 decks)
  18. Gandalf, Party Guest relevance 1.84 · 2.9% (145 of 4,921 decks)
  19. Jeleva, Nephalia's Scourge relevance 1.82 · 1.8% (28 of 1,547 decks)
  20. Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 1.80 · 2.1% (80 of 3,864 decks)
  21. Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 1.70 · 5.5% (40 of 724 decks)
  22. Medomai the Ageless relevance 1.69 · 6.8% (19 of 281 decks)
  23. Patron of the Moon relevance 1.69 · 9.4% (66 of 705 decks)
  24. Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger relevance 1.66 · 4.9% (44 of 905 decks)
  25. Yuriko, the Tiger's Shadow relevance 1.65 · 1.2% (188 of 16,168 decks)
  26. Emet-Selch, Unsundered // Hades, Sorcerer of Eld relevance 1.65 · 2.2% (52 of 2,412 decks)
  27. Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.60 · 8.7% (99 of 1,141 decks)
  28. Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 1.52 · 1.4% (80 of 5,633 decks)
  29. Kang the Conqueror relevance 1.50 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
  30. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.47 · 1.1% (102 of 8,897 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Part the Waterveil
    1.72 26.0%
    $0.92 €0.86
  • Karn's Temporal Sundering
    1.71 29.9%
    $1.77 €1.52
  • Time Warp
    1.69 34.4%
    $6.97 €6.59
  • Temporal Manipulation
    1.57 29.4%
    $13.10 €9.08
  • Nexus of Fate
    1.43 28.4%
    $5.31 €4.28
  • Temporal Mastery
    1.43 27.3%
    $4.97 €5.13
  • Time Stretch
    1.37 25.5%
    $5.61 €3.93
  • Capture of Jingzhou
    1.33 22.4%
    $7.68 €7.11
  • Beacon of Tomorrows
    1.25 20.2%
    $3.41 €1.90
  • Temporal Trespass
    1.09 20.5%
    $2.89 €4.00
All most relevant (30)
  1. Part the Waterveil relevance 1.72 · 26.0% (2,896 of 11,145 decks)
  2. Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.71 · 29.9% (3,328 of 11,145 decks)
  3. Time Warp relevance 1.69 · 34.4% (3,830 of 11,145 decks)
  4. Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.57 · 29.4% (3,281 of 11,145 decks)
  5. Nexus of Fate relevance 1.43 · 28.4% (3,167 of 11,145 decks)
  6. Temporal Mastery relevance 1.43 · 27.3% (3,048 of 11,145 decks)
  7. Time Stretch relevance 1.37 · 25.5% (2,847 of 11,145 decks)
  8. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.33 · 22.4% (2,499 of 11,145 decks)
  9. Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 1.25 · 20.2% (2,251 of 11,145 decks)
  10. Temporal Trespass relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (2,284 of 11,145 decks)
  11. Alrund's Epiphany relevance 1.05 · 17.8% (1,979 of 11,145 decks)
  12. Expropriate relevance 0.87 · 16.7% (1,863 of 11,145 decks)
  13. Mystical Tutor relevance 0.86 · 29.2% (3,255 of 11,145 decks)
  14. Counterspell relevance 0.84 · 51.2% (5,704 of 11,145 decks)
  15. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 21.9% (2,441 of 11,145 decks)
  16. Brainstorm relevance 0.77 · 31.0% (3,458 of 11,145 decks)
  17. Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.73 · 29.9% (3,331 of 11,145 decks)
  18. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (2,038 of 11,145 decks)
  19. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.68 · 19.8% (2,202 of 11,145 decks)
  20. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (1,956 of 11,145 decks)
  21. Negate relevance 0.67 · 27.7% (3,082 of 11,145 decks)
  22. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (3,522 of 11,145 decks)
  23. Omniscience relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (1,669 of 11,145 decks)
  24. Solve the Equation relevance 0.64 · 15.5% (1,727 of 11,145 decks)
  25. Pongify relevance 0.64 · 21.4% (2,384 of 11,145 decks)
  26. Mystic Remora relevance 0.60 · 23.1% (2,578 of 11,145 decks)
  27. Exploration relevance 0.60 · 17.1% (1,910 of 11,145 decks)
  28. Mana Drain relevance 0.59 · 21.2% (2,361 of 11,145 decks)
  29. High Tide relevance 0.58 · 14.1% (1,575 of 11,145 decks)
  30. Frantic Search relevance 0.58 · 22.4% (2,492 of 11,145 decks)

Creatures

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.78 21.9%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.70 18.3%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.68 19.8%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.67 17.6%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.56 13.8%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Scute Swarm
    0.56 17.1%
    $8.64 €7.74
All creatures (6)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 21.9% (2,441 of 11,145 decks)
  2. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (2,038 of 11,145 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.68 · 19.8% (2,202 of 11,145 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (1,956 of 11,145 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (1,539 of 11,145 decks)
  6. Scute Swarm relevance 0.56 · 17.1% (1,903 of 11,145 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Sapphire Medallion
    0.55 15.7%
    $8.55 €5.60
All artifacts (1)
  1. Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (1,747 of 11,145 decks)

Enchantments

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Omniscience
    0.65 15.0%
    $6.18 €4.95
  • Mystic Remora
    0.60 23.1%
    $15.08 €12.69
  • Exploration
    0.60 17.1%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Rhystic Study
    0.57 24.7%
    $69.59 €43.64
  • Retreat to Coralhelm
    0.57 11.6%
    $0.41 €0.58
All enchantments (5)
  1. Omniscience relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (1,669 of 11,145 decks)
  2. Mystic Remora relevance 0.60 · 23.1% (2,578 of 11,145 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 0.60 · 17.1% (1,910 of 11,145 decks)
  4. Rhystic Study relevance 0.57 · 24.7% (2,753 of 11,145 decks)
  5. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (1,298 of 11,145 decks)

Instants

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
  • Nexus of Fate
    1.43 28.4%
    $5.31 €4.28
  • Mystical Tutor
    0.86 29.2%
    $19.16 €11.32
  • Counterspell
    0.84 51.2%
    $4.28 €4.16
  • Brainstorm
    0.77 31.0%
    $0.57 €1.46
  • Cyclonic Rift
    0.73 29.9%
    $39.16 €37.56
  • Negate
    0.67 27.7%
    $0.24 €0.10
  • An Offer You Can't Refuse
    0.65 31.6%
    $3.16 €3.21
  • Pongify
    0.64 21.4%
    $3.12 €2.11
  • Mana Drain
    0.59 21.2%
    $56.89 €49.28
  • High Tide
    0.58 14.1%
    $1.66 €1.15
All instants (18)
  1. Nexus of Fate relevance 1.43 · 28.4% (3,167 of 11,145 decks)
  2. Mystical Tutor relevance 0.86 · 29.2% (3,255 of 11,145 decks)
  3. Counterspell relevance 0.84 · 51.2% (5,704 of 11,145 decks)
  4. Brainstorm relevance 0.77 · 31.0% (3,458 of 11,145 decks)
  5. Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.73 · 29.9% (3,331 of 11,145 decks)
  6. Negate relevance 0.67 · 27.7% (3,082 of 11,145 decks)
  7. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (3,522 of 11,145 decks)
  8. Pongify relevance 0.64 · 21.4% (2,384 of 11,145 decks)
  9. Mana Drain relevance 0.59 · 21.2% (2,361 of 11,145 decks)
  10. High Tide relevance 0.58 · 14.1% (1,575 of 11,145 decks)
  11. Frantic Search relevance 0.58 · 22.4% (2,492 of 11,145 decks)
  12. Arcane Denial relevance 0.57 · 24.2% (2,693 of 11,145 decks)
  13. Growth Spiral relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (1,907 of 11,145 decks)
  14. Dig Through Time relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (1,627 of 11,145 decks)
  15. Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (1,992 of 11,145 decks)
  16. Swan Song relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (2,625 of 11,145 decks)
  17. Force of Will relevance 0.56 · 18.0% (2,010 of 11,145 decks)
  18. Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.54 · 21.5% (2,391 of 11,145 decks)

Sorceries

14

Showing 1-10 of 14

Page size
  • Part the Waterveil
    1.72 26.0%
    $0.92 €0.86
  • Karn's Temporal Sundering
    1.71 29.9%
    $1.77 €1.52
  • Time Warp
    1.69 34.4%
    $6.97 €6.59
  • Temporal Manipulation
    1.57 29.4%
    $13.10 €9.08
  • Temporal Mastery
    1.43 27.3%
    $4.97 €5.13
  • Time Stretch
    1.37 25.5%
    $5.61 €3.93
  • Capture of Jingzhou
    1.33 22.4%
    $7.68 €7.11
  • Beacon of Tomorrows
    1.25 20.2%
    $3.41 €1.90
  • Temporal Trespass
    1.09 20.5%
    $2.89 €4.00
  • Alrund's Epiphany
    1.05 17.8%
    $4.06 €4.10
All sorceries (14)
  1. Part the Waterveil relevance 1.72 · 26.0% (2,896 of 11,145 decks)
  2. Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.71 · 29.9% (3,328 of 11,145 decks)
  3. Time Warp relevance 1.69 · 34.4% (3,830 of 11,145 decks)
  4. Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.57 · 29.4% (3,281 of 11,145 decks)
  5. Temporal Mastery relevance 1.43 · 27.3% (3,048 of 11,145 decks)
  6. Time Stretch relevance 1.37 · 25.5% (2,847 of 11,145 decks)
  7. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.33 · 22.4% (2,499 of 11,145 decks)
  8. Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 1.25 · 20.2% (2,251 of 11,145 decks)
  9. Temporal Trespass relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (2,284 of 11,145 decks)
  10. Alrund's Epiphany relevance 1.05 · 17.8% (1,979 of 11,145 decks)
  11. Expropriate relevance 0.87 · 16.7% (1,863 of 11,145 decks)
  12. Solve the Equation relevance 0.64 · 15.5% (1,727 of 11,145 decks)
  13. Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.55 · 10.8% (1,209 of 11,145 decks)
  14. Ponder relevance 0.53 · 18.2% (2,033 of 11,145 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Mystic Sanctuary
    1.22 39.8%
    $1.35 €1.23
  • Reliquary Tower
    0.60 43.3%
    $4.19 €3.85
All utility lands (2)
  1. Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.22 · 39.8% (4,433 of 11,145 decks)
  2. Reliquary Tower relevance 0.60 · 43.3% (4,828 of 11,145 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Simic Growth Chamber
    0.74 20.7%
    $0.37 €0.30
  • Breeding Pool
    0.59 24.7%
    $9.52 €9.22
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.59 26.1%
    $35.63 €26.45
  • Yavimaya Coast
    0.55 19.2%
    $0.69 €0.50
All lands (4)
  1. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.74 · 20.7% (2,312 of 11,145 decks)
  2. Breeding Pool relevance 0.59 · 24.7% (2,753 of 11,145 decks)
  3. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.59 · 26.1% (2,904 of 11,145 decks)
  4. Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (2,137 of 11,145 decks)

EDH data for Walk the Aeons: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 11,145 real decks.