Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Greater Good relevance 0.65 · 41.8% (478 of 1,143 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.84 · 12.2% (139 of 1,143 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.76 · 17.8% (203 of 1,143 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 35.2% (402 of 1,143 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (234 of 1,143 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.74 · 18.3% (209 of 1,143 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.63 · 32.8% (375 of 1,143 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.82 · 11.2% (128 of 1,143 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.73 · 16.1% (184 of 1,143 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.67 · 22.6% (258 of 1,143 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (159 of 1,143 decks)
- Six relevance 0.61 · 30.4% (347 of 1,143 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.62 · 26.9% (307 of 1,143 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.77 · 9.9% (113 of 1,143 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.77 · 7.1% (81 of 1,143 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.65 · 13.6% (156 of 1,143 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.68 · 11.1% (127 of 1,143 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.70 · 8.9% (102 of 1,143 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.68 · 8.9% (102 of 1,143 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.74 · 5.7% (65 of 1,143 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.71 · 7.0% (80 of 1,143 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.73 · 5.0% (57 of 1,143 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.48 · 32.3% (369 of 1,143 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.61 · 12.4% (142 of 1,143 decks)
- Eternal Scourge relevance 0.71 · 5.7% (65 of 1,143 decks)
- Misthollow Griffin relevance 0.70 · 6.0% (69 of 1,143 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.55 · 14.7% (168 of 1,143 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.53 · 15.7% (180 of 1,143 decks)
- Dredger's Insight relevance 0.67 · 5.5% (63 of 1,143 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.48 · 25.4% (290 of 1,143 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.51 · 19.1% (218 of 1,143 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.46 · 26.0% (297 of 1,143 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.48 · 21.6% (247 of 1,143 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.61 · 7.3% (83 of 1,143 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.62 · 6.6% (75 of 1,143 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.55 · 11.3% (129 of 1,143 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 0.71 · 4.2% (48 of 1,143 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.57 · 8.7% (99 of 1,143 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (137 of 1,143 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (159 of 1,143 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (143 of 1,143 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (151 of 1,143 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.37 · 40.9% (468 of 1,143 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.58 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.46 · 16.9% (193 of 1,143 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.59 · 5.9% (67 of 1,143 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.59 · 4.9% (56 of 1,143 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.57 · 6.0% (69 of 1,143 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (100 of 1,143 decks)
Card Stacks
17
Card Stacks
17Showing 1-2 of 17
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Icetill Explorer
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Scute Swarm
6.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 41%
- Springheart Nantuko 26%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
2.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Harrow 23%
- Entish Restoration 17%
- Scapeshift 10%
- Roiling Regrowth 6%
- Planar Engineering 5%
- Cycle of Renewal 1%
Cards like Eternal Witness
8.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Crystal Shard
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Crystal Shard 18%
- Erratic Portal 7%
Cards like Pongify
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 27%
- Rapid Hybridization 25%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 34%
- Elvish Mystic 27%
- Fyndhorn Elves 20%
- Boreal Druid 4%
Other options: Gyre Engineer, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Auroral Procession
4.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Auroral Procession 16%
- Regrowth 10%
Other options: True Ancestry, Flood of Recollection, Unnatural Restoration, Revive, Recollect, Nature's Spiral, Relearn, Elven Cache, Sage's Knowledge, Said // Done, Call to Mind, Déjà Vu, Divergent Equation
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Hedron Crab
6.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Hedron Crab 33%
- Ruin Crab 5%
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Evacuation
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Evacuation 17%
- Aetherize 8%
- Perplexing Test 1%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.72 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 33%
- Three Visits 27%
- Skyshroud Claim 10%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 1%
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds, Ranger's Path, Field Trip
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.63 · 32.8% (375 of 1,143 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.82 · 11.2% (128 of 1,143 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.67 · 22.6% (258 of 1,143 decks)
- Six relevance 0.61 · 30.4% (347 of 1,143 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.62 · 26.9% (307 of 1,143 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.74 · 5.7% (65 of 1,143 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.73 · 5.0% (57 of 1,143 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.48 · 32.3% (369 of 1,143 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.61 · 12.4% (142 of 1,143 decks)
- Eternal Scourge relevance 0.71 · 5.7% (65 of 1,143 decks)
- Misthollow Griffin relevance 0.70 · 6.0% (69 of 1,143 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.55 · 14.7% (168 of 1,143 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.53 · 15.7% (180 of 1,143 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.48 · 25.4% (290 of 1,143 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.51 · 19.1% (218 of 1,143 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.46 · 26.0% (297 of 1,143 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.48 · 21.6% (247 of 1,143 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.55 · 11.3% (129 of 1,143 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (159 of 1,143 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.37 · 40.9% (468 of 1,143 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.59 · 5.9% (67 of 1,143 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.43 · 21.2% (242 of 1,143 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (109 of 1,143 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (113 of 1,143 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.50 · 10.5% (120 of 1,143 decks)
- Emeritus of Abundance // Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (98 of 1,143 decks)
- Spawnbed Protector relevance 0.61 · 4.3% (49 of 1,143 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.53 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.33 · 41.8% (478 of 1,143 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (174 of 1,143 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.39 · 24.6% (281 of 1,143 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.30 · 47.3% (541 of 1,143 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.47 · 10.3% (118 of 1,143 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (420 of 1,143 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.53 · 5.0% (57 of 1,143 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (100 of 1,143 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.50 · 7.3% (83 of 1,143 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.38 · 23.9% (273 of 1,143 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.51 · 5.7% (65 of 1,143 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (95 of 1,143 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (165 of 1,143 decks)
- Flayer of Loyalties relevance 0.57 · 4.3% (49 of 1,143 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.49 · 6.7% (77 of 1,143 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.33 · 35.6% (407 of 1,143 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.38 · 21.3% (243 of 1,143 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.39 · 18.8% (215 of 1,143 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.50 · 5.6% (64 of 1,143 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.58 · 4.1% (47 of 1,143 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.31 · 40.9% (467 of 1,143 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (66 of 1,143 decks)
Artifacts
34
Artifacts
34 Showing 1-25 of 34
Page size
All artifacts (34)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.74 · 18.3% (209 of 1,143 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.73 · 16.1% (184 of 1,143 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.77 · 7.1% (81 of 1,143 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.62 · 6.6% (75 of 1,143 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 0.71 · 4.2% (48 of 1,143 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.57 · 8.7% (99 of 1,143 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.44 · 16.2% (185 of 1,143 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.46 · 13.6% (155 of 1,143 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.51 · 7.3% (84 of 1,143 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.53 · 5.4% (62 of 1,143 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.52 · 5.2% (59 of 1,143 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.41 · 10.1% (116 of 1,143 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.44 · 6.6% (75 of 1,143 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.45 · 5.5% (63 of 1,143 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (62 of 1,143 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (135 of 1,143 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.34 · 8.8% (101 of 1,143 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (64 of 1,143 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.31 · 11.1% (127 of 1,143 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (30 of 1,143 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (35 of 1,143 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.28 · 4.2% (48 of 1,143 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 10.6% (121 of 1,143 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (126 of 1,143 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (45 of 1,143 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (39 of 1,143 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (30 of 1,143 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (40 of 1,143 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (66 of 1,143 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (44 of 1,143 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (70 of 1,143 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (81 of 1,143 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 24.7% (282 of 1,143 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 54.1% (618 of 1,143 decks)
Enchantments
43
Enchantments
43 Showing 1-25 of 43
Page size
All enchantments (43)
- Greater Good relevance 0.65 · 41.8% (478 of 1,143 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.70 · 8.9% (102 of 1,143 decks)
- Dredger's Insight relevance 0.67 · 5.5% (63 of 1,143 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.61 · 7.3% (83 of 1,143 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.58 · 4.9% (56 of 1,143 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (196 of 1,143 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (92 of 1,143 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.47 · 10.0% (114 of 1,143 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (85 of 1,143 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (71 of 1,143 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.34 · 26.7% (305 of 1,143 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (83 of 1,143 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.35 · 18.3% (209 of 1,143 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (152 of 1,143 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.34 · 16.0% (183 of 1,143 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (56 of 1,143 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (51 of 1,143 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.34 · 10.6% (121 of 1,143 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (90 of 1,143 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (57 of 1,143 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.37 · 4.8% (55 of 1,143 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (50 of 1,143 decks)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.53 · 2.4% (28 of 1,143 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.27 · 17.0% (194 of 1,143 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.26 · 21.1% (241 of 1,143 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (41 of 1,143 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (63 of 1,143 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (45 of 1,143 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.36 · 4.1% (47 of 1,143 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.24 · 17.1% (195 of 1,143 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (36 of 1,143 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (41 of 1,143 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (61 of 1,143 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (34 of 1,143 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (64 of 1,143 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (31 of 1,143 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (30 of 1,143 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (35 of 1,143 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (43 of 1,143 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (35 of 1,143 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (37 of 1,143 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (35 of 1,143 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (29 of 1,143 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.84 · 12.2% (139 of 1,143 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.76 · 17.8% (203 of 1,143 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.77 · 9.9% (113 of 1,143 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.65 · 13.6% (156 of 1,143 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.68 · 11.1% (127 of 1,143 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.68 · 8.9% (102 of 1,143 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (137 of 1,143 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (143 of 1,143 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.46 · 16.9% (193 of 1,143 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.45 · 15.6% (178 of 1,143 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.52 · 8.9% (102 of 1,143 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.69 · 3.7% (42 of 1,143 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (98 of 1,143 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.54 · 5.4% (62 of 1,143 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.39 · 23.9% (273 of 1,143 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.50 · 5.2% (60 of 1,143 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (66 of 1,143 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.34 · 29.2% (334 of 1,143 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (150 of 1,143 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.40 · 13.4% (153 of 1,143 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (268 of 1,143 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.36 · 17.5% (200 of 1,143 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (94 of 1,143 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.36 · 16.8% (192 of 1,143 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.41 · 10.0% (114 of 1,143 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (118 of 1,143 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.34 · 21.3% (243 of 1,143 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.40 · 9.5% (109 of 1,143 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.50 · 4.2% (48 of 1,143 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.32 · 23.6% (270 of 1,143 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (83 of 1,143 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.44 · 4.8% (55 of 1,143 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (177 of 1,143 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (49 of 1,143 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.38 · 7.6% (87 of 1,143 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (51 of 1,143 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (71 of 1,143 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.29 · 21.4% (245 of 1,143 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (77 of 1,143 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.52 · 3.1% (36 of 1,143 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.32 · 12.0% (137 of 1,143 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.43 · 4.1% (47 of 1,143 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.47 · 3.6% (41 of 1,143 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (70 of 1,143 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.25 · 30.9% (353 of 1,143 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.45 · 3.6% (41 of 1,143 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (37 of 1,143 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.32 · 8.7% (99 of 1,143 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.23 · 33.1% (378 of 1,143 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 35.2% (402 of 1,143 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (234 of 1,143 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (159 of 1,143 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.71 · 7.0% (80 of 1,143 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (151 of 1,143 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.59 · 4.9% (56 of 1,143 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.57 · 6.0% (69 of 1,143 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (100 of 1,143 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.57 · 5.2% (59 of 1,143 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.56 · 5.9% (67 of 1,143 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.59 · 4.6% (53 of 1,143 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (99 of 1,143 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.47 · 9.9% (113 of 1,143 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.44 · 9.5% (109 of 1,143 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 9.8% (112 of 1,143 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (117 of 1,143 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.53 · 4.3% (49 of 1,143 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (91 of 1,143 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (57 of 1,143 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.53 · 3.9% (45 of 1,143 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (57 of 1,143 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (160 of 1,143 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.39 · 9.6% (110 of 1,143 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.52 · 3.6% (41 of 1,143 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.33 · 14.5% (166 of 1,143 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.39 · 5.5% (63 of 1,143 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (117 of 1,143 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.33 · 11.7% (134 of 1,143 decks)
- Tracker's Instincts relevance 0.58 · 2.5% (29 of 1,143 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.33 · 11.2% (128 of 1,143 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.29 · 18.5% (212 of 1,143 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (74 of 1,143 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.38 · 4.9% (56 of 1,143 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.31 · 12.3% (141 of 1,143 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.46 · 3.4% (39 of 1,143 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (69 of 1,143 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (66 of 1,143 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.47 · 3.1% (36 of 1,143 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.47 · 3.1% (35 of 1,143 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (261 of 1,143 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (91 of 1,143 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (56 of 1,143 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.30 · 9.5% (109 of 1,143 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (55 of 1,143 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.41 · 3.6% (41 of 1,143 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (44 of 1,143 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (79 of 1,143 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (29 of 1,143 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (77 of 1,143 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (44 of 1,143 decks)
Planeswalkers
9
Planeswalkers
9 Showing 1-9 of 9
Page size
All planeswalkers (9)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.58 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.42 · 15.8% (181 of 1,143 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (85 of 1,143 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (54 of 1,143 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (129 of 1,143 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (77 of 1,143 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.47 · 3.8% (43 of 1,143 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (49 of 1,143 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (33 of 1,143 decks)
Battles
1
Battles
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (45 of 1,143 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.68 · 5.2% (59 of 1,143 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.45 · 31.2% (357 of 1,143 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.48 · 23.2% (265 of 1,143 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (172 of 1,143 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.60 · 5.1% (58 of 1,143 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.44 · 15.2% (174 of 1,143 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.42 · 20.4% (233 of 1,143 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.47 · 11.6% (133 of 1,143 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.41 · 21.2% (242 of 1,143 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.35 · 34.7% (397 of 1,143 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.52 · 6.1% (70 of 1,143 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.42 · 15.2% (174 of 1,143 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (199 of 1,143 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (137 of 1,143 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.49 · 5.7% (65 of 1,143 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.57 · 4.1% (47 of 1,143 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.49 · 5.2% (59 of 1,143 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (99 of 1,143 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.47 · 6.1% (70 of 1,143 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (88 of 1,143 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (120 of 1,143 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.47 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.28 · 41.6% (475 of 1,143 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.35 · 21.9% (250 of 1,143 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.42 · 9.7% (111 of 1,143 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.37 · 14.8% (169 of 1,143 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (129 of 1,143 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.42 · 8.0% (92 of 1,143 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.31 · 27.3% (312 of 1,143 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.27 · 36.6% (418 of 1,143 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.27 · 37.2% (425 of 1,143 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.27 · 35.1% (401 of 1,143 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (82 of 1,143 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.39 · 7.0% (80 of 1,143 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 38.2% (437 of 1,143 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.31 · 14.9% (170 of 1,143 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.36 · 8.1% (93 of 1,143 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (67 of 1,143 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (51 of 1,143 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (88 of 1,143 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.40 · 4.4% (50 of 1,143 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.36 · 4.6% (53 of 1,143 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (54 of 1,143 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.45 · 3.1% (36 of 1,143 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.43 · 3.5% (40 of 1,143 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (44 of 1,143 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (62 of 1,143 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (50 of 1,143 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.29 · 10.1% (115 of 1,143 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 13.8% (158 of 1,143 decks)
Lands
50
Lands
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All lands (50)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.53 · 11.8% (135 of 1,143 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.55 · 5.1% (58 of 1,143 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.54 · 4.9% (56 of 1,143 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.40 · 20.5% (234 of 1,143 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (148 of 1,143 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.41 · 15.5% (177 of 1,143 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.41 · 15.2% (174 of 1,143 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.46 · 9.7% (111 of 1,143 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.58 · 4.0% (46 of 1,143 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.35 · 23.9% (273 of 1,143 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.34 · 26.2% (300 of 1,143 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.36 · 22.6% (258 of 1,143 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (256 of 1,143 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.47 · 5.0% (57 of 1,143 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.34 · 24.1% (275 of 1,143 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.39 · 12.9% (147 of 1,143 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (286 of 1,143 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (128 of 1,143 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.40 · 7.0% (80 of 1,143 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (75 of 1,143 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.25 · 36.3% (415 of 1,143 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (76 of 1,143 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (72 of 1,143 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.21 · 49.1% (561 of 1,143 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.25 · 31.2% (357 of 1,143 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.34 · 8.4% (96 of 1,143 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 28.2% (322 of 1,143 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.33 · 8.4% (96 of 1,143 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (78 of 1,143 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.29 · 14.2% (162 of 1,143 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.27 · 17.5% (200 of 1,143 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.26 · 15.5% (177 of 1,143 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.24 · 20.8% (238 of 1,143 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (97 of 1,143 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.16 · 56.7% (648 of 1,143 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (135 of 1,143 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (51 of 1,143 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (264 of 1,143 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (65 of 1,143 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (59 of 1,143 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.23 · 15.3% (175 of 1,143 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (49 of 1,143 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (208 of 1,143 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.13 · 62.5% (714 of 1,143 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (98 of 1,143 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.15 · 42.3% (483 of 1,143 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.19 · 19.9% (227 of 1,143 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (30 of 1,143 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.13 · 44.9% (513 of 1,143 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath, from 1,143 real Commander decks.