Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
5.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Gandalf, Shadow's Foe
Cards like Scute Swarm
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 67%
- Springheart Nantuko 54%
Cards like Icetill Explorer
8.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
5.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Harrow 38%
- Entish Restoration 29%
- Scapeshift 17%
- Planar Engineering 8%
- Roiling Regrowth 4%
Other options: Cycle of Renewal
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
5.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eternal Witness 63%
- Timeless Witness 21%
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Mulch
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mulch 38%
- Winding Way 17%
Other options: Scout the Borders, In the Presence of Ages, Relentless Pursuit
Cards like Auroral Procession
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Auroral Procession 21%
- Regrowth 13%
- Dryad's Revival 8%
Other options: Unnatural Restoration, Revive, Nature's Spiral, Recollect, Elven Cache, Creeping Renaissance
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
6.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 21%
- Territorial Scythecat 8%
- Scythecat Cub 8%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 4%
- Undergrowth Champion 4%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 4%
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Floral Evoker, Vinelasher Kudzu, Murasa Ranger, Sazh's Chocobo
Cards like Crystal Shard
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Crystal Shard 33%
- Erratic Portal 8%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 42%
- Three Visits 38%
- Skyshroud Claim 8%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Voidslime
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
9.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Lotus Cobra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 42%
- World Shaper 13%
Cards like Exploration
4.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
3.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Swan Song
3.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swan Song 29%
- Strix Serenade 4%
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Greater Good relevance 0.40 · 79.2% (19 of 24 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.42 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.39 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.37 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.37 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.36 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.35 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.28 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.26 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.24 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.24 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.23 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Misthollow Griffin relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Six relevance 0.23 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.27 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.25 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.25 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.16 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.17 · 54.2% (13 of 24 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Fade into Antiquity relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.20 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Return of the Mole Man relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.37 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.28 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.26 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.23 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Misthollow Griffin relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Six relevance 0.23 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.25 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.25 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.16 · 62.5% (15 of 24 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.17 · 54.2% (13 of 24 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.16 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.10 · 79.2% (19 of 24 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.14 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.16 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.16 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- World Breaker relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.15 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.09 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.13 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.37 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Phyrexian Processor relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.13 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.12 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Instrument of the Bards relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.10 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.10 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.08 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.09 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.07 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.07 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.07 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.07 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 54.2% (13 of 24 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.07 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.06 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Greater Good relevance 0.40 · 79.2% (19 of 24 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Return of the Mole Man relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.15 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.16 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Chronic Flooding relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.10 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Mana Vortex relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.10 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.09 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.08 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.09 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.09 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.08 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.36 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.35 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.24 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.27 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.20 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.15 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.13 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.16 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.16 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Gift of Tusks relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Blunt the Assault relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.11 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Unravel the Aether relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Turn the Earth relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Moment of Truth relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.42 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.39 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.24 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Fade into Antiquity relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.19 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.17 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.15 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.16 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Tracker's Instincts relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Benefaction of Rhonas relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Say Its Name relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Metamorphosis relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Healing Technique relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Thunderous Debut relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Nissa's Expedition relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Portent of Calamity relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Fascination relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Cosmium Confluence relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Druidic Ritual relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.12 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.12 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.10 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.07 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.26 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.26 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.21 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.21 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.18 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.16 · 29.2% (7 of 24 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.16 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.16 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.11 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.12 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.12 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.10 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.10 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.08 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
All lands (50)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.20 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.21 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.19 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.18 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (8 of 24 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.18 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.15 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.17 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.16 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.09 · 70.8% (17 of 24 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (12 of 24 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.14 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 66.7% (16 of 24 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.11 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 54.2% (13 of 24 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.11 · 20.8% (5 of 24 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (12 of 24 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.12 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 58.3% (14 of 24 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.08 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.04 · 79.2% (19 of 24 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.08 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.08 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.05 · 37.5% (9 of 24 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.08 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.07 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.07 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.05 · 41.7% (10 of 24 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.07 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.06 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 75.0% (18 of 24 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.04 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Island relevance 0.00 · 95.8% (23 of 24 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath, from 24 real Commander decks.