Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards like Icetill Explorer
4.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 47%
- Elvish Mystic 37%
- Fyndhorn Elves 29%
- Boreal Druid 4%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Scute Swarm
6.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 47%
- Springheart Nantuko 24%
Cards like Harrow
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Harrow 20%
- Entish Restoration 18%
- Scapeshift 14%
- Roiling Regrowth 8%
- Planar Engineering 6%
- Cycle of Renewal 4%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
9.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eternal Witness 51%
- Timeless Witness 20%
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Pongify
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 27%
- Rapid Hybridization 27%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Crystal Shard
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Crystal Shard 16%
- Erratic Portal 4%
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
4.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Spiral
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 45%
- Eureka Moment 12%
- Joint Exploration 4%
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 49%
- Negate 31%
- Stern Scolding 2%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Coiling Oracle
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 20%
- Risen Reef 4%
All top picks (50)
- Greater Good relevance 0.40 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.44 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.43 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.41 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.35 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.42 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.33 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.39 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.40 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.34 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.36 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Six relevance 0.29 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.34 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.29 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.24 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.33 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.28 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.29 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.25 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.25 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.18 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.18 · 53.1% (26 of 49 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.24 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.22 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.23 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.22 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.28 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.23 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.21 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.21 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.24 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.21 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.41 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Town Greeter relevance 0.42 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.33 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.34 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Six relevance 0.29 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.29 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.24 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.28 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.25 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.18 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.18 · 53.1% (26 of 49 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.22 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.28 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.23 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.21 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.21 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.23 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.17 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.21 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.16 · 46.9% (23 of 49 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.16 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.17 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Meandering Towershell relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Circle of the Land Druid relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.19 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.18 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.19 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.11 · 69.4% (34 of 49 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.18 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Emeritus of Ideation // Ancestral Recall relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.43 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.36 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Wishing Well relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.14 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.13 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Atmospheric Greenhouse relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Silver Shroud Costume relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.12 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.10 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Quicksilver Fountain relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.09 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.09 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.08 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Greater Good relevance 0.40 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.34 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.22 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.21 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Founding the Third Path relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Dredger's Insight relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Fable of Wolf and Owl relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.17 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.14 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.15 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.14 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.12 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.14 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Living Plane relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Roots of Life relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Crop Sigil relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Nylea's Presence relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Teferi's Veil relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Choke relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- The Binding of the Titans relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- March of the Machines relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Thoughtleech relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.13 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Titania's Song relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Holistic Wisdom relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Recycle relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.39 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.33 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.29 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.24 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.24 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.24 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.19 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.19 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.18 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.16 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.15 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.15 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.15 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.13 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.14 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.13 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.14 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.44 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.35 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.40 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.25 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.18 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Caravan Vigil relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.21 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.15 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Seismic Sense relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Bygone Marvels relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
All planeswalkers (21)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.23 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.23 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.21 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (21 of 49 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.21 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.16 · 53.1% (26 of 49 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.21 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.20 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.20 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Ipnu Rivulet relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.18 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.14 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.14 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.15 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
All lands (50)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.19 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.17 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.18 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.17 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.17 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.13 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.14 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.15 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.16 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.15 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.09 · 65.3% (32 of 49 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.14 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.13 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.15 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.13 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 57.1% (28 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.12 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 42.9% (21 of 49 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 73.5% (36 of 49 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.10 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.11 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.07 · 67.3% (33 of 49 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.08 · 44.9% (22 of 49 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.07 · 49.0% (24 of 49 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Teferi's Isle relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Flood Plain relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 61.2% (30 of 49 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath, from 49 real Commander decks.