Extinguish
Played in 254 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
254 decks
All commanders (10)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.25 · 2.2% (21 of 956 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.96 · 6.9% (7 of 101 decks)
- Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 1.41 · 2.8% (2 of 72 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.83 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 0.71 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Uchbenbak, the Great Mistake relevance 0.63 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
- Hisoka, Minamo Sensei relevance 0.59 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.55 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.53 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
All parallel cards (30)
- Envelop
- Flash Counter
- Negate
- Dispel
- Spell Snare
- Counterspell
- Cancel
- Outwit
- Quench
- Preemptive Strike
- False Summoning
- Essence Scatter
- Mystic Denial
- Miscast
- Remove Soul
- It'll Quench Ya!
- Nullify
- Minor Misstep
- Disallow
- Revolutionary Rebuff
- Last Word
- Stifle
- Muddle the Mixture
- Spell Blast
- Second Guess
- Thoughtbind
- Intervene
- Rethink
- Clash of Wills
- Annul
All most relevant (30)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.07 · 29.9% (76 of 254 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 2.94 · 28.3% (72 of 254 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 2.85 · 27.6% (70 of 254 decks)
- False Summoning relevance 2.75 · 29.5% (75 of 254 decks)
- Envelop relevance 2.57 · 29.5% (75 of 254 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 2.57 · 26.8% (68 of 254 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 2.56 · 26.8% (68 of 254 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 2.50 · 25.6% (65 of 254 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.50 · 30.3% (77 of 254 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 2.44 · 24.0% (61 of 254 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.43 · 30.3% (77 of 254 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 2.42 · 24.0% (61 of 254 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 2.37 · 23.6% (60 of 254 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 2.35 · 23.6% (60 of 254 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.33 · 26.8% (68 of 254 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.33 · 24.8% (63 of 254 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.30 · 28.7% (73 of 254 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.24 · 22.0% (56 of 254 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.18 · 20.9% (53 of 254 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.12 · 33.1% (84 of 254 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 2.12 · 22.4% (57 of 254 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.10 · 22.8% (58 of 254 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 2.02 · 22.0% (56 of 254 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 1.96 · 19.3% (49 of 254 decks)
- Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 1.95 · 20.5% (52 of 254 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.91 · 34.3% (87 of 254 decks)
- Eightfold Maze relevance 1.87 · 17.3% (44 of 254 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 1.86 · 18.9% (48 of 254 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.85 · 31.1% (79 of 254 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.85 · 26.4% (67 of 254 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 2.57 · 26.8% (68 of 254 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 2.50 · 25.6% (65 of 254 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 2.44 · 24.0% (61 of 254 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 2.37 · 23.6% (60 of 254 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 2.35 · 23.6% (60 of 254 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.30 · 28.7% (73 of 254 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 2.12 · 22.4% (57 of 254 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 2.10 · 22.8% (58 of 254 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 1.96 · 19.3% (49 of 254 decks)
- Guan Yu, Sainted Warrior relevance 1.95 · 20.5% (52 of 254 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 1.86 · 18.9% (48 of 254 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 1.83 · 18.5% (47 of 254 decks)
- Wu Spy relevance 1.69 · 15.7% (40 of 254 decks)
- Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 1.63 · 16.9% (43 of 254 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 1.61 · 15.0% (38 of 254 decks)
- Huang Zhong, Shu General relevance 1.58 · 15.0% (38 of 254 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 1.52 · 22.8% (58 of 254 decks)
All instants (23)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 3.07 · 29.9% (76 of 254 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 2.94 · 28.3% (72 of 254 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 2.85 · 27.6% (70 of 254 decks)
- False Summoning relevance 2.75 · 29.5% (75 of 254 decks)
- Envelop relevance 2.57 · 29.5% (75 of 254 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 2.50 · 30.3% (77 of 254 decks)
- Ceremonious Rejection relevance 2.02 · 22.0% (56 of 254 decks)
- Annul relevance 1.91 · 34.3% (87 of 254 decks)
- Eightfold Maze relevance 1.87 · 17.3% (44 of 254 decks)
- Confound relevance 1.85 · 26.4% (67 of 254 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.81 · 25.6% (65 of 254 decks)
- Invasive Surgery relevance 1.81 · 19.3% (49 of 254 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.76 · 35.0% (89 of 254 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.74 · 40.6% (103 of 254 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.70 · 25.2% (64 of 254 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 1.70 · 34.3% (87 of 254 decks)
- Exclude relevance 1.67 · 24.8% (63 of 254 decks)
- Ertai's Trickery relevance 1.63 · 14.6% (37 of 254 decks)
- Intervene relevance 1.62 · 20.9% (53 of 254 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.62 · 19.3% (49 of 254 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 1.57 · 31.9% (81 of 254 decks)
- Dismal Failure relevance 1.56 · 16.5% (42 of 254 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.49 · 22.0% (56 of 254 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Broken Dam relevance 2.56 · 26.8% (68 of 254 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 2.43 · 30.3% (77 of 254 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 2.42 · 24.0% (61 of 254 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 2.33 · 26.8% (68 of 254 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 2.33 · 24.8% (63 of 254 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 2.24 · 22.0% (56 of 254 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 2.18 · 20.9% (53 of 254 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 2.12 · 33.1% (84 of 254 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.85 · 31.1% (79 of 254 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 1.71 · 19.7% (50 of 254 decks)
EDH data for Extinguish: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 254 real decks.