Cards like Moon-Circuit Hacker
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Slither Blade
9.5× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Dimir decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Slither Blade 60%
- Triton Shorestalker 49%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 40%
- Tormented Soul 36%
- Gudul Lurker 19%
- Phantom Ninja 17%
- Invisible Stalker 15%
- Inkfathom Infiltrator 2%
Other options: Phantom Warrior, Metathran Soldier, Latch Seeker, Hazy Homunculus, Mystic of the Hidden Way, Tidal Kraken, Talas Warrior, Covert Operative, Plasma Elemental
Cards like Fallen Shinobi
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Commandeer
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Commandeer 46%
- Misdirection 41%
- Snapback 3%
- Disrupting Shoal 2%
Cards like Temporal Trespass
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Deadly Rollick
3.4× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Dimir decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Dimir decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
5.4× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Dimir decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Force of Will 32%
- Force of Negation 29%
Cards like Silver-Fur Master
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
4.8× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Dimir decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Vampiric Tutor 39%
- Imperial Seal 20%
- Grim Tutor 3%
- Cruel Tutor 2%
Cards like Mistblade Shinobi
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Remora
2.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Dimir decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 31%
- Rhystic Study 31%
Cards like Memnite
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Memnite 24%
- Phyrexian Walker 20%
Cards like Demonic Consultation
7.1× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Demonic Consultation 24%
- Tainted Pact 16%
Cards like Brainstorm
6.5× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Dimir decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 82%
- Brainsurge 15%
Cards like Prosperous Thief
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
7.0× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Dimir decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Merchant Scroll, Eerie Procession
Cards like Chrome Mox
4.5× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 20%
- Mox Diamond 12%
Cards like Faerie Seer
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Faerie Seer 67%
- Silver Raven 7%
- Augury Owl 5%
Other options: Omenspeaker, Archive Dragon, Bronze Walrus, Lost Legion, Willow-Wind, Sage's Row Savant, Automatic Librarian, Chrome Cat, Grey Havens Navigator, Horizon Scholar, Thaumaturge's Familiar, Octoprophet, Cloudreader Sphinx, Prophet of the Peak
Cards like Kaito Shizuki
16× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Ponder
12× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Cards like Flusterstorm
5.1× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Dokuchi Silencer
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Adaptation
11× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Mistform Mask
Cards like Flare of Denial
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Dig Through Time
7.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Dimir decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Dimir decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.89 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Counterspell 55%
- Negate 32%
- Wash Away 3%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Spell Snare 2%
Other options: Disruption Protocol, Stern Scolding, Remove Soul, Minor Misstep, Nullify, Wild Unraveling, Envelop, Flash Counter, Intervene, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, False Summoning
Cards like Preordain
2.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Dimir decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Preordain 25%
- Serum Visions 7%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni
15× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Spell Pierce
2.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 17%
- Mana Leak 5%
Other options: Don't Make a Sound, It'll Quench Ya!, Force Spike, Lose Focus, Make Disappear, Quench, Reasonable Doubt, Logic Knot, Rethink, Revolutionary Rebuff, Clash of Wills, Metallic Rebuke
Cards like Force of Despair
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Treasure Cruise
9.5× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Treasure Cruise 45%
- Eagle Vision 2%
Other options: Concentrate, Vivisurgeon's Insight, Universal Surveillance, Brilliant Plan, Reverse Engineer, Tidings, Unexplained Vision, Shared Discovery
Cards like Draco
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Draco 17%
- Scion of Draco 2%
All top picks (50)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.63 · 83.4% (13,560 of 16,250 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.66 · 75.3% (12,238 of 16,250 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 0.59 · 83.9% (13,628 of 16,250 decks)
- Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 0.59 · 83.1% (13,496 of 16,250 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 0.67 · 71.3% (11,593 of 16,250 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.65 · 71.5% (11,620 of 16,250 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.64 · 71.9% (11,689 of 16,250 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 0.73 · 60.0% (9,749 of 16,250 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.70 · 61.4% (9,984 of 16,250 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 0.58 · 78.1% (12,691 of 16,250 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.58 · 78.3% (12,729 of 16,250 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 0.74 · 50.4% (8,186 of 16,250 decks)
- Skullsnatcher relevance 0.75 · 47.4% (7,705 of 16,250 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.72 · 51.7% (8,396 of 16,250 decks)
- Wingcrafter relevance 0.79 · 40.2% (6,535 of 16,250 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.60 · 67.4% (10,957 of 16,250 decks)
- Kaito, Bane of Nightmares relevance 0.71 · 49.6% (8,064 of 16,250 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.67 · 54.4% (8,846 of 16,250 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.71 · 45.9% (7,458 of 16,250 decks)
- Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.74 · 41.4% (6,724 of 16,250 decks)
- Changeling Outcast relevance 0.46 · 87.3% (14,189 of 16,250 decks)
- Satoru Umezawa relevance 0.78 · 34.7% (5,637 of 16,250 decks)
- Consign // Oblivion relevance 0.83 · 27.9% (4,528 of 16,250 decks)
- Smoke Shroud relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (5,513 of 16,250 decks)
- Dokuchi Silencer relevance 0.77 · 32.8% (5,325 of 16,250 decks)
- Throat Slitter relevance 0.74 · 36.6% (5,945 of 16,250 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.69 · 43.9% (7,133 of 16,250 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.71 · 40.7% (6,607 of 16,250 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.70 · 41.1% (6,681 of 16,250 decks)
- Nashi, Moon Sage's Scion relevance 0.66 · 46.2% (7,502 of 16,250 decks)
- Fallen Shinobi relevance 0.59 · 57.5% (9,340 of 16,250 decks)
- Draco relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (2,812 of 16,250 decks)
- Contagion relevance 0.90 · 15.9% (2,584 of 16,250 decks)
- Splinter, Hamato Yoshi relevance 0.85 · 20.6% (3,346 of 16,250 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.78 · 27.7% (4,500 of 16,250 decks)
- Moonblade Shinobi relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (3,410 of 16,250 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.81 · 24.1% (3,909 of 16,250 decks)
- Satoru, the Infiltrator relevance 0.65 · 46.4% (7,546 of 16,250 decks)
- Walker of Secret Ways relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (2,969 of 16,250 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.83 · 22.3% (3,622 of 16,250 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.76 · 29.9% (4,854 of 16,250 decks)
- Phantom Ninja relevance 0.86 · 17.1% (2,774 of 16,250 decks)
- Mausoleum Wanderer relevance 0.89 · 14.4% (2,346 of 16,250 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.83 · 20.4% (3,321 of 16,250 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.80 · 24.1% (3,914 of 16,250 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.60 · 51.8% (8,416 of 16,250 decks)
- Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.79 · 25.3% (4,110 of 16,250 decks)
- Fourth Bridge Prowler relevance 0.92 · 12.9% (2,102 of 16,250 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 0.85 · 17.6% (2,863 of 16,250 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.71 · 34.4% (5,592 of 16,250 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.63 · 83.4% (13,560 of 16,250 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.66 · 75.3% (12,238 of 16,250 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 0.59 · 83.9% (13,628 of 16,250 decks)
- Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 0.59 · 83.1% (13,496 of 16,250 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 0.67 · 71.3% (11,593 of 16,250 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.65 · 71.5% (11,620 of 16,250 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.64 · 71.9% (11,689 of 16,250 decks)
- Shadow of Mortality relevance 0.73 · 60.0% (9,749 of 16,250 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 0.58 · 78.1% (12,691 of 16,250 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.58 · 78.3% (12,729 of 16,250 decks)
- Mist-Syndicate Naga relevance 0.74 · 50.4% (8,186 of 16,250 decks)
- Skullsnatcher relevance 0.75 · 47.4% (7,705 of 16,250 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.72 · 51.7% (8,396 of 16,250 decks)
- Wingcrafter relevance 0.79 · 40.2% (6,535 of 16,250 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.60 · 67.4% (10,957 of 16,250 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.67 · 54.4% (8,846 of 16,250 decks)
- Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.74 · 41.4% (6,724 of 16,250 decks)
- Changeling Outcast relevance 0.46 · 87.3% (14,189 of 16,250 decks)
- Satoru Umezawa relevance 0.78 · 34.7% (5,637 of 16,250 decks)
- Dokuchi Silencer relevance 0.77 · 32.8% (5,325 of 16,250 decks)
- Throat Slitter relevance 0.74 · 36.6% (5,945 of 16,250 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.69 · 43.9% (7,133 of 16,250 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.70 · 41.1% (6,681 of 16,250 decks)
- Nashi, Moon Sage's Scion relevance 0.66 · 46.2% (7,502 of 16,250 decks)
- Fallen Shinobi relevance 0.59 · 57.5% (9,340 of 16,250 decks)
- Draco relevance 0.89 · 17.3% (2,812 of 16,250 decks)
- Splinter, Hamato Yoshi relevance 0.85 · 20.6% (3,346 of 16,250 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.78 · 27.7% (4,500 of 16,250 decks)
- Moonblade Shinobi relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (3,410 of 16,250 decks)
- Satoru, the Infiltrator relevance 0.65 · 46.4% (7,546 of 16,250 decks)
- Walker of Secret Ways relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (2,969 of 16,250 decks)
- Phantom Ninja relevance 0.86 · 17.1% (2,774 of 16,250 decks)
- Mausoleum Wanderer relevance 0.89 · 14.4% (2,346 of 16,250 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.83 · 20.4% (3,321 of 16,250 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.80 · 24.1% (3,914 of 16,250 decks)
- Moonsnare Specialist relevance 0.79 · 25.3% (4,110 of 16,250 decks)
- Fourth Bridge Prowler relevance 0.92 · 12.9% (2,102 of 16,250 decks)
- Biting-Palm Ninja relevance 0.82 · 20.1% (3,266 of 16,250 decks)
- Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.64 · 44.0% (7,144 of 16,250 decks)
- Hope of Ghirapur relevance 0.87 · 14.4% (2,345 of 16,250 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.54 · 60.3% (9,793 of 16,250 decks)
- Throatseeker relevance 0.88 · 13.6% (2,213 of 16,250 decks)
- Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni relevance 0.70 · 34.2% (5,551 of 16,250 decks)
- Street Wraith relevance 0.82 · 17.4% (2,835 of 16,250 decks)
- Okiba-Gang Shinobi relevance 0.88 · 13.1% (2,126 of 16,250 decks)
- Nezumi Prowler relevance 0.81 · 18.2% (2,956 of 16,250 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.65 · 39.5% (6,423 of 16,250 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.72 · 28.5% (4,631 of 16,250 decks)
- Inkrise Infiltrator relevance 0.90 · 11.4% (1,855 of 16,250 decks)
- Azra Smokeshaper relevance 0.89 · 11.6% (1,879 of 16,250 decks)
All artifacts (34)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.71 · 34.4% (5,592 of 16,250 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.81 · 13.4% (2,179 of 16,250 decks)
- Ninja's Blades relevance 0.89 · 9.5% (1,549 of 16,250 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.57 · 43.0% (6,987 of 16,250 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.80 · 10.6% (1,721 of 16,250 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.96 · 4.6% (754 of 16,250 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.87 · 6.9% (1,125 of 16,250 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.63 · 23.3% (3,784 of 16,250 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.61 · 20.2% (3,283 of 16,250 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.57 · 24.7% (4,009 of 16,250 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.66 · 11.6% (1,885 of 16,250 decks)
- The Cauldron of Eternity relevance 0.86 · 4.4% (708 of 16,250 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.67 · 10.0% (1,618 of 16,250 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.84 · 3.8% (612 of 16,250 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.87 · 3.3% (536 of 16,250 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (1,527 of 16,250 decks)
- Dimir Keyrune relevance 0.58 · 5.9% (957 of 16,250 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.56 · 4.7% (769 of 16,250 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.52 · 6.2% (1,000 of 16,250 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.47 · 7.2% (1,178 of 16,250 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.63 · 3.1% (503 of 16,250 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.52 · 3.7% (605 of 16,250 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (1,094 of 16,250 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.56 · 2.8% (453 of 16,250 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.47 · 3.6% (577 of 16,250 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.28 · 16.1% (2,610 of 16,250 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.27 · 18.1% (2,943 of 16,250 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (1,498 of 16,250 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.24 · 14.9% (2,424 of 16,250 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.26 · 9.1% (1,479 of 16,250 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.14 · 37.1% (6,022 of 16,250 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.13 · 38.8% (6,299 of 16,250 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 65.2% (10,597 of 16,250 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 83.0% (13,486 of 16,250 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (19)
- Smoke Shroud relevance 0.77 · 33.9% (5,513 of 16,250 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (3,018 of 16,250 decks)
- Cunning Evasion relevance 0.80 · 15.6% (2,543 of 16,250 decks)
- Cover of Darkness relevance 0.61 · 31.2% (5,066 of 16,250 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.77 · 10.4% (1,688 of 16,250 decks)
- Ninja Teen relevance 0.79 · 7.9% (1,288 of 16,250 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.58 · 23.2% (3,773 of 16,250 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.77 · 5.9% (957 of 16,250 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.43 · 31.5% (5,111 of 16,250 decks)
- Xenograft relevance 0.92 · 2.6% (429 of 16,250 decks)
- Conspiracy relevance 0.81 · 3.3% (532 of 16,250 decks)
- Bloodchief Ascension relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (1,495 of 16,250 decks)
- Rogue Class relevance 0.62 · 4.2% (684 of 16,250 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.35 · 31.4% (5,095 of 16,250 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.70 · 3.0% (488 of 16,250 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.47 · 6.1% (993 of 16,250 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (433 of 16,250 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (1,641 of 16,250 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (581 of 16,250 decks)
All instants (50)
- Commandeer relevance 0.71 · 45.9% (7,458 of 16,250 decks)
- Consign // Oblivion relevance 0.83 · 27.9% (4,528 of 16,250 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.71 · 40.7% (6,607 of 16,250 decks)
- Contagion relevance 0.90 · 15.9% (2,584 of 16,250 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.81 · 24.1% (3,909 of 16,250 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.83 · 22.3% (3,622 of 16,250 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.60 · 51.8% (8,416 of 16,250 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 0.85 · 17.6% (2,863 of 16,250 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.57 · 51.1% (8,311 of 16,250 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.66 · 35.4% (5,759 of 16,250 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.61 · 38.3% (6,222 of 16,250 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.66 · 30.5% (4,951 of 16,250 decks)
- Flare of Malice relevance 0.69 · 26.9% (4,378 of 16,250 decks)
- Blinkmoth Infusion relevance 0.95 · 5.4% (880 of 16,250 decks)
- Insidious Dreams relevance 0.92 · 6.7% (1,083 of 16,250 decks)
- Far // Away relevance 0.90 · 6.4% (1,046 of 16,250 decks)
- Force of Despair relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (3,101 of 16,250 decks)
- Trickery Charm relevance 0.91 · 5.7% (932 of 16,250 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.90 · 5.9% (957 of 16,250 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.69 · 18.2% (2,963 of 16,250 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.67 · 20.4% (3,313 of 16,250 decks)
- Curtains' Call relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (2,519 of 16,250 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.83 · 8.0% (1,297 of 16,250 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.88 · 5.1% (822 of 16,250 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.79 · 9.5% (1,547 of 16,250 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.63 · 24.5% (3,977 of 16,250 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (2,587 of 16,250 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.49 · 46.5% (7,552 of 16,250 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.68 · 14.6% (2,370 of 16,250 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.61 · 22.7% (3,689 of 16,250 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.63 · 16.0% (2,597 of 16,250 decks)
- Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.73 · 9.5% (1,546 of 16,250 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.76 · 7.6% (1,241 of 16,250 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.32 · 82.0% (13,318 of 16,250 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.54 · 29.2% (4,739 of 16,250 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.52 · 31.5% (5,120 of 16,250 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.80 · 4.8% (778 of 16,250 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.59 · 17.3% (2,814 of 16,250 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.67 · 8.9% (1,449 of 16,250 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.45 · 39.1% (6,350 of 16,250 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.68 · 6.8% (1,106 of 16,250 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.69 · 5.4% (885 of 16,250 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.69 · 5.0% (808 of 16,250 decks)
- Spite // Malice relevance 0.93 · 2.9% (466 of 16,250 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.41 · 35.9% (5,836 of 16,250 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.81 · 3.4% (560 of 16,250 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.37 · 43.1% (7,002 of 16,250 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.58 · 7.8% (1,262 of 16,250 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.64 · 4.8% (775 of 16,250 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.87 · 2.8% (463 of 16,250 decks)
All sorceries (47)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.70 · 61.4% (9,984 of 16,250 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.76 · 29.9% (4,854 of 16,250 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.61 · 44.8% (7,276 of 16,250 decks)
- Rags // Riches relevance 0.89 · 10.3% (1,672 of 16,250 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (2,321 of 16,250 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.81 · 12.8% (2,082 of 16,250 decks)
- Dead Drop relevance 0.96 · 5.6% (902 of 16,250 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.84 · 10.1% (1,641 of 16,250 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.89 · 7.2% (1,171 of 16,250 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.86 · 7.4% (1,206 of 16,250 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.74 · 13.6% (2,205 of 16,250 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.68 · 18.9% (3,069 of 16,250 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.77 · 11.2% (1,812 of 16,250 decks)
- Splinter's Technique relevance 0.77 · 10.4% (1,685 of 16,250 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.90 · 4.8% (783 of 16,250 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.65 · 20.2% (3,277 of 16,250 decks)
- Kaito's Pursuit relevance 0.89 · 4.8% (776 of 16,250 decks)
- Never // Return relevance 0.88 · 4.4% (721 of 16,250 decks)
- Connive // Concoct relevance 0.71 · 9.2% (1,492 of 16,250 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.76 · 5.6% (918 of 16,250 decks)
- Diabolic Vision relevance 0.71 · 7.7% (1,252 of 16,250 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.43 · 46.4% (7,541 of 16,250 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.78 · 4.5% (738 of 16,250 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (1,224 of 16,250 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.49 · 25.0% (4,068 of 16,250 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (1,685 of 16,250 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.92 · 3.1% (496 of 16,250 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.63 · 7.6% (1,232 of 16,250 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.63 · 7.5% (1,216 of 16,250 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.61 · 7.5% (1,218 of 16,250 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.76 · 3.6% (577 of 16,250 decks)
- Crippling Fear relevance 0.52 · 10.2% (1,663 of 16,250 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.77 · 3.3% (533 of 16,250 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.39 · 29.8% (4,838 of 16,250 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.51 · 6.9% (1,120 of 16,250 decks)
- Shredder's Technique relevance 0.72 · 3.1% (496 of 16,250 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.77 · 2.6% (423 of 16,250 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.51 · 5.4% (870 of 16,250 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.60 · 2.8% (463 of 16,250 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 0.50 · 3.3% (530 of 16,250 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.54 · 2.7% (431 of 16,250 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (665 of 16,250 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.29 · 12.4% (2,019 of 16,250 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.23 · 18.7% (3,034 of 16,250 decks)
- Kindred Dominance relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (434 of 16,250 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (408 of 16,250 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (741 of 16,250 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Kaito, Bane of Nightmares relevance 0.71 · 49.6% (8,064 of 16,250 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.78 · 17.5% (2,840 of 16,250 decks)
- Kaito Shizuki relevance 0.71 · 19.4% (3,153 of 16,250 decks)
- Kaito, Dancing Shadow relevance 0.76 · 11.4% (1,854 of 16,250 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.70 · 2.6% (429 of 16,250 decks)
All utility lands (38)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.64 · 32.9% (5,343 of 16,250 decks)
- Turtle Lair relevance 0.87 · 9.5% (1,543 of 16,250 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.59 · 32.1% (5,213 of 16,250 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.65 · 21.3% (3,462 of 16,250 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.62 · 25.7% (4,178 of 16,250 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.66 · 19.5% (3,168 of 16,250 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.60 · 27.0% (4,382 of 16,250 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.57 · 32.2% (5,226 of 16,250 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.76 · 4.6% (748 of 16,250 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.68 · 6.1% (996 of 16,250 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (2,439 of 16,250 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.42 · 36.9% (5,993 of 16,250 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.82 · 3.6% (592 of 16,250 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.62 · 7.3% (1,183 of 16,250 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.59 · 8.8% (1,422 of 16,250 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.42 · 34.3% (5,573 of 16,250 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.71 · 4.1% (674 of 16,250 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.40 · 34.2% (5,561 of 16,250 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.54 · 6.6% (1,074 of 16,250 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.40 · 22.7% (3,695 of 16,250 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.32 · 36.8% (5,977 of 16,250 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.50 · 6.1% (990 of 16,250 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (2,020 of 16,250 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (1,385 of 16,250 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.34 · 18.3% (2,968 of 16,250 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (800 of 16,250 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.59 · 3.0% (487 of 16,250 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.58 · 3.0% (481 of 16,250 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.26 · 33.6% (5,453 of 16,250 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.29 · 19.4% (3,147 of 16,250 decks)
- Jwar Isle Refuge relevance 0.51 · 3.3% (543 of 16,250 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (1,234 of 16,250 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.26 · 24.8% (4,032 of 16,250 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.33 · 9.3% (1,509 of 16,250 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.47 · 3.1% (505 of 16,250 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (431 of 16,250 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.21 · 17.7% (2,872 of 16,250 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (644 of 16,250 decks)
All lands (45)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.64 · 17.2% (2,795 of 16,250 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (2,827 of 16,250 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.60 · 18.5% (3,003 of 16,250 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.58 · 19.8% (3,211 of 16,250 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.57 · 21.1% (3,430 of 16,250 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.60 · 15.1% (2,447 of 16,250 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.56 · 21.8% (3,539 of 16,250 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.56 · 20.2% (3,279 of 16,250 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.56 · 21.3% (3,463 of 16,250 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.54 · 23.6% (3,835 of 16,250 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.58 · 15.6% (2,534 of 16,250 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (2,160 of 16,250 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.76 · 4.1% (673 of 16,250 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.58 · 8.4% (1,370 of 16,250 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.45 · 21.4% (3,477 of 16,250 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.42 · 21.0% (3,411 of 16,250 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (1,650 of 16,250 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.52 · 5.0% (817 of 16,250 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.51 · 5.0% (810 of 16,250 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (1,194 of 16,250 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.33 · 30.9% (5,020 of 16,250 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (1,236 of 16,250 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (2,004 of 16,250 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.27 · 44.8% (7,281 of 16,250 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.39 · 11.8% (1,919 of 16,250 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (1,019 of 16,250 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.34 · 14.8% (2,412 of 16,250 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.25 · 40.5% (6,584 of 16,250 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.31 · 20.5% (3,332 of 16,250 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.21 · 56.1% (9,120 of 16,250 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.26 · 32.6% (5,297 of 16,250 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (465 of 16,250 decks)
- Submerged Boneyard relevance 0.52 · 3.1% (508 of 16,250 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.17 · 58.2% (9,454 of 16,250 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.49 · 2.7% (441 of 16,250 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.22 · 28.6% (4,655 of 16,250 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.24 · 18.9% (3,072 of 16,250 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.21 · 27.9% (4,541 of 16,250 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.19 · 36.9% (5,995 of 16,250 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.20 · 27.2% (4,412 of 16,250 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.15 · 47.4% (7,696 of 16,250 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.12 · 50.8% (8,252 of 16,250 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 88.6% (14,395 of 16,250 decks)
- Swamp relevance 0.02 · 94.1% (15,298 of 16,250 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 94.7% (15,396 of 16,250 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Yuriko, the Tiger's Shadow, from 16,250 real Commander decks.