Cards like Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Time Warp
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Brainstorm
11× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Dimir decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 61%
- Brainsurge 35%
Cards like Essence Flux
13× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 43%
- Planar Incision 25%
- Teferi's Time Twist 21%
- Spaceshift 20%
Cards like Quantum Misalignment
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other Dimir decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Dimir decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 45%
- Lightning Greaves 27%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
3.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Temporal Mastery
3.4× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like In Garruk's Wake
10× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- In Garruk's Wake 29%
- Plague Wind 4%
Cards like Echocasting Symposium
2.3× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Fated Infatuation, See Double, Self-Reflection
Cards like Displacer Kitten
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Deadly Rollick
1.1× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Dimir decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Pongify 20%
- Rapid Hybridization 11%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
1.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Dimir decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Dimir decks
All top picks (50)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 0.97 · 69.7% (244 of 350 decks)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 0.96 · 66.3% (232 of 350 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 0.93 · 68.9% (241 of 350 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.89 · 63.1% (221 of 350 decks)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 0.95 · 56.3% (197 of 350 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 0.95 · 53.1% (186 of 350 decks)
- Doom's Time Platform relevance 0.85 · 56.6% (198 of 350 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.70 · 57.7% (202 of 350 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.66 · 58.6% (205 of 350 decks)
- Kang the Conqueror relevance 0.79 · 32.3% (113 of 350 decks)
- Timebender relevance 0.88 · 21.1% (74 of 350 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.51 · 64.9% (227 of 350 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.72 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Galactus, Devourer of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 23.7% (83 of 350 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.69 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.57 · 43.4% (152 of 350 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 0.67 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.65 · 27.1% (95 of 350 decks)
- Molecule Man relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (66 of 350 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (64 of 350 decks)
- Suspend relevance 0.64 · 26.6% (93 of 350 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (70 of 350 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.62 · 28.0% (98 of 350 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.65 · 22.0% (77 of 350 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.47 · 53.1% (186 of 350 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.75 · 11.1% (39 of 350 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.56 · 33.7% (118 of 350 decks)
- Victor Timely, Wily Tycoon relevance 0.75 · 10.6% (37 of 350 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.55 · 35.1% (123 of 350 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.59 · 26.9% (94 of 350 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.54 · 36.0% (126 of 350 decks)
- Damocles Base, Sword of Kang relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (42 of 350 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Summon: Bahamut relevance 0.58 · 26.0% (91 of 350 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.62 · 17.4% (61 of 350 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.61 · 19.1% (67 of 350 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.50 · 38.3% (134 of 350 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.58 · 21.7% (76 of 350 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 0.69 · 8.3% (29 of 350 decks)
- Rewrite History relevance 0.63 · 12.0% (42 of 350 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.50 · 30.3% (106 of 350 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (49 of 350 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.43 · 42.9% (150 of 350 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (47 of 350 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.45 · 36.6% (128 of 350 decks)
- Kang, Temporal Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 16.9% (59 of 350 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.54 · 18.9% (66 of 350 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.41 · 42.9% (150 of 350 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.52 · 20.0% (70 of 350 decks)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.54 · 17.1% (60 of 350 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 0.96 · 66.3% (232 of 350 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 0.93 · 68.9% (241 of 350 decks)
- Kang the Conqueror relevance 0.79 · 32.3% (113 of 350 decks)
- Timebender relevance 0.88 · 21.1% (74 of 350 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.51 · 64.9% (227 of 350 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.72 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Galactus, Devourer of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 23.7% (83 of 350 decks)
- Molecule Man relevance 0.70 · 18.9% (66 of 350 decks)
- Emrakul, the World Anew relevance 0.65 · 22.0% (77 of 350 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.75 · 11.1% (39 of 350 decks)
- Victor Timely, Wily Tycoon relevance 0.75 · 10.6% (37 of 350 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.59 · 26.9% (94 of 350 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Summon: Bahamut relevance 0.58 · 26.0% (91 of 350 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.62 · 17.4% (61 of 350 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.43 · 42.9% (150 of 350 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.45 · 36.6% (128 of 350 decks)
- Kang, Temporal Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 16.9% (59 of 350 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.54 · 18.9% (66 of 350 decks)
- Emrakul, the Promised End relevance 0.54 · 17.1% (60 of 350 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.42 · 39.7% (139 of 350 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.43 · 34.9% (122 of 350 decks)
- Pharaoh Rama-Tut relevance 0.63 · 7.4% (26 of 350 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.46 · 28.6% (100 of 350 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.53 · 14.0% (49 of 350 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.40 · 39.1% (137 of 350 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 0.63 · 6.0% (21 of 350 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.44 · 28.0% (98 of 350 decks)
- Loki, Lord of Misrule relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (39 of 350 decks)
- Flayer of Loyalties relevance 0.59 · 7.7% (27 of 350 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.49 · 14.9% (52 of 350 decks)
- Taskmaster, Mercenary Mimic relevance 0.47 · 18.0% (63 of 350 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.38 · 37.1% (130 of 350 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 0.43 · 24.0% (84 of 350 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.43 · 23.4% (82 of 350 decks)
- Wiccan, Rising Magician relevance 0.56 · 6.3% (22 of 350 decks)
- Archon of Cruelty relevance 0.36 · 36.9% (129 of 350 decks)
- Sinister Concierge relevance 0.56 · 5.7% (20 of 350 decks)
- Doctor Octopus, Master Planner relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (41 of 350 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.31 · 49.1% (172 of 350 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.54 · 5.7% (20 of 350 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (43 of 350 decks)
- Star Whale relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (47 of 350 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager relevance 0.52 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Galactus's Herald relevance 0.59 · 3.7% (13 of 350 decks)
- Kozilek, the Great Distortion relevance 0.46 · 6.3% (22 of 350 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.42 · 10.0% (35 of 350 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (27 of 350 decks)
- Rassilon, the War President relevance 0.53 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Horror relevance 0.45 · 5.7% (20 of 350 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 0.95 · 56.3% (197 of 350 decks)
- Doom's Time Platform relevance 0.85 · 56.6% (198 of 350 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.62 · 28.0% (98 of 350 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.47 · 53.1% (186 of 350 decks)
- Damocles Base, Sword of Kang relevance 0.71 · 12.0% (42 of 350 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.58 · 21.7% (76 of 350 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.59 · 13.4% (47 of 350 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.48 · 22.3% (78 of 350 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (46 of 350 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.40 · 36.3% (127 of 350 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.56 · 8.0% (28 of 350 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.40 · 29.1% (102 of 350 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.49 · 9.7% (34 of 350 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.32 · 43.4% (152 of 350 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.50 · 5.4% (19 of 350 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.40 · 16.3% (57 of 350 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.32 · 20.0% (70 of 350 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.32 · 17.7% (62 of 350 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (42 of 350 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.31 · 14.9% (52 of 350 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (21 of 350 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (15 of 350 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (22 of 350 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (29 of 350 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 44.9% (157 of 350 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (21 of 350 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Progenitor's Icon relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (42 of 350 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (19 of 350 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.16 · 41.4% (145 of 350 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 32.9% (115 of 350 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (8 of 350 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (21 of 350 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 27.1% (95 of 350 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.16 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (16 of 350 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (27 of 350 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (15 of 350 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (8 of 350 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (15 of 350 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.08 · 65.4% (229 of 350 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (19 of 350 decks)
All enchantments (33)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.70 · 57.7% (202 of 350 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.66 · 58.6% (205 of 350 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.57 · 43.4% (152 of 350 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.61 · 19.1% (67 of 350 decks)
- Rewrite History relevance 0.63 · 12.0% (42 of 350 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.45 · 32.9% (115 of 350 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.47 · 21.1% (74 of 350 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.48 · 16.3% (57 of 350 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.47 · 18.3% (64 of 350 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.44 · 18.9% (66 of 350 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.48 · 10.0% (35 of 350 decks)
- Archnemesis relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (27 of 350 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.41 · 10.6% (37 of 350 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (19 of 350 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.36 · 10.0% (35 of 350 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.35 · 5.4% (19 of 350 decks)
- Roll-Roll-Roll-Roll relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (65 of 350 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (75 of 350 decks)
- Construct a Cosmic Cube relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Glorious Purpose relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Doom Reigns Supreme relevance 0.34 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (22 of 350 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (13 of 350 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (49 of 350 decks)
- Haunted Crossroads relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (8 of 350 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (8 of 350 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.16 · 6.6% (23 of 350 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
All instants (50)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.89 · 63.1% (221 of 350 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 0.67 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Suspend relevance 0.64 · 26.6% (93 of 350 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (70 of 350 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.50 · 30.3% (106 of 350 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.41 · 42.9% (150 of 350 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.42 · 35.1% (123 of 350 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.44 · 23.1% (81 of 350 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.42 · 25.1% (88 of 350 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.44 · 20.6% (72 of 350 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.36 · 31.1% (109 of 350 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.38 · 10.9% (38 of 350 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.43 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.37 · 9.4% (33 of 350 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (29 of 350 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.28 · 19.1% (67 of 350 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.18 · 61.1% (214 of 350 decks)
- Timeline Inquiry relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (20 of 350 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.31 · 10.0% (35 of 350 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (29 of 350 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (49 of 350 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (70 of 350 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.21 · 18.6% (65 of 350 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.21 · 18.0% (63 of 350 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (50 of 350 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.19 · 25.1% (88 of 350 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (68 of 350 decks)
- Surge of Brilliance relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (8 of 350 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (39 of 350 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.18 · 22.0% (77 of 350 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.19 · 16.6% (58 of 350 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.13 · 48.0% (168 of 350 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (19 of 350 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.21 · 8.6% (30 of 350 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 16.0% (56 of 350 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (24 of 350 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (33 of 350 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (16 of 350 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (45 of 350 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 18.0% (63 of 350 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (31 of 350 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.14 · 25.1% (88 of 350 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 0.97 · 69.7% (244 of 350 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 0.95 · 53.1% (186 of 350 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.69 · 25.7% (90 of 350 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.65 · 27.1% (95 of 350 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (64 of 350 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.56 · 33.7% (118 of 350 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.55 · 35.1% (123 of 350 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.54 · 36.0% (126 of 350 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.50 · 38.3% (134 of 350 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 0.69 · 8.3% (29 of 350 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (49 of 350 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.52 · 20.0% (70 of 350 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.51 · 19.7% (69 of 350 decks)
- Extract Power relevance 0.60 · 8.6% (30 of 350 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.49 · 17.4% (61 of 350 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.52 · 12.6% (44 of 350 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.52 · 11.7% (41 of 350 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.54 · 9.4% (33 of 350 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.41 · 29.1% (102 of 350 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (49 of 350 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.55 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.40 · 24.0% (84 of 350 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.48 · 10.0% (35 of 350 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.40 · 19.1% (67 of 350 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (38 of 350 decks)
- Temporal Extortion relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (25 of 350 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (35 of 350 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.31 · 34.0% (119 of 350 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (23 of 350 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.42 · 8.6% (30 of 350 decks)
- Great Intelligence's Plan relevance 0.41 · 8.6% (30 of 350 decks)
- Decorum Dissertation relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (27 of 350 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.34 · 20.3% (71 of 350 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (38 of 350 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.39 · 6.6% (23 of 350 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.24 · 42.3% (148 of 350 decks)
- Curse of the Cabal relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (16 of 350 decks)
- Diabolic Vision relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (31 of 350 decks)
- Phthisis relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.31 · 11.7% (41 of 350 decks)
- Charnel Serenade relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (21 of 350 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.26 · 19.4% (68 of 350 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Plague Wind relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (13 of 350 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (36 of 350 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (22 of 350 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (15 of 350 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
All utility lands (46)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (32 of 350 decks)
- Villainous Hideout relevance 0.42 · 6.9% (24 of 350 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (37 of 350 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.30 · 15.1% (53 of 350 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.31 · 12.9% (45 of 350 decks)
- Volrath's Stronghold relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (21 of 350 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.29 · 14.9% (52 of 350 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.31 · 11.4% (40 of 350 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (16 of 350 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (26 of 350 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.28 · 11.1% (39 of 350 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.26 · 12.9% (45 of 350 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (30 of 350 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.20 · 32.3% (113 of 350 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (11 of 350 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (74 of 350 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.25 · 8.9% (31 of 350 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (75 of 350 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.19 · 20.9% (73 of 350 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 41.1% (144 of 350 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.21 · 10.6% (37 of 350 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.20 · 13.1% (46 of 350 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.21 · 10.3% (36 of 350 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 13.1% (46 of 350 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (8 of 350 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 20.6% (72 of 350 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (21 of 350 decks)
- Sinister Hideout relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (36 of 350 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.14 · 24.9% (87 of 350 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.15 · 16.9% (59 of 350 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.12 · 30.6% (107 of 350 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (25 of 350 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
All lands (49)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (50 of 350 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.27 · 16.0% (56 of 350 decks)
- A.I.M. Labs relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.23 · 17.4% (61 of 350 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.18 · 34.9% (122 of 350 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (45 of 350 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.20 · 25.1% (88 of 350 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (27 of 350 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.15 · 47.4% (166 of 350 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (30 of 350 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (31 of 350 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.17 · 26.6% (93 of 350 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (30 of 350 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (27 of 350 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (18 of 350 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.15 · 37.4% (131 of 350 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (23 of 350 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.13 · 46.3% (162 of 350 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.12 · 45.4% (159 of 350 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (8 of 350 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.18 · 9.1% (32 of 350 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (22 of 350 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.14 · 26.0% (91 of 350 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (14 of 350 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (28 of 350 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.10 · 53.1% (186 of 350 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.09 · 62.0% (217 of 350 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (17 of 350 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.13 · 19.4% (68 of 350 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 23.1% (81 of 350 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (15 of 350 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (12 of 350 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.11 · 26.0% (91 of 350 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.10 · 30.9% (108 of 350 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (10 of 350 decks)
- Submerged Boneyard relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (15 of 350 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (9 of 350 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.07 · 49.7% (174 of 350 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 80.3% (281 of 350 decks)
- Swamp relevance 0.01 · 89.4% (313 of 350 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 92.6% (324 of 350 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kang Prime, from 350 real Commander decks.