Red Cliffs Armada

Played in 71 decks

Red Cliffs Armada
$11.26 €3.16

Change per day

Commanders

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
All commanders (5)
  1. Skeleton Ship relevance 2.43 · 1.6% (8 of 485 decks)
  2. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 2.42 · 44.4% (4 of 9 decks)
  3. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.15 · 1.3% (12 of 928 decks)
  4. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.73 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
  5. Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.68 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)

Parallel Cards

25

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Wu Warship
    8.19 74.6%
    $1.97 €0.77
  • Steam Frigate
    5.79 52.1%
    $0.25 €0.33
  • Armored Galleon
    5.42 52.1%
    $1.07 €0.69
  • Wu Admiral
    5.19 45.1%
    $2.33 €0.81
  • Zhou Yu, Chief Commander
    5.16 47.9%
    $150.00 €40.85
  • Preemptive Strike
    4.77 46.5%
    $6.27 €0.93
  • Wu Infantry
    4.57 40.8%
    $2.12 €0.66
  • Pirate Ship
    4.56 50.7%
    $0.66 €0.28
  • Forced Retreat
    4.53 45.1%
    $2.71 €0.54
  • Sun Ce, Young Conquerer
    4.46 46.5%
    $114.40 €33.40
All most relevant (30)
  1. Wu Warship relevance 8.19 · 74.6% (53 of 71 decks)
  2. Steam Frigate relevance 5.79 · 52.1% (37 of 71 decks)
  3. Armored Galleon relevance 5.42 · 52.1% (37 of 71 decks)
  4. Wu Admiral relevance 5.19 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  5. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 5.16 · 47.9% (34 of 71 decks)
  6. Preemptive Strike relevance 4.77 · 46.5% (33 of 71 decks)
  7. Wu Infantry relevance 4.57 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  8. Pirate Ship relevance 4.56 · 50.7% (36 of 71 decks)
  9. Forced Retreat relevance 4.53 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  10. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.46 · 46.5% (33 of 71 decks)
  11. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 4.46 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  12. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 4.44 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  13. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 4.43 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  14. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 4.41 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  15. Merchant Ship relevance 4.40 · 42.3% (30 of 71 decks)
  16. Wu Spy relevance 4.37 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  17. Sage's Knowledge relevance 4.27 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  18. Mystic Denial relevance 4.23 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  19. Wu Longbowman relevance 4.22 · 42.3% (30 of 71 decks)
  20. Straw Soldiers relevance 4.15 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  21. Counterintelligence relevance 4.15 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  22. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 4.12 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  23. Dandân relevance 4.12 · 46.5% (33 of 71 decks)
  24. Champion's Victory relevance 4.09 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  25. Reef Pirates relevance 4.05 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  26. Broken Dam relevance 4.05 · 42.3% (30 of 71 decks)
  27. Wu Scout relevance 4.01 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  28. Lady Sun relevance 3.97 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  29. Council of Advisors relevance 3.93 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  30. Lingering Mirage relevance 3.80 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)

Creatures

35

Showing 1-10 of 35

Page size
  • Wu Warship
    8.19 74.6%
    $1.97 €0.77
  • Steam Frigate
    5.79 52.1%
    $0.25 €0.33
  • Armored Galleon
    5.42 52.1%
    $1.07 €0.69
  • Wu Admiral
    5.19 45.1%
    $2.33 €0.81
  • Zhou Yu, Chief Commander
    5.16 47.9%
    $150.00 €40.85
  • Wu Infantry
    4.57 40.8%
    $2.12 €0.66
  • Pirate Ship
    4.56 50.7%
    $0.66 €0.28
  • Sun Ce, Young Conquerer
    4.46 46.5%
    $114.40 €33.40
  • Wu Elite Cavalry
    4.46 45.1%
    $2.20 €0.76
  • Lu Su, Wu Advisor
    4.44 43.7%
    $42.43 €19.53
All creatures (35)
  1. Wu Warship relevance 8.19 · 74.6% (53 of 71 decks)
  2. Steam Frigate relevance 5.79 · 52.1% (37 of 71 decks)
  3. Armored Galleon relevance 5.42 · 52.1% (37 of 71 decks)
  4. Wu Admiral relevance 5.19 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  5. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 5.16 · 47.9% (34 of 71 decks)
  6. Wu Infantry relevance 4.57 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  7. Pirate Ship relevance 4.56 · 50.7% (36 of 71 decks)
  8. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.46 · 46.5% (33 of 71 decks)
  9. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 4.46 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  10. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 4.44 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  11. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 4.43 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  12. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 4.41 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  13. Merchant Ship relevance 4.40 · 42.3% (30 of 71 decks)
  14. Wu Spy relevance 4.37 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  15. Wu Longbowman relevance 4.22 · 42.3% (30 of 71 decks)
  16. Straw Soldiers relevance 4.15 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  17. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 4.12 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  18. Dandân relevance 4.12 · 46.5% (33 of 71 decks)
  19. Reef Pirates relevance 4.05 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  20. Wu Scout relevance 4.01 · 43.7% (31 of 71 decks)
  21. Lady Sun relevance 3.97 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  22. Council of Advisors relevance 3.93 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  23. Saprazzan Outrigger relevance 3.74 · 32.4% (23 of 71 decks)
  24. Ghost Ship relevance 3.55 · 36.6% (26 of 71 decks)
  25. Deep-Sea Serpent relevance 3.51 · 32.4% (23 of 71 decks)
  26. Sea Monster relevance 3.46 · 33.8% (24 of 71 decks)
  27. Kukemssa Serpent relevance 3.40 · 32.4% (23 of 71 decks)
  28. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.29 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  29. Sea Serpent relevance 3.24 · 31.0% (22 of 71 decks)
  30. Vodalian Knights relevance 3.19 · 29.6% (21 of 71 decks)
  31. Hammerhead Shark relevance 3.14 · 32.4% (23 of 71 decks)
  32. Ethereal Whiskergill relevance 3.12 · 28.2% (20 of 71 decks)
  33. Serpent of the Endless Sea relevance 3.05 · 33.8% (24 of 71 decks)
  34. Floodchaser relevance 2.90 · 28.2% (20 of 71 decks)
  35. Dreamwinder relevance 2.89 · 26.8% (19 of 71 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Lingering Mirage
    3.80 40.8%
    $0.35 €0.18
  • Phantasmal Terrain
    3.17 33.8%
    $0.13 €0.06
  • Sea's Claim
    2.80 32.4%
    $0.22 €0.15
All enchantments (3)
  1. Lingering Mirage relevance 3.80 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  2. Phantasmal Terrain relevance 3.17 · 33.8% (24 of 71 decks)
  3. Sea's Claim relevance 2.80 · 32.4% (23 of 71 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Preemptive Strike
    4.77 46.5%
    $6.27 €0.93
  • Mystic Denial
    4.23 40.8%
    $10.72 €3.85
  • Champion's Victory
    4.09 39.4%
    $10.11 €4.27
  • Extinguish
    3.70 36.6%
    $0.25 €0.33
All instants (4)
  1. Preemptive Strike relevance 4.77 · 46.5% (33 of 71 decks)
  2. Mystic Denial relevance 4.23 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  3. Champion's Victory relevance 4.09 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  4. Extinguish relevance 3.70 · 36.6% (26 of 71 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Forced Retreat
    4.53 45.1%
    $2.71 €0.54
  • Sage's Knowledge
    4.27 40.8%
    $3.43 €2.17
  • Counterintelligence
    4.15 40.8%
    $10.49 €5.21
  • Broken Dam
    4.05 42.3%
    $7.97 €2.20
  • Borrowing 100,000 Arrows
    3.44 53.5%
    $0.42 €0.29
  • Brilliant Plan
    3.43 39.4%
    $0.21 €0.13
  • Balance of Power
    3.17 33.8%
    $0.32 €0.28
  • Exhaustion
    2.94 36.6%
    $0.28 €0.33
All sorceries (8)
  1. Forced Retreat relevance 4.53 · 45.1% (32 of 71 decks)
  2. Sage's Knowledge relevance 4.27 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  3. Counterintelligence relevance 4.15 · 40.8% (29 of 71 decks)
  4. Broken Dam relevance 4.05 · 42.3% (30 of 71 decks)
  5. Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 3.44 · 53.5% (38 of 71 decks)
  6. Brilliant Plan relevance 3.43 · 39.4% (28 of 71 decks)
  7. Balance of Power relevance 3.17 · 33.8% (24 of 71 decks)
  8. Exhaustion relevance 2.94 · 36.6% (26 of 71 decks)

EDH data for Red Cliffs Armada: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 71 real decks.