Wu Admiral
Played in 63 decks
630+333+5+12+
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
63 decks
-
Blue 29 · 46.0%
-
Azorius 25 · 39.7%
-
Dimir 3 · 4.8%
-
Jeskai 2 · 3.2%
-
Temur 2 · 3.2%
- Other (2) 2 · 3.2%
Commanders
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 1.9% of decks
Sun Quan, Lord of Wu 1.9% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 6.0% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 6.0% of decks
Jedit Ojanen 4.7% of decks
Jedit Ojanen 4.7% of decks
Lu Meng, Wu General 20.0% of decks
Lu Meng, Wu General 20.0% of decks
Ragnar 1.0% of decks
Ragnar 1.0% of decks
Zhou Yu, Chief Commander 11.1% of decks
Zhou Yu, Chief Commander 11.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Wu Infantry 76.2% of decks
Wu Infantry 76.2% of decks
Wu Spy 79.4% of decks
Wu Spy 79.4% of decks
Wu Warship 76.2% of decks
Wu Warship 76.2% of decks
Wu Longbowman 79.4% of decks
Wu Longbowman 79.4% of decks
Wu Scout 85.7% of decks
Wu Scout 85.7% of decks
Wu Elite Cavalry 79.4% of decks
Wu Elite Cavalry 79.4% of decks
Same Job
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.62 · 1.9% (18 of 961 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 2.15 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 1.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 0.90 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 0.85 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
Same Job
Cards that fulfill a similar role to Wu Admiral.
All parallel cards: same job (2)
Related
Close to Wu Admiral in text.
All parallel cards: related (1)
All most relevant (30)
- Wu Infantry relevance 8.54 · 76.2% (48 of 63 decks)
- Wu Spy relevance 8.51 · 79.4% (50 of 63 decks)
- Wu Warship relevance 8.37 · 76.2% (48 of 63 decks)
- Wu Longbowman relevance 7.93 · 79.4% (50 of 63 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 7.88 · 85.7% (54 of 63 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 7.83 · 79.4% (50 of 63 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 7.80 · 82.5% (52 of 63 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 7.52 · 69.8% (44 of 63 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 7.25 · 71.4% (45 of 63 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 6.55 · 68.3% (43 of 63 decks)
- Red Cliffs Armada relevance 6.29 · 55.6% (35 of 63 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 6.12 · 60.3% (38 of 63 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 5.89 · 60.3% (38 of 63 decks)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 5.38 · 52.4% (33 of 63 decks)
- Straw Soldiers relevance 5.35 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 5.14 · 49.2% (31 of 63 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 5.11 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 5.10 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 5.05 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 5.01 · 52.4% (33 of 63 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.83 · 60.3% (38 of 63 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 4.78 · 46.0% (29 of 63 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 4.76 · 46.0% (29 of 63 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 4.19 · 41.3% (26 of 63 decks)
- Extinguish relevance 4.00 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 4.00 · 46.0% (29 of 63 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 3.72 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Wind Sail relevance 3.68 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Zephid relevance 3.54 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Zhao Zilong, Tiger General relevance 3.45 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Wu Infantry relevance 8.54 · 76.2% (48 of 63 decks)
- Wu Spy relevance 8.51 · 79.4% (50 of 63 decks)
- Wu Warship relevance 8.37 · 76.2% (48 of 63 decks)
- Wu Longbowman relevance 7.93 · 79.4% (50 of 63 decks)
- Wu Scout relevance 7.88 · 85.7% (54 of 63 decks)
- Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 7.83 · 79.4% (50 of 63 decks)
- Wu Light Cavalry relevance 7.80 · 82.5% (52 of 63 decks)
- Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 7.52 · 69.8% (44 of 63 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 7.25 · 71.4% (45 of 63 decks)
- Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 6.55 · 68.3% (43 of 63 decks)
- Red Cliffs Armada relevance 6.29 · 55.6% (35 of 63 decks)
- Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 6.12 · 60.3% (38 of 63 decks)
- Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 5.89 · 60.3% (38 of 63 decks)
- Straw Soldiers relevance 5.35 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Lady Sun relevance 5.10 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Council of Advisors relevance 5.05 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.83 · 60.3% (38 of 63 decks)
- Zephid relevance 3.54 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Zhao Zilong, Tiger General relevance 3.45 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Windscouter relevance 3.45 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Zealots en-Dal relevance 3.37 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Wave Elemental relevance 3.35 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Walking Dream relevance 3.31 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Wirecat relevance 3.28 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Waterspout Djinn relevance 3.27 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.27 · 49.2% (31 of 63 decks)
- Wilderness Hypnotist relevance 3.27 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Water Wurm relevance 3.27 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Whip-Spine Drake relevance 3.25 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Zhang Fei, Fierce Warrior relevance 3.21 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Warped Researcher relevance 3.16 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Water Elemental relevance 3.14 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Wizard Mentor relevance 3.14 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
All instants (5)
- Preemptive Strike relevance 5.38 · 52.4% (33 of 63 decks)
- Mystic Denial relevance 4.78 · 46.0% (29 of 63 decks)
- Champion's Victory relevance 4.76 · 46.0% (29 of 63 decks)
- Extinguish relevance 4.00 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Warrior's Stand relevance 3.30 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Sage's Knowledge relevance 5.14 · 49.2% (31 of 63 decks)
- Forced Retreat relevance 5.11 · 50.8% (32 of 63 decks)
- Broken Dam relevance 5.01 · 52.4% (33 of 63 decks)
- Counterintelligence relevance 4.19 · 41.3% (26 of 63 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 4.00 · 46.0% (29 of 63 decks)
- Balance of Power relevance 3.72 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Wind Sail relevance 3.68 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 3.44 · 42.9% (27 of 63 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 3.17 · 49.2% (31 of 63 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 3.16 · 49.2% (31 of 63 decks)
- Warrior's Charge relevance 3.16 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Withering Gaze relevance 3.14 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
EDH data for Wu Admiral: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 63 real decks.

































