Cards like Engulfing Slagwurm
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Engulfing Slagwurm 26%
- Tangle Asp 16%
- Sylvan Basilisk 15%
- Cockatrice 15%
- Thicket Basilisk 7%
- Loyal Sentry 1%
- Venomous Dragonfly 1%
Other options: Alaborn Zealot
Cards like Baton of Morale
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Baton of Morale 16%
- Helm of Chatzuk 16%
Cards like Kjeldoran Warrior
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Kjeldoran Warrior 16%
- Benalish Hero 13%
- Shield Bearer 11%
- Benalish Infantry 5%
- Kjeldoran Escort 3%
- Icatian Phalanx 2%
- Kjeldoran Phalanx 2%
- Veteran Cavalier 1%
- Standing Troops 1%
Other options: Steadfast Guard, Alert Shu Infantry, Ardent Militia, Alaborn Musketeer, Alaborn Grenadier, Border Patrol
Cards like Saprazzan Heir
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Saprazzan Heir 30%
- Chambered Nautilus 11%
Other options: Psychic Membrane, Drelnoch, Tome Anima
Cards like Generous Gift
2.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Bant decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Generous Gift 32%
- Beast Within 23%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Bant decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Bant decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 34%
- Three Visits 31%
- Skyshroud Claim 9%
- Ranger's Path 1%
Other options: Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Mother of Runes
16× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.77 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 31%
- Cultivate 30%
- Kodama's Reach 18%
- Explosive Vegetation 3%
- Shared Roots 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- Deep Reconnaissance 1%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Eladamri's Call
2.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 18%
- Worldly Tutor 11%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 22%
- Lightning Greaves 15%
Cards like Bloom Tender
1.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Bant decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 23%
- Faeburrow Elder 10%
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
5.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards like Growth Spiral
4.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
1.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Verdant Haven, Glittering Frost, Blighted Burgeoning, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Buried in the Garden
Cards like Tempting Licid
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Quickening Licid, Calming Licid, Gliding Licid, Dominating Licid, Stinging Licid
Cards like Taunting Elf
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Taunting Elf 18%
- Prized Unicorn 1%
- Golgari Decoy 1%
Other options: Elvish Bard, Breaker of Armies
Cards like Asceticism
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Tolarian Entrancer relevance 0.70 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Saprazzan Heir relevance 0.66 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.64 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Tempting Licid relevance 0.66 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.63 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Tangle Asp relevance 0.61 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Sylvan Basilisk relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Elven Warhounds relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (22 of 88 decks)
- Cooperation relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Warrior relevance 0.59 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Shinen of Life's Roar relevance 0.57 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Cockatrice relevance 0.58 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Baton of Morale relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Chambered Nautilus relevance 0.59 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Timber Wolves relevance 0.55 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.52 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.51 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Indrik Umbra relevance 0.51 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Mesa Pegasus relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Debt of Loyalty relevance 0.51 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 0.53 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Venom relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Shield Bearer relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Dead-Iron Sledge relevance 0.54 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Formation relevance 0.53 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Knights of Thorn relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- War Elephant relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Craw Giant relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Knight relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Phytohydra relevance 0.44 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Vortex Elemental relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Icatian Infantry relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Pygmy Troll relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Jangling Automaton relevance 0.49 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Illusory Ambusher relevance 0.43 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Thicket Basilisk relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.43 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Gorilla Berserkers relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Bloodscent relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Stuffy Doll relevance 0.40 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Veteran Bodyguard relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.42 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Tolarian Entrancer relevance 0.70 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Saprazzan Heir relevance 0.66 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Tempting Licid relevance 0.66 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.63 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Tangle Asp relevance 0.61 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Sylvan Basilisk relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Elven Warhounds relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (22 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Warrior relevance 0.59 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Shinen of Life's Roar relevance 0.57 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Cockatrice relevance 0.58 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Chambered Nautilus relevance 0.59 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Timber Wolves relevance 0.55 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.51 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Mesa Pegasus relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 0.53 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Shield Bearer relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Knights of Thorn relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- War Elephant relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Craw Giant relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Knight relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Phytohydra relevance 0.44 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Vortex Elemental relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Icatian Infantry relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Pygmy Troll relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Jangling Automaton relevance 0.49 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Illusory Ambusher relevance 0.43 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Thicket Basilisk relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.43 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Gorilla Berserkers relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Stuffy Doll relevance 0.40 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Veteran Bodyguard relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Beloved Chaplain relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Weathered Bodyguards relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Ayesha Tanaka relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Slith Strider relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Odric, Master Tactician relevance 0.36 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skycaptain relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Teremko Griffin relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Abu Ja'far relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Benalish Infantry relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.29 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Battering Ram relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.29 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Mossbridge Troll relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.27 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.61 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Baton of Morale relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.52 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Dead-Iron Sledge relevance 0.54 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.31 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.22 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Implements of Sacrifice relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Wand of Ith relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.22 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Magnetic Web relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.14 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Caduceus, Staff of Hermes relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Worldslayer relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Crystal Chimes relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.13 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Barrow-Blade relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Heroes' Podium relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Godsend relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Mjölnir, Storm Hammer relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Silver Shroud Costume relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.13 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Kaldra Compleat relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.11 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Lure relevance 0.64 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Cooperation relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Indrik Umbra relevance 0.51 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Venom relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Pariah relevance 0.36 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.31 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Druid's Call relevance 0.39 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Defensive Formation relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Nature's Blessing relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.25 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.25 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Charisma relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.20 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Predatory Impetus relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.19 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.17 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Gift of Immortality relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Fortified Area relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.17 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Angelic Renewal relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Sigarda's Aid relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Dragon Scales relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Brilliant Halo relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.18 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Dazzling Theater // Prop Room relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Veiled Sentry relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Mantle of the Ancients relevance 0.19 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Dragon Fangs relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Hidden Predators relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Caribou Range relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Zephid's Embrace relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Cessation relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
All instants (50)
- Debt of Loyalty relevance 0.51 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Formation relevance 0.53 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Bloodscent relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.31 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.28 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Valor Made Real relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Chant of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Holy Day relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Bant Charm relevance 0.20 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Argivian Find relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.17 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.17 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.14 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Prismatic Strands relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Reknit relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.16 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Errand of Duty relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.15 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.14 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Blaze of Glory relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Stampede relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.14 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.12 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Righteousness relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Spore Cloud relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.14 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Dawn Charm relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Energy Arc relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.42 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Alluring Scent relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Ascend from Avernus relevance 0.25 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Tidings relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Steelshaper's Gift relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Breath of Life relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.21 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.21 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.18 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.18 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Omen relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Revenge of the Hunted relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.15 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.19 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Sift relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Stream of Life relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.16 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Secrets of the Golden City relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Untamed Wilds relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.14 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.08 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.10 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Tolaria relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Adventurers' Guildhouse relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Cathedral of Serra relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.14 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.11 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Kor Haven relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.13 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.13 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.14 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Clive's Hideaway relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Sejiri Refuge relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.08 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
All lands (50)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.16 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.16 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.16 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Veldt relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.15 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Glacial Floodplain relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.16 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.12 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.12 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.15 · 9.1% (8 of 88 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.14 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.11 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.12 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Aysen Abbey relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.10 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.10 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.12 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.14 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.14 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.11 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.08 · 46.6% (41 of 88 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.08 · 46.6% (41 of 88 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 46.6% (41 of 88 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.09 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Meteor Crater relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Grand Coliseum relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.09 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (6 of 88 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (4 of 88 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.07 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 88 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.10 · 5.7% (5 of 88 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.07 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ragnar, from 88 real Commander decks.