Reclaim
Played in 16,479 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 4.09 · 7.8% (435 of 5,580 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 3.98 · 31.8% (504 of 1,583 decks)
- Hans Eriksson relevance 3.71 · 37.6% (164 of 436 decks)
- Oviya Pashiri, Sage Lifecrafter relevance 3.62 · 42.5% (191 of 449 decks)
- Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 3.37 · 25.8% (1,006 of 3,902 decks)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.26 · 17.9% (2,117 of 11,822 decks)
- Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 3.03 · 8.6% (127 of 1,469 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 3.02 · 19.7% (234 of 1,185 decks)
- Lila, Hospitality Hostess relevance 2.75 · 57.6% (19 of 33 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 2.62 · 14.7% (185 of 1,259 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 2.36 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Raph & Mikey, Troublemakers relevance 2.29 · 5.1% (446 of 8,680 decks)
- Intet, the Dreamer relevance 2.28 · 24.5% (116 of 473 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 2.28 · 12.2% (129 of 1,058 decks)
- Sergeant John Benton relevance 2.02 · 4.1% (98 of 2,364 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.78 · 2.8% (150 of 5,432 decks)
- Old Stickfingers relevance 1.62 · 3.6% (58 of 1,609 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.56 · 1.5% (204 of 13,733 decks)
- Kenessos, Priest of Thassa relevance 1.51 · 4.5% (135 of 2,985 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.50 · 8.0% (14 of 174 decks)
- Atla Palani, Nest Tender relevance 1.41 · 1.0% (120 of 11,777 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi, the Dire relevance 1.36 · 1.8% (35 of 1,957 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 1.35 · 4.0% (54 of 1,339 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 1.29 · 1.1% (61 of 5,358 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 1.28 · 2.9% (184 of 6,246 decks)
- Rhys the Redeemed relevance 1.27 · 1.9% (57 of 3,003 decks)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 1.24 · 1.5% (31 of 2,028 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa relevance 1.18 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 1.16 · 4.3% (48 of 1,109 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 1.15 · 1.6% (65 of 3,974 decks)
All parallel cards (8)
All most relevant (30)
- Noxious Revival relevance 1.17 · 29.7% (4,894 of 16,479 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (4,057 of 16,479 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.76 · 36.4% (6,002 of 16,479 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.75 · 16.6% (2,728 of 16,479 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.72 · 31.3% (5,150 of 16,479 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.69 · 12.8% (2,111 of 16,479 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.67 · 21.0% (3,467 of 16,479 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.67 · 18.6% (3,071 of 16,479 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.67 · 11.2% (1,841 of 16,479 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.63 · 18.9% (3,114 of 16,479 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.63 · 35.7% (5,880 of 16,479 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.60 · 29.6% (4,880 of 16,479 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.58 · 22.4% (3,686 of 16,479 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 0.57 · 9.1% (1,497 of 16,479 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.56 · 17.1% (2,816 of 16,479 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.55 · 29.5% (4,862 of 16,479 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (2,521 of 16,479 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.53 · 15.3% (2,524 of 16,479 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.52 · 26.2% (4,319 of 16,479 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.51 · 14.9% (2,461 of 16,479 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 21.9% (3,606 of 16,479 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.51 · 18.3% (3,023 of 16,479 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (1,649 of 16,479 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (1,927 of 16,479 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (2,183 of 16,479 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (1,996 of 16,479 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.45 · 14.4% (2,380 of 16,479 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.45 · 21.9% (3,602 of 16,479 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (2,336 of 16,479 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.41 · 18.5% (3,050 of 16,479 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.72 · 31.3% (5,150 of 16,479 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.58 · 22.4% (3,686 of 16,479 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 0.57 · 9.1% (1,497 of 16,479 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (2,521 of 16,479 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.51 · 14.9% (2,461 of 16,479 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.51 · 18.3% (3,023 of 16,479 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (1,996 of 16,479 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.45 · 21.9% (3,602 of 16,479 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (2,336 of 16,479 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.41 · 10.6% (1,751 of 16,479 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (2,133 of 16,479 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (2,028 of 16,479 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (1,716 of 16,479 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (1,797 of 16,479 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (1,823 of 16,479 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (1,220 of 16,479 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.67 · 21.0% (3,467 of 16,479 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.67 · 11.2% (1,841 of 16,479 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.53 · 15.3% (2,524 of 16,479 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (1,649 of 16,479 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (2,183 of 16,479 decks)
All instants (9)
- Noxious Revival relevance 1.17 · 29.7% (4,894 of 16,479 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.67 · 18.6% (3,071 of 16,479 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.63 · 18.9% (3,114 of 16,479 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.60 · 29.6% (4,880 of 16,479 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.56 · 17.1% (2,816 of 16,479 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (1,927 of 16,479 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.45 · 14.4% (2,380 of 16,479 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (1,868 of 16,479 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.41 · 16.4% (2,697 of 16,479 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Explore relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (4,057 of 16,479 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.76 · 36.4% (6,002 of 16,479 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.75 · 16.6% (2,728 of 16,479 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.69 · 12.8% (2,111 of 16,479 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.63 · 35.7% (5,880 of 16,479 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.55 · 29.5% (4,862 of 16,479 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.52 · 26.2% (4,319 of 16,479 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 21.9% (3,606 of 16,479 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.41 · 18.5% (3,050 of 16,479 decks)
All lands (11)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.59 · 20.4% (3,368 of 16,479 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.58 · 22.6% (3,717 of 16,479 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.50 · 19.4% (3,201 of 16,479 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.49 · 20.3% (3,343 of 16,479 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.48 · 27.7% (4,566 of 16,479 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (2,754 of 16,479 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.45 · 12.7% (2,099 of 16,479 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.44 · 18.1% (2,985 of 16,479 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.43 · 14.4% (2,372 of 16,479 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.42 · 20.8% (3,429 of 16,479 decks)
- Frontier Bivouac relevance 0.40 · 11.1% (1,826 of 16,479 decks)
EDH data for Reclaim: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16,479 real decks.