Change per day
Archetypes
64% of decks lean toward it
39% of decks lean toward it
33% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Frilled Mystic
64% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Dig Through Time
39% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Brainstorm
33% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Mystic Remora
23% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Opt
13% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 300 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Rewind
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Frilled Mystic
19× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Sister of Silence
Cards like Growth Spiral
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 59%
- Eureka Moment 20%
- Joint Exploration 15%
Cards like Pongify
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 36%
- Rapid Hybridization 34%
Cards like Wavebreak Hippocamp
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wavebreak Hippocamp 49%
- Glademuse 13%
Cards like Counterspell
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 58%
- Negate 30%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Spell Snare 3%
Other options: Stern Scolding, Intervene, Nullify, Flash Counter, Remove Soul, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, False Summoning, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Brainstorm
5.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 56%
- Brainsurge 15%
Cards like Mystic Confluence
8.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Confluence 24%
- Sublime Epiphany 13%
- Cryptic Command 10%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 37%
- Elvish Mystic 30%
- Fyndhorn Elves 20%
- Boreal Druid 3%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Llanowar Tribe, Fyndhorn Elder, Apprentice Wizard, Greenweaver Druid, Rootrider Faun, Leaf Gilder, Golden Hind, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Mystical Tutor
6.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Opt
8.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like High Fae Trickster
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Naiad of Hidden Coves
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Uthros Psionicist, Highspire Bell-Ringer
Cards like Dig Through Time
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dig Through Time 40%
- Impulse 10%
- Telling Time 1%
- Anticipate 1%
Other options: Experimental Augury
Cards like Aetherize
6.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 26%
- Evacuation 16%
- Perplexing Test 2%
Cards like Noxious Revival
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Force of Will
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Force of Will 17%
- Force of Negation 16%
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 23%
- Mystic Remora 22%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Mana Drain
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mana Drain 27%
- Plasm Capture 16%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Planar Engineering, Scapeshift
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Swan Song
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swan Song 34%
- Strix Serenade 4%
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Market Festival, Dawn's Reflection, Verdant Haven, Glittering Frost, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Baral, Chief of Compliance
6.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 21%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Reclamation Sage
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Reclamation Sage 21%
- Acidic Slime 4%
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
All top picks (50)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.86 · 48.8% (635 of 1,300 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.85 · 18.3% (238 of 1,300 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (334 of 1,300 decks)
- Glademuse relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (163 of 1,300 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.62 · 38.3% (498 of 1,300 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.71 · 19.5% (254 of 1,300 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.68 · 21.6% (281 of 1,300 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.63 · 29.8% (388 of 1,300 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (212 of 1,300 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.78 · 10.5% (137 of 1,300 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.54 · 40.0% (520 of 1,300 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.60 · 27.8% (361 of 1,300 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.44 · 57.8% (752 of 1,300 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 0.76 · 10.2% (132 of 1,300 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.54 · 35.2% (458 of 1,300 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.54 · 32.6% (424 of 1,300 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (149 of 1,300 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.69 · 11.8% (153 of 1,300 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (313 of 1,300 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.79 · 5.1% (66 of 1,300 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (196 of 1,300 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 0.70 · 9.2% (120 of 1,300 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (132 of 1,300 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.62 · 14.8% (192 of 1,300 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (158 of 1,300 decks)
- Final-Word Phantom relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (147 of 1,300 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (130 of 1,300 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 18.2% (236 of 1,300 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.50 · 29.0% (377 of 1,300 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 23.6% (307 of 1,300 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (218 of 1,300 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (99 of 1,300 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (97 of 1,300 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (126 of 1,300 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.48 · 30.2% (392 of 1,300 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 7.5% (97 of 1,300 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.66 · 7.5% (98 of 1,300 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 23.9% (311 of 1,300 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (206 of 1,300 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.54 · 14.1% (183 of 1,300 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 0.65 · 6.4% (83 of 1,300 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.42 · 36.1% (469 of 1,300 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 56.3% (732 of 1,300 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.46 · 27.8% (362 of 1,300 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (132 of 1,300 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 21.1% (274 of 1,300 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (171 of 1,300 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.58 · 8.7% (113 of 1,300 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 0.72 · 4.1% (53 of 1,300 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.61 · 6.1% (79 of 1,300 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.86 · 48.8% (635 of 1,300 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.85 · 18.3% (238 of 1,300 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (334 of 1,300 decks)
- Glademuse relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (163 of 1,300 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.71 · 19.5% (254 of 1,300 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.68 · 21.6% (281 of 1,300 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (212 of 1,300 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.78 · 10.5% (137 of 1,300 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.60 · 27.8% (361 of 1,300 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 0.76 · 10.2% (132 of 1,300 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (313 of 1,300 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.79 · 5.1% (66 of 1,300 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 0.70 · 9.2% (120 of 1,300 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (132 of 1,300 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (158 of 1,300 decks)
- Final-Word Phantom relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (147 of 1,300 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 23.6% (307 of 1,300 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (218 of 1,300 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (99 of 1,300 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 7.5% (97 of 1,300 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 0.65 · 6.4% (83 of 1,300 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.46 · 27.8% (362 of 1,300 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.58 · 8.7% (113 of 1,300 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 0.72 · 4.1% (53 of 1,300 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (135 of 1,300 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (124 of 1,300 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.32 · 51.2% (665 of 1,300 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.72 · 3.5% (45 of 1,300 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.55 · 5.8% (76 of 1,300 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.54 · 6.0% (78 of 1,300 decks)
- Draining Whelk relevance 0.65 · 3.9% (51 of 1,300 decks)
- Winged Coatl relevance 0.59 · 4.3% (56 of 1,300 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.39 · 22.1% (287 of 1,300 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.50 · 6.4% (83 of 1,300 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.48 · 8.2% (106 of 1,300 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.41 · 14.8% (193 of 1,300 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.30 · 43.9% (571 of 1,300 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (67 of 1,300 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.42 · 13.6% (177 of 1,300 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (71 of 1,300 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (148 of 1,300 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 0.56 · 4.2% (55 of 1,300 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (75 of 1,300 decks)
- Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 0.49 · 4.8% (63 of 1,300 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.54 · 4.2% (55 of 1,300 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.35 · 22.0% (286 of 1,300 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.53 · 4.2% (55 of 1,300 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.60 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (274 of 1,300 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.30 · 34.6% (450 of 1,300 decks)
All artifacts (28)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.54 · 35.2% (458 of 1,300 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (196 of 1,300 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (171 of 1,300 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.48 · 13.1% (170 of 1,300 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.50 · 10.8% (141 of 1,300 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.58 · 4.4% (57 of 1,300 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (115 of 1,300 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (186 of 1,300 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (35 of 1,300 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.27 · 24.8% (323 of 1,300 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (34 of 1,300 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (119 of 1,300 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (64 of 1,300 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.33 · 7.8% (101 of 1,300 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 26.8% (348 of 1,300 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.33 · 6.6% (86 of 1,300 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (93 of 1,300 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (66 of 1,300 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (32 of 1,300 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.22 · 26.8% (348 of 1,300 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (220 of 1,300 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (39 of 1,300 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (48 of 1,300 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (136 of 1,300 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (35 of 1,300 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (41 of 1,300 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 57.7% (750 of 1,300 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 75.6% (983 of 1,300 decks)
All enchantments (41)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.44 · 57.8% (752 of 1,300 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.54 · 32.6% (424 of 1,300 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.69 · 11.8% (153 of 1,300 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (97 of 1,300 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (126 of 1,300 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.66 · 7.5% (98 of 1,300 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.54 · 14.1% (183 of 1,300 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.63 · 4.6% (60 of 1,300 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.55 · 7.3% (95 of 1,300 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.38 · 28.5% (370 of 1,300 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 23.8% (309 of 1,300 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.49 · 5.2% (67 of 1,300 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.54 · 4.1% (53 of 1,300 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.45 · 6.5% (85 of 1,300 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.60 · 3.3% (43 of 1,300 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (171 of 1,300 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (146 of 1,300 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (47 of 1,300 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.51 · 3.8% (50 of 1,300 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.54 · 3.3% (43 of 1,300 decks)
- Urban Burgeoning relevance 0.56 · 2.9% (38 of 1,300 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 22.3% (290 of 1,300 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (125 of 1,300 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (69 of 1,300 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (41 of 1,300 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 23.1% (300 of 1,300 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (48 of 1,300 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (83 of 1,300 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (122 of 1,300 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (48 of 1,300 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (56 of 1,300 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (40 of 1,300 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (39 of 1,300 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (39 of 1,300 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (42 of 1,300 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (33 of 1,300 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (36 of 1,300 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (43 of 1,300 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (32 of 1,300 decks)
All instants (50)
- Rewind relevance 0.62 · 38.3% (498 of 1,300 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.63 · 29.8% (388 of 1,300 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.54 · 40.0% (520 of 1,300 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.62 · 14.8% (192 of 1,300 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (130 of 1,300 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 18.2% (236 of 1,300 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.50 · 29.0% (377 of 1,300 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.48 · 30.2% (392 of 1,300 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 23.9% (311 of 1,300 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (206 of 1,300 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.42 · 36.1% (469 of 1,300 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 56.3% (732 of 1,300 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (132 of 1,300 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.61 · 6.1% (79 of 1,300 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (163 of 1,300 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.53 · 10.3% (134 of 1,300 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.49 · 13.1% (170 of 1,300 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.42 · 27.3% (355 of 1,300 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.47 · 15.7% (204 of 1,300 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.52 · 10.5% (137 of 1,300 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (191 of 1,300 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.65 · 4.4% (57 of 1,300 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.46 · 15.2% (197 of 1,300 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.38 · 34.5% (449 of 1,300 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.40 · 28.3% (368 of 1,300 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.56 · 6.2% (80 of 1,300 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.39 · 29.2% (379 of 1,300 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (125 of 1,300 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (106 of 1,300 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.45 · 13.8% (179 of 1,300 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.44 · 14.4% (187 of 1,300 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.44 · 13.9% (181 of 1,300 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (94 of 1,300 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.34 · 34.2% (444 of 1,300 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.54 · 4.7% (61 of 1,300 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (156 of 1,300 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.58 · 4.2% (55 of 1,300 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (126 of 1,300 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 23.5% (305 of 1,300 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (134 of 1,300 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.40 · 11.6% (151 of 1,300 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 8.8% (114 of 1,300 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (120 of 1,300 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.33 · 26.3% (342 of 1,300 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (63 of 1,300 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.45 · 5.5% (71 of 1,300 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.35 · 16.4% (213 of 1,300 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (74 of 1,300 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.37 · 13.5% (175 of 1,300 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (43 of 1,300 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (149 of 1,300 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 21.1% (274 of 1,300 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.56 · 6.5% (84 of 1,300 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 0.60 · 4.2% (54 of 1,300 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (260 of 1,300 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (96 of 1,300 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (101 of 1,300 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (76 of 1,300 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.65 · 2.9% (38 of 1,300 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (66 of 1,300 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.36 · 15.6% (203 of 1,300 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (104 of 1,300 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (62 of 1,300 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (65 of 1,300 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.42 · 6.8% (88 of 1,300 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (70 of 1,300 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.52 · 3.3% (43 of 1,300 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (47 of 1,300 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (65 of 1,300 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (54 of 1,300 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (130 of 1,300 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (51 of 1,300 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (106 of 1,300 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (50 of 1,300 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (127 of 1,300 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.48 · 2.8% (36 of 1,300 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (53 of 1,300 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (54 of 1,300 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (71 of 1,300 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (50 of 1,300 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (86 of 1,300 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (32 of 1,300 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.27 · 11.1% (144 of 1,300 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 32.3% (420 of 1,300 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (34 of 1,300 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.21 · 27.1% (352 of 1,300 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (59 of 1,300 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (58 of 1,300 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (61 of 1,300 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.18 · 38.8% (504 of 1,300 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (174 of 1,300 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (53 of 1,300 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 34.1% (443 of 1,300 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (89 of 1,300 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (35 of 1,300 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (63 of 1,300 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (42 of 1,300 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (96 of 1,300 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (69 of 1,300 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.54 · 5.2% (68 of 1,300 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (103 of 1,300 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.49 · 4.2% (55 of 1,300 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (109 of 1,300 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.47 · 2.9% (38 of 1,300 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (33 of 1,300 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (46 of 1,300 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (126 of 1,300 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.50 · 14.8% (193 of 1,300 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.42 · 24.5% (319 of 1,300 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 38.8% (505 of 1,300 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.42 · 15.2% (197 of 1,300 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (134 of 1,300 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (150 of 1,300 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (126 of 1,300 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (325 of 1,300 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.32 · 15.1% (196 of 1,300 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (65 of 1,300 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (180 of 1,300 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.26 · 30.4% (395 of 1,300 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (95 of 1,300 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.25 · 34.5% (449 of 1,300 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (90 of 1,300 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.27 · 24.8% (322 of 1,300 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (66 of 1,300 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (65 of 1,300 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.26 · 24.4% (317 of 1,300 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (66 of 1,300 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (57 of 1,300 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.23 · 25.2% (328 of 1,300 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.44 · 3.0% (39 of 1,300 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (57 of 1,300 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.26 · 11.5% (150 of 1,300 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (57 of 1,300 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (50 of 1,300 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (143 of 1,300 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.27 · 6.5% (85 of 1,300 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.18 · 31.5% (410 of 1,300 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (43 of 1,300 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (35 of 1,300 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (34 of 1,300 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.23 · 7.2% (94 of 1,300 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (46 of 1,300 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (42 of 1,300 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 43.5% (566 of 1,300 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (89 of 1,300 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (44 of 1,300 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 6.5% (84 of 1,300 decks)
All lands (45)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (160 of 1,300 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.34 · 16.5% (214 of 1,300 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.33 · 18.4% (239 of 1,300 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.32 · 18.2% (236 of 1,300 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.30 · 21.2% (276 of 1,300 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (120 of 1,300 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.38 · 4.9% (64 of 1,300 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.28 · 19.1% (248 of 1,300 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.31 · 13.1% (170 of 1,300 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (82 of 1,300 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (81 of 1,300 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.31 · 11.2% (145 of 1,300 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (139 of 1,300 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (64 of 1,300 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.26 · 23.5% (305 of 1,300 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (127 of 1,300 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (68 of 1,300 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.25 · 21.2% (276 of 1,300 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 19.2% (249 of 1,300 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (80 of 1,300 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (76 of 1,300 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.20 · 37.2% (483 of 1,300 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.20 · 27.8% (362 of 1,300 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (68 of 1,300 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 15.6% (203 of 1,300 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.22 · 17.6% (229 of 1,300 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.16 · 46.1% (599 of 1,300 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (59 of 1,300 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.21 · 13.3% (173 of 1,300 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.24 · 8.3% (108 of 1,300 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (117 of 1,300 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (187 of 1,300 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.14 · 47.6% (619 of 1,300 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (74 of 1,300 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (42 of 1,300 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.15 · 34.4% (447 of 1,300 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (131 of 1,300 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.13 · 50.8% (660 of 1,300 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.13 · 44.0% (572 of 1,300 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.12 · 57.3% (745 of 1,300 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (372 of 1,300 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 63.9% (831 of 1,300 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 80.5% (1,047 of 1,300 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 85.8% (1,115 of 1,300 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 86.0% (1,118 of 1,300 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Rashmi, Eternities Crafter, from 1,300 real Commander decks.