Change per day
Archetypes
64% of decks lean toward it
39% of decks lean toward it
33% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Frilled Mystic
64% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Dig Through Time
39% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Brainstorm
33% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Mystic Remora
23% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Opt
13% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 300 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Rewind
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Frilled Mystic
19× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Sister of Silence
Cards like Growth Spiral
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 59%
- Eureka Moment 20%
- Joint Exploration 15%
Cards like Pongify
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 36%
- Rapid Hybridization 34%
Cards like Wavebreak Hippocamp
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wavebreak Hippocamp 49%
- Glademuse 13%
Cards like Counterspell
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 58%
- Negate 30%
- Essence Scatter 3%
- Spell Snare 3%
Other options: Stern Scolding, Intervene, Nullify, Flash Counter, Remove Soul, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, False Summoning, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Brainstorm
5.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 56%
- Brainsurge 15%
Cards like Mystic Confluence
8.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Confluence 24%
- Sublime Epiphany 13%
- Cryptic Command 10%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 37%
- Elvish Mystic 30%
- Fyndhorn Elves 20%
- Boreal Druid 3%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Llanowar Tribe, Fyndhorn Elder, Apprentice Wizard, Greenweaver Druid, Rootrider Faun, Leaf Gilder, Golden Hind, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Mystical Tutor
6.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Opt
8.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like High Fae Trickster
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Dig Through Time
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dig Through Time 40%
- Impulse 10%
- Telling Time 1%
- Anticipate 1%
Other options: Experimental Augury
Cards like Naiad of Hidden Coves
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Uthros Psionicist, Highspire Bell-Ringer
Cards like Aetherize
6.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 26%
- Evacuation 16%
- Perplexing Test 2%
Cards like Noxious Revival
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Force of Will
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Force of Will 17%
- Force of Negation 16%
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 23%
- Mystic Remora 22%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Mana Drain
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mana Drain 26%
- Plasm Capture 16%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Planar Engineering, Scapeshift
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
2.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Swan Song
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swan Song 34%
- Strix Serenade 4%
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Market Festival, Dawn's Reflection, Verdant Haven, Glittering Frost, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Baral, Chief of Compliance
6.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 21%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Reclamation Sage
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Reclamation Sage 21%
- Acidic Slime 4%
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
All top picks (50)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.86 · 48.8% (633 of 1,298 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.85 · 18.3% (237 of 1,298 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (333 of 1,298 decks)
- Glademuse relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (163 of 1,298 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.62 · 38.2% (496 of 1,298 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.71 · 19.5% (253 of 1,298 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.63 · 29.9% (388 of 1,298 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.68 · 21.5% (279 of 1,298 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (212 of 1,298 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.78 · 10.6% (137 of 1,298 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.53 · 39.8% (517 of 1,298 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.60 · 27.7% (359 of 1,298 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 0.75 · 10.1% (131 of 1,298 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 57.6% (747 of 1,298 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.54 · 35.2% (457 of 1,298 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.54 · 32.6% (423 of 1,298 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (149 of 1,298 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (152 of 1,298 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (313 of 1,298 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.79 · 5.1% (66 of 1,298 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (196 of 1,298 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 0.70 · 9.2% (120 of 1,298 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (132 of 1,298 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.62 · 14.8% (192 of 1,298 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (158 of 1,298 decks)
- Final-Word Phantom relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (147 of 1,298 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (130 of 1,298 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 18.0% (234 of 1,298 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.50 · 28.8% (374 of 1,298 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 23.6% (306 of 1,298 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (218 of 1,298 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (99 of 1,298 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (126 of 1,298 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.67 · 7.4% (96 of 1,298 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 7.5% (97 of 1,298 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.48 · 30.0% (390 of 1,298 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.65 · 7.5% (97 of 1,298 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 23.7% (308 of 1,298 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.53 · 15.9% (206 of 1,298 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 0.65 · 6.4% (83 of 1,298 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.54 · 14.0% (182 of 1,298 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.42 · 36.1% (469 of 1,298 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 56.2% (730 of 1,298 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.46 · 27.8% (361 of 1,298 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (132 of 1,298 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 21.1% (274 of 1,298 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (171 of 1,298 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (112 of 1,298 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 0.72 · 4.1% (53 of 1,298 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.61 · 6.1% (79 of 1,298 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.86 · 48.8% (633 of 1,298 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.85 · 18.3% (237 of 1,298 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (333 of 1,298 decks)
- Glademuse relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (163 of 1,298 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.71 · 19.5% (253 of 1,298 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.68 · 21.5% (279 of 1,298 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (212 of 1,298 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.78 · 10.6% (137 of 1,298 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.60 · 27.7% (359 of 1,298 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 0.75 · 10.1% (131 of 1,298 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (313 of 1,298 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.79 · 5.1% (66 of 1,298 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 0.70 · 9.2% (120 of 1,298 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (132 of 1,298 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.65 · 12.2% (158 of 1,298 decks)
- Final-Word Phantom relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (147 of 1,298 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 23.6% (306 of 1,298 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (218 of 1,298 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (99 of 1,298 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.66 · 7.5% (97 of 1,298 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 0.65 · 6.4% (83 of 1,298 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.46 · 27.8% (361 of 1,298 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.58 · 8.6% (112 of 1,298 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 0.72 · 4.1% (53 of 1,298 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (135 of 1,298 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (123 of 1,298 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.32 · 50.9% (661 of 1,298 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.72 · 3.5% (45 of 1,298 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.55 · 5.9% (76 of 1,298 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.54 · 6.0% (78 of 1,298 decks)
- Draining Whelk relevance 0.65 · 3.9% (51 of 1,298 decks)
- Winged Coatl relevance 0.59 · 4.3% (56 of 1,298 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.39 · 22.0% (286 of 1,298 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.50 · 6.4% (83 of 1,298 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.41 · 14.8% (192 of 1,298 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (104 of 1,298 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (67 of 1,298 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.30 · 43.8% (568 of 1,298 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.42 · 13.6% (177 of 1,298 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (71 of 1,298 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 0.56 · 4.2% (55 of 1,298 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.43 · 11.2% (146 of 1,298 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (75 of 1,298 decks)
- Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (63 of 1,298 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.54 · 4.2% (55 of 1,298 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.35 · 22.0% (286 of 1,298 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.53 · 4.2% (55 of 1,298 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.60 · 3.4% (44 of 1,298 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.34 · 21.0% (273 of 1,298 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.30 · 34.5% (448 of 1,298 decks)
All artifacts (28)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.54 · 35.2% (457 of 1,298 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.62 · 15.1% (196 of 1,298 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (171 of 1,298 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.48 · 12.9% (168 of 1,298 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.50 · 10.9% (141 of 1,298 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.58 · 4.4% (57 of 1,298 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (114 of 1,298 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (186 of 1,298 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (35 of 1,298 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.27 · 24.8% (322 of 1,298 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (34 of 1,298 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (118 of 1,298 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (64 of 1,298 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (102 of 1,298 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 26.8% (348 of 1,298 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (94 of 1,298 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.33 · 6.6% (86 of 1,298 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (66 of 1,298 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (32 of 1,298 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.22 · 26.8% (348 of 1,298 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (220 of 1,298 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (39 of 1,298 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (48 of 1,298 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (136 of 1,298 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (35 of 1,298 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (41 of 1,298 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 57.7% (749 of 1,298 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 75.7% (982 of 1,298 decks)
All enchantments (41)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 57.6% (747 of 1,298 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.54 · 32.6% (423 of 1,298 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (152 of 1,298 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.64 · 9.7% (126 of 1,298 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.67 · 7.4% (96 of 1,298 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.65 · 7.5% (97 of 1,298 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.54 · 14.0% (182 of 1,298 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.63 · 4.6% (60 of 1,298 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.55 · 7.3% (95 of 1,298 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.38 · 28.4% (368 of 1,298 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 23.7% (307 of 1,298 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.49 · 5.2% (67 of 1,298 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.54 · 4.1% (53 of 1,298 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.45 · 6.5% (85 of 1,298 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.60 · 3.3% (43 of 1,298 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.38 · 13.0% (169 of 1,298 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (146 of 1,298 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (47 of 1,298 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.51 · 3.9% (50 of 1,298 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.54 · 3.3% (43 of 1,298 decks)
- Urban Burgeoning relevance 0.56 · 2.9% (38 of 1,298 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 22.3% (289 of 1,298 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (125 of 1,298 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (69 of 1,298 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (41 of 1,298 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 23.0% (298 of 1,298 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (48 of 1,298 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (83 of 1,298 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (121 of 1,298 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (47 of 1,298 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (44 of 1,298 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (56 of 1,298 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (40 of 1,298 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (39 of 1,298 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (39 of 1,298 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (42 of 1,298 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (33 of 1,298 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (44 of 1,298 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (36 of 1,298 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (43 of 1,298 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (32 of 1,298 decks)
All instants (50)
- Rewind relevance 0.62 · 38.2% (496 of 1,298 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.63 · 29.9% (388 of 1,298 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.53 · 39.8% (517 of 1,298 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.62 · 14.8% (192 of 1,298 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (130 of 1,298 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 18.0% (234 of 1,298 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.50 · 28.8% (374 of 1,298 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.48 · 30.0% (390 of 1,298 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.50 · 23.7% (308 of 1,298 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.53 · 15.9% (206 of 1,298 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.42 · 36.1% (469 of 1,298 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.34 · 56.2% (730 of 1,298 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (132 of 1,298 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.61 · 6.1% (79 of 1,298 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.52 · 12.6% (164 of 1,298 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (135 of 1,298 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.42 · 27.4% (356 of 1,298 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (169 of 1,298 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (137 of 1,298 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (191 of 1,298 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.65 · 4.4% (57 of 1,298 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (202 of 1,298 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.46 · 15.2% (197 of 1,298 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.38 · 34.4% (447 of 1,298 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.40 · 28.3% (367 of 1,298 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.56 · 6.2% (80 of 1,298 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.39 · 29.1% (378 of 1,298 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (125 of 1,298 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (106 of 1,298 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (180 of 1,298 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (185 of 1,298 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.44 · 13.8% (179 of 1,298 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (93 of 1,298 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.34 · 34.1% (443 of 1,298 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.54 · 4.7% (61 of 1,298 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.58 · 4.2% (55 of 1,298 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.44 · 11.9% (155 of 1,298 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (126 of 1,298 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 23.5% (305 of 1,298 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.42 · 10.2% (133 of 1,298 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.40 · 11.6% (151 of 1,298 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 8.8% (114 of 1,298 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (120 of 1,298 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.33 · 26.2% (340 of 1,298 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.45 · 5.5% (71 of 1,298 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (74 of 1,298 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (212 of 1,298 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (173 of 1,298 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (43 of 1,298 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (115 of 1,298 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (149 of 1,298 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 21.1% (274 of 1,298 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.56 · 6.4% (83 of 1,298 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (260 of 1,298 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 0.60 · 4.0% (52 of 1,298 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.48 · 7.5% (97 of 1,298 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.47 · 7.9% (102 of 1,298 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (76 of 1,298 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (66 of 1,298 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.36 · 15.7% (204 of 1,298 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (104 of 1,298 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.65 · 2.8% (36 of 1,298 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (62 of 1,298 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (65 of 1,298 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (87 of 1,298 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (70 of 1,298 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (47 of 1,298 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (65 of 1,298 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (54 of 1,298 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (41 of 1,298 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (52 of 1,298 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (130 of 1,298 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (106 of 1,298 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.43 · 3.9% (50 of 1,298 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (127 of 1,298 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.48 · 2.8% (36 of 1,298 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (53 of 1,298 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (54 of 1,298 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (72 of 1,298 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (50 of 1,298 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (86 of 1,298 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (32 of 1,298 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (44 of 1,298 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (143 of 1,298 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (34 of 1,298 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 32.1% (417 of 1,298 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.21 · 27.1% (352 of 1,298 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (59 of 1,298 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (58 of 1,298 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (61 of 1,298 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.18 · 38.7% (502 of 1,298 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (174 of 1,298 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (53 of 1,298 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 34.2% (444 of 1,298 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (89 of 1,298 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (43 of 1,298 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (35 of 1,298 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (63 of 1,298 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (42 of 1,298 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (95 of 1,298 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.55 · 5.2% (68 of 1,298 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.54 · 5.2% (68 of 1,298 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (103 of 1,298 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.49 · 4.2% (54 of 1,298 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (109 of 1,298 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.47 · 2.9% (38 of 1,298 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (33 of 1,298 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (46 of 1,298 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (126 of 1,298 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.50 · 14.9% (193 of 1,298 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.42 · 24.4% (317 of 1,298 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 38.8% (504 of 1,298 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.42 · 15.2% (197 of 1,298 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (134 of 1,298 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (149 of 1,298 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (126 of 1,298 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (324 of 1,298 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (195 of 1,298 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.33 · 13.9% (181 of 1,298 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (63 of 1,298 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.26 · 30.2% (392 of 1,298 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (93 of 1,298 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.25 · 34.5% (448 of 1,298 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (90 of 1,298 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.27 · 24.7% (320 of 1,298 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (65 of 1,298 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (65 of 1,298 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.26 · 24.3% (316 of 1,298 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (66 of 1,298 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (44 of 1,298 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (57 of 1,298 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.23 · 25.2% (327 of 1,298 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.44 · 3.0% (39 of 1,298 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (56 of 1,298 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.26 · 11.5% (149 of 1,298 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (57 of 1,298 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (50 of 1,298 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (86 of 1,298 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (143 of 1,298 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.18 · 31.6% (410 of 1,298 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (41 of 1,298 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (35 of 1,298 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (34 of 1,298 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.23 · 7.2% (94 of 1,298 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (46 of 1,298 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (44 of 1,298 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (42 of 1,298 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 43.5% (564 of 1,298 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (89 of 1,298 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (44 of 1,298 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 6.5% (84 of 1,298 decks)
All lands (45)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 12.2% (159 of 1,298 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (213 of 1,298 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.33 · 18.3% (238 of 1,298 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.32 · 18.1% (235 of 1,298 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.30 · 21.2% (275 of 1,298 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (119 of 1,298 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.38 · 4.9% (64 of 1,298 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.31 · 13.2% (171 of 1,298 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.28 · 19.0% (247 of 1,298 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.35 · 6.4% (83 of 1,298 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (82 of 1,298 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.31 · 11.2% (146 of 1,298 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (140 of 1,298 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (64 of 1,298 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.26 · 23.4% (304 of 1,298 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.31 · 9.9% (128 of 1,298 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (69 of 1,298 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.25 · 21.1% (274 of 1,298 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 19.0% (247 of 1,298 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (77 of 1,298 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (80 of 1,298 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.20 · 37.1% (482 of 1,298 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.20 · 27.8% (361 of 1,298 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (68 of 1,298 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 15.6% (203 of 1,298 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.22 · 17.6% (229 of 1,298 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (59 of 1,298 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.16 · 45.9% (596 of 1,298 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.21 · 13.3% (172 of 1,298 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (117 of 1,298 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.24 · 8.3% (108 of 1,298 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (186 of 1,298 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.14 · 47.5% (617 of 1,298 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (74 of 1,298 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (42 of 1,298 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.16 · 34.5% (448 of 1,298 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (130 of 1,298 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.13 · 50.7% (658 of 1,298 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.13 · 43.8% (568 of 1,298 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.12 · 57.2% (743 of 1,298 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (371 of 1,298 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 63.8% (828 of 1,298 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 80.4% (1,044 of 1,298 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 85.7% (1,112 of 1,298 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 85.9% (1,115 of 1,298 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Rashmi, Eternities Crafter, from 1,298 real Commander decks.