Hour of Promise
Played in 686 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (7)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 2.57 · 4.3% (208 of 4,812 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 1.82 · 4.2% (45 of 1,074 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.26 · 3.7% (15 of 410 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi relevance 0.44 · 1.6% (3 of 186 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.25 · 50.3% (345 of 686 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.22 · 31.8% (218 of 686 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.13 · 54.1% (371 of 686 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.09 · 56.3% (386 of 686 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.07 · 48.4% (332 of 686 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 40.5% (278 of 686 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.06 · 40.1% (275 of 686 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.05 · 44.2% (303 of 686 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.05 · 25.2% (173 of 686 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.04 · 43.4% (298 of 686 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.02 · 23.0% (158 of 686 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.00 · 31.3% (215 of 686 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.96 · 47.1% (323 of 686 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.95 · 58.9% (404 of 686 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.92 · 37.6% (258 of 686 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.90 · 32.9% (226 of 686 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.83 · 29.7% (204 of 686 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 48.1% (330 of 686 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.82 · 45.5% (312 of 686 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.80 · 18.5% (127 of 686 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.79 · 29.4% (202 of 686 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.79 · 42.3% (290 of 686 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.79 · 15.7% (108 of 686 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.78 · 22.4% (154 of 686 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.78 · 42.0% (288 of 686 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.76 · 37.5% (257 of 686 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.75 · 36.2% (248 of 686 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 40.7% (279 of 686 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 31.8% (218 of 686 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.74 · 24.1% (165 of 686 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.25 · 50.3% (345 of 686 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.13 · 54.1% (371 of 686 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.07 · 48.4% (332 of 686 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.06 · 40.1% (275 of 686 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.00 · 31.3% (215 of 686 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.96 · 47.1% (323 of 686 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.95 · 58.9% (404 of 686 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.83 · 29.7% (204 of 686 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.82 · 45.5% (312 of 686 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.80 · 18.5% (127 of 686 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.79 · 42.3% (290 of 686 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.78 · 22.4% (154 of 686 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.78 · 42.0% (288 of 686 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.75 · 36.2% (248 of 686 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 40.7% (279 of 686 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.02 · 23.0% (158 of 686 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.92 · 37.6% (258 of 686 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.76 · 37.5% (257 of 686 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.75 · 31.8% (218 of 686 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Exploration relevance 1.04 · 43.4% (298 of 686 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.90 · 32.9% (226 of 686 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.79 · 29.4% (202 of 686 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.74 · 24.1% (165 of 686 decks)
All instants (4)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.22 · 31.8% (218 of 686 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.09 · 56.3% (386 of 686 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.79 · 15.7% (108 of 686 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.74 · 19.1% (131 of 686 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 40.5% (278 of 686 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.05 · 44.2% (303 of 686 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.05 · 25.2% (173 of 686 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 48.1% (330 of 686 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.74 · 18.7% (128 of 686 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.72 · 11.4% (78 of 686 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.43 · 39.4% (270 of 686 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.27 · 49.1% (337 of 686 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.23 · 32.1% (220 of 686 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.95 · 29.6% (203 of 686 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.90 · 46.5% (319 of 686 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.89 · 20.7% (142 of 686 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.86 · 32.7% (224 of 686 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.81 · 45.6% (313 of 686 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.77 · 16.3% (112 of 686 decks)
All lands (8)
- Vesuva relevance 1.40 · 37.0% (254 of 686 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 1.05 · 29.7% (204 of 686 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.00 · 25.5% (175 of 686 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.90 · 22.3% (153 of 686 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.86 · 36.4% (250 of 686 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.80 · 23.2% (159 of 686 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (148 of 686 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.75 · 28.9% (198 of 686 decks)
EDH data for Hour of Promise: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 686 real decks.