Hour of Promise
Played in 1,049 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (28)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 3.76 · 23.6% (179 of 759 decks)
- Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.62 · 8.2% (137 of 1,680 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.95 · 6.8% (49 of 718 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.62 · 2.7% (112 of 4,166 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 1.45 · 5.0% (25 of 498 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.38 · 2.0% (107 of 5,430 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Street Urchin relevance 1.10 · 2.7% (23 of 847 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 1.05 · 2.1% (30 of 1,412 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.96 · 1.3% (57 of 4,396 decks)
- Ellie, Brick Master // Abby, Merciless Soldier relevance 0.85 · 5.9% (5 of 85 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.83 · 2.6% (11 of 431 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 0.67 · 1.3% (15 of 1,123 decks)
- Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (2 of 20 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Tavern Brawler relevance 0.55 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Hugs, Grisly Guardian relevance 0.51 · 1.3% (8 of 637 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Popular Entertainer relevance 0.51 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.48 · 1.0% (9 of 871 decks)
- The Lady of the Mountain relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (2 of 47 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (2 of 55 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.42 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Guild Artisan relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (2 of 73 decks)
- Strax, Sontaran Nurse relevance 0.34 · 2.2% (2 of 93 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Borborygmos relevance 0.27 · 1.4% (2 of 145 decks)
- Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Hajar, Loyal Bodyguard relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Guild Artisan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.17 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.37 · 46.6% (489 of 1,049 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.25 · 40.4% (424 of 1,049 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.24 · 39.8% (417 of 1,049 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.20 · 27.9% (293 of 1,049 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 51.1% (536 of 1,049 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.16 · 28.9% (303 of 1,049 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.08 · 27.4% (287 of 1,049 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.07 · 34.6% (363 of 1,049 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.01 · 38.8% (407 of 1,049 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 1.00 · 36.2% (380 of 1,049 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.00 · 29.6% (310 of 1,049 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.00 · 30.3% (318 of 1,049 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.97 · 34.2% (359 of 1,049 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 26.5% (278 of 1,049 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (337 of 1,049 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.90 · 20.5% (215 of 1,049 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.87 · 27.6% (289 of 1,049 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.86 · 23.8% (250 of 1,049 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.86 · 23.5% (247 of 1,049 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.80 · 17.2% (180 of 1,049 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 22.4% (235 of 1,049 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.79 · 14.4% (151 of 1,049 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 25.3% (265 of 1,049 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.77 · 18.4% (193 of 1,049 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.76 · 28.4% (298 of 1,049 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.75 · 16.3% (171 of 1,049 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.75 · 15.1% (158 of 1,049 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.73 · 23.9% (251 of 1,049 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.72 · 25.9% (272 of 1,049 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.71 · 25.4% (266 of 1,049 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.37 · 46.6% (489 of 1,049 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.25 · 40.4% (424 of 1,049 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.20 · 27.9% (293 of 1,049 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.07 · 34.6% (363 of 1,049 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.00 · 29.6% (310 of 1,049 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.97 · 34.2% (359 of 1,049 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (337 of 1,049 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.87 · 27.6% (289 of 1,049 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.86 · 23.8% (250 of 1,049 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 25.3% (265 of 1,049 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.77 · 18.4% (193 of 1,049 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.76 · 28.4% (298 of 1,049 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.75 · 16.3% (171 of 1,049 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 0.75 · 15.1% (158 of 1,049 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.73 · 23.9% (251 of 1,049 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.72 · 25.9% (272 of 1,049 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.71 · 25.4% (266 of 1,049 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (150 of 1,049 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 26.5% (278 of 1,049 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.90 · 20.5% (215 of 1,049 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Spelunking relevance 1.24 · 39.8% (417 of 1,049 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.01 · 38.8% (407 of 1,049 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.80 · 17.2% (180 of 1,049 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 51.1% (536 of 1,049 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 1.00 · 36.2% (380 of 1,049 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.16 · 28.9% (303 of 1,049 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.08 · 27.4% (287 of 1,049 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.00 · 30.3% (318 of 1,049 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.86 · 23.5% (247 of 1,049 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 22.4% (235 of 1,049 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.79 · 14.4% (151 of 1,049 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.71 · 31.8% (334 of 1,049 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.61 · 39.3% (412 of 1,049 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.51 · 39.7% (416 of 1,049 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.38 · 37.1% (389 of 1,049 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 1.23 · 32.1% (337 of 1,049 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.91 · 18.9% (198 of 1,049 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.86 · 24.6% (258 of 1,049 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.74 · 15.2% (159 of 1,049 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.70 · 10.5% (110 of 1,049 decks)
All lands (10)
- Vesuva relevance 1.40 · 35.4% (371 of 1,049 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.98 · 31.2% (327 of 1,049 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.97 · 20.3% (213 of 1,049 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.97 · 30.4% (319 of 1,049 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.85 · 38.2% (401 of 1,049 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.81 · 34.0% (357 of 1,049 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.80 · 33.7% (353 of 1,049 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.77 · 32.8% (344 of 1,049 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.73 · 29.0% (304 of 1,049 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.72 · 30.3% (318 of 1,049 decks)
EDH data for Hour of Promise: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,049 real decks.