Hour of Promise
Played in 1,001 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
3030+12+4+1+4+9+9+11+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 2.74 · 22.4% (44 of 196 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.19 · 7.8% (62 of 792 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 1.97 · 8.6% (36 of 421 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.92 · 3.6% (130 of 3,652 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.73 · 4.3% (57 of 1,311 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 1.02 · 2.5% (20 of 810 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.93 · 1.1% (69 of 6,249 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.88 · 1.9% (19 of 994 decks)
- Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.87 · 8.5% (4 of 47 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.78 · 2.8% (8 of 283 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.78 · 1.7% (16 of 968 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.77 · 5.9% (4 of 68 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.76 · 2.4% (9 of 374 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.73 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.61 · 9.1% (2 of 22 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.60 · 1.3% (11 of 834 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 0.57 · 1.2% (12 of 1,043 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.57 · 1.9% (6 of 320 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.55 · 3.7% (3 of 81 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.55 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.54 · 1.7% (6 of 355 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.54 · 1.7% (6 of 358 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (3 of 103 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.48 · 1.6% (5 of 311 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.47 · 1.1% (8 of 745 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.43 · 1.3% (5 of 389 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 0.40 · 1.4% (4 of 284 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (2 of 84 decks)
- Bartz and Boko relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (2 of 87 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.38 · 43.8% (438 of 1,001 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.23 · 34.2% (342 of 1,001 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 35.5% (355 of 1,001 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.87 · 29.1% (291 of 1,001 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.81 · 22.0% (220 of 1,001 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.81 · 24.3% (243 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.80 · 27.2% (272 of 1,001 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 45.7% (457 of 1,001 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.75 · 37.2% (372 of 1,001 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (130 of 1,001 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.70 · 20.4% (204 of 1,001 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (164 of 1,001 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.66 · 27.9% (279 of 1,001 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (316 of 1,001 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.64 · 20.9% (209 of 1,001 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.61 · 21.6% (216 of 1,001 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 22.8% (228 of 1,001 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.60 · 17.6% (176 of 1,001 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 20.1% (201 of 1,001 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.59 · 32.5% (325 of 1,001 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (136 of 1,001 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.57 · 28.9% (289 of 1,001 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.57 · 20.7% (207 of 1,001 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.57 · 40.1% (401 of 1,001 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.57 · 25.3% (253 of 1,001 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.57 · 17.2% (172 of 1,001 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.56 · 20.1% (201 of 1,001 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (133 of 1,001 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.55 · 19.4% (194 of 1,001 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 18.9% (189 of 1,001 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 35.5% (355 of 1,001 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.87 · 29.1% (291 of 1,001 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.81 · 24.3% (243 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.80 · 27.2% (272 of 1,001 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.75 · 37.2% (372 of 1,001 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.66 · 27.9% (279 of 1,001 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (316 of 1,001 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.57 · 28.9% (289 of 1,001 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.57 · 25.3% (253 of 1,001 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.57 · 17.2% (172 of 1,001 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.55 · 19.4% (194 of 1,001 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 18.9% (189 of 1,001 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.23 · 34.2% (342 of 1,001 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 22.8% (228 of 1,001 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 20.1% (201 of 1,001 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.57 · 20.7% (207 of 1,001 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Spelunking relevance 0.56 · 20.1% (201 of 1,001 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 45.7% (457 of 1,001 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.59 · 32.5% (325 of 1,001 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.57 · 40.1% (401 of 1,001 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (133 of 1,001 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.38 · 43.8% (438 of 1,001 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.81 · 22.0% (220 of 1,001 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (130 of 1,001 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.70 · 20.4% (204 of 1,001 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (164 of 1,001 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.64 · 20.9% (209 of 1,001 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.61 · 21.6% (216 of 1,001 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.60 · 17.6% (176 of 1,001 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (136 of 1,001 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.41 · 40.9% (409 of 1,001 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.11 · 40.7% (407 of 1,001 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.82 · 25.2% (252 of 1,001 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.75 · 28.1% (281 of 1,001 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.75 · 16.4% (164 of 1,001 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.71 · 21.0% (210 of 1,001 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (183 of 1,001 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.67 · 45.0% (450 of 1,001 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.55 · 14.4% (144 of 1,001 decks)
All lands (11)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.04 · 26.9% (269 of 1,001 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.95 · 20.9% (209 of 1,001 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.91 · 19.9% (199 of 1,001 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.91 · 19.8% (198 of 1,001 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.89 · 27.7% (277 of 1,001 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.74 · 13.2% (132 of 1,001 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.68 · 25.3% (253 of 1,001 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.58 · 16.2% (162 of 1,001 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.56 · 27.8% (278 of 1,001 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.56 · 28.9% (289 of 1,001 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (291 of 1,001 decks)
EDH data for Hour of Promise: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,001 real decks.
















































































