Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.37 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.36 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.31 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.26 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 0.32 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.26 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Simulacrum Shaper relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.28 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Hexhaven Invigorator relevance 0.29 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.29 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.29 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.22 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.26 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Something Worth Saving relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.27 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Six relevance 0.22 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.25 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Cracked Earth Technique relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.19 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Fluctuator relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.23 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Return of the Mole Man relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.21 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.19 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.24 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.22 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.24 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.23 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.27 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.19 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.21 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.21 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.22 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.16 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
Card Stacks
21
Card Stacks
21Showing 1-2 of 21
Cards like Badgermole Cub
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 24%
- Planar Engineering 22%
- Scapeshift 16%
- Entish Restoration 12%
- Roiling Regrowth 6%
- Cycle of Renewal 6%
Cards like Toph, the Blind Bandit
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Icetill Explorer
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Green Sun's Zenith
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards like Nissa, Vital Force
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Collective Resistance
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards like Argothian Elder
4.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Argothian Elder 20%
- Ley Weaver 2%
- Blossom Dryad 2%
- Hope Tender 2%
- Voyaging Satyr 2%
Other options: Juniper Order Druid, Ley Druid, Portent Tracker, Krosan Restorer
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
2.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards like Springheart Nantuko
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Springheart Nantuko 26%
- Scute Swarm 16%
Cards like Burgeoning
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
- Burgeoning 16%
- On the Trail 6%
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 18%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 10%
- Sazh's Chocobo 6%
- Scythecat Cub 4%
- Seedship Agrarian 2%
- Floral Evoker 2%
- Undergrowth Champion 2%
Other options: Foe-liage, Oran-Rief Hydra, Vinelasher Kudzu, Territorial Scythecat, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Nature's Revolt
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards like Zuran Orb
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Zuran Orb 40%
- Claws of Gix 2%
Cards like Simulacrum Shaper
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, Primeval Herald, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger, Wild Wanderer
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.37 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.31 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 0.32 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.26 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- Simulacrum Shaper relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.28 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Hexhaven Invigorator relevance 0.29 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.29 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Six relevance 0.22 · 38.0% (19 of 50 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.25 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.19 · 48.0% (24 of 50 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.21 · 32.0% (16 of 50 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.19 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.24 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.23 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.19 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.21 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.21 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.22 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.16 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.16 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Spitting Spider relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.18 · 28.0% (14 of 50 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.18 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.16 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.19 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Hungering Puppetbeast relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Loot, the Nexus relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Arcane Amphisbaena relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.16 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Emrakul, the Exigent Doom relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Emeritus of Abundance // Regrowth relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.16 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.26 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.22 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Fluctuator relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Kormus Bell relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.18 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.17 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Hunter's Axe relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Blade of the Bloodchief relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Stone of Erech relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Portcullis relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Trinisphere relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Excavator relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Thran Turbine relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Medic's Kitesail relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- The Masamune relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Ward of Bones relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Sunstone relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Gerrard's Hourglass Pendant relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Pithing Needle relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Barrow-Blade relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Sphere of Resistance relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Claws of Gix relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.08 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.26 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Return of the Mole Man relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.22 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.27 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Invigorating Boon relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.15 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.18 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.17 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Overlaid Terrain relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.15 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.14 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.12 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Dredger's Insight relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.13 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Fortitude relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.14 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.12 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Kiss relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Puppet Crafting relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Song of Serenity relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Way of the Paradox relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Genju of the Cedars relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Freyalise's Winds relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Lush Growth relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Dual Nature relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.36 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.29 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Something Worth Saving relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.23 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.23 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.14 · 46.0% (23 of 50 decks)
- Animate Land relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Tethermage's Advantage relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Compel Brutality relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Fulminous Forte relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Violent Echoes relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.12 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.14 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Blazing Crescendo relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Konstrari Charm relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.12 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Once and Future relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.12 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.14 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.10 · 30.0% (15 of 50 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.11 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.11 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Vivify relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.10 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Flourishing Grapple relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Rocky Rebuke relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.09 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Vengeant Earth relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Restore with Empathy relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.09 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.10 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Rampaging Growth relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.09 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.27 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Cracked Earth Technique relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.24 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Earth Rumble relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Thermokarst relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Bestial Incursion relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.16 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Nostalgic Dreams relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Reclaiming Vines relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Seismic Sense relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Creeping Mold relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- No Admittance relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Awaken the Inferno relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Artifist Acumen relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Command the Stage relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Recollect relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.12 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.13 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.12 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.12 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
Planeswalkers
11
Planeswalkers
11 Showing 1-10 of 11
Page size
All planeswalkers (11)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.24 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.16 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.06 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.06 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.05 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
Battles
1
Battles
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.34 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.34 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.31 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.27 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.25 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.25 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.19 · 40.0% (20 of 50 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.22 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.20 · 34.0% (17 of 50 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.19 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Quicksand relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.21 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.20 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.18 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.15 · 36.0% (18 of 50 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.18 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.18 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Frostwalk Bastion relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.17 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.12 · 44.0% (22 of 50 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Faceless Haven relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Encroaching Wastes relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 42.0% (21 of 50 decks)
- Throne of the High City relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
Lands
50
Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All lands (50)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.27 · 22.0% (11 of 50 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.24 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.22 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.18 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.16 · 26.0% (13 of 50 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.16 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.18 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.17 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.15 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.18 · 12.0% (6 of 50 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.16 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (5 of 50 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.13 · 24.0% (12 of 50 decks)
- Konstrari Annex relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Scorched Ruins relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.12 · 18.0% (9 of 50 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.12 · 14.0% (7 of 50 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Room of Refuge relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.12 · 8.0% (4 of 50 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (3 of 50 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.08 · 16.0% (8 of 50 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Twists and Turns // Mycoid Maze relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Terminal Moraine relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.07 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Marwyn, the Preserver, from 50 real Commander decks.